What is the real pay off of the self-contradiction test? What does it reveal in us that opens up the secret of the ethical universe according to Kant?

/in /by

 

Please read the following instructions and write a 3 pages essay.I have attached all the required reading resources.

 

Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals Section 2 The Categorical Imperative

DUE TBA:

Reminder this is a reading quiz. As usual, isolate the quotes from the text FIRST and then give your exegesis of the quotes in an interpretive paragraph to follow.

Explain Kant’s tirade against making happiness or the good life the basis for ethics, explain carefully his arguments on pp. 27-28 and their relation to the Monkey’s Paw and Pickle stories (to discuss in class).

 

Distinguish the self-contradiction test from the moral worth test. Can you pass the first without passing the second?

 

Explain all four examples of the categorical imperative test, (pp. 30-32) with the following in mind. Distinguish Kant’s self-contradiction test from Grandma’s Theory of “what if everybody did that”? Explain the difference between the perfect duties of examples 1 and 2, and the imperfect duties of 3 and 4 and show that both compel assent from a perfectly rational and free will.

 

What is the real pay off of the self-contradiction test? What does it reveal in us that opens up the secret of the ethical universe according to Kant?

 

–

See Attached files please. and use primary sources ONLY.

THE Book: Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Ellington, trans. 3rd Edition (Hackett, 1993).

 

please see the previous paper and write a new one.

 

the paper needs to be perfect because this is my last chance. try to be more clear and explain more and clear. this paper is short paper please make it has more info.  let me know if you have any questions before you write the paper.

 

read the comment from the prof. (remember write a paper that explain clearly ) don’t write the same as this paper because the prof refused it.

For this assignment, you will write a short (500-750 words) paper describing three psychological disorders.

/in /by

Authoritarianism is the personality trait most commonly associated with high levels of prejudice in adults. Defined simply, it is the tendency to follow the wishes of powerful others without thinking critically. Authoritarians have little tolerance for those whom they perceive to be different from themselves in race, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, or political values. Both traditional and contemporary psychologists have characterized authoritarians as politically conservative and averse to progressive thinking. Their high levels of prejudice are an expression of their right-wing political attitudes and their hostility toward those who disagree. Conservatives, on the other hand, argue that many liberals (particularly those in academic fields) have adopted a norm of “political correctness” leading them to be prejudiced and hostile in their own right.

With which side do you agree? Is it true that authoritarian intolerance is a hallmark ONLY of political conservatism? Or, do conservatives have a point: Can people who are politically liberal be equally authoritarian, intolerant, and prejudiced?n this module, several psychological disorders were introduced. For this assignment, you will write a short (500-750 words) paper describing three psychological disorders. Please analyze the treatment options for each, as well as how these disorders were treated historically. Use your textbook and other academic sources to support your claims. Explain why you chose to write about these three disorders for the assignment. The paper should be in APA style, using 12-point Times New Roman font and double spaced. Please refer to the rubric for detailed grading expectations.

Consider how these were either supported or not supported within the scenario you described of the decisions the teacher (or teachers) made regarding the experience.

/in /by

Initial Post: The Instructor Guidance for this week describes some of the things you should pay attention to as you read through sections of an important report that documents the efforts of the National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education (NACCCE), a committee in Britain that created a recommended plan for restructuring the education system to support creativity and cultural education in response to the need for addressing 21st-century skills in school. Read the NACCCE report, All our futures: Creativity, culture and education, focusing specifically on the Creative and Cultural Education (pp. 54-60) and Teaching and Learning (pp. 100-123) section. You might also want to read some of the material presented at the beginning to give you a better understanding of the overall project and the purpose of the report.

As you read through this work, describe some of the specific strategies NACCCE recommends for facilitating creativity skills. Make a list of these strategies for future reference. Once you have a clear picture of the types of educational strategies Robinson believes supports creativity, view the When there is a Correct Answer video This is a short two-minute summary of Dr. Segev’s research on creative drawing with children.

Based on the results of Dr. Segev’s research, describe a situation during your life in which your creativity was either inhibited due to an understanding that whatever you were creating needed to be completed a “correct” way, or encouraged because you were not given such stringent design parameters. Write about this incident in a narrative, storytelling way. Also include in your story a reflection on the NACCCE strategies you listed. Consider how these were either supported or not supported within the scenario you described of the decisions the teacher (or teachers) made regarding the experience. Once you complete your story, post it in the discussion forum. Feel free to be creative with this story. For example, you may want to try Storybird, which is a digital storytelling platform (free accounts are available to students and teachers). If you use a web-based technology to create your story, be sure to post a link to it in your post.

Explain the related social problem(s), the area of  practice/concentration, agency setting, and geographical location-local,  state, national, global, virtual (half page)

/in /by

Below are the required elements of the Unit 3 Assignment:

  1. Abstract: One paragraph summary and overview of the final project-overview (half page)
  2. Introduction: Problem Statement
  • Provide a statement of the problem(s) your program is addressing.
  • Define the target population your program will be serving.
  • Explain the related social problem(s), the area of  practice/concentration, agency setting, and geographical location-local,  state, national, global, virtual (half page)
  1. Literature Review: The literature review summarizes  current peer-reviewed research on the research problem or topic. It  explores the cause, risk factors, background history and theoretical  perspectives related to the problem and the proposed program.

Part I: The Problem

  • Significant and Relevance: Does the research support the problem  statement? Does it confirm, expand or refute your problem statement?
  • Etiology: Causes and risk factors related to the problem. Cultural,  Social, Political and Religious Values and Practices Affecting the  Problem, including any ethical or legal issues.
  • Social and economic costs to society related to the problem. (One and a half pages)

Part II: The Program

  • Provide a background history on the program or if a new program,  background history on relevant or similar programs. What programs  currently exist? Where are there gaps in the system? How does your  program fulfill an unmet need or gap for the target population, in the  service delivery system and service area? (One and a half pages.) (This  part of the Assignment relates to the Unit 3 Discussion.)

The assignment should be a minimum of 4 pages (excluding title and  reference page), with at least 4 scholarly academic references in the  literature review.