How these items can be used within the context of a professional learning community framework

Wk 5 Team – Wiki Update: Artifacts & Portfolios

Assignment Content

  1. Explain the following in a word document of 350 words or whatever other format your team chooses:
    • Purpose and process of using student artifacts and portfolios
    • How these items can be used within the context of a professional learning community framework

SIOP Lesson Plan

SIOP LESSON TEMPLATE

Standards

 

Central Theme:
Higher Order Thinking Skills Cognitive, Metacognitive, Linguistic):
Lesson Topic:
Content Objective

Language Objective:.

 

Key Vocabulary:

 

Supplemental material

 

Meaningful material:

 

Multimedia and material:

 

 

 

Warm-up Activity:

 

 

 

 

 

Building Background knowledge:

 

Introduction Lesson:

 

Guided Practice:

 

Independent:

 

Closing:

 

Review and Assessments:

 

 

Extension and Resources:

 

 

Content Objective:

 

Language Objective

Persuasive Essay First Draft

PHI-105 Persuasive Essay Guidelines

Modules 1-7: Full-Course Assignment

1) Throughout this course, you will work on writing a persuasive essay of 750–1,000 words (roughly three to five pages).

2) The essay-writing process is broken down into seven parts. Each part will be due in a different module and graded separately.

a) Topic and Audience (due by the end of Module 1)

b) Brainstorm (due by the end of Module 2)

c) Thesis Statement (due by the end of Module 3)

d) Outline (due by the end of Module 4)

e) First Draft (due by the end of Module 5)

f) Peer Review (due by the end of Module 6)

g) Final Draft (due by the end of Module 7)

3) Your essay will be informed by the topic readings and the use of a minimum of three peer-reviewed journal articles, that you will need to locate using the GCU Library. Use the PHI-105 Library Guide to help find peer-reviewed sources: http://libguides.gcu.edu/PHI105

4) For this essay, you will begin by choosing a topic from the list provided in the “Persuasive Essay: Topic and Audience Worksheet.” If you would like to write about a topic that is not on the list, you may ask the instructor for permission.

5) Next, take a position on your topic by deciding if you are for or against the topic or agree or disagree with specific issues related to the topic. This would be considered the “writing prompt,” or what you will be responding to in your essay.

6) The goal of this essay is for you to persuade your audience to agree with your position. Your written essay should demonstrate critical thinking by adhering to the following principles which will be studied throughout the course:

a) Manage emotions and avoid fallacies.

b) Provide evidence to support your position.

c) Acknowledge other perspectives and evaluate assumptions about the topic.

d) Use facts and figures when appropriate.

7) Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

8) This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

9) You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

© 2013. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Short Paper: Developing Research Methods

In Module Six, we have analyzed research design, including data collection and analysis. You will continue your application of the content to your area of research interest with this short paper.

Prompt: What research methods have been used to address your research problem? Were these methods appropriate? What data collection methods have you noted in your review of literature? Evaluate the appropriateness of statistical analyses used. What gaps and inconsistencies in the literature have you noted? Remember to use APA format.

Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a two- to three-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and at least three sources cited in APA format.

Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value

Research Methods Meets “Proficient” criteria, is clear, and offers specific examples from articles to support analysis

Explains types of research methods used and discusses the appropriateness of methods

Does not sufficiently explain types of research methods used; discusses the appropriateness of methods

The types of research methods used and discussion of the appropriateness of methods are not evident

30

Data Collection and Analysis

Meets “Proficient” criteria, is clear, and provides detail on strengths and weaknesses of data collection methods and statistical analysis used

Identifies data collection methods used and analyzes the types of statistical tests

Either data collection methods used or analysis of types of statistical tests is not clearly discussed

Discussion of data collection methods used or analysis of the types of statistical tests is not evident

10

Gaps and Inconsistencies

Meets “Proficient” criteria and uses substantial examples from literature as support

Identifies both the gaps and inconsistencies noted in the literature reviewed

Does not sufficiently identify the gaps and inconsistencies in the literature reviewed

A discussion of the gaps and/or inconsistencies is not evident

30

Organization Applies highly effective pattern of organization around a logical flow (introduction, body, and conclusion) to effectively communicate a critical analysis of the research methods

Applies clear pattern of organization around a logical flow (introduction, body, and conclusion) to effectively communicate a critical analysis of the research methods

Does not sufficiently apply clear pattern of organization around a logical flow (introduction, body, and conclusion) to effectively communicate a critical analysis of the research methods

Organization of ideas is not evident

20

Articulation of Response

Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, and syntax and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format

Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax

Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas

Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that prevent understanding of ideas

10