Last week, we read several responses to the problem of evil and suffering. Think

/in /by

Last week, we read several responses to the problem of evil and suffering. Think about the approaches of James Cone and Andrew Sung Park in particular. How do their approaches help us understand Elie Wiesel’s experiences of suffering, trauma, and faith in Night? How does Wiesel respond to his own lived experience of the problem of evil: the Holocaust? Where do you see Wiesel’s struggle with the problem of evil, and how does he live out his faith and express his faith in response to this particular obstacle? (Use quotes from Night to guide your reflections.) Night by Elie Wiesel, preface and pages 1-29 (this is one of your required textbooks) Night by Elie Wiesel, pages 29-65

The post Last week, we read several responses to the problem of evil and suffering. Think appeared first on homework handlers.

Judgment and Decision Making is a relatively new field, with an incredibly activ

/in /by

Judgment and Decision Making is a relatively new field, with an incredibly active current research agenda. Draw on what you have learnt throughout the module to construct a research proposal. Focus of research proposal: Using Adults with ADHD to test heuristic and bias based theories of judgement and decision making. Maximum length: 10 pages (A4 – font 12, DOUBLE SPACED, margins a minimum of 2.5 cm). The proposal must include each of the following elements. The use of subheadings is encouraged. Figures and tables are another way in which information might be presented most effectively. • Aims • Background • Methodology (15%) o Ethical Issues – You need to demonstrate that you have paid attention to the potential for any difficulties to arise from the proposed research. How you structure the proposal is ultimately up to you. A typical structure would present a short introduction to the issue under investigation with the central aims of the proposal, all included in the first couple of pages. The background would follow, with the aim being to set up why the current research question is of paramount importance, given the extant literature (approximately 6-7 pages). The final page or so would consist of methodology. Methodology. You need to report what you will do, and why you will do it. The methodology should present an example experiment in your program of research. Although the number of participants (including power calculations) is a critical part of ‘real’ grant applications, that is not necessary in this assignment. Whilst the aims and methodology are important, the main aim of this assessment is to test your ability to synthesise previous literature to identify a fruitful future line of research. Consequently, it is the background that is weighted most heavily in this assessment. Strong proposals will synthesise across the module to identify a program of research. Proposals simply suggesting a methodological tweak on a previous experiment will not achieve high marks. Bibliography. This is required, but is IN ADDITION TO the 10 pages of the proposal.

The post Judgment and Decision Making is a relatively new field, with an incredibly activ appeared first on homework handlers.

Instructions for this Discussion Our nation’s system of public budgeting and fin

/in /by

Instructions for this Discussion Our nation’s system of public budgeting and finance became more visibly institutionalized and established early in the twentieth century, providing a basis for fiscal federalism and intergovernmental relations. Today, virtually all decisions and functions in government are driven by fiscal considerations. Please discuss how the progression of grants-in-aid from the New Deal era forward facilitated the evolution of federalism from a dual and relatively independent relationship between tiers of government, to a structure of interdependence where there is considerable intergovernmental coordination. Related, you may want to reflect upon how fiscal trends and reform efforts have been interrelated over time starting with the Nixon presidency. This discussion meets course learning objective 5: Demonstrate an understanding of how policy is financed in a federal system. You will also need to post a response to at least two of your classmates’ posts. Also, make sure that your response(s) are substantial and consist of at least 100 words. Grading Criteria Please refer to the discussion grading rubric. Due Date Your primary post is due by 11:30 pm on Wednesday 3/31/21. Responses to your peers must be posted by 11:30 pm on Friday 4/2/21.

The post Instructions for this Discussion Our nation’s system of public budgeting and fin appeared first on homework handlers.

paper is about-Obesity among children and adolescents (NWS-10.4) title page with

/in /by

paper is about-Obesity among children and adolescents (NWS-10.4) title page with reference page NR222 RUA: Health Promotion Project (New MAY20) NR222 RUA: Health Promotion Project (New MAY20) Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction and Conclusion Required criteria 1. Introduction establishes the purpose of the paper and describes why topic is important to health promotion in the target population in your area. 2. Introduction stimulates the reader’s interest. 3. Conclusion includes the main ideas from the body of the paper. 4. Conclusion includes the major support points from the body of the paper. 15 pts Highest Performance Includes no fewer than 4 requirements for section. 13 pts High Performance Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section. 12 pts Satisfactory Includes no fewer than 2 requirements for section. 8 pts Unsatisfactory Includes 1 or fewer requirements for section. 0 pts Section not Present No requirements for this section presented. 15 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRelate Topic to Target Population Required criteria 1. Describes the topic and target cultural population. 2. Includes statistics to support significance of the topic. 3. Explains how the project relates to the selected Healthy People 2020 topic area. 4. Applies health promotion concepts. 25 pts Highest Performance Includes no fewer than 4 requirements for section. 20 pts High Performance Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section. 15 pts Satisfactory Includes no fewer than 2 requirements for section. 10 pts Unsatisfactory Includes 1 or fewer requirements for section. 0 pts Section not Present No requirements for this section presented. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary of Articles Required criteria 1. A minimum of three (3) scholarly articles, from the last 5 years, are used as sources. 2. Articles meet criteria of being from scholarly journals and include health promotion and wellness content. 3. At least one article is related to the chosen cultural group. 4. Summaries all key points and findings from the articles. 5. Includes statistics to support significance of the topic. 6. Discusses how information from the articles is used in the Health Promotion Project, including specific examples. 25 pts Highest Performance Includes no fewer than 4 requirements for section. 23 pts High Performance Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section. 21 pts Satisfactory Includes no fewer than 2 requirements for section. 10 pts Unsatisfactory Includes 1 or fewer requirements for section. 0 pts Section not Present No requirements for this section presented. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHealth Promotion Discussion Required criteria 1. Describes approaches to educate the target population about the topic. 2. The approaches are appropriate for the cultural target population. 3. Identifies specific ways to promote lifestyle changes within the target population. 4. Applies health promotion strategies. 25 pts Highest Performance Includes no fewer than 4 requirements for section. 23 pts High Performance Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section. 21 pts Satisfactory Includes no fewer than 2 requirements for section. 10 pts Unsatisfactory Includes 1 or fewer requirements for section. 0 pts Section not Present No requirements for this section presented. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style and Organization Required criteria 1. TurnItIn is used prior to submitting paper for grading. 2. Revisions are made based on TurnItIn originality report. 3. References are submitted with assignment. 4. Uses current APA format and is free of errors. 5. Grammar and mechanics are free of errors. 6. Paper is 3-4 pages, excluding title and reference pages. 7. Information is organized around required components and flows in a logical sequence. 10 pts Highest Performance Includes no fewer than 7 requirements for section. 9 pts High Performance Includes no fewer than 6 requirements for section. 8 pts Satisfactory Includes no fewer than 5 requirements for section. 4 pts Unsatisfactory Includes 1 -4 requirements for section. 0 pts Section not Present No requirements for this section presented. 10 pts Total Points: 100

The post paper is about-Obesity among children and adolescents (NWS-10.4) title page with appeared first on homework handlers.