Influence-of-Labels-psychology-assignment-help-

/in /by

Argue both that the Rosenhan study is and is not a valid test of problems associated with labeling.

Use the following format to complete this assignment:

The Rosenhan study is a valid test of the problems associated with labeling.

Argument 1:

Argument 2:

The Rosenhan study is not a valid test of the problems associated with labeling.

Argument 1:

Argument 2:

Resources are linked here:

http://psychrights.org/articles/Rosenham.htm

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post Influence-of-Labels-psychology-assignment-help- appeared first on Custom Nursing Help.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”

assault battery and crimes against persons paper

/in /by

1. Compare and contrast the key similarities and differences between the crime of assault with a deadly weapon and the crime of felonious and aggravated battery. Provide one (1) example of each crime to support your response.
Weight: 15%

Points Range:0 (0%) – 17.08 (8.99%)
Did not submit or incompletely compared and contrasted the key similarities and differences between the crime of assault with a deadly weapon and the crime of felonious and aggravated battery. Did not submit or incompletely provided one (1) example of each crime to support your response.

Points Range:17.1 (9%) – 19.93 (10.49%)
Insufficiently compared and contrasted the key similarities and differences between the crime of assault with a deadly weapon and the crime of felonious and aggravated battery. Insufficiently provided one (1) example of each crime to support your response.

Points Range:19.95 (10.5%) – 22.78 (11.99%)
Partially compared and contrasted the key similarities and differences between the crime of assault with a deadly weapon and the crime of felonious and aggravated battery. Partially provided one (1) example of each crime to support your response.

Points Range:22.8 (12%) – 25.63 (13.49%)
Satisfactorily compared and contrasted the key similarities and differences between the crime of assault with a deadly weapon and the crime of felonious and aggravated battery. Satisfactorily provided one (1) example of each crime to support your response.

Points Range:25.65 (13.5%) – 28.5 (15%)
Thoroughly compared and contrasted the key similarities and differences between the crime of assault with a deadly weapon and the crime of felonious and aggravated battery. Thoroughly provided one (1) example of each crime to support your response.

LEG320-A3-22. Determine whether or not the jurisdiction in which the crime has occurred should consider the man’s actions as assault. Next, determine whether or not the jurisdiction should punish the man’s actions as battery. Justify your response.
Weight: 15%

Points Range:0 (0%) – 17.08 (8.99%)
Did not submit or incompletely determined whether or not the jurisdiction in which the crime has occurred should consider the man’s actions as assault. Did not submit or incompletely determined whether or not the jurisdiction should punish the man’s actions as battery. Did not submit or incompletely justified your response.

Points Range:17.1 (9%) – 19.93 (10.49%)
Insufficiently determined whether or not the jurisdiction in which the crime has occurred should consider the man’s actions as assault. Insufficiently determined whether or not the jurisdiction should punish the man’s actions as battery. Insufficiently justified your response.

Points Range:19.95 (10.5%) – 22.78 (11.99%)
Partially determined whether or not the jurisdiction in which the crime has occurred should consider the man’s actions as assault. Partially determined whether or not the jurisdiction should punish the man’s actions as battery. Partially justified your response.

Points Range:22.8 (12%) – 25.63 (13.49%)
Satisfactorily determined whether or not the jurisdiction in which the crime has occurred should consider the man’s actions as assault. Satisfactorily determined whether or not the jurisdiction should punish the man’s actions as battery. Satisfactorily justified your response.

Points Range:25.65 (13.5%) – 28.5 (15%)
Thoroughly determined whether or not the jurisdiction in which the crime has occurred should consider the man’s actions as assault. Thoroughly determined whether or not the jurisdiction should punish the man’s actions as battery. Thoroughly justified your response.

3. Suggest one (1) different fact pattern that would change the scenario from felonious and aggravated assault and / or battery to simple assault. Support the validity of your response.
Weight: 15%

Points Range:0 (0%) – 17.08 (8.99%)
Did not submit or incompletely suggested one (1) different fact pattern that would change the scenario from felonious and aggravated assault and / or battery to simple assault. Did not submit or incompletely supported the validity of your response.

Points Range:17.1 (9%) – 19.93 (10.49%)
Insufficiently suggested one (1) different fact pattern that would change the scenario from felonious and aggravated assault and / or battery to simple assault. Insufficiently supported the validity of your response.

Points Range:19.95 (10.5%) – 22.78 (11.99%)
Partially suggested one (1) different fact pattern that would change the scenario from felonious and aggravated assault and / or battery to simple assault. Partially supported the validity of your response.

Points Range:22.8 (12%) – 25.63 (13.49%)
Satisfactorily suggested one (1) different fact pattern that would change the scenario from felonious and aggravated assault and / or battery to simple assault. Satisfactorily supported the validity of your response.

Points Range:25.65 (13.5%) – 28.5 (15%)
Thoroughly suggested one (1) different fact pattern that would change the scenario from felonious and aggravated assault and / or battery to simple assault. Thoroughly supported the validity of your response.

4. Discuss the crime of kidnapping. Next, debate whether or not the suggested change in Question 3 would allow the court to convict the attacker for the crime of kidnapping. Provide a rationale to support your response.
Weight: 15%

Points Range:0 (0%) – 17.08 (8.99%)
Did not submit or incompletely discussed the crime of kidnapping. Did not submit or incompletely debated whether or not the suggested change in Question 3 would allow the court to convict the attacker for the crime of kidnapping. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale to support your response.

Points Range:17.1 (9%) – 19.93 (10.49%)
Insufficiently discussed the crime of kidnapping. Insufficiently debated whether or not the suggested change in Question 3 would allow the court to convict the attacker for the crime of kidnapping. Insufficiently provided a rationale to support your response.

Points Range:19.95 (10.5%) – 22.78 (11.99%)
Partially discussed the crime of kidnapping. Partially debated whether or not the suggested change in Question 3 would allow the court to convict the attacker for the crime of kidnapping. Partially provided a rationale to support your response.

Points Range:22.8 (12%) – 25.63 (13.49%)
Satisfactorily discussed the crime of kidnapping. Satisfactorily debated whether or not the suggested change in Question 3 would allow the court to convict the attacker for the crime of kidnapping. Satisfactorily provided a rationale to support your response.

Points Range:25.65 (13.5%) – 28.5 (15%)
Thoroughly discussed the crime of kidnapping. Thoroughly debated whether or not the suggested change in Question 3 would allow the court to convict the attacker for the crime of kidnapping. Thoroughly provided a rationale to support your response.

5. Differentiate between the crimes of hostage taking and kidnapping. Support or critique the notion that one of the two crimes is more serious than the other. Justify your response. Justify your response.
Weight: 15%

Points Range:0 (0%) – 17.08 (8.99%)
Did not submit or incompletely differentiated between the crimes of hostage taking and kidnapping. Did not submit or incompletely supported or critiqued the notion that one of the two crimes is more heinous than the other. Did not submit or incompletely justified your response.

Points Range:17.1 (9%) – 19.93 (10.49%)
Insufficiently differentiated between the crimes of hostage taking and kidnapping. Insufficiently supported or critiqued the notion that one of the two crimes is more heinous than the other. Insufficiently justified your response.

Points Range:19.95 (10.5%) – 22.78 (11.99%)
Partially differentiated between the crimes of hostage taking and kidnapping. Partially supported or critiqued the notion that one of the two crimes is more heinous than the other. Partially justified your response.

Points Range:22.8 (12%) – 25.63 (13.49%)
Satisfactorily differentiated between the crimes of hostage taking and kidnapping. Satisfactorily supported or critiqued the notion that one of the two crimes is more heinous than the other. Satisfactorily justified your response.

Points Range:25.65 (13.5%) – 28.5 (15%)
Thoroughly differentiated between the crimes of hostage taking and kidnapping. Thoroughly supported or critiqued the notion that one of the two crimes is more heinous than the other. Thoroughly justified your response.

LEG320-A3-66. Debate whether or not (A)’s action would require the attacker to defend himself. Provide a rationale to support your response.
Weight: 10%

Points Range:0 (0%) – 11.38 (5.99%)
Did not submit or incompletely debated whether or not (A)’s action would require the attacker to defend himself. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale to support your response.

Points Range:11.4 (6%) – 13.28 (6.99%)
Insufficiently debated whether or not (A)’s action would require the attacker to defend himself. Insufficiently provided a rationale to support your response.

Points Range:13.3 (7%) – 15.18 (7.99%)
Partially debated whether or not (A)’s action would require the attacker to defend himself. Partially provided a rationale to support your response.

Points Range:15.2 (8%) – 17.08 (8.99%)
Satisfactorily debated whether or not (A)’s action would require the attacker to defend himself. Satisfactorily provided a rationale to support your response.

Points Range:17.1 (9%) – 19 (10%)
Thoroughly debated whether or not (A)’s action would require the attacker to defend himself. Thoroughly provided a rationale to support your response.

7. Cite 3 References.

Points Range:0 (0%) – 5.68 (2.99%)
No references provided.

Points Range:5.7 (3%) – 6.63 (3.49%)
Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.

Points Range:6.65 (3.5%) – 7.58 (3.99%)
Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.

Points Range:7.6 (4%) – 8.53 (4.49%)
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Points Range:8.55 (4.5%) – 9.5 (5%)
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

LEG320-A3-88. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements
Weight: 10%

Points Range:0 (0%) – 11.38 (5.99%)
More than 8 errors present.

Points Range:11.4 (6%) – 13.28 (6.99%)
7-8 errors present.

Points Range:13.3 (7%) – 15.18 (7.99%)
5-6 errors present.

Points Range:15.2 (8%) – 17.08 (8.99%)
3-4 errors present.

Points Range:17.1 (9%) – 19 (10%)
0-2 errors present.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”

Jazz 8 5 10 Sentences

/in /by

“Jazz is experiencing a resurgence as of late. The BBC ran a report recently that adults in their early 30’s, in Britain, report their favorite genre of music to now include jazz. There are more music schools that offer jazz education than during jazz’s heyday. Why do you think jazz has become so relevant today, especially for young people? Keep in mind everything we have learned and think about the world today before you answer.”

The post Jazz 8 5 10 Sentences appeared first on My Perfect Tutors.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”

Week 4: Thinking, Memory, Problem Solving, And Creativity Questions

/in /by

Thinking, Memory, Problem Solving, and Creativity Questions
Select any threeof the following items to write about.  Each response should be 1-2 pages long. You may combine all responses into one paper and provide headings for each item.
1. Distinguish between the human mind and computers as tools for thinking. What does the human mind do better and why? What does the computer dobetter and why? Weigh in on the debate over artificial intelligence and support your claims.
2.  Take this free creativity problem solving test or one of your choosing, and weigh in on the results.  Do you feel they were on target?  Do you think the survey questions accurately assess problem-solving creativity? Are there reliable ways to measure creativity? Why is creativity an imortant area of study for psychologists?
3. Describe and discuss the role of consolidation.  Identify how psychologists study this process and why. Provide examples from your life that demonstrate the process of consolidation in action.
4. Describe mental imagery (theories and processes) and explain why people might use it for different reasons. How is it different from hypnosis. Identify a scientific study related to this process and describe the results. Weigh in on the effectiveness of mental imagery.  What role does motivation play? Have you ever tried to incorporate it in to your life? Explain.
5. Select one memory disorder to research and detail its causes, symptoms, and treatments (traditional and emerging).  Explain how therapists and/or psychologists can help support patients experiencing memory loss.
6. Research ways that culture influences how we categorize the world. Present a scenario using at least two different cultures to demonstrate the idea. Compare and contrast attitudes and perceptions based on cultural categorizations.  Why is it important to recognize this distinction?
7. Read the following excerpt from Final Jeopardy: Man vs. Machine and the Quest to Know Everything as discussed by delancyplace.com.  Devise and conduct a unique experiment to mimic the findings of the Moses illusion.  Detail your hypothesis, the experiment, the findings, and your analysis of those findings.
Find at least one scholarly source for each item to support your ideas. A minimum total of three sources should be cited and listed on your reference page.)
Use APA format to style your paper and cite and reference your sources.
Each response should be a 1—2 pages long, in addition to a title page and a reference page.
Refer to the rubric for more information on how your assignment will be graded.
Due: Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time)
Points: 100

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”