Discussion Criminal Justice

/in /by

Discussion topics support this unit’s objective and should be completed after reading all materials. Your responses ought to include original evaluation, synthesis, or analysis of the topic, and contribute to the weekly discussion in a meaningful way. You must complete all discussion topics and reply to your peers’ posts. Refer to the Discussion Board Rubric under Course Resources for additional requirements.

Read the following article.

Hendrie, Edward M. (1997, Mar.). Beyond miranda. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 3(66), 25–32. Retrieved fromhttps://search-proquest-com.lib.kaplan.edu/central/docview/204120664?accountid=34544

Law enforcement agents can, and do, question citizens suspected of committing a crime, but they cannot conduct an interrogation before ensuring that the suspect is protected against self-incrimination. Courts have prohibited physically coercive techniques when questioning suspects (Brown v. Mississippi). The privilege against self-incrimination does not prevent officers from using psychologically coercive techniques to elicit confessions as long as the suspect is informed of his or her rights prior to custodial interrogation (Miranda v. Arizona).

Discussion Topic: The Miranda Decision

Consider each of the rights statements that make up the Miranda decision. Are there any “rights” that you would add to, or remove from, the Miranda rights? If so, what would they be? Use research to substantiate your thoughts and cite your sources using APA formatting.

Vignette Analysis 3

/in /by

Vignette Analysis III: This assignment focuses on vignette analysis  and direct application of course concepts to the persons and situations  presented in the vignette for each question. All discussions must  take into account the legal and ethical considerations, as well as  issues of culture and human diversity that may pertain to the situations  presented below.
Please keep your responses focused on what is presented in the  vignette. Do not add information but use your creativity to support what  you see in the vignette as written. All assignments MUST be typed and  double-spaced, in APA style and must be written at graduate level  English. The content, conciseness and clarity of your answers will be  considered in the evaluation of your work. You must use and integrate the material presented in the course text and cite your work according to APA format. Use of outside resources for culture-specific information to enhance your vignette analysis is encouraged.
This assignment should be 6-7 pages total plus a Title and Reference Page A  team of experts from the Behavioral, Social Cognitive and Cognitive  schools of personality has been asked to evaluate this case. Each team  will discuss their view of this case in direct and specific context to a  minimum of four (4) theoretical constructs per team. Each team will  take into consideration the research on personality and the brain as  well as culture and legal/ethical issues that might arise. For this assignment you are to present this case from the viewpoint of each of the following teams of experts:

Pavlov and Skinner
Kelly, Bandura and Mischel
Ellis and Beck 

Jane, a 38 year old, African American female, wants therapy but  is afraid to venture outside of her home. She explains that this began  shortly after her husband was killed in a car accident, in which she was  a passenger. Her family is no longer willing to cater to her incessant  demands, because they feel that she is using the accident as an excuse  for attention. Jane tells you that she feels that she is no longer loved  and just “might as well give up”. She wants to know if you do therapy  on a ‘home-visit’ basis.
Assignment Outcomes:

Distinguish the major theories of personality

Contrast historical and current views of personality  Integrate evidence based treatment interventions

Combine current research to assessment and technique  Identify legal,  ethical issues in theories of personality and psychotherapy

Examine issues of culture and diversity in theories and application

Describe any new insights you gained through this experience about your interactions with others on a daily basis

/in /by

In a 5-7 slide PowerPoint presentation, not counting title or reference slides:

The goal is to be as thoughtfully prosocial in your interactions throughout the day as possible.

Due 22 April 3pm EST.

All work must be original

  • At the beginning of the day, jot down your general mood, feelings, attitude, etc.
  • Then throughout the day, whenever possible, carry a small notebook with you or make notes in an app on your phone to jot down meaningful encounters or experiences as you attempt to engage in prosocial behaviors.
  • At the end of the day, again reflect and take notes on how you feel, your general mood, feelings and attitudes, etc.
  • Summarize your experience. Describe the prosocial behaviors you engaged in, others’ reactions to these behaviors, and your assessment of any changes in mood, attitude, good fortune, or anything else of note you experienced.
  • Review what you have learned about human behavior in social settings this week in your readings and CogBooks activities. Connect what you learned or experienced through your day of conscious, prosocial behavior with the terms, concepts, and theories from your research. Integrate at least two academic sources (your assigned readings/resources can comprise one of these sources), citing any references used in APA format.
  • Describe any new insights you gained through this experience about your interactions with others on a daily basis, including any behaviors you wish to change or to continue.
  • Use the features of PowerPoint to your advantage to communicate your ideas – include pictures, audio recorded narration, speaker’s notes, video, links, etc. as appropriate to enhance your ideas.
  • Include an APA formatted title slide and reference slide. APA components such as an abstract, headings, etc. are not required since this is a PowerPoint presentation.

What steps would you take to attempt to resolve the issue?

/in /by

U6 Minimum 250 word discussion.

Share your insights about ethical principles in psychology by responding to the following questions:

  • What      do you see as the ethical issue or issues involved in the case study you      reviewed? Cite the relevant elements within the APA’s Ethical Principles      of Psychologists and Code of Conduct to support your analysis.
  • What      steps would you take to attempt to resolve the issue?
  • How      can you apply the principles from the Becoming an Ethical Helping      Professional coursepack readings to the case study you chose?
  • How      does this issue as well as the other standards in the APA ethics code      relate to your future career in psychology?
  • What      is the difference between conducting research in the field of psychology      and conducting your informational interview for this course?
  • What      ethical principles are most applicable to your professional interview?
  • What      will you do to ensure you adhere to ethical principles while conducting      your interview?

���