The 2007 Maritime Strategy and the widely-anticipated update to that strategy

The 2007 Maritime Strategy and the widely-anticipated update to that strategy

– CS-21Refresh – emphasize “cooperation” as a key to securing the global maritime commons.  Section III of CS-21R identifies five maritime capabilities necessary to support our National Security.  Select a major region (e.g., PACOM, NORTHCOM, CENTCOM, SOUTHCOM, AFRICOM, or EUCOM) and state which of the CS-21R maritime capabilities you feel is the most important for the near term (i.e., 3 to 5 years) in that region to support our National Security.  Explain your reasoning

M A R C H 2 0 1 5

F O R W A R D ❚ E N G A G E D ❚ R E A D Y

A Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower

 

 

DRAFT/PRE-DECISIONAL – NOT FOR DISSEMINATION – 02 FEB

 

 

A COOPERATIVE STRATEGY FOR 21ST CENTURY SEAPOWER, MARCH 2015 [i]

America’s Sea Services—the U.S. Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard—uniquely provide presence around the globe. During peacetime and times of conflict, across the full spectrum—from supporting an ally with humanitarian assistance or disaster relief to

deterring or defeating an adversary in kinetic action—Sailors, Marines,

and Coast Guardsmen are deployed at sea and in far-flung posts to be

wherever we are needed, when we are needed. Coming from the sea, we

get there sooner, stay there longer, bring everything we need with us,

and we don’t have to ask anyone’s permission.

Our founders recognized the United States as a maritime nation and

the importance of maritime forces, including in our Constitution the re-

quirement that Congress “maintain a Navy.” In today’s dynamic security

environment, with multiple challenges from state and non-state actors

that are often fed by social disorder, political upheaval, and technological

advancements, that requirement is even more prescient.

The United States Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard are our

Nation’s first line of defense, often far from our shores. As such, main-

taining America’s leadership role in the world requires our Nation’s Sea

Services to return to our maritime strategy on occasion and reassess

our approach to shifting relationships and global responsibilities. This

necessary review has affirmed our focus on providing presence around

the world in order to ensure stability, build on our relationships with allies

and partners, prevent wars, and provide our Nation’s leaders with options

in times of crisis. It has confirmed our continued commitment to main-

tain the combat power necessary to deter potential adversaries and to

fight and win when required.

Our responsibility to the American people dictates an efficient use of

our fiscal resources and an approach that adapts to the evolving security

environment. The adjustments made in this document do just that. Look-

ing at how we support our people, build the right platforms, power them

to achieve efficient global capability, and develop critical partnerships

will be central to its successful execution and to providing that unique

capability: presence.

PREFACE

 

 

[ii] Forward ✦ Engaged ✦ Ready

Seapower has been and will continue to be the critical foundation of

national power and prosperity and international prestige for the United

States of America. Our Sea Services will integrate with the rest of our

national efforts, and those of our friends and allies. This revision to A

Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower builds on the heritage

and complementary capabilities of the Navy-Marine Corps-Coast Guard

team to advance the prosperity and guarantee the security of our Nation.

The demands of a changing world and the defense of the American

people and our interests require nothing less.

RAY MABUS

Secretary of the Navy

 

 

A COOPERATIVE STRATEGY FOR 21ST CENTURY SEAPOWER, MARCH 2015 [iii]

This maritime strategy describes how we will design, organize, and employ the Sea Services in support of our national, defense, and homeland security strategies. It also sets maritime priorities in an era of constrained resources, while emphasizing warfighting capa-

bilities and forward naval presence to advance national interests today

and guide preparations for tomorrow’s challenges.

Forward naval presence is essential to strengthening alliances and

partnerships, providing the secure environment necessary for an open

economic system based on the free flow of goods, protecting U.S. natural

resources, promoting stability, deterring conflict, and responding to ag-

gression. As global maritime commerce expands, populations increase,

competition for energy and natural resources grows, and advanced mil-

itary technologies proliferate across the oceans and through the littoral,

so too will challenges arise for anyone operating in those regions.

The American people will continue to rely on the Sea Services to

respond to fast-changing and complex world events that threaten the

security of the United States and our allies and partners. Our Sailors,

Marines, and Coast Guardsmen stand ready to meet these challenges

with the same determination and responsiveness they have demon-

strated for more than two centuries.

FOREWORD

JOSEPH F. DUNFORD, JR.

General, U.S. Marine Corps Commandant of the Marine Corps

JONATHAN W. GREENERT

Admiral, U.S. Navy Chief of Naval Operations

PAUL F. ZUKUNFT

Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Commandant of the Coast Guard

 

 

Our foremost priority remains the security of the American people, our territory, and our way of life.

 

 

A COOPERATIVE STRATEGY FOR 21ST CENTURY SEAPOWER, MARCH 2015 [v]

Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

Section I THE GLOBAL SECURITY ENVIRONMENT 3

Geopolitical Changes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

Military Challenges. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

Section II FORWARD PRESENCE AND PARTNERSHIP 9

Indo-Asia-Pacific . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

Middle East . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

Africa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

Western Hemisphere . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

Arctic and Antarctic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

Section III SEAPOWER IN SUPPORT OF NATIONAL SECURITY 19

All Domain Access . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

Deterrence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

Sea Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

Power Projection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

Maritime Security . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

Section IV FORCE DESIGN: BUILDING THE FUTURE FORCE 27

Flexible, Agile, and Ready Forces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

People. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

Concepts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31

Capabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33

Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37

CONTENTS

 

 

Oceans are the lifeblood of the interconnected global community, where seaborne trade is expected to double

over the next 15 years. Our forward naval forces support the free flow of commerce that has enabled unparalleled

global economic growth over the last 70 years. Ninety percent of trade by volume travels across the oceans.

Approximately 70 percent of the world’s population lives within 100 miles of the coastline—an area known as the

littoral. Likewise, most maritime activity—commercial shipping, fishing, and oil and gas extraction—takes

place within 200 miles of the shore. Above, a Japanese container ship arrives at the Port of Los Angeles.

[Photo courtesy of the Port of Los Angeles]

 

 

A COOPERATIVE STRATEGY FOR 21ST CENTURY SEAPOWER, MARCH 2015 [1]

INTRODUCTION

The United States of America is a maritime nation. For more than two centuries, the Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard—the Sea Services—have operated throughout the world to protect Ameri- can citizens and defend U.S. interests by responding to crises and, when necessary, fighting and winning wars. Since we published A Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower in 2007, changes in the security and fiscal environments, along with new strategic guidance, including the 2012 Defense Strategic Guidance and the 2014 Quadrennial Defense and Homeland Security Reviews, mandate an updated maritime strategy to ensure that we continue to advance our national interests in an increas- ingly complex and interdependent world.

Forward-deployed and forward-stationed naval forces use the global maritime commons as a medium of maneuver, assuring access to over- seas regions, defending key interests in those areas, protecting our citi- zens abroad, and preventing our adversaries from leveraging the world’s oceans against us. The ability to sustain operations in international waters far from our shores constitutes a distinct advantage for the United States—a Western Hemisphere nation separated from many of its strategic interests by vast oceans. Maintaining this advantage in an interconnected global community that depends on the oceans remains an imperative for our Sea Services and the Nation.

Today’s global security environment is characterized by the rising importance of the Indo-Asia-Pacific region, the ongoing development and fielding of anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) capabilities that chal- lenge our global maritime access, continued threats from expanding and evolving terrorist and criminal networks, the increasing frequency and intensity of maritime territorial disputes, and threats to maritime com- merce, particularly the flow of energy.

In addition to the risks emerging in this turbulent 21st Century, there are opportunities as well—many facilitated by the Sea Services through routine and constructive engagement with allies and partners. Chief among them is the potential for a global network of navies that brings together the contributions of like-minded nations and organizations around the world to address mutual maritime security challenges and respond to natural disasters.

 

 

[2] Forward ✦ Engaged ✦ Ready

This maritime strategy reaffirms two foundational principles. First, U.S. forward naval presence is essential to accomplishing the following naval missions derived from national guidance: defend the homeland, deter conflict, respond to crises, defeat aggression, protect the maritime commons, strengthen partnerships, and provide humanitarian assistance and disaster response. Our self-sustaining naval forces, operating in the global commons, ensure the protection of the homeland far from our shores, while providing the President with decision space and options to deny an adversary’s objectives, preserve freedom of action, and assure access for follow-on forces.

Second, naval forces are stronger when we operate jointly and to- gether with allies and partners. Merging our individual capabilities and capacity produces a combined naval effect that is greater than the sum of its parts. By working together in formal and informal networks, we can address the threats to our mutual maritime security interests. Maximizing the robust capacity of this global network of navies concept, we are all better postured to face new and emerging challenges.

The Sea Services have historically organized, trained, and equipped to perform four essential functions: deterrence, sea control, power projec- tion, and maritime security. Because access to the global commons is critical, this strategy in- troduces a fifth function: all domain access. This function assures appropriate freedom of action in any domain—the sea, air, land, space, and cyber- space, as well as in the electromagnetic (EM) spectrum.

This strategy informs naval force employ- ment and describes a force that balances

Complete the University of Phoenix Material: Three Branches of Government Chart.

Three Branches of Government Chart

POL/443 Version 3

1

University of Phoenix Material

Three Branches of Government Chart

Complete the chart below regarding the three branches of government by doing the following:

· Indicate the individuals or departments that are contained in each branch.

· Describe the functions of each branch.

· Explain how each branch functions as a check and balance for the other two branches.

Respond to the short answer question below the chart in 50 to 100 words.

  Legislative Executive Judicial
Who

 

     
Function

 

     
Checks and Balances

 

     

Why were the three branches of government created?

The executive and judicial branches of the U.S. national government

Prepare: Prior to beginning your reflection this week, read chapters 5, 6, and 7 in American Government. Review the videos, Episode I – A More Perfect Union and Episode II – It’s a Free Country regarding the U.S. Constitution.
 Reflect IconReflect: The executive and judicial branches of the U.S. national government often seem to operate independently and with little conflict. Many laws are signed by the President and then implemented without a word from the judicial branch. However, there are times when executive decisions are challenged by the judicial branch in a process called judicial review. In addition, there are times when a judicial review has direct impact on your life. For example, when the Supreme Court declared the Affordable Care Act constitutional, many people without health care insurance were finally able to purchase health care insurance. Additionally, when the Supreme Court declared sections of the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional, some of the constraints that prevented many gay and lesbian couples from marrying were eliminated. Executive Order 13658 on February 20, 2014 also had a direct impact on many business people that contract with the federal government by increasing the minimum wage to $10.10 per hour. Clearly, the actions of the executive and judicial branches often directly affect our lives.
 Write IconWrite: In your initial post, explain how and why the actions of the executive and/or judicial branches have personally affected your life. Fully respond to all parts of the question. Write in your own words. Support your position with APA citations to two or more of the assigned resources required for this discussion. Fully respond to all parts of the prompt and write your response in your own words. Your initial post must be 200 to 250 words. Please be sure that you demonstrate understanding of these resources, integrate them into your argument, and cite them properly.

Violent Crimes In America 8pm East

Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:

 

  1. The topic is Violent crimes in america
  2. Select a topic from the textbook that you want to explore in greater depth.
  3. Provide an explanation as to why the topic needs to be researched and the problems and challenges that exist.
  4. Analyze the topic, and describe the intended outcome of your research.
  5. Describe the approach or actions that you will take in conducting your research.
  6. Use at least three (3) scholarly sources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia, Ask.com, Answers.com and general websites do not qualify as scholarly.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must conform to the APA formatting requirements. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.