Stroop Effect Research Report

Final Research Paper – due May 11, 2021 by 11:59 PM.

For this assignment, you will complete a research paper on The Stroop Effect and selective attention. The Stroop Effect is a phenomenon that occurs with the Stroop Task, a test that looks at what happens when we are asked to perform an ordinary task (such as reading or identifying  a list of colors) when there is some sort of visual interference.

You are acting like you are the researcher who conducted this study! However, you do not have to actually collect the data – that will be provided for you. In order to understand how the study works and how data was collected, you will need to participate in an online experiment on the Stroop Effect located within the “psychology learning tools”.  You should have already completed this part for the discussion in Week 4.  And in Week 4 you were to identify your hypothesis.  If you have decided to change your hypothesis, you may do so but get professor permission first.

Once you have completed the experiment you will need to analyze data that is contained in Week 4 Discussion Question and write a lab report (7- 10 pages – this page count does not include the title page or references) in APA style consisting of the following sections:

  • Title Page
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Method
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • References

(More information on each section is located below)

Just like the mini lab report, you will participate in the online experiment so you know what the experiment is like.

Here is the data file: DATA

Remember that you were given additional details in the Hypothesis discussion.

You will write the report as if you were the researcher conducting the experiment. You have some options in your research question for this project. The data you are given includes the gender and age of the participants as well as two columns of results data (reading the words and saying the colors). You can choose one independent variable, either gender or age.  You should try to use as much of your data as possible. Do not discard data unless there is a really good reason to do so.

Careful attention must be paid to APA Style as it represents a significant portion of your grade for the paper and is an intended learning outcome for the course. At the end of the term, you will submit your completed paper to your assignment folder.

Here is the grading rubric for the paper: Rubric

Main components on your research paper – See Chapter 11 Presenting Your Research for additional information.

  1. Title page – Make sure that the main points of a title page are included.
  2. Abstract – This is a well written summary of your paper. A reader should be able to get a clear picture of your paper based on the abstract. Include everything from a quick introduction of the topic to a sentence that implies that you will discuss results and implications.
  3. Introduction – This is so much more than a summary of your paper and should not be treated that way. For this paper, your introduction should be 2-3 pages of double spaced writing. Start by introducing your topic in general. Then you should discuss research from relevant published studies. Most, if not all, of your 8 references from peer reviewed sources will be cited in this section. Discussing these studies are important as they help provide a rationale for your study. Give that rationale next. Finish by clearly stating your hypothesis.
    1. Here is an article to get you started. Remember that this website isn’t the source for this article. You need to locate and cite the original source!
  4. Methods – Split this section into participants, materials and procedures subsections. You know the gender and age of all of your participants. You are welcome to include other demographic or recruiting information as it helps you with your study. Try the study here so you can adequately write about the procedures. Click on Run Experiment to get started.
  5. Results – Use the data I provided to calculate your results. Remember that your hypothesis drives your statistics. Think about what statistics you need to include to test your hypothesis. Write out all of your numbers even if you are including them in a table. Don’t forget to include a chart or table!
  6. Discussion – This is the best section because it is finally time to talk about what YOU think. After restating your results, talk about what they mean. What are the implications of your findings? Why are they important? For instance, why should we care that one gender is better at this than the other or that there aren’t gender differences for this study? After that, talk about the limitations to your study and give specific ideas for future research.
  7. References – Don’t forget that your references (and all of your paper) need to be in APA format. You need at least 8 references from peer reviewed sources (e.g., journals).

Stroop Effect Explanation

Psychology Of Personality

FINAL EXAM INSTRUCTIONS: Summer 2021-1

 

Your Final Exam begins with your completing one of the Personal Assessment tests in your textbook. Choose any one of them you want. Your Final Exam questions 4a, 4b, and 4c will be based on your participation in your selected Assessment.

 

Your Final Exam will consist of 12 items for you to answer: Items 1a,b,c; Items 2a,b,c; Cognitive Theory Items 3a, b, c; and your Personal Assessment Analysis Items: 4a, b and c. To begin, take one of the self-assessments listed in our Burger Text. You will be asked to EVALUATE  that test’s usefulness in question #4 of your Final Exam. 

 

For some sections, there are specific numbers of sentences requested. You will be graded according both to your content and answers’ length requirements.

 

 

 

You may consult your own notes and text, but not share information with other students.

Your content will be reviewed by UML’s plagiarism detection software.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

*For grading purposes, all papers must be received by the deadline of Monday June 28. You will have 9 days to complete your FINAL EXAM, from Friday June 19 to Monday 28.

 

BEFORE YOU BEGIN:

 

BE SURE TO CHECK THE RUBRIC IN YOUR GRADEBOOK BEFORE YOU BEGIN YOUR FINAL EXAM.

 

SUBMIT THROUGH THE ASSIGNMENT BOX, NOT EMAIL.

it will help if you can successfully copy and paste your paper into the Assignment Box, under the link “Write here”.  Otherwise, post your document itself.

 

 

Please go to the next page to see your 4 FINAL EXAM QUESTIONS.

 

 

PSYCHOLOGY OF PERSONALITY FINAL EXAM QUESTIONS (4)

TOTAL POINTS=110

Name of student:

Date:

 

QUESTION 1   (28 P0INTS)

In the space below:

1a. How do Trait Theorists and Neo-Freudians differ in their explanations of Personality? (About 100 words).

1b. What common explanations of Personality do Freudians and Behaviorists share? (About 100 words).

1c. How do Humanists utilize Cognitivist theory principles in counseling patients? (100 words)

 

 

QUESTION (27 POINTS)

 

In the space below:

2a. How might Behaviorists and Humanists differ in their treatment of anger? (about100 words)

2b. Explain why Freud’s theories are still relevant today? (About 100 words).

2c. What do Biologists say about the importance of 2 topics: genetics, and the extravert-introvert question. (100 words)

 

 

QUESTION 3 (27 POINTS)

 

In the space below:

3a. From a Cognitivist perspective, explain the behavior of one person you have observed. (100 words)

3b. From a Behaviorist perspective, explain the behavior of a second person you have observed. (100 words)

3c From a Freudian perspective, explain the behavior of a third person you have observed. (100 words)

(About 100 words).

 

 

QUESTION 4 (28 POINTS)

 

In the space below:

 

4a. Take and complete one I PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT that is in your textbook. Name the test and describe its methodology and assumptions. (About 100 words).

4b. Identify and explain one concept or principle that the test is supposed to measure or illustrate,

in words that you think a relative or colleague could understand. (About 100 words).

4c. Rate this Assessment (low 1 to 10 high) for 1. Its Reliability and 2. Its Validity. Explain your answer. (About 100 words).

 

 

DIRECTIONS:

1. Label the 12 sections: “1a.” through “4c”.

2. Confine your answers to the correct sections.

 

GOOD LUCK!

Pop Culture

Watch at least 2 episodes of any television situation comedy. After watching the programs, identify any minority characters, and write a two- to four-page paper in APA format describing how any one of these minority characters was portrayed. Detail if the portrayal was accurate or stereotypical and whether the character’s minority status alone was used as a source of humor. The page count does not include the title, abstract, or reference pages.

Considering “The Jeffersons” Black-ish” or “The Big Bang Theory”

Assess Between And Within Subjects Experimental Research Designs

******************

Although colleges and universities have utilized distance learning (i.e., online classes) for many years, teaching kindergarten through 12th-grade students using an online platform is much rarer. Unfortunately, the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) pandemic of 2020 forced K-12 schools throughout the world to turn to distance learning to teach children under 18. But how effective is an online curriculum for children who are only familiar with physical classrooms? To answer this question, your local school district asks you to conduct a series of studies focusing on the new distance learning curriculum they developed to teach K-12 students. Fortunately, the school district does have a control group option available to you should you need it. That is, some classrooms can use in-person instruction as the school has adequate safety measures in place to protect these students. The school administrator who hired you has four goals (though only the first goal must be addressed in all study designs):

  • First, the school administrator must know if online students are adequately learning material appropriate for their age group (as measured by an end-of-semester  that all students must pass).
  • Second, the administrator would like to know if the curriculum they developed works equally well across students with different computer experience (experienced versus inexperienced).
  • Third, the administrator would like to know if students are improving as they progress through the semester.
  • Fourth, the administrator would like to know if the curriculum helps male and female students equally.

The school administrator recognizes that the COVID-19 pandemic is temporary but that other pandemics might occur in the future, or K-12 schools might naturally evolve an online component. Thus, the administrator would like to know how well distance learning students perform over the next four calendar years.

Assignment Instructions:

You have come up with a series of studies to test the administrator’s goals.

  • Use the information in the study designs presented below to determine whether the design involves a posttest-only between-groups design, a pretest-posttest between groups design, a matched pairs design, a block design, a within-group design (pretest, posttest), or a longitudinal design.
  • Determine if the study meets the first goal of the administrator.
  • Determine whether the study meets at least one other goal, and if not, describe how you would alter the study design to meet at least one other administrator goal.

Scenario A

You design a study where you randomly assign students to one of two conditions. In one condition, students take the curriculum fully online. In the second condition, they take the curriculum fully in person. However, because you think familiarity and experience with computers might impact how students adapt to fully online classes, you first find students who are experienced with computers as well as students who are not experienced with computers. To make sure the two conditions are composed of students who share similar traits and abilities, you pair up experienced computer users and send one to Condition 1 and the other to Condition 2. You do the same for the next pair (and the next). You also pair up students who are not experienced with computers and similarly assign one to Condition 1 and the other to Condition 2. Here, the independent variable is the condition (online versus in-person teaching), and the dependent variable(s) is the extent to which the child learns the age-appropriate material (as measured by passing the final assignments).

  1. This study best describes which of the six research designs described in this lesson? Explain your response, including how this study design meets the first administrator goal.
  2. Does this design meet any of the other administrator goals?
  • If yes, which one and why?
  • If no, how could you redesign the study to meet at least one other administrator goal?

Scenario B

You design a study where you randomly assign students to one of two conditions. In one condition, students take the curriculum fully online. In the second condition, they take the curriculum fully in person. All students take a pretest at the start of the semester and a post-test at the end of the semester. Here, there are two independent variables. One is the type of course (online versus in person), and the second is timing (pretest at the start of the semester versus post-test at the end of the semester). The dependent variable(s) is the extent to which the child learns the age-appropriate material (as measured by passing the final assignments).

  1. This study best describes which of the six research designs described in this lesson? Explain your response, including how this study design meets the first administrator goal.
  2. Does this design meet any of the other administrator goals?
  • If yes, which one and why?
  • If no, how could you redesign the study to meet at least one other administrator goal?

Scenario C

You design a study where you randomly assign students to one of two conditions. In one condition, children will have in-person instruction in a physical classroom. In the second condition, the children will have online instruction. Both conditions will use the same curriculum, though the online version is remote. The independent variable will be the condition (in person or online), and the dependent variable(s) will be the extent to which the child learns the age-appropriate material (as measured by passing the final  assignments).

  1. This study best describes which of the six research designs described in this lesson? Explain your response, including how this study design meets the first administrator goal.
  2. Does this design meet any of the other administrator goals?
  • If yes, which one and why?
  • If no, how could you redesign the study to meet at least one other administrator goal?

Scenario D

You design a study where you randomly assign students to one of two conditions. In one condition, children will have in-person instruction in a physical classroom. In the second condition, the children will have online instruction. However, you first match students on multiple key characteristics that you think might impact their learning. In this case, you focus on their computer experience and gender. That is, you pair students with the same computer experience and then randomly assign one member of each pair to the online condition and the other member to the in-person condition.

Similarly, you pair inexperienced students, you pair males, and you pair females, and once again assign one member of each pair to the online condition and the other to the in-person condition. You do this for all students. Thus, male experienced computer users, male inexperienced computer users, female experienced computer users, and female inexperienced computer users are present in both online and in-person classes. The dependent variable(s) is the extent to which the child learns the age-appropriate material (as measured by passing the final  assignments).

  1. This study best describes which of the six research designs described in this lesson? Explain your response, including how this study design meets the first administrator goal.
  2. Does this design meet any of the other administrator goals?
    • If yes, which one and why?
  • If no, how could you redesign the study to meet at least one other administrator goal?

Scenario E

Unfortunately, you find that the school district cannot give you an adequate in-person comparison group; therefore, all students will participate in the new online curriculum. Since they still want your help to assess the program’s effectiveness, you decide to do so by assessing student knowledge at the start of the semester and comparing it to their knowledge at the end of the semester. The dependent variable(s) is the extent to which the child learns the age-appropriate material (as measured by passing the final  and/or assignments).

  1. This study best describes which of the six research designs described in this lesson? Explain your response, including how this study design meets the first administrator goal.
  2. Does this design meet any of the other administrator goals?
  • If yes, which one and why?
  • If no, how could you redesign the study to meet at least one other administrator goal?

Scenario F

You design a study where you randomly assign students to one of two conditions. In one condition, children will have in-person instruction in a physical classroom. In the second condition, the children will have online instruction. Fortunately, your study design allows you to follow and assess both sets of students multiple times over four years. Even as the students advance from one grade to the next, your study will determine if taking classes online helps or hurts their ability to pass assignments and final asignment(the dependent variables in this study). The independent variables would be (a) the varying amounts of times assessments are taken (quarterly, mid-semester, end of the semester, the following semester, the next school year, etc.) and (b) the two conditions, in-person and online instruction.

  1. This study best describes which of the six research designs described in this lesson? Explain your response, including how this study design meets the first administrator goal.
  2. Does this design meet any of the other administrator goals?
  • If yes, which one and why?
  • If no, how could you redesign the study to meet at least one other administrator goal?

Length: 5 pages, not including title and reference pages no plagiarism if used work  cite it

References: Include a minimum of 3 scholarly resources.

I attached the rubric below please follow directions

9/16/21, 2:33 PMWeek 7 – Signature Assignment: Assess Between and Within Subjects …Y-5107 v4: Research Design (8587480384) – Northcentral University

Page 1 of 16https://ncuone.ncu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=290944&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=267298

Signature Assignment Rubric Course: PSY-5107 v4: Research Design (8587480384)

Criteria Does Not Meet Expectations (0% – 72%)

Below Expectations (73%-82%)

Meets Expectations (83%-89%)

Exceeds Most Expectations (90%-93%)

Exceeds All Expectations (94%-100%)

Criterion Score

The writing is clear

and compelling. 7%

/ 1.8

The writing reflects

correct punctuation,

grammar, word usage,

and APA style. 7%

/ 1.8

The response to the

FIRST scenario is

complete, with

detailed explanations

and scholarly

citations. 40%

/ 10

The response to the

SECOND scenario is

complete, with

detailed explanations

and scholarly

citations. 40%

/ 10

1.3 points

Student failed to

demonstrate a well-

developed focus, and

there is little evidence of

integration of reading

material or conceptual

knowledge.

1.4 points

Student demonstrated

some focus, some logical

organization of ideas, and

some integration of

readings revealing

conceptual knowledge and

skills.

1.6 points

Student mostly

demonstrated a well-

developed focus, a logical

organization of ideas, and

exhibited an integration of

readings revealing

conceptual knowledge and

skills.

1.7 points

Student demonstrated

strength in almost all the

following areas: a well-

developed focus, a logical

organization of ideas,

integration of readings

revealing conceptual

knowledge and skills, and

inclusion of some scholarly

citations to support ideas

presented in the

assignment.

1.8 points

Student demonstrated

strength in all the

following areas: a well-

developed focus, a logical

organization of ideas,

integration of readings

revealing conceptual

knowledge and skills, and

inclusion of several

scholarly citations to

support ideas presented in

the assignment.

1.3 points

Student needs to refine

grammar, punctuation, and

APA formatting because

many errors were evident.

1.4 points

Student used some correct

grammar, punctuation, and

APA formatting.

1.6 points

Student used mostly

correct grammar,

punctuation, and APA

formatting, having less

than five errors.

1.7 points

Student used correct

grammar, punctuation, and

APA formatting, with only

three or four errors.

1.8 points

Student used correct

grammar, punctuation, and

APA formatting, with no

more than one or two

errors.

7.2 points

Response to the scenario

is inaccurate or

incomplete.

8.2 points

Response to the scenario

contains some

inaccuracies or is

incomplete.

8.9 points

Response to the scenario

is accurate, complete and

supported with the

required number of

scholarly references.

9.3 points

Response to the scenario

includes sound

explanations, with clear

details and accurate ideas

with thorough

explanations, along with

more than the required

amount of scholarly

references.

10 points

Response to the scenario

is exceptionally crafted

with detailed explanations,

compelling ideas and

supported with scholarly

references.

7.2 points

Response to the scenario

is inaccurate or

incomplete.

8.2 points

Response to the scenario

contains some

inaccuracies or is

incomplete.

8.9 points

Response to the scenario

is accurate, complete and

supported with the

required number of

scholarly references.

9.3 points

Response to the scenario

includes sound

explanations, with clear

details and accurate ideas

with thorough

explanations, along with

more than the required

amount of scholarly

references.

10 points

Response to the scenario

is exceptionally crafted

with detailed explanations,

compelling ideas and

supported with scholarly

references.

Criteria Level 3 Exceeds All Expectations Criterion Score

The student met the required length for

the assignment. 6%

/ 1.41.1 points

The assignment is longer or shorter than

required.

1.4 points

The assignment meets the length requirement.

Paragraph

Lato (Recomm…

19px (…

 

 

9/16/21, 2:33 PMWeek 7 – Signature Assignment: Assess Between and Within Subjects …Y-5107 v4: Research Design (8587480384) – Northcentral University

Page 2 of 16https://ncuone.ncu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=290944&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=267298

Total

Overall Score

Does Not Meet Expectations 0 points minimum

Below Expectations 18.25 points minimum

Meets Expectations 20.75 points minimum

Exceeds Most Expectations 22.5 points minimum

Exceeds All Expectations 23.5 points minimum

 

 

9/16/21, 2:33 PMWeek 7 – Signature Assignment: Assess Between and Within Subjects …Y-5107 v4: Research Design (8587480384) – Northcentral University

Page 3 of 16https://ncuone.ncu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=290944&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=267298

 

 

9/16/21, 2:33 PMWeek 7 – Signature Assignment: Assess Between and Within Subjects …Y-5107 v4: Research Design (8587480384) – Northcentral University

Page 4 of 16https://ncuone.ncu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=290944&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=267298

 

 

9/16/21, 2:33 PMWeek 7 – Signature Assignment: Assess Between and Within Subjects …Y-5107 v4: Research Design (8587480384) – Northcentral University

Page 5 of 16https://ncuone.ncu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=290944&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=267298

 

 

9/16/21, 2:33 PMWeek 7 – Signature Assignment: Assess Between and Within Subjects …Y-5107 v4: Research Design (8587480384) – Northcentral University

Page 6 of 16https://ncuone.ncu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=290944&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=267298

 

 

9/16/21, 2:33 PMWeek 7 – Signature Assignment: Assess Between and Within Subjects …Y-5107 v4: Research Design (8587480384) – Northcentral University

Page 7 of 16https://ncuone.ncu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=290944&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=267298

 

 

9/16/21, 2:33 PMWeek 7 – Signature Assignment: Assess Between and Within Subjects …Y-5107 v4: Research Design (8587480384) – Northcentral University

Page 8 of 16https://ncuone.ncu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=290944&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=267298

 

 

9/16/21, 2:33 PMWeek 7 – Signature Assignment: Assess Between and Within Subjects …Y-5107 v4: Research Design (8587480384) – Northcentral University

Page 9 of 16https://ncuone.ncu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=290944&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=267298

 

 

9/16/21, 2:33 PMWeek 7 – Signature Assignment: Assess Between and Within Subjects …Y-5107 v4: Research Design (8587480384) – Northcentral University

Page 10 of 16https://ncuone.ncu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=290944&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=267298

 

 

9/16/21, 2:33 PMWeek 7 – Signature Assignment: Assess Between and Within Subjects …Y-5107 v4: Research Design (8587480384) – Northcentral University

Page 11 of 16https://ncuone.ncu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=290944&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=267298

 

 

9/16/21, 2:33 PMWeek 7 – Signature Assignment: Assess Between and Within Subjects …Y-5107 v4: Research Design (8587480384) – Northcentral University

Page 12 of 16https://ncuone.ncu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=290944&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=267298

 

 

9/16/21, 2:33 PMWeek 7 – Signature Assignment: Assess Between and Within Subjects …Y-5107 v4: Research Design (8587480384) – Northcentral University

Page 13 of 16https://ncuone.ncu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=290944&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=267298

 

 

9/16/21, 2:33 PMWeek 7 – Signature Assignment: Assess Between and Within Subjects …Y-5107 v4: Research Design (8587480384) – Northcentral University

Page 14 of 16https://ncuone.ncu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=290944&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=267298

 

 

9/16/21, 2:33 PMWeek 7 – Signature Assignment: Assess Between and Within Subjects …Y-5107 v4: Research Design (8587480384) – Northcentral University

Page 15 of 16https://ncuone.ncu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=290944&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=267298

 

 

9/16/21, 2:33 PMWeek 7 – Signature Assignment: Assess Between and Within Subjects …Y-5107 v4: Research Design (8587480384) – Northcentral University

Page 16 of 16https://ncuone.ncu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=290944&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=267298