opioid use disorder & medically assisted treatment among adolescents

/in /by

This is a SUD 250 class, which is Youth SUD Assessment Counseling. My paper is on OUD & medical assisted treatment among adolescents. For this paper it needs to be on the assessment process and tools used during pre-screening (which I will attach in additional material)and OUD and MAT among adolescents. We have discussion questions each week about things we learned in class, I will send these to you so you can use some of the things I would like added in the paper. You did the annotated bibliography for this research paper for me recently, that was done perfectly. Do you need me to send that or do you still have it? 

“Each week, students will complete an assignment that explores how the weekly content applies to the adolescent treatment related topic of the students choosing (OUD & MAT). This is not only a mechanism to assist students in the creation of their final paper, but an exercise in application of knowledge to practice.” This is what is written in our weekly discussion board. Also, would you like me to put my discussions from the past few weeks all on one google doc and send it to you? 

Unit 4 Discussion

/in /by

Unit 4 Discussion

Subscribe

Developing Your Research Question

When you were in elementary school, the most difficult task many of you may have faced was deciding what experiment to do for the science fair. In this week’s discussion, you are asked to formulate a research question and then convert that question into statistical language, including the null and alternative hypotheses.

For this discussion, please complete the following:

A. Develop a research question: In your area of interest, think about a research question that could be answered using a hypothesis test for a mean (watch the Unit 4 Discussion video in LiveBinder for examples). Write down this research question and explain what your research is trying to investigate. Clearly describe the population(s) you are studying and the variable you are measuring for each person (or thing) in your sample(s).

B. State the hypotheses: Using your research question, create the null hypothesis that will be tested and the alternative hypothesis. Be sure to use the symbols Ho for the null hypothesis and H1 for the alternative hypothesis. You can state your hypotheses verbally or symbolically.

Verbal example:

Ho: mean anxiety level for kids with ASD = mean anxiety level for kids without ASD

H1: mean anxiety level for kids with ASD ≠ mean anxiety level for kids without ASD

Symbolic example:

Ho: 𝜇1= 𝜇2

H1: 𝜇1≠ 𝜇2

where 𝜇1= mean anxiety level for kids with ASD,

and 𝜇2= mean anxiety level for kids without ASD.

Note: If you use a symbolic statement, you must define your parameter symbols (e.g., 𝜇1, 𝜇2).

C. One-tailed or two-tailed: Based on your research question, indicate whether you would conduct a one-tailed or two-tailed test. If you would conduct a one-tailed test, indicate which direction the test would be and explain why you chose that direction.

D. Expected conclusion: Think of a hypothetical p-value (must be between 0 and 1 since it is a probability, but it is fine to just invent a value here) and provide your expected decision (reject Ho or not) and conclusion from your hypothesis test based on this p-value. Your conclusion should explain what your decision means in the context of your research question.

Remember that your goal for discussion is to ensure:

  • Responses are on topic, original, and contribute to the quality of the discussion.

My area of interest is Forensic Psychology. The topic is the average life expectancy of a correction officer after retirement is 10+ years (hypothesis). H1: The average life expectancy f a correction officer after retirement is actually 5 years.

Unit 3 Discussion

/in /by

Unit 3 Discussion

Subscribe

Is this Unusual?

In this discussion, you will explore probabilities within normal distributions and see how these probabilities can be useful in decision making. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) is one variable that is known to have a normal distribution. Wright et al. (2011) provided systolic blood pressure statistics for the following ethnicities✝ and age groups:

****Attached Below****

 

*The referenced publication provided standard errors, which were converted to approximate standard deviations by multiplying the standard error by the square root of the sample size for the age/ethnic group, given in the technical notes of the publication.

✝We acknowledge that there are many more race/ethnicity groups than those listed in the table. These are simply the ones the researchers selected for comparison purposes at that time.

Wright, J. D., Hughes, J. P., Ostchega, Y., Yoon, S. S., & Nwankwo, T. (2011, March 25). Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure in adults aged 18 and over in the United States, 2001–2008. National Health Statistics Reports, Number 35. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr035.pdf.

Watch the Unit 3 Discussion video in the LiveBinder for a demonstration of how to use Excel and the above table to complete this week’s discussion. You will do the following:

  1. Open a blank Excel worksheet. Go to cell A1 and type the following =RANDBETWEEN(82, 203), then press Enter. Make sure to start with an equal sign, and Excel should generate a random integer between the values of 82 and 203, inclusive. State your random value.
  2. From the table above, select one of the listed ethnicities to work with. State your selected ethnicity.
  3. Within your chosen ethnicity, select two age groups on which you would like to focus. State your two selected age groups.
  4. For the first ethnic/age group you selected, answer the following questions:
    1. Use the above table to find the mean and standard deviation of systolic blood pressure (SBP) for the group. State the mean and SD.
    2. If your random value from step 1 was the SBP of a person from this ethnic/age group, what would the corresponding z-score be (SHOW WORK)?
    3. Use technology to calculate the percentage of people in this group with SBP at or below this value. Paste a snip of the normal curve picture showing the corresponding shaded area into your post.
    4. Is this SBP unusual for this ethnic/age group? Explain.
  5. For the second ethnic/age group you selected, answer the following questions:
    1. Use the above table to find the mean and standard deviation of systolic blood pressure (SBP) for the group. State the mean and SD.
    2. If your random value from Step 1 was the SBP of a person from this ethnic/age group, what would the corresponding z-score be (SHOW WORK)?
    3. Use technology to calculate the percentage of people in this group with SBP at or above this value. Paste a snip of the normal curve picture showing the corresponding shaded area into your post.
    4. Is this SBP unusual for this ethnic/age group? Explain.
  6. Based on the z-scores and percentages you got in steps 4 and 5 of the discussion, is the SBP you randomly generated in Excel closer to the first ethnic/age group you selected, or is it closer to the second one? Explain.
  7. Suppose you took a sample of 40 people from the first ethnic/age group you selected. If your randomly generated SBP was the sample mean SBP of these 40 people, what would the z-score be (SHOW WORK)? Hint: Since this is a sample of SBPs, you will need to use the sampling distribution and corresponding z-score formula. Would this sample mean be unusual for your selected ethnic/age group? Explain.

How Do I write a Good Literature Review Paper?

/in /by

 

 

 

 

Literature Review and the Research Process

 

Name

Institution

Course Code: Course Name

Professor

Date of Submission

 

Literature Review and the Research Process

A literature review is a critical element in any research or academic project. A literature review involves reviewing existing publications to understand a topic at hand. The review aims to fill in research gaps and add new knowledge to what is known regarding a particular research topic. The discussion will capture different elements of a literature review and its purpose in quantitative and qualitative studies and at homeworkhandlers.com, we help you on how to write a good literature review and all types of research papers and also guide you through the writing process to give you an AI-free A+ quality paper.

Why Do I Need to Do a Literature Review?

A literature review helps situate current research within the existing body of knowledge. This will help a person identify gaps that the study may focus on or expound on. The information gathered will also inform the study (University of South Carolina, 2019). The review further helps one identify key concepts and theories relevant to the research. This knowledge will help guide the study’s research design, data collection, and analysis. The third justification is that literature reviews increase familiarity with the topic under study (University of South Carolina, 2019). A researcher will be seen to know the study topic, enabling one to make informed decisions.

Type of Literature to Use in the Review

Using a wide range of resources for the literature review is essential. First, peer reviewed sources with different levels of evidence will provide credible evidence specific to the different areas of the topic under study. A study will leverage high-level evidence with more generalizability and reduced bias by focusing on random-control trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and literature reviews (Glasofer & Townsend, 2020). Having diverse sources increases the richness of the gathered information and the credibility of the final findings. I will also use diverse literature that supports and opposes the argument. This will reduce researcher and confirmation bias by selecting sources that support the argument, giving more validity to the study findings.

How to Do a Literature Search

A literature search should be systematic to capture every necessary and relevant step. The first step would be identifying pertinent keywords to the search topic. The second step would be to determine the databases and journals or websites to use (Mohamed Shaffril et al., 2020). The next step would be to refine the search process based on a specific criterion. For instance, an established publication date range, research methodology, and geographical location should be established. Using search engines that generate references and citations would also help ease the documentation of sources (Mohamed Shaffril et al., 2020). The search engines may also provide related sources with relevant information to inform the study.

How Do I Do a Literature Review?

The first step of a literature review is defining the research question, hypothesis, or objective. This will help determine the study’s scope and guide the research process. The next step is to review the literature using the techniques above (Mohamed Shaffril et al., 2020). One should then critically examine the selected sources by looking at the themes, strengths, limitations, and patterns that would fill in the gaps in research. It is also essential to examine the connections between the sources (Mohamed Shaffril et al., 2020). The literature should be well-organized, coherent, and have a logical flow of ideas.

What Makes a Successful Literature Review?

A successful literature review should be comprehensive, analytical, well-organized, and synthesized. It should have a range of relevant key concepts and theories related to the study topic. A researcher should also identify the strengths and limitations of research. There should be a clear structure and logical flow of ideas from one point to another (Mohamed Shaffril et al., 2020). The synthesis should further highlight connections for better interpretations.

A literature review should thoroughly examine existing research and other relevant sources to inform a study topic. It involves summarizing key findings, themes, and methodologies to determine whether gaps in research could be filled (University of South Carolina, 2019). A literature review is the foundation of knowledge, guiding the development of research questions, hypotheses, and methodology in the later phases.

Importance of Literature Review in Qualitative Research

Researchers can gain insights into existing publications to inform the studies conducted in the field of interest. Researchers can identify theories, themes, and patterns in the existing knowledge. Therefore, qualitative research can build up existing information by filling gaps or adding new data (University of South Carolina, 2019). The literature review will enable such studies to develop theories that would create new concepts to explain or refine the existing research in greater detail. Researchers can use the review to identify gaps they can study more to understand a phenomenon (University of South Carolina, 2019). After all, the current societal landscape is dynamic, and the world is evolving, bringing something new with every change.

Importance of Literature Review in Quantitative Research

Literature review in quantitative research further helps to establish theories and concepts to support empirical evidence. The University of South Carolina (2019) adds that a literature review on quantitative studies will also add empirical data to current studies for better analysis. Researchers can use the reviews to measure variables, identify trends, and employ research designs that have been effective in previous research. This review will help them refine their current study by understanding a topic under study in greater detail. On the other hand, researchers can identify gaps they can fill and provide further evidence to strengthen or challenge existing findings.

Conclusion

Literature review informs qualitative and quantitative research studies by providing a framework to work on. Researchers can use the review to design methodologies, develop research questions, identify gaps to fill, and refine existing research. The reviews strengthen or challenge existing knowledge while sparking interest in further research since there is more to learn.

References

Glasofer, A., & Townsend, A. B. (2020). Determining the level of evidence. Nursing Critical Care, 15(1), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccn.0000612856.94212.9b

Mohamed Shaffril, H. A., Samsuddin, S. F., & Abu Samah, A. (2020). The ABC of systematic literature review: The basic methodological guidance for beginners. Quality & Quantity, 55, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01059-6

University of South Carolina. (2019). Literature review: Purpose of a literature review. Libguides.com. https://uscupstate.libguides.com/c.php?g=627058&p=4389968