Self-Nutritional Assessment

Sheet1

Monday Food Consumed Cal Kilocalories Total Fat Sat Trans Na K Cholesterol Total Carbs Sugars Proteins Vit A Vit C Ca Iron Consumed at
Breakfast 2 Boiled Eggs 1 American Coffee 160 cal 0.16 5g 1.6g 62mg 63mg 187mg 0.6g 0.6g 6g 260IU 0mg 50mg 1.2mg 1/20/2020 at 7:30am
Lunch Ropa vieja sweet potato bowl 615 cal 0.615 16g 4.69g 460g 580mg 78mg 8.6g 4.2g 28g 47% 122% 6% 15% 1/20/2020 at 1:00pm
Dinner Seared chopped chicken breast w/ creamy italin dressing & veggies 646 cal 0.646 17g 3.1g 517mg 705mg 113mg 7.6g 4.2g 25g 15.90% 30% 4.10% 7.40% 1/20/2020 at 7:00pm
Tuesday Food Consumed Cal Kilocalories Total Fat Sat Trans Na K Cholesterol Total Carbs Sugars Proteins Vit A Vit C Ca Iron Consumed at
Breakfast 2 Boiled Eggs 1 American Coffee 160 cal 0.16 5g 1.6g 62mg 63mg 187mg 0.6mg 0.6g 6g 260IU 0mg 50mg 1.2mg 1/21/2020 at 7:30am
Lunch Healthy carnitas tacos w/ whole wheat tortilla 750 cal 0.75 4g 4.9g 420mg 214mg 0mg 38g 2g 8g 0.10% 0% 15.40% 12% 1/21/2020 at 1:00pm
Dinner Baja style shrimp/Quinoa bowl 496 cal 0.496 0.1g/10g 0.5g/0.3g 47mg/11mg 8.5mg 11mg/29mg 0.1g/65g 0.5g/3.8g 1.1g/25g 0.3%/32% 0%/20% 0.3%/23? 0.1%/33% 1/21/2020 at 7:00pm
Wednesday Food Consumed Cal Kilocalories Total Fat Sat Trans Na K Cholesterol Total Carbs Sugars Proteins Vit A Vit C Ca Iron Consumed at
Breakfast 2 Boiled Eggs 1 American Coffee 160 cal 0.16 5g 1.6g 62mg 63mg 187mg 0.6g 0.6g 6g 260IU 0mg 50mg 1.2mg 1/22/2020 at 7:30am
Lunch Lemon pepper chicken bowl 456 cal 0.456 22g 11.6g 258mg 656mg 186mg 10.6g 0.6g 54g 11.80% 7.20% 7.20% 17.40% 1/22/2020 at 1:00pm
Dinner Mongolian beef whole grain 830 cal 0.83 5g 2g 55mg 496.3mg 70mg 10g 19g 31g 1% 6% 0% 3.7mg 1/22/2020 at 7:00pm
Thursday Food Consumed Cal Kilocalories Total Fat Sat Trans Na K Cholesterol Total Carbs Sugars Proteins Vit A Vit C Ca Iron Consumed at
Breakfast 2 Boiled Eggs 1 American Coffee 160 cal 0.16 5g 1.6g 62mg 63mg 187mg 0.6g 0.6g 6g 260IU 0mg 50mg 1.2mg 1/23/2020 at 7:30am
Lunch BBQ glazed turkey meatballs w/ mash and veggies 670 cal 0.67 6.14g 1.74g 127.28mg 240g 146.2 1.2g 1.3g 23.26g 2.10% 5.90% 4% 1.5mg 1/23/2020 at 1:00pm
Dinner Baked white fish on bed of mixed vegetables 752 cal 0.752 11.6g 1.8g 101mg 628mg 119mg 0.3g 0.3g 161g 238IU 0mg 51.5mg 0.7mg 1/23/2020 at 7:00pm
Friday Food Consumed Cal Kilocalories Total Fat Sat Trans Na K Cholesterol Total Carbs Sugars Proteins Vit A Vit C Ca Iron Consumed at
Breakfast 2 Boiled Eggs 1 American Coffee 160 cal 0.16 5g 1.6g 62mg 63mg 187mg 0.6g 0.6g 6g 260IU 0mg 50mg 1.2mg 1/24/2020 at 7:30am
Lunch Turkey and pepper jack cheese with pea soup 646 cal 0.646 2.1g 0.6g 29mg 68mg 31mg 0g 0g 8g 11IU 0% 4mg 0.30% 1/24/2020 at 1:00pm
Dinner Cuban cubed pollo fricassee w/ boiled potatoes 740 cal 0.74 9.9mg 4.8g 571mg 164mg 20mg 201mg 1.6g 9.4g 3.20% 0.20% 9.50% 9.70% 1/24/2020 at 7:00pm
Saturday Food Consumed Cal Kilocalories Total Fat Sat Trans Na K Cholesterol Total Carbs Sugars Proteins Vit A Vit C Ca Iron Consumed at
Breakfast 2 Boiled Eggs 1 American Coffee 160 cal 0.16 5g 1.6g 62mg 63mg 187mg 0.6g 0.6g 6g 260IU 0mg 50mg 1.2mg 1/25/2020 at 8:00am
Lunch Glazed Turkey meatloaf w/ sweet potato mash and corn 850 cal 0.85 5g 5.60g 120mg 248mg 18mg 15.9g 1g 12g 2174IU 10.5mg 78.2mg 2.4mg 1/25/2020 at 1:00pm
Dinner Chicken thighs w/ veggies 650 cal 0.65 0.1g 2.6g 64mg 575mg 91mg 0mg 0g 20g 12% 7% 0.50% 4.40% 1/25/2020 at 7:00pm
Sunday Food Consumed Cal Kilocalories Total Fat Sat Trans Na K Cholesterol Total Carbs Sugars Proteins Vit A Vit C Ca Iron Consumed at
Breakfast 2 Boiled Eggs 1 American Coffee 160 cal 0.16 5g 1.6g 62mg 63mg 187mg 0.6g 0.6g 6g 260IU 0mg 50mg 1.2mg 1/26/2020 at 8:00am
Lunch Spanish style ground chicken & quinoa w/ cucumber and tomato 588 cal 0.588 3g 3.5g 160mg 259mg 20mg 22g 13g 2g 4999IU 2.4mg 59.5mh 0.7mg 1/26/2020 at 1:00pm
Dinner Shrimp enchiladas zucchini boats 810 cal 0.81 0.3g 0.6g 47mg 8.5mg 11mg 0

Evaluate the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative.

Overview

Write a report on the application of population health improvement initiative outcomes to patient-centered care, based on information presented in an interactive multimedia scenario.

In this assessment, you have an opportunity to apply the tenets of evidence-based practice in both patient-centered care and population health improvement contexts. You will be challenged to think critically, evaluate what the evidence suggests is an appropriate approach to personalizing patient care, and determine what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients.

SHOW LESS

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

  • Competency 1: Apply evidence-based practice to plan patient-centered care.
    • Evaluate the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative.
    • Develop an approach to personalizing patient care that incorporates lessons learned from a population health improvement initiative.
  • Competency 2: Apply evidence-based practice to design interventions to improve population health.
    • Propose a strategy for improving the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative, or for ensuring that all outcomes are being addressed, based on the best available evidence.
  • Competency 3: Evaluate outcomes of evidence-based interventions.
    • Propose a framework for evaluating the outcomes of an approach to personalizing patient care and determining what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients.
  • Competency 4: Evaluate the value and relative weight of available evidence upon which to make a clinical decision.
    • Justify the value and relevance of evidence used to support an approach to personalizing patient care.
  • Competency 5: Synthesize evidence-based practice and academic research to communicate effective solutions.
    • Write clearly and logically, with correct grammar and mechanics.
    • Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

RESOURCES

  • MSN Program Journey | Transcript.
    • Required Resources
      The following resources are required to complete the assessment.
      Evidence-Based Practice
    • Evidence-Based Health Evaluation and Application | Transcript.
    • SHOW LESSSuggested Resources
      The resources provided here are optional. You may use other resources of your choice to prepare for this assessment; however, you will need to ensure that they are appropriate, credible, and valid. The MSN-FP6011 – Evidence-Based Practice for Patient-Centered Care and Population Health Library Guide can help direct your research, and the Supplemental Resources and Research Resources, both linked from the left navigation menu in your courseroom, provide additional resources to help support you.
      Evidence-Based Practice
    • Devine, D. A., Wenger, B., Krugman, M., Zwink, J. E., Shiskowsky, K., Hagman, J., . . . Reeves, C. (2015). Part 1: Evidence-based facility design using transforming care at the bedside principles [PDF]. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration45(2), 74–83.
    • Jeffs, L., Beswick, S., Lo, J., Campbell, H., Ferris, E., & Sidani, S. (2013). Defining what evidence is, linking it to patient outcomes, and making it relevant to practice: Insight from clinical nurses. Applied Nursing Research26(3), 105–109.
    • Krugman, M., Sanders, C., & Kinney, L. J. (2015). Part 2: Evaluation and outcomes of an evidence-based facility design project. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration45(2), 84–92.
    • Rice, M. J. (2013). Evidence-based practice: A model for clinical application. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association19(4), 217–221.
    • Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Health Sciences: Review Levels of Evidence.
    • Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Health Sciences.
    • Research Guides
    • Nursing Masters (MSN) Research Guide.
    • Database Guide: Ovid Nursing Full Text PLUS.
    • Kaplan, L. (n.d.). Framework for how to read and critique a research study. Retrieved from https://www.nursingworld.org/~4afdfd/globalassets/practiceandpolicy/innovation–evidence/framework-for-how-to-read-and-critique-a-research-study.pdf
  • Assessment Instructions Preparation
    In this assessment, you will base your Patient-Centered Care Report on the scenario presented in the Evidence-Based Health Evaluation and Application media piece. Some of the writing you completed and exported from the media piece should serve as pre-writing for this assessment and inform the final draft of your report. Even though the media piece presented only one type of care setting, you can extrapolate individualized care decisions, based on population health improvement initiative outcomes, to other settings.
    Requirements
    Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point. In addition, you may want to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.
    Writing, Supporting Evidence, and APA Style

    • Write clearly and logically, using correct grammar and mechanics.
    • Integrate relevant evidence from 3–5 current scholarly or professional sources to support your evaluation, recommendations, and plans.
      • Apply correct APA formatting to all in-text citations and references.
      • Attach a reference list to your report.
    • Report Content
      Address the following points in a 4–6 page report:
    • Evaluate the expected outcomes of the population health improvement initiative that were, and were not, achieved.
      • Describe the outcomes that were achieved, their positive effects on the community’s health, and any variance across demographic groups.
      • Describe the outcomes that were not achieved, the extent to which they fell short of expectations, and any variance across demographic groups.
      • Identify the factors (for example: institutional, community, environmental, resources, communication) that may have contributed to any achievement shortfalls.
    • Propose a strategy for improving the outcomes of the population health improvement initiative, or ensuring that all outcomes are being addressed, based on the best available evidence.
      • Describe the corrective measures you would take to address the factors that may have contributed to achievement shortfalls.
      • Cite the evidence (from similar projects, research, or professional organization resources) that supports the corrective measures you are proposing.
      • Explain how the evidence illustrates the likelihood of improved outcomes if your proposed strategy is enacted
    • Develop an approach to personalizing patient care that incorporates lessons learned from the population health improvement initiative outcomes.
      • Explain how the outcomes and lessons learned informed the decisions you made in your approach for personalizing care for the patient with a health condition related to the population health concern addressed in the improvement initiative.
      • Ensure that your approach to personalizing care for the individual patient addresses the patient’s:
        • Individual health needs.
        • Economic and environmental realities.
        • Culture and family.
      • Incorporate the best available evidence (from both the population health improvement initiative and other relevant sources) to inform your approach and actions you intend to take.
    • Justify the value and relevance of evidence you used to support your approach to personalizing care for your patient.
      • Explain why your evidence is valuable and relevant to your patient’s case.
      • Explain why each piece of evidence is appropriate for both the health issue you are trying to correct and for the unique situation of your patient and their family.
    • Propose a framework for evaluating the outcomes of your approach to personalizing patient care.
      • Ensure that your framework includes measurable criteria that are relevant to your desired outcomes.
      • Explain why the criteria are appropriate and useful measures of success.
      • Identify the specific aspects of your approach that are most likely to be transferable to other individual cases.
  • Scoring Guide
  • 1.  Evaluate the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative.
    Evaluates the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative. Identifies knowledge gaps, unknowns, missing information, unanswered questions, or areas of uncertainty (where further information could improve the evaluation).

2.  Propose a strategy for improving the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative, or for ensuring that all outcomes are being addressed, based on the best available evidence.

Proposes a strategy for improving the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative, or for ensuring that all outcomes are being addressed, based on the best available evidence. Acknowledges challenges in the proposed strategy.

3. Develop an approach to personalizing patient care that incorporates lessons learned from a population health improvement initiative.

Develops an approach to personalizing patient care that incorporates lessons learned from a population health improvement initiative, and identifies assumptions on which the approach is based.

4.  Justify the value and relevance of evidence used to support an approach to personalizing patient care.

Justifies the value and relevance of evidence used to support an approach to personalizing patient care. Identifies knowledge gaps, unknowns, missing information, unanswered questions, or areas of uncertainty (where further information could improve the personalized concept map).

5.  Propose a framework for evaluating the outcomes of an approach to personalizing patient care and determining what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients.

Proposes a framework for evaluating the outcomes of an approach to personalizing patient care and determining what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients. Acknowledges the limitations of the proposal.

6.  Write clearly and logically, with correct grammar and mechanics.

Writes clearly, logically, and persuasively; grammar and mechanics are error-free.

7.  Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

Integrates relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style. Citations are error-free.

Patient-Centered Care Report

Overview

Write a report on the application of population health improvement initiative outcomes to patient-centered care, based on information presented in an interactive multimedia scenario.

In this assessment, you have an opportunity to apply the tenets of evidence-based practice in both patient-centered care and population health improvement contexts. You will be challenged to think critically, evaluate what the evidence suggests is an appropriate approach to personalizing patient care, and determine what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients.

SHOW LESS

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

  • Competency 1: Apply evidence-based practice to plan patient-centered care.
    • Evaluate the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative.
    • Develop an approach to personalizing patient care that incorporates lessons learned from a population health improvement initiative.
  • Competency 2: Apply evidence-based practice to design interventions to improve population health.
    • Propose a strategy for improving the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative, or for ensuring that all outcomes are being addressed, based on the best available evidence.
  • Competency 3: Evaluate outcomes of evidence-based interventions.
    • Propose a framework for evaluating the outcomes of an approach to personalizing patient care and determining what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients.
  • Competency 4: Evaluate the value and relative weight of available evidence upon which to make a clinical decision.
    • Justify the value and relevance of evidence used to support an approach to personalizing patient care.
  • Competency 5: Synthesize evidence-based practice and academic research to communicate effective solutions.
    • Write clearly and logically, with correct grammar and mechanics.
    • Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

RESOURCES

  • MSN Program Journey | Transcript.
    • Required Resources
      The following resources are required to complete the assessment.
      Evidence-Based Practice
    • Evidence-Based Health Evaluation and Application | Transcript.
    • SHOW LESSSuggested Resources
      The resources provided here are optional. You may use other resources of your choice to prepare for this assessment; however, you will need to ensure that they are appropriate, credible, and valid. The MSN-FP6011 – Evidence-Based Practice for Patient-Centered Care and Population Health Library Guide can help direct your research, and the Supplemental Resources and Research Resources, both linked from the left navigation menu in your courseroom, provide additional resources to help support you.
      Evidence-Based Practice
    • Devine, D. A., Wenger, B., Krugman, M., Zwink, J. E., Shiskowsky, K., Hagman, J., . . . Reeves, C. (2015). Part 1: Evidence-based facility design using transforming care at the bedside principles [PDF]. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration45(2), 74–83.
    • Jeffs, L., Beswick, S., Lo, J., Campbell, H., Ferris, E., & Sidani, S. (2013). Defining what evidence is, linking it to patient outcomes, and making it relevant to practice: Insight from clinical nurses. Applied Nursing Research26(3), 105–109.
    • Krugman, M., Sanders, C., & Kinney, L. J. (2015). Part 2: Evaluation and outcomes of an evidence-based facility design project. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration45(2), 84–92.
    • Rice, M. J. (2013). Evidence-based practice: A model for clinical application. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association19(4), 217–221.
    • Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Health Sciences: Review Levels of Evidence.
    • Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Health Sciences.
    • Research Guides
    • Nursing Masters (MSN) Research Guide.
    • Database Guide: Ovid Nursing Full Text PLUS.
    • Kaplan, L. (n.d.). Framework for how to read and critique a research study. Retrieved from https://www.nursingworld.org/~4afdfd/globalassets/practiceandpolicy/innovation–evidence/framework-for-how-to-read-and-critique-a-research-study.pdf
  • Assessment Instructions Preparation
    In this assessment, you will base your Patient-Centered Care Report on the scenario presented in the Evidence-Based Health Evaluation and Application media piece. Some of the writing you completed and exported from the media piece should serve as pre-writing for this assessment and inform the final draft of your report. Even though the media piece presented only one type of care setting, you can extrapolate individualized care decisions, based on population health improvement initiative outcomes, to other settings.
    Requirements
    Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point. In addition, you may want to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.
    Writing, Supporting Evidence, and APA Style

    • Write clearly and logically, using correct grammar and mechanics.
    • Integrate relevant evidence from 3–5 current scholarly or professional sources to support your evaluation, recommendations, and plans.
      • Apply correct APA formatting to all in-text citations and references.
      • Attach a reference list to your report.
    • Report Content
      Address the following points in a 4–6 page report:
    • Evaluate the expected outcomes of the population health improvement initiative that were, and were not, achieved.
      • Describe the outcomes that were achieved, their positive effects on the community’s health, and any variance across demographic groups.
      • Describe the outcomes that were not achieved, the extent to which they fell short of expectations, and any variance across demographic groups.
      • Identify the factors (for example: institutional, community, environmental, resources, communication) that may have contributed to any achievement shortfalls.
    • Propose a strategy for improving the outcomes of the population health improvement initiative, or ensuring that all outcomes are being addressed, based on the best available evidence.
      • Describe the corrective measures you would take to address the factors that may have contributed to achievement shortfalls.
      • Cite the evidence (from similar projects, research, or professional organization resources) that supports the corrective measures you are proposing.
      • Explain how the evidence illustrates the likelihood of improved outcomes if your proposed strategy is enacted
    • Develop an approach to personalizing patient care that incorporates lessons learned from the population health improvement initiative outcomes.
      • Explain how the outcomes and lessons learned informed the decisions you made in your approach for personalizing care for the patient with a health condition related to the population health concern addressed in the improvement initiative.
      • Ensure that your approach to personalizing care for the individual patient addresses the patient’s:
        • Individual health needs.
        • Economic and environmental realities.
        • Culture and family.
      • Incorporate the best available evidence (from both the population health improvement initiative and other relevant sources) to inform your approach and actions you intend to take.
    • Justify the value and relevance of evidence you used to support your approach to personalizing care for your patient.
      • Explain why your evidence is valuable and relevant to your patient’s case.
      • Explain why each piece of evidence is appropriate for both the health issue you are trying to correct and for the unique situation of your patient and their family.
    • Propose a framework for evaluating the outcomes of your approach to personalizing patient care.
      • Ensure that your framework includes measurable criteria that are relevant to your desired outcomes.
      • Explain why the criteria are appropriate and useful measures of success.
      • Identify the specific aspects of your approach that are most likely to be transferable to other individual cases.
  • Scoring Guide
  • 1.  Evaluate the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative.
    Evaluates the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative. Identifies knowledge gaps, unknowns, missing information, unanswered questions, or areas of uncertainty (where further information could improve the evaluation).

2.  Propose a strategy for improving the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative, or for ensuring that all outcomes are being addressed, based on the best available evidence.

Proposes a strategy for improving the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative, or for ensuring that all outcomes are being addressed, based on the best available evidence. Acknowledges challenges in the proposed strategy.

3. Develop an approach to personalizing patient care that incorporates lessons learned from a population health improvement initiative.

Develops an approach to personalizing patient care that incorporates lessons learned from a population health improvement initiative, and identifies assumptions on which the approach is based.

4.  Justify the value and relevance of evidence used to support an approach to personalizing patient care.

Justifies the value and relevance of evidence used to support an approach to personalizing patient care. Identifies knowledge gaps, unknowns, missing information, unanswered questions, or areas of uncertainty (where further information could improve the personalized concept map).

5.  Propose a framework for evaluating the outcomes of an approach to personalizing patient care and determining what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients.

Proposes a framework for evaluating the outcomes of an approach to personalizing patient care and determining what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients. Acknowledges the limitations of the proposal.

6.  Write clearly and logically, with correct grammar and mechanics.

Writes clearly, logically, and persuasively; grammar and mechanics are error-free.

7.  Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

Integrates relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style. Citations are error-free.

Critic Of The Art

Instructions

Select a work of art from any of the chapters in our textbook, and write a response that analyzes the art through the lens of a descriptive critic, an interpretive critic, and an evaluative critic. What different things would these critics have to say? Use the following guidelines:

  • Descriptive Critic: Address at least 3 different elements of art and/or principles of design.
  • Interpretive Critic: This will require research so that you can understand the subject, meaning, and intent of the work.
  • Evaluative Critic: Use the standards of perfection, insight, and inexhaustibly (as described in the text).

Writing Requirements

. 1 full page

. Minimum of 2 sources cited (assigned readings/online lessons and an outside source)

. APA format for in-text citations and list of references

THE HUMANITIES THROUGH THE ARTS

mar23984_fm_i-xx.indd imar23984_fm_i-xx.indd i 06/02/14 7:47 PM06/02/14 7:47 PM

 

 

This page intentionally left blank

 

 

THE HUMANITIES THROUGH THE ARTS

N i n t h E d i t i o n

F. David Martin Professor of Philosophy Emeritus

Bucknell University

Lee A. Jacobus Professor of English Emeritus

University of Connecticut

mar23984_fm_i-xx.indd iiimar23984_fm_i-xx.indd iii 06/02/14 7:47 PM06/02/14 7:47 PM

 

 

THE HUMANITIES THROUGH THE ARTS, NINTH EDITION

Published by McGraw-Hill Education, 2 Penn Plaza, New York, NY 10121. Copyright © 2015 by McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Previous editions © 2011, 2008, and 2004. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education, including, but not limited to, in any network or other electronic storage or transmission, or broadcast for distance learning.

Some ancillaries, including electronic and print components, may not be available to customers outside the United States.

This book is printed on acid-free paper.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 DOC/DOC 1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4

ISBN 978-0-07-352398-9 MHID 0-07-352398-4

Senior Vice President, Products & Markets: Kurt L. Strand Vice President, General Manager, Products & Markets: Michael Ryan Vice President, Content Production & Technology Services: Kimberly Meriwether David Managing Director: William R. Glass Brand Manager: Sarah Remington Senior Director of Development: Dawn Groundwater Editorial Coordinator: Kanyakrit Vongkiatkajorn Marketing Manager: Kelly Odom Director, Content Production: Terri Schiesl Content Project Manager: Laura Bies

Buyer: Nichole Birkenholz Designer: Trevor Goodman Content Licensing Specialist (Image): Brenda Rolwes Content Licensing Specialist (Text): Beth Thole Cover Image: Four ballerinas on the stage (pastel) © Edgar Degas; George Balanchine’s THE NUTCRACKER, New City Ballet Production, Choreography George Balanchine © The George Balanchine Trust © Paul Kolnik Compositor: MPS Limited Typeface: 10/12 Janson Text LT Std 55 Roman Printer: R. R. Donnelley

All credits appearing on page or at the end of the book are considered to be an extension of the copyright page.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Martin, F. David, 1920– author. The humanities through the arts / F. David Martin, Bucknell University; Lee A. Jacobus, University of Connecticut–Storrs.—Ninth Edition. pages cm Includes index. ISBN 978–0–07–352398–9 — ISBN 0–07–352398–4 (hard : alk. paper) 1. Arts–Psychological aspects. 2. Art appreciation. I. Jacobus, Lee A., author. II. Title. NX165.M37 2014 700.1’04–dc23 2013041627

The Internet addresses listed in the text were accurate at the time of publication. The inclusion of a website does not indicate an endorsement by the authors or McGraw-Hill Education, and McGraw-Hill Education does not guarantee the accuracy of the information presented at these sites.

www.mhhe.com

mar23984_fm_i-xx.indd ivmar23984_fm_i-xx.indd iv 06/02/14 7:47 PM06/02/14 7:47 PM

 

 

v

ABOUT THE AUTHORS

F. David Martin (PhD, University of Chicago) taught at the University of Chicago and then at Bucknell University until his retirement in 1983. He was a Fulbright Research Scholar in Florence and Rome from 1957 through 1959, and he has received seven other major research grants during his career as well as the Christian Lindback Award for Distinguished Teaching. In addition to more than 100 articles in professional journals, Dr. Martin is the author of Art and the Religious Experience (Associated University Presses, 1972); Sculpture and the Enlivened Space (The University Press of Kentucky, 1981); and Facing Death: Theme and Variations (Associated University Presses, 2006).

Lee A. Jacobus (PhD, Claremont Graduate University) taught at Western Connecticut University and then at the University of Connecticut (Storrs) until he retired in 2001. He held a Danforth Teachers Grant while earning his doctorate. His publications include Hawaiian Tales (Tell Me Press, 2014); Substance, Style and Strategy (Oxford University Press, 1999); Shakespeare and the Dialectic of Certainty (St. Martin’s Press, 1992); Sudden Apprehension: Aspects of Knowledge in Paradise Lost (Mouton, 1976); John Cleveland: A Critical Study (G. K. Hall, 1975); and Aesthetics and the Arts (McGraw-Hill, 1968). Dr. Jacobus writes poetry, drama, and fi ction. He is the editor of The Bedford Introduction to Drama (Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2013). His A World of Ideas (Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2013) is in its ninth edition.

mar23984_fm_i-xx.indd vmar23984_fm_i-xx.indd v 06/02/14 7:47 PM06/02/14 7:47 PM

 

 

We dedicate this study to teachers and students of the humanities.

mar23984_fm_i-xx.indd vimar23984_fm_i-xx.indd vi 06/02/14 7:47 PM06/02/14 7:47 PM

 

 

vii

BRIEF CONTENTS

PREFACE xiii

Part 1 FUNDAMENTALS

1 The Humanities: An Introduction 1 2 What Is a Work of Art? 18

3 Being a Critic of the Arts 47

Part 2 THE ARTS

4 Painting 63 5 Sculpture 95

6 Architecture 126 7 Literature 171 8 Theater 199 9 Music 225

10 Dance 256 11 Photography 278

12 Cinema 304 13 Television and Video Art 333

Part 3 INTERRELATIONSHIPS

14 Is It Art or Something Like It? 352 15 The Interrelationships of the Arts 379

16 The Interrelationships of the Humanities 400 GLOSSARY G-1

CREDITS C-1

INDEX I-1

mar23984_fm_i-xx.indd viimar23984_fm_i-xx.indd vii 06/02/14 7:47 PM06/02/14 7:47 PM

 

 

viii

CONTENTS

PREFACE xiii

Part 1 FUNDAMENTALS

1 Th e Humanities: An Introduction 1

The Humanities: A Study of Values 1 Taste 4 Responses to Art 4 Structure and Artistic Form 9

EXPERIENCING: The Mona Lisa 10

Perception 12

Abstract Ideas and Concrete Images 13 Summary 16

2 What Is a Work of Art? 18 Identifying Art Conceptually 19 Identifying Art Perceptually 19 Artistic Form 20 Participation 24 Participation and Artistic Form 26 Content 27 Subject Matter 29 Subject Matter and Artistic Form 30 Participation, Artistic Form, and Content 30 Artistic Form: Examples 32

Subject Matter and Content 38

EXPERIENCING: Interpretations of the Female Nude 44

Further Thoughts on Artistic Form 44 Summary 45

3 Being a Critic of the Arts 47 You Are Already an Art Critic 47 Participation and Criticism 48 Three Kinds of Criticism 48 Descriptive Criticism 49

Interpretive Criticism 53

Evaluative Criticism 56

EXPERIENCING: The Polish Rider 60 Summary 61

Part 2 THE ARTS

4 Painting 63 Our Visual Powers 63 The Media of Painting 64 Tempera 64

Fresco 66

Oil 67

Watercolor 69

Acrylic 69

Other Media and Mixed Media 70

Elements of Painting 72 Line 73

Color 76

mar23984_fm_i-xx.indd viiimar23984_fm_i-xx.indd viii 06/02/14 7:47 PM06/02/14 7:47 PM

 

 

CONTENTS ix

6 Architecture 126 Centered Space 126 Space and Architecture 127 Chartres 128 Living Space 131 Four Necessities of Architecture 132 Technical Requirements of Architecture 132

Functional Requirements of Architecture 133

Spatial Requirements of Architecture 137

Revelatory Requirements of Architecture 137

Earth-Rooted Architecture 139 Site 140

Gravity 140

Raw Materials 142

Centrality 143

Sky-Oriented Architecture 145 Axis Mundi 148 Defi ance of Gravity 149

Integration of Light 150

Earth-Resting Architecture 151 Earth-Dominating Architecture 153 Combinations of Types 154 Guggenheim Museum Bilbao and Sydney Opera House 155

High-Rises and Skyscrapers 157

EXPERIENCING: Sydney Opera House 158

FOCUS ON: Fantasy Architecture 163

Urban Planning 166 Summary 170

7 Literature 171 Spoken Language and Literature 171 Literary Structures 174 The Narrative and the Narrator 174

The Episodic Narrative 176

The Organic Narrative 179

The Quest Narrative 182

The Lyric 184

EXPERIENCING: “Musée des Beaux Arts” 187

Literary Details 188 Image 189

Texture 77

Composition 77

The Clarity of Painting 80 The “All-at-Onceness” of Painting 81 Abstract Painting 81 Intensity and Restfulness in

Abstract Painting 83 Representational Painting 84 Comparison of Five Impressionist Paintings 84

FOCUS ON: The Self-Portrait: Rembrandt van Rijn, Gustave Courbet, Vincent van Gogh, and Frida Kahlo 90

Frames 92 Some Painting Styles of the Past 150 Years 92

EXPERIENCING: Frames 93 Summary 94

5 Sculpture 95 Sensory Interconnections 96 Sculpture and Painting Compared 96 Sculpture and Space 98 Sunken-Relief Sculpture 98 Low-Relief Sculpture 99 High-Relief Sculpture 100 Sculpture in the Round 101 Sculpture and Architecture Compared 103 Sensory Space 104 Sculpture and the Human Body 105 Sculpture in the Round and the

Human Body 106 EXPERIENCING: Sculpture and Physical Size 108

Contemporary Sculpture 109 Truth to Materials 109 Protest against Technology 112 Accommodation with Technology 115 Machine Sculpture 116 Earth Sculpture 117

FOCUS ON: African Sculpture 119

Sculpture in Public Places 122 Summary 125

mar23984_fm_i-xx.indd ixmar23984_fm_i-xx.indd ix 06/02/14 7:47 PM06/02/14 7:47 PM

 

 

x CONTENTS

Tonal Center 235 Musical Structures 237 Theme and Variations 237

Rondo 238

Fugue 238

Sonata Form 238

Fantasia 239

Symphony 240

FOCUS ON: Beethoven’s Symphony in E♭ Major, No. 3, Eroica 245

Blues and Jazz: Popular American Music 250 Blues and Rock and Roll 252 Summary 254

10 Dance 256 Subject Matter of Dance 256

EXPERIENCING: Feeling and Dance 258

Form 259 Dance and Ritual 259 Ritual Dance 261

Social Dance 261

The Court Dance 262

Ballet 262 Swan Lake 264

Modern Dance 267 Alvin Ailey’s Revelations 269 Martha Graham 271

Pilobolus and Momix Dance Companies 272

Mark Morris Dance Group 273

FOCUS ON: Theater Dance 275

Popular Dance 276 Summary 277

11 Photography 278 Photography and Painting 278

EXPERIENCING: Photography and Art 282

Photography and Painting: The Pictorialists 283

Straight Photography 286 Stieglitz: Pioneer of Straight Photography 287

Metaphor 191

Symbol 194

Irony 195

Diction 196 Summary 198

8 Th eater 199 Aristotle and the Elements of Drama 200 Dialogue and Soliloquy 201

Archetypal Patterns 203 Genres of Drama: Tragedy 205 The Tragic Stage 205

Stage Scenery and Costumes 207

Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet 209

Comedy: Old and New 212 Tragicomedy: The Mixed Genre 215 A Play for Study: The Swan Song 215

EXPERIENCING: Anton Chekhov’s The Swan Song 219

FOCUS ON: Musical Theater 220

Experimental Drama 223 Summary 224

9 Music 225 Hearing and Listening 225 The Elements of Music 226 Tone 226

Consonance 227

Dissonance 227

Rhythm 228

Tempo 228

Melodic Material: Melody, Theme, and Motive 228

Counterpoint 229

Harmony 229

EXPERIENCING: “Battle Hymn of the Republic” 230

Dynamics 231

Contrast 231

The Subject Matter of Music 231 Feelings 232

Two Theories: Formalism and Expressionism 234 Sound 234

mar23984_fm_i-xx.indd xmar23984_fm_i-xx.indd x 06/02/14 7:47 PM06/02/14 7:47 PM

 

 

CONTENTS xi

Part 3 INTERRELATIONSHIPS

14 Is It Art or Something Like It? 352

Art and Artlike 352 Illustration 355 Realism 355

Folk Art 356

Popular Art 358

Propaganda 363

EXPERIENCING: Propaganda Art 364

FOCUS ON: Kitsch 364

Decoration 366 Idea Art 369 Dada 369

Duchamp and His Legacy 371

Conceptual Art 372

Performance Art 374 Shock Art 375 Virtual Art 376 Summary 378

15 Th e Interrelationships of the Arts 379

Appropriation 379 Synthesis 381 Interpretation 382 Film Interprets Literature: Howards End 382 Music Interprets Drama: The Marriage of Figaro 385 Poetry Interprets Painting: The Starry Night 388 Sculpture Interprets Poetry: Apollo and Daphne 390

EXPERIENCING: Bernini’s Apollo and Daphne and Ovid’s The Metamorphoses 392

FOCUS ON: Photography Interprets Fiction 393

Architecture Interprets Dance: National Nederlanden Building 395

Painting Interprets Dance and Music: The Dance and Music 396

EXPERIENCING: Death in Venice: Three Versions 398 Summary 399

The f/64 Group 288

The Documentarists 290 The Modern Eye 296

FOCUS ON: Digital Photography 300 Summary 303

12 Cinema 304 The Subject Matter of Film 304 Directing and Editing 305 The Participative Experience and Film 308 The Film Image 309

EXPERIENCING: Still Frames and Photography 310

Camera Point of View 312 Violence and Film 315 Sound 316 Image and Action 318 Film Structure 319 Cinematic Signifi cance 321 The Context of Film History 322 Francis Ford Coppola’s The Godfather 323 The Narrative Structure of The Godfather Films 324 Coppola’s Images 325

Coppola’s Use of Sound 326

The Power of The Godfather 326

FOCUS ON: Alfred Hitchcock’s Vertigo 327

Experimentation 330 Summary 332

13 Television and Video Art 333 The Evolution of Television 333 The Subject Matter of Television and Video

Art 334 Commercial Television 335 The Television Series 336

The Structure of the Self-Contained Episode 337

The Television Serial 337

Video Art 342 FOCUS ON: Downton Abbey 343

Summary 350

mar23984_fm_i-xx.indd ximar23984_fm_i-xx.indd xi 06/02/14 7:47 PM06/02/14 7:47 PM

 

 

xii CONTENTS

FOCUS ON: The Arts and History, The Arts and Philosophy, The Arts and Theology 406

Summary 411

GLOSSARY G-1

CREDITS C-1

INDEX I-1

16 Th e Interrelationships of the Humanities 400

The Humanities and the Sciences 400 The Arts and the Other Humanities 401

EXPERIENCING: The Humanities and Students of Medicine 402

Values 403

mar23984_fm_i-xx.indd xiimar23984_fm_i-xx.indd xii 06/02/14 7:47 PM06/02/14 7:47 PM

 

 

xiii

PREFACE

The Humanities through the Arts , ninth edition, explores the humanities with an emphasis on the arts. Examining the relationship of the humanities to values, ob- jects, and events important to people is central to this book. We make a distinction between artists and other humanists: Artists reveal values, while other humanists examine or refl ect on values. We study how values are revealed in the arts, while keeping in mind a basic question: “What is Art?” Judging by the existence of an- cient artifacts, we see that artistic expression is one of the most fundamental human activities. It binds us together as a people by revealing the most important values of our culture. Our genre-based approach offers students the opportunity to understand the relation of the arts to human values by examining in-depth each of the major artis- tic media. Subject matter, form, and content in each of the arts supply the frame- work for careful analysis. Painting and photography focus our eyes on the visual appearance of things. Sculpture reveals the textures, densities, and shapes of things. Architecture sharpens our perception of spatial relationships, both inside and out. Literature, theater, cinema, and video make us more aware of the human condition, among other ideas. Our understanding of feelings is deepened by music. Our sensi- tivity to movement, especially of the human body, is enhanced by dance. The wide range of opportunities for criticism and analysis helps the reader synthesize the complexities of the arts and their interaction with values of many kinds. All of this is achieved with an exceptionally vivid and complete illustration program alongside detailed discussion and interactive responses to the problems inherent in a close study of the arts and values of our time. Four major pedagogical boxed features enhance student understanding of the genres and of individual works within the genres: Perception Key boxes, Concep- tion Key boxes, Experiencing boxes, and new Focus On boxes (the latter described in detail in the “Key Changes in the Ninth Edition” section of this Preface):

• The Perception Key boxes are designed to sharpen readers in their responses to the arts. These boxes raise important questions about specifi c works of art in a way that respects the complexities of the works and of our responses to them. The questions raised are usually open-ended and thereby avoid any doctrinaire views or dogmatic opinions. The emphasis is on perception and awareness, and how a heightened awareness will produce a fuller and more meaningful under- standing of the work at hand. In a few cases our own interpretations and analyses

mar23984_fm_i-xx.indd xiiimar23984_fm_i-xx.indd xiii 06/02/14 7:47 PM06/02/14 7:47 PM

 

 

xiv

PREFACE

follow the keys, and are offered not as the way to perceive a given work of art but, rather, as one possible way. Our primary interest is in exciting our readers to perceive the splendid singularity of the work of art in question.

• We use Conception Key boxes, rather than Perception Key boxes, in certain instances throughout the book where we focus on thought and conception rather than observation and perception. Again, these are open-ended questions that involve refl ection and understanding. There is no single way of responding to these keys, just as there is no simple way to answer the questions.

PERCEPTION KEY Public Sculpture 1. Public sculpture such as that by Maya Lin, Richard Serra, and Judy Chicago usually

produces tremendous controversy when it is not representative, such as a conven- tional statue of a man on a horse, a hero holding a rifl e and fl ag, or person of local fame. What do you think causes these more abstract works to attract controversy? Do you react negatively or positively to any of these three works?

2. Should artists who plan public sculpture meant to be viewed by a wide-ranging audience aim at pleasing that audience? Should that be their primary mission, or should they simply make the best work they are capable of ?

3. Which of the three, Vietnam Veterans Memorial, Sequence, or The Dinner Party, seems least like a work of art to you? Try to convince someone who disagrees with you that it is not a work of art.

4. Choose a public sculpture that is in your community, photograph it, and establish its credentials, as best you can, for making a claim to being an important work of art.

5. If we label Chicago’s The Dinner Party a feminist work, is it then to be treated as political sculpture? Do you think Lin’s Vietnam Veterans Memorial is a less political or more political sculpture than Chicago’s work? Could Serra’s Sequence be consid-

mar23984_ch05_095-125.indd 124 22/01/14 5:54 PMCONCEPTION KEY Archetypes 1. You may wish to supplement the comments above by reading the third chapter of

Northrop Frye’s Anatomy of Criticism or the Hamlet chapter in Francis Fergusson’s The Idea of a Theater.

2. Whether or not you do additional reading, consider the recurrent patterns you have observed in dramas—include television dramas or television adaptations of drama. Can you fi nd any of the patterns we have described? Do you see other patterns showing up? Do the patterns you have observed seem basic to human experience? For example, do you associate gaiety with spring, love with summer, death with fall, and bitterness with winter? What season seems most appropriate

mar23984_ch08_199-224.indd 204 22/01/14 7:02 PM

• Each chapter provides an Experiencing box that gives the reader the opportu- nity to approach a specifi c work of art in more detail than the Perception Key boxes. Analysis of the work begins by answering a few preliminary questions to make it accessible to students. Follow-up questions ask students to think criti- cally about the work and guide them to their own interpretations. In every case

mar23984_fm_i-xx.indd xivmar23984_fm_i-xx.indd xiv 06/02/14 7:47 PM06/02/14 7:47 PM

 

 

xv