Write a 750–word paper discussing codes of practice and ethical issues that must be considered when using psychological assessments. Address the following in your paper:

/in /by

Details:

Write a 750–word paper discussing codes of practice and ethical issues that must be considered when using psychological assessments. Address the following in your paper:

  1. A description of at least three ethical issues including multicultural and diversity issues
  2. Implications of each ethical issue
  3. Ways to avoid the ethical issues in psychological assessments
  4. A discussion of how a clinician assesses behaviors that stem from cultures or subcultures
  5. A discussion of how a client’s academic/education, career, personal, and social development impacts assessment choice

Include a discussion of how these ethical issues are addressed in “Section E: Evaluation, Assessment, and Interpretation” from the American Counseling Association Code of Ethics located at: http://www.counseling.org/Resources/aca-code-of-ethics.pdf.

Include at least three scholarly references in addition to the textbook in your paper.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

This assignment meets the following CACREP Standards:

2.F.7.i. Use of assessments relevant to academic/educational, career, personal, and social development.

2.F.7.m. Ethical and culturally relevant strategies for selecting, administering, and interpreting assessment and test results.

RUBRIC 

10.0 %Ethical, Multicultural, and Diversity IssuesThe paper does not include a description of at least three ethical issues including multicultural and diversity issues. Paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.The paper includes a fair description of at least three ethical issues including multicultural and diversity issues. Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.The paper includes a concise description of at least three ethical issues including multicultural and diversity issues. Paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.The paper includes an advanced description of at least three ethical issues including multicultural and diversity issues. Paper demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.The paper includes an insightful description of at least three ethical issues including multicultural and diversity issues. Paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.10.0 %Implications of Each Ethical IssueThe paper does not discuss the ethical implications of each ethical issue. Paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.The paper inadequately discusses the ethical implications of each ethical issue. Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.The paper appropriately discusses the ethical implications of each ethical issue. Paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.The paper includes an advanced discussion of the ethical implications of each ethical issue. Paper demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.The paper includes an insightful discussion of the ethical implications of each ethical issue. Paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.15.0 %How to Avoid Ethical Issues in Psychological AssessmentsThe paper does not include a discussion of how ethical issues can be avoided during a psychological assessment. Paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.The paper includes a fair discussion of how ethical issues can be avoided during a psychological assessment. Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.The paper includes a concise discussion of how ethical issues can be avoided during a psychological assessment. Paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.The paper includes an advanced discussion of how ethical issues can be avoided during a psychological assessment. Paper demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.The paper includes an insightful discussion of how ethical issues can be avoided during a psychological assessment. Paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.15.0 %Assessing Behaviors that Stem from Cultures or SubculturesThe paper does not include a discussion of how a clinician assesses behaviors that stem from cultures or subcultures. Paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.The paper includes a fair discussion of how a clinician assesses behaviors that stem from cultures or subcultures. Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.The paper includes a concise discussion of how a clinician assesses behaviors that stem from cultures or subcultures. Paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.The paper includes an advanced discussion of how a clinician assesses behaviors that stem from cultures or subcultures. Paper demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.The paper includes an insightful discussion of how a clinician assesses behaviors that stem from cultures or subcultures. Paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.15.0 %Impacts of Assessment ChoiceThe paper does not include a discussion of how a client?s academic/education, career, personal, and social development impacts assessment choice. The paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.The paper includes a fair discussion of how a client?s academic/education, career, personal, and social development impacts assessment choice. The paper demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.The paper includes a concise discussion of how a client?s academic/education, career, personal, and social development impacts assessment choice. The paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.The paper includes an advanced discussion of how a client?s academic/education, career, personal, and social development impacts assessment choice. The paper demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.The paper includes an insightful discussion of how a client?s academic/education, career, personal, and social development impacts assessment choice. The paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.15.0 %Ethical Issues as Specified in the ACA Code of EthicsThe paper does not include a discussion of how ethical issues are addressed as specified in the ACA Code of Ethics. Paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.The paper includes a fair discussion of how ethical issues are addressed as specified in the ACA Code of Ethics. Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.The paper includes a concise discussion of how ethical issues are addressed as specified in the ACA Code of Ethics. Paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.The paper includes an advanced discussion of how ethical issues are addressed as specified in the ACA Code of Ethics. Paper demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.The paper includes an insightful discussion of how ethical issues are addressed as specified in the ACA Code of Ethics. Paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.10.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 3.0 %Thesis Development and PurposePaper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.10.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 5.0 %Argument Logic and ConstructionStatement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.10.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 2.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.10.0 %Format 5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct.10.0 %Format 5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.100 %Total Weightage

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

The post Write a 750–word paper discussing codes of practice and ethical issues that must be considered when using psychological assessments. Address the following in your paper: appeared first on Coursework Research.

Edu 645 week 6 assignment ( final project – curriculum based

/in /by

Curriculum Based Summative Assessment Design

Using what you’ve learned from Chapters Six and Eight from Lefrançois as well as other resources along the way, develop a curriculum based assessment (CBA) centered on one of your two instructional plans from Weeks Three and Four.

Part 1:  Provide a Pre-Assessment Description (One-to two-pages).
Use these prompts to guide your exploration of what occurred BEFORE the summative assessment.

  1. State measurable and observable objectives (what you wanted students to learn).
  2. Describe how you knew learning occurred prior to summative assessment.
  3. Describe the instructional strategies used to prepare students for the summative assessment (from your previous instructional plan in either Weeks Three or Four).
  4. Explain adjustments you made or should have made to your instruction to ensure mastery of learning objectives.
  5. Describe how the use of technology contributed to student preparation for the summative assessment or how it will be added to and contribute to the summative assessment here.

Part 2: Design an easily accessible summative assessment (Approximately two to three pages) 

  1. Identify the grade level and subject matter and a measurable unit objective(s) and align with the stated standard as prescribed in the original instructional plan from either Week Three or Four and referenced from the Common Core State Standards Initiative. 
  2. Create a minimum of six, no more than ten, problems/questions/tasks for students to complete that include a variety of test item types (selected response, short answer, extended written response, and/or performance).
  3. Label each question with its corresponding: 
  • Objective(s) (if more than one is being assessed)
  • Depth of Knowledge (DOK) levels (Note at least two different cognitive levels must be measured on this assessment.)
  • Define and discuss criteria for scoring extended response and performance items.

    • Part 3: Provide Assessment Reflection (One to two pages).

    1. Define how you determined mastery.
    2. Explain how you will accommodate or modify for the special population previously described in Week Four (two students with specific learning disabilities in reading and math, one ADHD student, and one English language learner).
    3. Describe how you will use the evidence collected. 

    Grading: You will submit a SINGLE document clearly labeled as Parts 1, 2, and 3. APA formatting will be followed, including the required cover and reference pages. You must use a minimum of five scholarly resources, in addition to the course text. Your resources should include a combination of peer-reviewed articles and web-based articles, and they must be cited in-text. You will be held accountable for each required subcomponent per part, viewable on the assignment rubric.

    Writing the Final Project
    The Summative Assessment:

    1. Must be approximately eight double-spaced pages in length, and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
    2. Must include a title page with the following:
      1. Title of paper
      2. Student’s name
      3. Course name and number
      4. Instructor’s name
      5. Date submitted
    3. Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement.
    4. Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
    5. Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.
    6. Must use at least five scholarly sources, in addition to the course text.
    7. Must document all sources in APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
    8. Must include a separate reference page, formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

    Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

     

    DISCUSSION #3 PSY – Custom Nursing Help

    /in /by

    “Genetics versus Society” Please respond to the following:Give your opinion on whether you believe gender roles associated with each gender (i.e., the stereotypical ways that females and males are “supposed” to behave) are based more on biology or environment. Determine whether you believe the actions of females and males are based more on genetics or the expectations and dictates of society. Provide a rationale for your response
     
    Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

    2134 – My Nursing Assignment

    /in /by

    Stress and Nursing Practice
    Write an 500 word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least two (2) sources in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

    Describe the case that defined you as a nurse.

    What happened, how were you involved?
    How does this case still affect you and your practice?
    What steps have you taken to overcome the stress of this event? (Remember to protect patient privacy).

    Explain the importance of debriefings.

    If a debriding would happen in your workplace who would be involved, what would be discussed, who would lead the debriefing, where would it take place?

    Assignment Expectations:
    Length: 500 words
    Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA format.  These do not count towards the minimum word count for this assignment. Your essay must include an introduction and a conclusion.
    References: Use appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions.  A minimum of two (2) scholarly sources are required for this assignment.
     
    “Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code “Newclient”

    The post 2134 – My Nursing Assignment appeared first on nursing writers.