What might your weaker manager do to become stronger?

THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST BE 10 POWERPOINT SLIDES LONG

 

Choice 1:

Assignment: You have been selected to participate in a leadership and management training program at work. Your first assignment in your program is to create a PowerPoint presentation on the topics of leadership and management. Your presentation must have a minimum of 10 slides and include some light talking points to help your audience follow your slides. Visual elements are definitely encouraged. Please discuss Parts I and II in your presentation.

Part I: Management

  • Provide a formal definition of a team
  • Provide a formal definition of management
  • Create 2 fictional managers (1 strong and 1 weak). List 5 behaviors you would expect to see from each manager.
  • What might your weaker manager do to become stronger?
  • What might your stronger manager do to become stronger with time?

Part II: Leadership

  • Provide a formal definition of a leader
  • Provide a formal definition of leadership style
  • Create 2 fictional leaders (1 positive and 1 negative). List 5 behaviors you would expect to see from each leader.
  • What is the danger of a negative leader having influence over a group?
  • How can a positive leader inspire others?

Please base your essay on Unit 6 course content, textbook, experience, and quality Internet materials. You must cite a minimum of two sources for this assignment.  Sources must be properly cited using APA format.

Please submit your assignment.

-Or-

Choice 2:

Assignment: As a veteran member of your team at work, you have been asked to create and deliver a PowerPoint presentation for new employees.  The topic is conflict and problem solving in the workplace.  Your goal is to make the presentation informative and meaningful and to provide usable solutions and ideas for these new employees. Your presentation must have a minimum of 10 slides and include talking points to support your slides. Visual elements are encouraged. Please discuss Parts I, II, and III in your presentation.

Part I:  Understanding conflict in the workplace

  • Provide a formal definition of conflict
  • Provide a list of 3 common types of workplace conflict
  • Describe the source and reasons for these conflicts

Part II:  Providing a meaningful example

  • Describe a workplace conflict from a television show or movie.
  • What problem-solving methods did the characters use to solve the conflict?
  • How realistic were their methods? Were they true to life or more for entertainment? Please explain.

Part III: A take-away

 

  • Create a tool for employees to use when they find themselves in a workplace conflict.  Choose oneto discuss from the list below:
    • Create a list of 3 questions to ask oneself when conflict arises and 3 helpful suggestions to help solve it
    • Create a problem-solving flowchart that takes the employee from conflict to solution.
    • Create a list of 3 helpful reading materials (from books or the Internet), and briefly describe why each is helpful.  

Grandma vs. Research

Grandma vs. Research

Prior to completing this assignment, please read chapters 1 and 2 in your textbook, view the “Endless Questions” video, and review any relevant Instructor Guidance. You may want to look specifically at the interactive media tools demonstrating information on theory which are provided in the Section 1.5 (within Module 1) of the textbook.  In this assignment you will be addressing the role of theory and evidence – both scholarly and personal – and how they can be utilized in the classroom or other professional settings.

In PART I of the paper, begin by reflecting on the benefits and drawbacks of accepting advice from stories told by previous generations (i.e. “I did that with my kids and they turned out just fine.”).  For example, you may have heard a grandparent suggest that you put a bit of whiskey on an infant’s gums to help with teething. Consider your own thoughts about anecdotal advice such as this and think about why it may be true in some cases, but not in others.

PHL 458: Creative Genius List.

LIST A

  • Banksy (graffiti artist)
  • Philip Glass (composer, minimalism)
  • Joseph Campbell (mythologist)
  • Carl Sagan (astrophysicist, cosmologist

LIST B

  • Hal Cone (theologian, Black liberation theology)
  • Limor Fried (electrical engineer, aka Lady Ada, open-source hardware)
  • Jane Goodall (primatologist)
  • Ai Weiwei (artist, cultural critic)

Reviewthe list of names provided in the University of Phoenix: Creative Genius List.

Selecttwo individuals who were famous for their creative ideas (one from each column).

Researchthier biographies in the University Library and/or respected sites on the Internet.

Write a 700-1,050- word paper to include the following:

 

  • Information about each of the thinker’s unique contributions to society
  • The problems or issues that their ideas sought to solve
  • Each thinkers’ personal/social/political environments and how you think these factors contributed to their creativity
  • The creative process of each thinker, including obstacles they faced, and a comparison to Ruggerio’s creative process (refer to chapter 5 ofThe Art of Thinking)
  • Critique a failure of the individual: could they have done something differently? What was the effect or result of the failure?

What standards are used by courts to determine who is an expert witness?

Explore court standards, rules, and regulations and the differences among them for selecting and approving professional witnesses and determining admissibility of expert testimony. Use resources from professional literature and conduct research to support your responses. Professional literature may include relevant textbooks; peer-reviewed journal articles; and websites created by professional organizations, agencies, or institutions (.edu, .org, and .gov).

Write a 3- to 4-page paper, including the following:

  • What standards are used by courts to determine who is an expert witness?
  • What standards are used by courts to determine the admissibility of expert testimony?
  • What are the differences between standards for sentencing, commitment, and competencies in civil and criminal courts?