justice in the context of human rights

/in /by

Please discuss the following question:

1. Both the Jackson chapter and the Slaughter journal article address the idea of a “shift” from two systems of criminal law – purely international and domestic law – toward one system. How does a system of transnational law evolve and how close do you think we are to having a unified system? What are some of the obstacles, especially in terms of getting domestic courts to adopt the laws?

Remember to read your texts, watch the video in Course Overview, and read any other materials in Week One Lessons. Include those ideas in your discussions. Also, feel free to include a link to a website or a journal article to share with your classmates to support your views.

News sources on the internet may be found in our Library (see the link on the left-side toolbar). The best database is Lexis Nexis. Do an “advanced search” to set date parameters to the past six months.

I look forward to reading your posts and providing feedback on your topics!

Your initial post should be at least 350 words (but it may be more!).

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post justice in the context of human rights appeared first on The Nursing Hub.

Nessus report | Computer Science homework help

/in /by

  

VM Scanner Background Report, based on the Nessus Report. As you are writing your report, you may want to refer back to the CEO’s video in Week 1 to make sure your analysis and recommendations align with the CEO’s priorities and concerns.

You should link your analysis to the kinds of organizational functions and data associated with a transportation company (e.g., protecting order data, customer lists, sales leads, Payment Card Industry (PCI) compliance for processing credit, proprietary software, etc.) and provide your recommendation if Mercury USA should purchase the Nessus tool. This report should be four to six pages in length and include a title/cover page. Include in-text citations and a reference page with three quality sources in a citation style of your choice.

【ポイント６倍】最大３４倍！ノ・アルフレ シャンプー ２９０ml 詰め替え用パウチ レモングラス 3個セット メンズ レディス ノンシリコン 送料無料 クリスマス お歳暮 プレゼント ギフト：

/in /by

今すぐ購入

最大３００円クーポン配布中 泡立ち 保湿 オールインワン リンス不要 コンディショナー不要

ノ・アルフレ シャンプー（レモングラス）は、美容成分で私たちの髪の毛にうるおいや栄養をカバーしてくれます。香り、泡立ちが良いシャンプーです！こんな方におススメ！・年とともにツヤやハリが減ってきて老け髪に……・髪の毛がパサパサゴワゴワ……・忙しくてお風呂にかける時間を減らしたい！〇特徴〇・ノンシリコン・カオチン界面活性剤フリー・石油系界面活性剤フリー・合成香料フリー・合成着色料フリー・紫外線吸収剤フリー・エタノールフリー・鉱物油フリー・小麦由来タンパク成分フリー・ジエタノールアミンフリー〇ノ・アルフレの使い方〇ノ・アルフレの使い方は普通のシャンプーと同じでとっても簡単ですが、泡パックをするとより良く使えるんです！1.髪の毛全体を濡らします2.シャンプーを髪全体になじませ、マッサージするように洗います3.泡に包んだ髪の毛を3分から5分放置します4.最後にしっかりすすぎますコンディショナーをする必要が無いので、かなり楽になりますね♪■商品名：ノ・アルフレ シャンプー ２９０ml 詰め替え用パウチ レモングラス■内容量：290ml×3■原材料：水、ココイルグルタミン酸TEA、コカミドDEA、ラウロイルメチルアラニンNa、グリセリン、ツバキ種子油、シャクヤク根エキス、シトルスジャバラ果皮エキス、加水分解アメリカブドウ果皮エキス、アシタバ葉/茎エキス、加水分解ダイズエキス、マコンブエキス、ゴレンシ葉エキス、シゾサッカロミセスポンベエキス、コウヤマキ枝/葉エキス、ノリウツギ果実/花エキス、ローマカミツレ花エキス、メアカンキンバイカルスエキス、デキストラン、レモン果実エキス、スギナエキス、ホップ花エキス、セイヨウアカマツ球果エキス、ローズマリー葉エキス、乳酸球菌培養溶解質、ユズ果実エキス、アカツメクサ花エキス、ポリクオタニウム-10、フェノキシエタノール、デシルグルコシド、グリコシルトレハロース、安息香酸Na、アセチルテトラペプチド-3、加水分解水添デンプン、BG、クエン酸、デキストリン、エタノール、カジメエキス、（レモングラス油）■保存方法/注意事項：高温多湿・直射日光を避け、涼しいところに保管してください■メーカー或いは販売者：株式会社あすなろわかさ ■区分：化粧品■製造国：日本

【免責事項】※自社とモール店舗で在庫を共有しているためタイミングにより欠品となる場合がございます。※商品リニューアル等により、テキストや画像の一部がお届け商品と異なる場合 がございます。※メール便はポスト投函です。代引きはご利用できません。厚さ制限（３cm以下）があるため簡易包装となります。パッケージや中身がダメージを受け易くなります。※メール便送料無料商品に関して小型宅配便配送をご選択された場合、別途送料 が加算されます。※当店は一般消費者向け小売店のため法人様からのご注文は一切受け付けることができません。予めご了承ください。

おすすめ商品

￥38,390

￥11,220

￥30,000

￥28,050

￥14,370

￥33,660

関連製品

￥11,220￥13,200

￥11,590￥13,640

￥17,760￥22,200

￥11,940￥14,050

￥10,290￥12,100

￥9,870￥14,520

￥11,170￥13,150

￥121,000￥242,000

Discussion: statistical significance and meaningfulness

/in /by

 

Once you start to understand how exciting the world of statistics can be, it is tempting to fall into the trap of chasing statistical significance. That is, you may be tempted always to look for relationships that are statistically significant and believe they are valuable solely because of their significance. Although statistical hypothesis testing does help you evaluate claims, it is important to understand the limitations of statistical significance and to interpret the results within the context of the research and its pragmatic, “real world” application.

As a scholar-practitioner, it is important for you to understand that just because a hypothesis test indicates a relationship exists between an intervention and an outcome, there is a difference between groups, or there is a correlation between two constructs, it does not always provide a default measure for its importance. Although relationships are significant, they can be very minute relationships, very small differences, or very weak correlations. In the end, we need to ask whether the relationships or differences observed are large enough that we should make some practical change in policy or practice.

For this Discussion, you will explore statistical significance and meaningfulness.

To prepare for this Discussion:

  • Review Magnusson’s web blog found ( https://rpsychologist.com/index.html )in the Learning Resources to further your visualization and understanding of statistical power and significance testing.
  • Review the American Statistical Association’s press release and consider the misconceptions and misuse of p-values (attached).
  • Consider the scenario:
    • A research paper claims a meaningful contribution to the literature based on finding statistically significant relationships between predictor and response variables. In the footnotes, you see the following statement, “given this research was exploratory in nature, traditional levels of significance to reject the null hypotheses were relaxed to the .10 level.”

By Day 3

Post your response to the scenario in which you critically evaluate this footnote. As a reader/reviewer, what response would you provide to the authors about this footnote?