Kodak Failure

KODAK FAILURE

Preet Singh Sahota, Venkata M. Sana, Younga Hong,

Eloisa Goncalez Rodrigues, Benarji B.Vemulamada

Dr. Rashi Gaur

April 27th, 2019

 

 

FISHBONE DIAGRAM OF KODAK

Production Line

Management

Declining Film Sales

Ecosystem

Competitors

Digital Photography

Film, Chemical

Complacency

Fuji

SonyDigital Product

Sales & Marketing focused on Film Business

Consumption changed from analog to digital Downsizing

 

 

Problem Tree

Decline Profits

Downsizing

Difficult Technology Transition

Scaling down is hard Management

Digitalization

Bankruptcy Lost Market

Share

Direct Effects

Higher Level Effects

Direct Causes

Root Cause Adaptability to Change

Kodak

Ecosystem Trouble

 

  • KODAK FAILURE
  • FISHBONE DIAGRAM OF KODAK

Unit 2 Discussion

Unit 2 Discussion

In about 250 words discuss the following. For many years, predatory publishing has negatively impacted the world of academic research. Predatory publishing involves charging high publication fees to the authors of submitted articles without checking for quality of content, plagiarism or legitimacy of the research findings. Inexperienced authors (and experienced ones as well) are tricked into publishing with these journals. This can create serious issues for the consumer. Consider what would happen if someone published a “cure” for a previously incurable disease and the misinformation was picked up by the news media. Serious harm, beyond just bogus information could lead to disastrous consequences. Many legitimate journals will blacklist an author who has had a history of publishing in predatory journals.

Topic 1: Predatory Publishing

Define “predatory publishing.” What are the common characteristics of a predatory journal? How can you ensure that you are not accessing predatory

Writing a Literature Review

Each summary of a selected journal article should include a section that addresses the main points or ideas found in the article. It should conclude with your own statement evaluating the quality of the article and relating the article to your own evidence-based practice topic.

The literature review assignment has two parts: Part 1 is the summation of six or more peer reviewed current articles that relate to your evidence-based practice project; Part 2 is the abstract and keywords assignment.

Unit 2 Assignment Part 1:

 When summarizing the articles, address the following for each entry:

Introduction:

  • What parts of the topic does the source emphasize or de-emphasize?

Methodology

  • What assumptions does the author make about the topic or audience?
  • Did there appear to be any bias or slant in the source?
  • Were there any obvious omissions that seem important to the ideas being discussed?

Findings

  • Does the evidence clearly support the author’s main points?

Conclusion

  • What is the ‘take home” message that you learned from this article?

Relevance

  • How is this article going to be of benefit to you in the design and implementation of your evidence-based practice project?

Anyone reading your summation of each of the articles should be able to understand how each one individually contributes to your EBP topic.

Use the following process for Part 1 of this assignment:

  1. Title of the article and keywords used
  2. Summary of the article, addressing the bullet points listed above
  3. Reference list
  4. Each article summation should be one page (approximately 250 words).

For full credit, a minimum of six (6) peer reviewed articles less than 5 years old should be reviewed. 

Part 2: The Abstract and Keywords:

The abstract should be a synthesis of the chosen articles for the literature review. It is important that the abstract has a conclusion that addresses the cumulative strengths and limitations that were discovered within the chosen articles. An abstract is typically between 100-250 words and is on a separate page from the main text.

Keywords represent both the EBP topic and the words frequently used to describe the topic. Choosing the most appropriate keywords will facilitate the literature review process and ensure that the most relevant articles are found. Combining search terms in a way that a database can understand is important. Use the Boolean operators to narrow the results to those sources that best represent the chosen topic. Avoid using keyword phrases. Keywords should be listed after the abstract and are written in lower case.

To view the Grading Rubric for this Assignment, please visit the Grading Rubrics section of the Course Resources.

Assignment Requirements

Before finalizing your work, you should:

  • be sure to read the Assignment description carefully (as displayed above)
  • consult the Grading Rubric (under the Course Resources) to make sure you have included everything necessary
  • utilize spelling and grammar check to minimize errors

Your writing Assignment should:

  • follow the conventions of Standard English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.);
  • be well orderedlogical, and unified, as well as original and insightful;
  • display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics; and
  • be 5-7 pages in length, not including the cover page, abstract or references
  • follow APA, 7th ed. formatting of content and references

Unit 1 Discussion Topic 2: Project Management and the Nursing Process

Unit 1 Discussion Topic 2: Project Management and the Nursing Process

In about 250 words, discuss the steps in project management and what actions are involved in each for effective progression and goal achievement. Compare the methodology of project management to the five phases in the nursing process in problem solving and how each of these steps align with managing and leading a project.

Review the Project Management Tool template provided under Course Documents, for monitoring the progress of your own evidence-based practice (EBP) project topic and begin to fill in the activities that you accomplish each week of the course toward the final goal of project closure and evaluation. It is your responsibility to update the tool weekly and submit it during Unit Assignment weeks. You will receive credit for the MN590 final submission in Unit 9 of this course.