Explain the barriers to mental health treatment of ethnic minorities described by Sue & Sue (2003). Give specific examples of each one.

Answer a total of (10) questions with at least 

(1) question from each chapter  Each answer must be in complete sentences and minimum a paragraph or 5 sentences 

Chapter 1

l)Describe 4 out of the 6 ways the term culture is used in everyday language (Kroeber & Kluckholn, 1952; Berry, Poortinga, Segal, & Dasen, 1992). Give the definition and specific examples for each.

2)Describe the 5 levels of the Biopsychosocial model and how behavior is explained at each of these levels.

3)Define Multicultural Psychology and explain how it differs from traditional psychology.

Chapter 3

4)Discuss how different groups vary according to the Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck value orientation model where time focus, human activity, social relations, and people/nature relationships are presented.

5)Discuss the Sue world view model of locus of control and locus of responsibility.

6)Discuss how different worldviews can lead people to markedly different conclusions about things such as poverty

7)describe the worldview of the following groups: a) Ethnic minorities b)women c)Lesbian,Gay, and bisexual individuals

Chapter 4

8)Discuss some common conversational rule violations. What rules do these violate?

9)Discuss the differences among proxemics, kinesics, and paralanguage.

10) What kinds of conversational rules are in effect when many African Americans converse with White Americans?

Chapter 5

11 )Compare and contrast the experiences of immigrants and refugees. Describe at least three specific similarities and/or differences.

12)Describe the four statuses of Bemy’s Model of Acculturation.

13)Using Bronfenbrenner’s (1979) model, describe possible stressors that immigrants and refugees might experience at each of the levels.

Chapter 6

14)How do aspects of attribution theory relate to issues of racism?

15)What is stereotype threat? How might stereotype threat be applicable to you?

16)How might the governmental response to Hurricane Katrina be understood within fudley’s overt and covert racism model?

17)Discuss White privilege. Apply concepts of White privilege to any other kind of privilege that those in power enjoy.

Chapter 7

18)Apply one of the identity developments to your own experiences. Be sure to describe each stage and provide example(s) of each stage from your personal experience.

19)Explain the Tripartite Tripartite Model of Personal Identity and include each circle that makes up this model.

Chapter 9)

2O)Describe at least three different ways that culture influences mental health.

21)Explain the barriers to mental health treatment of ethnic minorities described by Sue & Sue (2003). Give specific examples of each one.

22)Describe at least three methods used to provide culturally sensitive counseling and psychotherapy to ethnic minorities.

Describe how you would work within a professional treatment team to consult, triage, and treat this case. Include a description of the various members of the professional team with whom you would be likely to interact.

Argosy University Comprehensive Examination

 

MA Forensic Psychology

 

Summer C 2017

 

(Thursday, July 27-Wednesday, August 2)

 

Case Vignette for Comprehensive Examination

 

Please read the vignette carefully. Based on information provided in the vignette, please compose a well-written and organized response to each of the questions that follow.

 

Presentation of the Problem

 

Ryan is a 61 year old Caucasian male who was arrested for violating a no-contact orderwith his ex-husband and two adopted sons. Police were called when he attempted to “break in” to the family home to obtain some personal belongings. While at the home, his ex-husband returned and a physical altercation ensued in which Ryan allegedly attacked his ex-husband with a kitchen knife. No injuries were noted by police; His ex-husband, however, expressed intent to press assault charges. The circumstances surrounding the no-contact order are related to a series of incidences involving allegations of inappropriate sexual behavior with his children. Six months before, a long history of marriage conflict “came to a head” and he informed Ryan that he wished to file for divorce. Ryan’s ex-husband left the home with their two sons and filed a no-contact order against Ryan. The basis of the no-contact order included allegations that Ryan had a “secret life of sex addiction,” including frequent activity on “sex apps” and that he viewed pornography in front of their two sons. The ex-husband also alleged Ryan’s inappropriate relationship with their oldest son, 16 year old, citing that he discovered sexually-provocative language in text messages. A Child Protective Services Investigation and report was completed. Ryan adamantly denies these allegations of inappropriate sexual behavior with and in front of the children; He did however, verify he had been active on “sex apps” throughout the relationships in order to “hook up” with other men.

 

Psychosocial History

 

Ryan was born and raised in rural Mississippi. He comes from an intact family and is the youngest of four children. He referenced a narrative within the family that characterized him as the “unplanned pregnancy.” Ryan described a “good childhood” and he denied a history of emotional, physical, or sexual abuse. He graduated from college and has had a successful career as an insurance broker.

 

 

 

When Ryan was age 9, his mother was diagnosed with breast cancer.She passed away four years later. This event caused tremendous emotional pain. After his mother’s death, his father began using alcohol heavily and eventually received voluntary inpatient treatment. Ryan reported a strained relationship with his father and a sense of rejection after he told his father he was homosexual. He experienced significant inner emotional conflict as an adolescent related to his sexuality. He began to seek sexual contact with others and by age 17 was having sex with men for money. He does not believe he has a sexual addiction and denied any compulsive sexual behavior. He did note that he feels somewhat conflicted about his sexual behavior but tended to minimize its impact on his life.

 

 

 

Ryan was in a relationship with his ex-husband for 19 years. He described the relationship as chronically strained, stating that “I’m not sure I ever loved him.” He also described his ex-husband as manipulative and unstable which instilled fear in the children. They have two adopted sons(ages 16 and 11). Both were characterized as having“special needs” and both sustained abuse when in the foster care system. Both children have received extensive inpatient and outpatient mental health treatment.

 

 

 

Ryan endorsed significant alcohol use throughout his life. After the loss of a previous partner, he began to drink more frequently and noticed a similar pattern to that of  his father when he turned to alcohol after the death of his mother. After treatment, he stayed sober for 13 years. Currently, he considers himself a social drinker and consumes three to four drinks each evening. He does not believe that he has a drinking problem.

 

 

 

Ryan’s psychiatric history is also positive for depression. He believes his depression started after the loss of his mother and “I never could shake it.” He has been hospitalized three times for risk of harm to self. He reportedly made threats about ending his life and this was reported to the police by his ex-husband. He has been in therapy “on and off” and expressed a strong disdain for medication.

 

 

 

Behavioral Observations

 

Ryan was dressed casually and his grooming and hygiene were fair. He was mostly uncooperative but warmed up slowly over time. He appeared agitated and despondent. Eye contact was poor. He expressed a strong mistrust in the “system” and beliefs about being unfairly accused. He denies any wrong doing, stating simply, “I was in my own house!”

 

 

 

Ryan was fully oriented. His thought process was mostly linear with no apparent thought problems or abnormalities. His mood and affect were dysphoric. He demonstrated mild emotional lability and became tearful when discussing his family and stressors in his life. Emotional expression appeared to be within normal limits and congruent with the topic. His speech was normal for rate, tone, and intonation. Intellectual functioning was judged to be in the high average to superior range.

 

 

 

 

 

Based on the vignette provided above, please compose a well-written and organized response to each of the following questions.  When writing your responses, please:

 

 

 

  • Use APA (6th Edition, Second Printing) Style, with 1-inch margins, double-spaced, 12 font, with a reference list at the end.
  • Write clearly and concisely.
  • Cite appropriate, and especially current, literature (empirical and/or theoretical).
  • Avoid all sexist idioms and allusions.
  • Remember to demonstrate your multicultural competence where appropriate.

 

 

 

Psychological Theory and Practice

 

 

 

  1. What assessments (general and specific) would you conduct to enhance your understanding of the client’s problems and how would your choice of assessment(s) inform your diagnostic impression and treatment planning? Assessments may include structured or unstructured interviews, valid and reliable assessment measures, and/or formalized assessment procedures that may be conducted by yourself or by someone else referred by you.

 

 

 

  1. Provide your diagnostic impressions (based on the DSM-5) for this individual. In narrative form, please describe how the individual meets the diagnostic criteria for the disorder(s) chosen in addition to the differential diagnostic thought process that you used to reach your hypotheses. Be sure to include any additional (missing) information that is needed to either rule out or confirm your differential diagnoses impressions.

 

 

 

Legal Theory and Application

 

 

 

  1.  Explain the background, current presentation, and behavior of the client utilizing theories of offender and/or victim psychology and personality/psychological theories to support your position. Do not simply restate the client’s presentation from the vignette. Instead, provide a theoretical-based discussion of the client’s behaviors as presented in the vignette. 
  2. Describe the psycholegal standards and/or definitions for each of the following: competence to stand trial, risk of dangerousness, and insanity.Identify and describe one or more landmark case(s) for each standard (at least three cases total). Describe the elements or issues that a mental health professional usually focuses on when assessing a person’s adjudicative competence, risk and insanity, and any additional items that might be especially important to focus on in the provided vignette.

 

 

 

Research and Evaluation

 

 

 

  1. Describe tests or assessment procedures you would employ to address the psycholegal issues of (competence to stand trial, risk of dangerousness, and insanity). You may refer to these from the Psychological Theory and Assessment Section “A” if you already covered them there.  Discuss what the anticipated conclusions would be based upon information provided in the vignette. 
  2. Develop one empirically supported therapeutic treatment plan for the client in the vignette. Please make sure you summarize the empirical evidence with appropriate citations to support your treatment choice(s) in working with your client. Be sure to discuss the effectiveness and limitations in working with this particular client, including this client’s background, using the above treatment plans.

 

 

 

Interpersonal Effectiveness

 

  1. What diversity factors, cultural considerations, or other demographic variables pertaining to this client would you take into account in rendering a diagnostic impression, choosing assessment measures, forming case conceptualizations, and designing the treatment plan?  Be sure to discuss cultural/diversity factors that could apply even if they are not explicitly mentioned in the vignette. 
  2. Your writing, use of citations, ability to form a logical argument, and proper APA Style, including the use of paraphrasing, will be evaluated as a measure of your interpersonal effectiveness. No response is required for “B”.

 

Leadership, Consultation, and Ethics

 

  1. Describe how you would work within a professional treatment team to consult, triage, and treat this case. Include a description of the various members of the professional team with whom you would be likely to interact. Additionally, explain the roles and responsibilities of each member of the treatment team. 
  2. What are the ethical and legal dilemmas this vignette introduced? What would be your immediate steps and why? Please be specific and make sure that you describe your process of ethical decision making and the solutions/consequences to which this process might lead. Your discussion should be informed by the American Psychological Association’s Ethics Code as well as the Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists

 

Describe and discuss the mandatory reporting laws in your state. If Tamika lived in your state, would she be required to take any particular action?

Before you begin your Assignment, watch a brief video introduction to Tamika Johnson and one of her clients. (VIDEO LINK:http://extmedia.kaplan.edu/artsSCi/Media/HN450/HN4…)

In a 3–5-page paper, analyze the implications of this case. Use the Internet and the Kaplan Library to research the legal and ethical issues presented by this situation and respond to the following questions:

1. Discuss the next steps Tamika should take in the case. Explain the reasoning for your choices.

2. Identify the various ethical dilemmas presented in this scenario.

3. Discuss the specific NOHS Standards that would apply in this situation.

4. Explore any legal issues that might be raised by this situation regarding any state or federal laws. How might this information guide Tamika’s actions?

5. Describe and discuss the mandatory reporting laws in your state. If Tamika lived in your state, would she be required to take any particular action?

6. If you were Tamika’s supervisor, what direction might you provide for her? How might her actions impact you?

7. Finally, discuss strategies to minimize the likelihood of these legal and ethical issues arising in your practice.

Please be sure to introduce the specifics of the case study in your paper, which should reflect your understanding and research of these issues.

Your Assignment should:

  • Be presented in the form of a well-written university level document
  • Use an essay format, 12-point font, and double spacing
  • Be 3–5 pages in length, not including the title and reference pages
  • Include a title page and reference page
  • Including at least two references in support of your observations and conclusions using proper APA citation and reference formatting

BOOK REFERENCE

Sommers-Flanagan, R., Sommers-Flanagan, J. (2015-06-08). Becoming an Ethical Helping Professional: Cultural and Philosophical Foundations, with Video Resource Center, 1st Edition. [Kaplan]. Retrieved from https://kaplan.vitalsource.com/#/books/97811190879…

Grading Rubric for Unit 9 Assignment

 

Grading Criteria Possible Points Points Earned
Course Content
Student work thoroughly discusses the next steps Tamika should take in the case, including the reasoning for these steps and choices. 0–15
Student identifies the various ethical dilemmas presented in this scenario.

Student identifies the NOHS Ethical Standards that would apply to this situation. To receive full credit, student must both identify the appropriate standard(s) and discuss how it applies to the case.

0–15

 

 

Student thoroughly discusses the legal issues raised by this situation regarding any state or federal laws and explains how this information might guide Tamika’s actions. 0–10
Student provides information from research that clearly expands on the material available from the text or other course materials. 0–10
Student describes and discusses the mandatory reporting laws in their home state and indicates whether Tamika would be required to take any specific action if she lived in their state. 0–10
Student indicates what direction s/he would provide Tamika as her supervisor. Student discusses how Tamika’s actions might impact a supervisor. 0–10
Student concludes with strategies to minimize the likelihood of these legal and ethical issues arising in practice 0–15
Student introduces the specifics of the case study in the paper, which reflects the student understands and research of these issues. 0–10
Writing
Structure: Includes complete paragraphs, proper sentence structure, clear and logical organization throughout, and introduction and summary paragraphs.Primarily student’s own words with quotes used very sparingly.Includes at least two references in support of observations in addition to the text. 0–15
Mechanics: Uses correct grammar, spelling, punctuation, and APA style, including reference page and in-text citations where appropriate.Submits double-spaced paper that meets the 3–5-page length requirement for a total of 5–7 pages including the cover page and reference pages. 0–15
Total 125
An explanation of the points earned, as well as where the assignment could be strengthened will be included with your grade.

Do you think there is a qualitative difference between believing some races are inferior and the belief that marriage should only be between one man and one woman?

 

Week 8 Discussion: When the People You Love Don’t Think Like You

77 unread replies.77 replies.

Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:

  • Textbook: Chapter 16
  • Lesson
  • Minimum of 1 scholarly source (in addition to the textbook)

Introduction
Facione & Gittens (2016) state, “Strong critical thinking about complex and difficult social policies demands that we respect those with whom we disagree” (p. 344). The authors of your text ask us to take seriously the points of view of those with whom we disagree.

  • Should I respect the point of view of a misogynist – a person who dislikes, despises, or is strongly prejudiced against women?
  • Should I respect the point of view of a racist?
  • How about someone who believes marriage is only between one man and one woman?
  • How about someone who does not believe that humans are contributing to the conditions that cause climate change?
  • How about someone who denies that the Holocaust occurred?

Initial Post Instructions
For the initial post, pick one point of view from the five questions above that you find particularly repugnant – one that you think is completely unjustifiable. If you were in conversation with such a person, how could you ethically respond to the statement of such a point of view? Keep in mind that you are expressing a value opinion, which requires ideological reasoning, so you may want to review Chapter 13.

As you form your response, keep in mind the following; these are things you need to think about but not necessarily to write about in your initial post:

  • Reflect if you are using System-1 or System-2 thinking? Are your responses tinged with cognitive bias?
  • Do you think there is a qualitative difference between believing some races are inferior and the belief that marriage should only be between one man and one woman?
  • Do you think there is a qualitative difference between not believing in human contribution to climate change and not believing in the Holocaust?

Reference

Facione, P. & Gittens, C. A. (2016). Critical Thinking (3rd ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.