Provider Evaluation (Quality and Safety)

Overview
In this age of acute competition and alignment of providers, systems are evolving to improve contracting opportunities, including population health, Accountable Care organizations, and models of health care delivery. They are targeting quality care at a value price. This assignment explores a provider of your choice to determine their desirability to be a member of a system and recommend improvements they may need to make to become more competitive in their market.

Requirements
Write a 23 page proposal in which you evaluate and make recommendations for a provider you have chosen in terms of safety, quality, and evidence-informed health care by doing the following:

Choose a health care providernursing home, hospital, home care, etc.
Using the search function on Medicare.gov to review your provider’s measures on safety, quality, and evidence-informed health care.
Pay attention to the publicly reported outcomes on mortality, rehospitalization, and infection rates, as well as patient satisfaction and preventive care.
Note: If you have chosen a home health provider, use the Home Health Quality Measures website to review their home health quality measures.
Identify other providers in the same geographic area, review their outcomes, and compare your provider (e.g., search by Zip code).
Determine how these outcomes impact this provider as a potential member for a health system, Accountable Care organization, or as a contender to obtain population health contracts.
Based on the reports, determine which quality initiative the providers should address through evidence-based practices, such as safety, quality, rehospitalizations, mortality, etc.
Would your provider be the desired member of a system?
What is your recommendation for this provider to improve their outcomes in order to improve reimbursement and to become a desirable member of a system of providers?

Johari Window Paper

I am attaching some of my personality results for this paper. The rest based on that you can make up.

Also use the book terms. Chapters 1-6

Wood, J. T. (2016). Interpersonal communication: Everyday encounters (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning. ISBN: 9781285445830

Option 1: Write a Paper
For this option you are to write a 3-5 page paper outlining the four quadrants (Open, Blind, Hidden and Unknown) of your Johari Window. This paper should provide a detailed explanation of each quadrant of your window and the information you placed from your WebQuest assessments, speaking with friends/family and your self exploration.

You are to discuss the information contained within each quadrant (you should include at least 3 “pieces” of information that you learned from completing this assignment into each quadrant. This information should come from your Webquest assessments and from the conversations you have with friends/family and the like) demonstrating how it relates to how you see yourself and how others see you.

This paper should be typed and submitted to me in the discussion forum designated entitled Johari Window Assignment anytime before the due date (I would prefer that you cut and paste your paper into the body of the discussion forum).
It should include an introduction whereby you introduce yourself to your reader and detailed description of the content of your Johari Window.

Finally, the paper should include a picture of your Johari Window (this could be done in any word processing software- a simple table of your window which should indicate the size of each quadrant).

The final section of your paper should include a listing of the five WebQuest assessments you completed and the results of those assessments. The actual results should also appear in their appropriate quadrant description in your paper.
PLEASE NOTE: I DO NOT WANT THE PRINT OUTS OF YOU ASSESSMENTS. YOU ARE TO PROVIDE ME THE RESULTS OF THESE ASSESSMENTS IN THE CONTEXT OF YOUR PAPER AND IN THE BIBLIOGRAPHY AT THE END OF YOUR PAPER.

I put the time for 4 but I really need by 4:30 latest

comm 120 week 7

Instructions
Goal: Demonstrate the ability to create a field of study project that uses both research-based and personal content while using presentation software to communicate with an intended audience.

Description:

During the first six-weeks you formulated a project plan, researched the content of the plan, and collected quality academic and non-academic sources. For the week 7 Field of Study Project you will create a presentation (CO8) that builds upon the week 2 Project Plan and the week 4 Location and Access (Source Organization worksheet) that effectively communicates the knowledge you have gained during COMM120.

Please consider the following:

Presentation will include an introduction, body, conclusion, and properly formatted reference/work cited slide in the citation style of your degree program (APA, MLA, or Chicago).
Clear evidence that the topic was researched and expanded upon the week 2 Project Plan (CO2 & 5).
Presentation provides audience with information to increase their knowledge of the topic presented (CO1).
Presentation engages the audience by using elements such as images, graphs, and charts. Appropriate citations must be included.
Three (3) vetted credible sources. One (1) of the sources must be scholarly and from the library.
Appropriate length 7-9 slides.
If you have multimedia skills and want to add creative content to your presentation, please do! Try to add any of the following enhancements and as you do, think about how it will impact your presentation and improve communication with the intended audience.

Voice narration, closed captioning, script.
Appropriate background music (must be cited on reference page).
Creative use of slide animations and transitions.
After submitting your presentation, review your TurnItIn Origi

Trading economics

use your knowledge of microeconomics to establish the facts and analyse the American oil market. Evaluate the economic functioning of the oil market in US, including demand and supply, incentives, elasticity on demand and supply and any signs of price bubble. Explain possible options for policy intervention to correct market failure and make recommendations to policy makers.