Bipolar Order – Psychology Majors

Please read the article below and give your OPINION as well as cited work

 

Bipolar Disorder, which was formerly called manic depression or manic-depressive Idisorder, is characterized by manic-highs and depressive lows. People with bipolar will experience times when they are full of energy and feeling euphoric, or a manic episode and then shift to a depressive episode, which leads people to feel sad and hopeless. There are different types of Bipolar disorder, two of which are Bipolar and Bipolar II. Bipolar I is characterized by a manic episode that is “preceded or followed by a major depressive episode” (mayoclinic.org), while Bipolar II involves a major depressive episode of at least 2 weeks followed by a hypomanic episode, but not a manic episode. The emotional instability that is seen in individuals with Bipolar Disorder disrupts their daily activities, such as work, school, and personal relationships.

The reason I decided too look into this disorder is because people use it as a descriptor for someone who is moody (“they’re bipolar” or “so and so must have bipolar disorder”). Obviously, this is an incorrect use of this term, and in fact is a common misconception of the disorder. Just because a person tends to be moody or has mood swings does not mean that they have bipolar disorder.

In an effort to understand this disorder better, I looked up common misconceptions of the disorder. On ibpf.org (international bipolar foundation), the first one listed is that Bipolar means mood swings, which the reality is that the mood swings experienced by someone with this disorder are so severe that it “interfered with one or all important aspects of functioning” (ibpf.org). For someone without this disorder, having a mood swing doesn’t make it difficult to function properly in school, work, etc. Another myth is that mania is productive because it is characterized by an increase in activity, but the truth is that as the manic episode progresses, “people tend to become irritable, making dangerous choices leading to disaster in multiple spheres of life- professional, personal or sexual” (ibpf.org).

Something else that I was unaware of when learning about Bipolar is that making a diagnosis can take years. According to a recent study, it can take up to 6 years to get a proper diagnosis (Preidt, 2016).

” ‘While some patients, particularly those who present with psychosis, probably do receive timely treatment, the diagnosis of the early phase of bipolar disorder can be difficult,’ study leader Matthew Large, a professor psychiatry at the University of New South Wales, Australia, said in a school news release. ‘This is because mental health clinicians are sometimes unable to distinguish the depressed phase of bipolar disorder from other types of depression,’ he added” (Preidt, 2016).

The study also mentioned that a diagnosis and treatment plan tends to take longer in younger patients because parents and teachers are chalking up their depressive states to being moody teenagers.

In learning more about Bipolar Disorder, I realize how serious of a condition it is. According to our text, both major depression and bipolar disorder are associated with a higher risk of a suicide which is something I did not realize (Lilienfeld, 2014). Although I knew it wasn’t as simple as someone having “mood swings,” I did not understand the potential for the intensity a person living with this can experience, and was also unaware of the different types of Bipolar disorder that people can suffer from.

Bipolar Disorder (n.d.). From Mayo Clinic. Retrieved from http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/bipolar-disorder/basics/causes/con-20027544

Sandhu, Ravneet (n.d.). 4 Misconceptions about Bipolar that Need to be Smashed. International Bipolar Foundation. Retrieved from http://ibpf.org/blog/4-misconceptions-about-bipolar-need-be-smashed

Preidt, R. (2016). Why Bipolar Disorder Can Take so Long to Diagnose. CBS news. Retrieved from http://www.cbsnews.com/news/bipolar-disorder-mental-health-diagnosis/

Lilienfeld, S., Lynn, S.J., Namy, . & Woolf, N (2014). Psychology: From Inquiry to Understanding, Third Edition. Pearson.

Identify the independent variable(s), dependent variable, and any possible extraneous variable.

For this assignment, again, it is beneficial that you keep the topic you would like to research for the capstone proposal in mind. The capstone will require a literature review for your proposal, of which you may use articles obtained during this course.

Select a peer-reviewed, experimental research study that exemplifies a two-group design and a factorial design (use keywords method, results, and discussion in your Boolean search). These studies can be found using tools such as the GCU Library and Google Scholar.

Write a 500-750-word paper in which you:

  1. Compare the two research designs.
  2. Identify the independent variable(s), dependent variable, and any possible extraneous variable.
  3. Identify main effects and interactions for the factorial design.
  4. Explain if the study has a random sample and/or random assignment. Were there other limitations that were noticed?

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

 

MUST PASS TURN IT IN

Explain the rationale for selecting this agency with at least two (2) justifiable reasons.

v

Refer to the Scenario for Assignments 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5

Write a three to four page paper, titled Rationale and Analysis for Agency Selected, Part 1

1. Provide background information about the agency’s key historical events, mission, and goals / objectives. (Title this section Introduction)

2. Describe at least three (3) functions of this agency, highlighting the public it serves. (Title this section Agency Functions)

3. Analyze at least two (2) current events involving the agency that might have implications to personnel management. (Title this section Agency News)

 

4. Explain the rationale for selecting this agency with at least two (2) justifiable reasons. (Title this section Rationale for Selecting Agency)

Discuss the possible sources of bias and inaccuracy whenever a person looks back on their past history

In this assignment, begin by taking a retrospective look at your life history, to discuss which aspects of your personality have remained consistent and which aspects of your personality have changed over time. Then, analyze the roles of nature and nurture in shaping your personality. Subsequently, discuss possible sources of inaccuracy and bias in any retrospective analysis. Finally, discuss the reasons why systematic scientific studies are considered more valuable than individual accounts.

Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:

  1. Reflect on your life history and discuss which aspects of your personality have changed over time and which aspects have stayed consistent.
  2. Based on your retrospective analysis, describe the roles of nature and nurture in shaping your personality. Reflect on your justification for distinguishing between nature and nurture.
  3. Discuss the possible sources of bias and inaccuracy whenever a person looks back on their past history. Be sure to discuss factors related to memory and factors related to cognition.
  4. Describe why the science of psychology places more emphasis on results based on scientific studies than it does on personal experience and anecdotes.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow APA or school-specific format.  Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • To keep this essay short and manageable, your only sources for your paper should be your own experience and the Webtext. For this reason, APA citations and references are not required for this assignment.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date.  The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Relate psychological concepts to real-world situations.
  • Describe the major theories of personality development, learning, memory, cognition, consciousness, development and social psychology.
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in psychology.
  • Write clearly and concisely about psychology using proper writing mechanics.

Click here to view the grading rubric.