Power Point: Personality Disorders Case StudyRubic_Print_Format Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points PCN-605 PCN-605-O500 Personality Disorders Case Study Presentation (Obj. 7.1 and 7.2) 100.0 Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) Satisfactory (79.00%) Good (87.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned Content 100.0% Includes a brief description of the selected case study 10.0% The presentation omits a brief description of the selected case study. The presentation includes a vague description of the selected case study. The presentation includes an adequate description of the selected case study. The presentation includes an advanced description of the selected case study. The presentation includes a comprehensive description of the selected case study. Includes an explanation and rationale for the Personality Disorder Diagnosis using the latest version of the DSM as a reference 20.0% The presentation omits an explanation and rationale for the Personality Disorder Diagnosis using the latest version of the DSM as a reference. The presentation includes a vague explanation and rationale for the Personality Disorder Diagnosis using the latest version of the DSM as a reference. The presentation includes an adequate explanation and rationale for the Personality Disorder Diagnosis using the latest version of the DSM as a reference. The presentation includes an advanced explanation and rationale for the Personality Disorder Diagnosis using the latest version of the DSM as a reference. The presentation includes a comprehensive explanation and rationale for the Personality Disorder Diagnosis using the latest version of the DSM as a reference. Includes information on the course of treatment for the disorder 15.0% The presentation omits information on the course of treatment for the disorder. The presentation includes vague information on the course of treatment for the disorder. The presentation includes adequate information on the course of treatment for the disorder. The presentation includes advanced information on the course of treatment for the disorder. The presentation includes comprehensive information on the course of treatment for the disorder. Identifies which cluster (A, B, or C) this personality disorder belongs to and explain your rationale 10.0% The presentation does not identify which cluster the personality disorder belongs or include rationale for the identification. The presentation vaguely identifies which cluster the personality disorder belongs to and includes some type of rationale. The presentation includes an adequate identification of which cluster the personality disorder belongs to and includes and adequate rationale for the identification. The presentation includes an advanced identification of which cluster the personality disorder belongs to and an advanced rationale for the identification. The presentation includes a comprehensive identification of which cluster the personality disorder belongs to and a comprehensive explanation of the rationale for the identification. Includes information on the prognosis and prevalence of the disorder 15.0% The presentation omits information on the prognosis and prevalence of the disorder. The presentation includes vague information on the prognosis and prevalence of the disorder. The presentation includes adequate information on the prognosis and prevalence of the disorder. The presentation includes advanced information on the prognosis and prevalence of the disorder. The presentation includes comprehensive information on the prognosis and prevalence of the disorder. Detailed Speaker Notes 5.0% The presentation does not contain speaker notes. The presentation contains vague speaker notes and/or inaccurate or poorly written speaker notes. The presentation’s speaker notes are present and are generally competent. The presentation contains advanced speaker notes that indicate what might be said if giving the presentation in person. The presentation includes comprehensive speaker notes that give a complete picture of what would be said if the presentation were given in person. Presentation of Content 5.0% The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear. The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information. The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources. The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea. Layout 5.0% The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text. Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) 5.0% Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope. Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. Writer is clearly in control of standard, written academic English. Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Total Weightage 100%

/in /by

THE CASE STUDY IS ATTACHED BELOW IT IS ON PARANOID PERSONALITY DISORDER MUST READ BEFORE COMPLETING ASSIGNMENT

Read any one case study from Chapter 13 (Personality Disorders) in DSM-5 in Action and research the specific personality disorder.

Create a 10-15-slide PowerPoint presentation about your selected case study and include the following:

Include the following in your presentation:

A brief description of the selected case study
Explanation and rationale for the Personality Disorder Diagnosis using the latest version of the DSM as a reference.
Information on the course of treatment for the disorder.
Identification of which cluster (A, B, or C) this personality disorder belongs to and an explanation of your rationale.
Information on the prognosis and prevalence of the disorder.
A minimum of five scholarly references including your textbook and the latest version of the DSM. Be sure to only use current and scholarly references for this assignment.
Detailed speaker notes that represent what you would say if giving the presentation in person.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

PLEASE USE ATTACHED RUBRIC TO COMPLETE, MUST BE ORIGINAL WORK.

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
PCN-605 PCN-605-O500 Personality Disorders Case Study Presentation (Obj. 7.1 and 7.2) 100.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) Satisfactory (79.00%) Good (87.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 100.0%
Includes a brief description of the selected case study 10.0% The presentation omits a brief description of the selected case study. The presentation includes a vague description of the selected case study. The presentation includes an adequate description of the selected case study. The presentation includes an advanced description of the selected case study. The presentation includes a comprehensive description of the selected case study.
Includes an explanation and rationale for the Personality Disorder Diagnosis using the latest version of the DSM as a reference 20.0% The presentation omits an explanation and rationale for the Personality Disorder Diagnosis using the latest version of the DSM as a reference. The presentation includes a vague explanation and rationale for the Personality Disorder Diagnosis using the latest version of the DSM as a reference. The presentation includes an adequate explanation and rationale for the Personality Disorder Diagnosis using the latest version of the DSM as a reference. The presentation includes an advanced explanation and rationale for the Personality Disorder Diagnosis using the latest version of the DSM as a reference. The presentation includes a comprehensive explanation and rationale for the Personality Disorder Diagnosis using the latest version of the DSM as a reference.
Includes information on the course of treatment for the disorder 15.0% The presentation omits information on the course of treatment for the disorder. The presentation includes vague information on the course of treatment for the disorder. The presentation includes adequate information on the course of treatment for the disorder. The presentation includes advanced information on the course of treatment for the disorder. The presentation includes comprehensive information on the course of treatment for the disorder.
Identifies which cluster (A, B, or C) this personality disorder belongs to and explain your rationale 10.0% The presentation does not identify which cluster the personality disorder belongs or include rationale for the identification. The presentation vaguely identifies which cluster the personality disorder belongs to and includes some type of rationale. The presentation includes an adequate identification of which cluster the personality disorder belongs to and includes and adequate rationale for the identification. The presentation includes an advanced identification of which cluster the personality disorder belongs to and an advanced rationale for the identification. The presentation includes a comprehensive identification of which cluster the personality disorder belongs to and a comprehensive explanation of the rationale for the identification.
Includes information on the prognosis and prevalence of the disorder 15.0% The presentation omits information on the prognosis and prevalence of the disorder. The presentation includes vague information on the prognosis and prevalence of the disorder. The presentation includes adequate information on the prognosis and prevalence of the disorder. The presentation includes advanced information on the prognosis and prevalence of the disorder. The presentation includes comprehensive information on the prognosis and prevalence of the disorder.
Detailed Speaker Notes 5.0% The presentation does not contain speaker notes. The presentation contains vague speaker notes and/or inaccurate or poorly written speaker notes. The presentation’s speaker notes are present and are generally competent. The presentation contains advanced speaker notes that indicate what might be said if giving the presentation in person. The presentation includes comprehensive speaker notes that give a complete picture of what would be said if the presentation were given in person.
Presentation of Content 5.0% The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear. The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information. The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources. The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
Layout 5.0% The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) 5.0% Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. Writer is clearly in control of standard, written academic English.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage 100%

Cognitive Dissonance, Social Attribution, Learning And Instruction

/in /by

Question

Applying theories to learning and instruction becomes problematic when theories contradict one another. For example, while cognitive dissonance theory asserts that beliefs and behaviors can influence attitudes, social attribution theory holds that people make causal inferences to explain others behaviors, actions, and mental states. In this assignment, you will contrast cognitive dissonance theory and social attribution theory, and you will consider how cognitive dissonance theory and attribution theory could be applied to improve learning and instruction. You will also consider the potential for personal worldview to countermand cognitive dissonance.

Discuss;

 

1. the theoretical perspective and current research on cognitive dissonance theory. Provide examples that support the research claims.

2. the theoretical perspective and current research on social attribution theory. Provide examples that support the research claims.

3. how cognitive dissonance theory and attribution theory could be applied to improve learning and instruction. (Benchmarks C3.4: Apply the theories of cognitive psychology to learning and instruction.)

4. personal worldview as a means to countermand cognitive dissonance. How might a distinctly Christian worldview function in this role?

Requirements;

At least 6 citation

All citations/referenced should not be older than 2015

Only scholarly articles are to be cited/referenced

APA format

1500-1750 words

****DO NOT PLAGIARIZE****

Due June 22nd 2020 by 11.00 pm

Compare & Contrast Theory

/in /by

Assignment Instructions

Theory Compare / Contrast Paper

For this assignment, you will write a paper no less than 7 pages in length, not including required cover and Reference pages, comparing and contrasting two personality theories from the course. You are free to select from among the several theories covered in the course to date but only two theories may be used.

Your task is to demonstrate your knowledge of these theories you chose via descriptions of their key concepts and detailing the most important aspects of each theory in explaining personality. It is recommended that you revisit the material covered to date to refresh your knowledge of theory details. This is a comprehensive assignment and you should demonstrate in your work that you have studied and comprehended the similarities and the differences between your two chosen theories.  This is a fact based paper only.  It should not be based upon your preference for a theory or your opinion.

Your submission should be double-spaced with 1 inch margins on all sides of each page and should be free of spelling and grammar errors. It must include source crediting of any materials used in APA format, including source citations in the body of your paper and in a Reference list attached to the end. Easy to follow guides to APA formatting can be found on the tutorial section of the APUS Online Library and on the following website.  Upon submission your paper will automatically be submitted to Turnitin.

http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/

The grading rubric below details specific grading criteria.

 

Theory   Compare/Contrast Paper

Assignment Instructions

Theory Compare / Contrast Paper

For this assignment, you will write a paper no less than 7 pages in length, not including required cover and Reference pages, comparing and contrasting two personality theories from the course. You are free to select from among the several theories covered in the course to date but only two theories may be used.

Your task is to demonstrate your knowledge of these theories you chose via descriptions of their key concepts and detailing the most important aspects of each theory in explaining personality. It is recommended that you revisit the material covered to date to refresh your knowledge of theory details. This is a comprehensive assignment and you should demonstrate in your work that you have studied and comprehended the similarities and the differences between your two chosen theories.  This is a fact based paper only.  It should not be based upon your preference for a theory or your opinion.

Your submission should be double-spaced with 1 inch margins on all sides of each page and should be free of spelling and grammar errors. It must include source crediting of any materials used in APA format, including source citations in the body of your paper and in a Reference list attached to the end. Easy to follow guides to APA formatting can be found on the tutorial section of the APUS Online Library and on the following website.  Upon submission your paper will automatically be submitted to Turnitin.

http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/

The grading rubric below details specific grading criteria.

Theory Compare/Contrast Paper

Developmental Analysis

/in /by

HSCO 502

Developmental Analysis: Part 2 Instructions

Adulthood

You will use developmental theories and concepts to analyze your own developmental processes focusing on adulthood. Use a variety in your sentence structure and wording. You should not use direct quotes, but rather summarize and paraphrase insight from your sources. You will use your textbook and at least 3 other scholarly sources (no less than 4 sources total) to create your developmental analysis. Your paper must be at least 8 pages including a title page, 6 pages in the body, and a reference page. *You may have up to 8 pages in the body of your paper.

 

Title Page – Use current APA format. http://ezproxy.liberty.edu/login?url=https://academicwriter.apa.org

 

Use the following headings to organize your content:

Personal Introduction to Adulthood

 

Provide a concise introduction to significant personal characteristics, family dynamics and support structures, and meaningful events or occurrences. This section should be no more than 1 page.

 

Theoretical Perspectives of Development

Postformal Thought according to Perry

Explain how the process of moving from dualism to relativism is applicable to your own thought development. Refer to the the portion of your textbook or outside references that address(es) Perry’s theory of intellectual and ethical development in the college years. Focus on the period of adulthood and how you have grown into your current stage of cognitive and moral development. (Approx. one-half page).

Adult Attachment and Relationships

Examine the portion of your textbook or outside references that address(es) the attachment prototypes in peer/romantic tradition. Provide explanations and examples of your own adult attachment challenges and strengths. Also, use the insights from the portion of the textbook or outside references that address(es) research on young adult dyadic relationships to draw conclusions about your partnership selection, elements of intimacy, satisfaction and stability, as well as communication styles and conflict resolution. (Approx. 1 page).

Career Development Process: Super’s Approach (Chapter 12)

Examine the portion of your textbook or outside references that address(es) the Super Developmental approach to determine what stage you are currently in and what you anticipate will be important influences in the future for you to move into the next stage or maintain a current stage. (Approx. one-half page).

Identity Development

Examine the portion of your textbook or outside references that address(es) Erikson’s theory related to adulthood. Depending on your age and life experience, identify which stage of Erikson’s psychosocial development you are in and examine how you managed the crisis period? Are there any notable influences, good or bad, that will help you navigate successfully to the next stage? (Approx. one-half page).

Personality and Temperament

Examine the portion of your textbook or outside references that address(es) the Big 5 personality traits. Provide explanations and examples of your own personality and temperament characteristics in adulthood related to these personality traits. (Approx. one-half page).

Family Life Cycle

Examine the portion of your textbook or outside references that address(es) States of Family life cycle. Identify the stage, transitions, and tasks that are most relevant to your current life cycle. Provide explanations and examples of your own transitions and tasks that correspond with your current stage. (Approx. one-half page).

Culture, Religion and Well Being

In Chapter 14, culture, religion, and well-being are detailed. Select at least 2 concepts in this chapter that you find most meaningful to your own development. Provide explanation and examples of how these concepts are relevant to you. Integrate a Christian worldview and biblical themes as appropriate. (Approx. 1 page).

Ending Well

Chapters 14 and 15 provide a comprehensive overview of many considerations for end of life care and quality of life. Use these concepts to examine your own morality and how do you anticipate your own dying process. Conclude this section of your paper with a self-eulogy; you can include a statement, Bible verse, quote, or other significant details. (Approx. 1 page).

 

References

Provide a complete list of references in current APA format that you used to inform your paper. At least 3 scholarly resources, in addition to your textbook, are required.

 

Writing Guidelines:

Your references can include peer-reviewed journal articles found in Liberty’s library or credible web resources; if you are not sure of the credibility of your web resource, please ask your instructor before using it. Provide appropriate in-text citations and references for any information you use in this paper. Write the paper using professional writing etiquette and consult the Liberty Writing Center if you have questions about grammar or format. Remember that all work must be your own and plagiarism is not tolerated. Be sure to review the plagiarism policy in your syllabus. Anything that is not common knowledge or is not an original thought must be cited or it is considered plagiarism. Citations should be rephrased into your own words. In-text citations must be in current APA format (Author, Year).

 

 

Submit this assignment by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of Module/Week 7.

Page 2 of 3