Refine Your Vision and Create SMART GoalsIn your first week in this course, you wrote a vision of your career in psychology. You will need to refine your vision and create three SMART goals for the Your Career in Psychology assignment

For the discussion this week, share why your SMART goal is important to you and your role as practitioner-scholar in the field of psychology.

 

  • Refine Your Vision and Create SMART GoalsIn your first week in this course, you wrote a vision of your career in psychology. You will need to refine your vision and create three SMART goals for the Your Career in Psychology assignment. Your vision statement can be thought of as a general representation of your long-term career goals. The term milestone means a significant step toward a goal. However, each milestone can be seen as a goal in itself. Thus, earning your master’s degree in psychology is a milestone toward your long-term career goals, but it is itself an important goal, and will be worthy of celebration. Here are a few other comparisons between goals and milestones:
    Comparison Between Goals and MilestonesGoalsMilestonesEarn my master’s degree in psychology in three years.Complete all studies and assignments for PSY5002 on time.Develop strategies to stay up to date and evaluate scholarly and professional literature and research related to key theories, authors, and best practices in technology-enhanced P–12 learning over the next three years.Join a professional association that provides professional development programs on technology-enhanced P–12.Select, administer, score, and interpret psychological tests accurately in the workplace in four years.Complete the course Testing and Assessment in Workplace Psychology.As important as it is to have a clear vision of your career destination, it is every bit as important to be as clear as possible on how you will get there. Therefore, it is very helpful to analyze your goals and milestones to be sure they are SMART:

    • Specific.
    • Measurable.
    • Achievable.
    • Relevant.
    • Time-bound.
    • Revise your vision statement and formulate three personally meaningful and relevant educational, career, and life goals to achieve your vision. View the SMART Goals presentation to learn more about this model for creating goals.
  • Write Your Discussion Post
    Your Career in Psychology
    What did you learn about this week that grabbed your attention or caused you to think more deeply about it? For the assignment this week, you are asked to refine your vision and create three SMART goals. Your vision statement is a general representation of your long-term career goas. The term milestone is a significant step toward a goal. However, each milestone can be seen as a goal in itself. For example, completing this class is a milestone toward completing your master’s degree.
    For this discussion create a post using a minimum of 50 words and discuss at least one of your main SMART goals. Your goal is to enthusiastically share something you’ve learned with your peers, apply it to real life, and make your pin informative, concise, and engaging to your readers. Be creative!

    • Share why your SMART goal is important to you and your role as practitioner-scholar in the field of psychology.
    • Share how your SMART goal impact you personally, professionally, or in relevant current events.
    • Share how you might be able to apply SMART goal setting in your life, personally or professionally.
    • If applicable, include resources to support your post by providing links to credible or scholarly articles, videos, images, or other web resources.
    • You may also create a slide show or use audio or video as your discussion post.

create a research question related to one of the topics the TED speakers addressed. explain what your independent and dependent variable would be.

Explain how and why Matthew may have edited Mark’s Gospel. Use the following two sets of passages to support your claim.

According to course materials (Bible, textbook, digital materials linked below, etc.):

1. How and why would Matthew have edited Mark 6:45-52 contrasted with Matthew 14:25-27,32-33?

2. How and why would Matthew have edited Mark 9:2-10 contrasted with Matthew 17:1-13?

Be sure to distinguish between paraphrase and direct quotes. Type a 350-750 word paper using MLA formatting. Submit the completed assignment to the appropriate Assignment box by no later than Sunday 11:59 PM EST/EDT.

Resources for this paper:

See the ebook via SLU library: New Testament History and Literature by Martin (2012), pp. 106-108.

See the ebook via SLU library: The Gospels by Barton and Muddiman (2010), p. 56.

Grading Rubric
  • Accurate use of English including careful documentation (including ability to paraphrase and use quotations) and good organizational plan. 40 pts
  • Adequate research. 20 pts
  • Accurate and complete reflection of material read for assignment. 40 pts

Saint Leo University

Discussion Instruction:

1. Watch the following TED presentation videos:

The Magic of the Placebo (Eric Mead)

https://www.ted.com/talks/eric_mead_the_magic_of_the_placebo

Homeopathy, Quackery, and Fraud (James Randi)

https://www.ted.com/talks/james_randi

2. In the first paragraph of the discussion post, students should describe what they found the most intellectually intriguing and perhaps even surprising about the videos.

3. In the next section of the discussion post, student should try their best to test a concept addressed in one of the videos using the following steps:

  1. create a research question related to one of the topics the TED speakers addressed.
  2. explain what your independent and dependent variable would be.
  3. explain what extraneous variables could impact the study.

4. When responding to students this week, contribute to their research design by critically analyzing it and offering your advice.

NOTE: as always for every discussion and assignment, students must properly cite resources in-text and in a “References” list.

Describe Freud’s theory of the Oedipal Crisis and its resolution in the boy and the girl. b) Summarize a major criticism of Freud’s theory of the Oedipus complex (with respect to either the boy or the girl).

In light of problems posed by the concept of drive, Premack, one of Skinner’s followers, proposes that we consider reinforcement:

 

A.In terms of the length of extinction.

 

B.In terms of the power of discriminative stimuli.

 

C.As ratios between positive and negative reinforcement.

 

D.As the momentary probability of a response.

 

Responses that are intermittently rather than continuously reinforced are:

 

A.Less likely to generalize.

 

B.Less subject to negative reinforcement.

 

C.More difficult to extinguish.

 

D.All of the above.

 

The text indicates how Skinner discussed emotions as the effects of:

 

A.Reinforcement schedules.

 

B.Shaping.

 

C.Discriminative stimuli.

 

D.Behavior chains.

 

Skinner’s attitude toward the theory of natural selection seemed basically:

 

A.Positive.

 

B.Negative.

 

C.Mixed.

 

D.Unclear

 

Skinner argued that internal events such as thoughts:

 

A.Have no place in behaviorism.

 

B.Should only be studied if they can be observed and measured.

 

C.Are less important than Pavlov said they are.

 

D.Are less important than Watson said they are

 

According to the text, the most basic difference between Skinner and the developmentalists has to do with:

 

A.The issue of stages.

 

B.The source of developmental change-inner or outer.

 

C.The continuity-discontinuity issue.

 

D.The importance of emotions in the developmental process.

 

An example of a discriminative stimulus is a boy who:

 

A.Is startled by the sight of a dog.

 

B.Works only when immediately rewarded.

 

C.Cries to get attention.

 

D.Works hard only when the teacher says, “This paper will be graded.”

 

The text considers research on televised aggression as:

 

A.Weak.

 

B.Fairly Weak.

 

C.Fairly conclusive.

 

D.Supporting some theorists but not others.

 

In Bandura’s theory, direct reinforcements primarily affect:

 

A.General classes of behavior rather than specific behavior.

 

B.Aggressive behavior rather than other kinds of behavior.

 

C.Altruistic behavior rather than other kinds of behavior.

 

D.Performances rather than the acquisition of responses.

 

Over the years, Bandura has come to view Piaget’s theory as:

 

A.Similar to his own.

 

B.Still wrong in major respects.

 

C.Correct about external standards.

 

D.Correct about stages.

 

Studies on pro-social behavior suggest that:

 

A.Preaching can have strong short-term effects but can backfire.

 

B.Modeling a behavior for children always has stronger effects than issuing orders.

 

C.Practicing and preaching have about the same effects.

 

D.Preaching is always more effective than modeling a behavior

 

A 3-year old child enthusiastically imitates the behavior of a slightly older child. This imitation most clearly supports the theory of:

 

A.Piaget.

 

B.Bandura.

 

C.Skinner.

 

D.Watson.

 

Five-year olds seem to talk to themselves aloud more often as their work becomes increasingly difficult. This finding supports:

 

A.Piaget.

 

B.Vygotsky.

 

C.Both Piaget and Vygotsky.

 

D.Neither Piaget nor Vygotsky.

 

Luria found that when young children try to give themselves verbal commands:

 

A.They can immediately regulate their behavior.

 

B.They respond to the meaning of their words rather than their words’ signaling function.

 

C.They respond primarily to familiar words.

 

D.They behave as if all commands initiate behavior.

 

One of Vygotsky’s laws was that:

 

A.Behavior begins as action and then become increasingly verbal and logical.

 

B.The dialectic of history manifests itself in the cognitive conflicts between individuals.

 

C.Children first learn the social forms of behavior, then apply it to themselves.

 

D.Logic is simply interiorized action.

 

The text most strongly criticizes Vygotsky’s educational approach for:

 

A.Ignoring Piaget.

 

B.Lack of clarity.

 

C.Overemphasizing social learning.

 

D.Fostering dependence.

 

The text suggests Vygotsky described the interactions between inner and outer forces behind development:

 

A.In a clear and precise way.

 

B.In an imbalanced way.

 

C.In a clearer manner with respect to language than school instruction.

 

D.In a clearer manner for older than younger children.

 

Freud would suggest that a young man’s anxiety over competition probably reflects earlier problems at:

 

A.The first stage.

 

B.The second stage.

 

C.The third stage.

 

D.The fourth stage.

 

What most puzzled Freud about the girl’s Oedipus Complex was:

 

A.Why girls experience penis envy.

 

B.Why girls aren’t as open as boys about sexual matters.

 

C.Why girls feel a need to resolve the crisis.

 

D.Why girls develop a masculinity complex.

 

In general, the strongest fixation seems to be:

 

A.Excessive gratification.

 

B.Excessive frustration.

 

C.Inconsistent care.

 

D.Unconscious fantasies.

 

ESSAY QUESTIONS (INCLUDE CITATIONS)

 

1.What does the text consider to be the major difference between Skinner and Piaget?

 

2.Briefly contrast Bandura’s view of learning with Skinner’s view.

 

3.Contrast the views of Piaget and Bandura on how children develop.

 

4.Compare the views of Piaget and Vygotsky on school instruction in abstract concepts.

 

5.a) Why did Vygotsky believe the “zone of proximal development” provides a better indication of students’ potential than conventional achievement tests? b) In the evaluation section, the textbook author presents a Rousseauist critique of this concept. Discuss one of the points the authors makes.

 

6.a) Describe Freud’s theory of the Oedipal Crisis and its resolution in the boy and the girl. b) Summarize a major criticism of Freud’s theory of the Oedipus complex (with respect to either the boy or the girl).

After reading each section, write down how you compare to the advice given by  Putnam, Sungkhasettee, and Roediger (2016).  

This exercise should get you to thinking about your study strategies and what is working and not working in comparison to suggestions from cognitive psychologist. 

1. Read the article.

2. After reading each section, write down how you compare to the advice given by  Putnam, Sungkhasettee, and Roediger (2016).  

Examples of things to include would be: Do you already do the suggestion? If so does it work for you? How or why not? If you do not do the suggestion, why not and do you think you should consider it?  

3. Use the subheading provided and include your response and information underneath ALL SECTIONS IN ARTICLE!!

Example:

Organize your time

    Type out your information

Buy or rent your books before the course

   Type out your information

Continue using ALL the other subheadings in the article. 

Your answers should reflect that you read the article and thought about your own study techniques. 

Attachment with article included at bottom!!Prior to beginning work on this discussion, please read both “Limitations to Evidence-Based Practice” and “Rationale and Standards of Evidence-Based Practice,”and listen to the Case Studies in Non-evidence Based Treatment Part One. On the last day of Week 5, listen to Case Studies in Non-evidence Based Treatment Part Two.  For your initial post, you will choose one of the case studies from this week’s audio file selection on which to base your remarks. Based on the available information, evaluate the symptoms and presenting problems for the patient in the chosen case study and propose a provisional diagnosis. Describe one evidence-based treatment for this diagnosis and provide a rationale for your choice. Research at least two peer-reviewed articles to support your evidence-based treatment selection.