Historical Journal-ONL

Create a journal entry of 500-750 words reflecting on what your life would have been like as an immigrant to the United States from 1830 to 1920.

Be sure to include the physical, mental, and social issues you may have encountered.

Use a minimum of three of the sources provided to support your journal entry and be sure to cite the sources.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a scoring guide. Please review the scoring guide prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

cid:D7D4B297-EEAE-4174-AD01-F87097282051@canyon.com

 

 

HIS-144-ONL-Historical Journal Scoring Guide

 

REQUIREMENTS: POSSIBLE ACTUAL
Created a journal/diary/letter from a period of American History    
1) Described what life as an immigrant would be like from 1830-1920. 30  
2) Included physical, mental and social issues that may have been encountered. 10  
3) Cited three to five scholarly resources. 10  
4) Word count is 500-750 words

5  
5) Proper formatting and writing conventions 5  
TOTAL 60  

 

 

 

Instructor Comments:

 

 

 

© 2015. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Budget Reflection

Assessment Description

You have had experience in Topics 1 and 2 with needs assessment and developing a small group budget. Now shift your thinking toward how to create a large group budget that is aligned to the school’s continuous improvement plan (CIP). Becoming familiar with the funding areas and how to align the budget items to the plan is essential when it comes to budgeting.

A responsibility of the principal is learning what the function and object codes are as they relate to categories within the school budget. As a principal, you will be required to allocate funds into these categories to plan for the upcoming year.

Part 1: Reference Sheet

Using your school’s budget and CIP/SIP, develop a reference sheet that identifies a total of 7-10 school budget line items across three or more budget account categories and align them to the school’s vision, mission, and CIP/SIP. Remember the CIP/SIP should drive the budget.

Use the “Reference Sheet Template” to complete this assignment. If you are unable to obtain a copy of the school budget, use the “Arizona Chart of Accounts,” as a resource for account codes and line items.

Part 2: Reflection

On the “Reference Sheet Template,” write a 250-500 word reflection that explains how the budget line items and categories align to the school’s vision, mission, and CIP/SIP. Reflect on why it is the principal’s responsibility to ensure that the budget aligns to the school’s mission, vision, and continuous improvement initiatives.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite Technical Support Articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Reference Sheet Template

 

Part 1: Reference Sheet

 

School Vision:

 

 
School Mission:

 

 
   
Budget Account Category: INSTRUCTION
Function Code-Object code Description CIP/SIP Goals
1000-642 (Example) Science text books Grade 7 (Example) Students will have textbooks no older than seven (7) years. (Example)
     
     
     
     
Budget Account Category:  
Function Code-Object code Description CIP/SIP Goals
     
     
     
     
     
Budget Account Category:  
Function Code-Object code Description CIP/SIP Goals
     
     
     
     
     

 

 

 

 

 

Part 2: Reflection

 

 

 

© 2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

 

 

© 2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Differentiation In The Classroom

Consider this statement:  When a teacher tries to teach something to the entire class at the same time, chances are, one-third of the kids already know it; one-third will get it; and the remaining third won’t. So two-thirds of the children are wasting their time. —Lillian Katz, EdD

Lillian Katz is a well-known leader in the field of early-childhood education. She lectures all over the world and has written numerous books and articles on elementary education, teacher education, and parenting. Like Tomlinson, Katz advocates for instruction that is differentiated to meet the needs of all learners. Consider her statement— one-third/one-third/one-third—this is an estimate of what most teachers encounter when presenting new content.

What implications does this have for teachers when planning lessons?

Lesson 1 Topic 1: Differentiation

CONSIDER THESE FIVE STUDENTS

Differentiation is an approach to teaching that advocates active planning for student differences in classrooms.

—Carol Ann Tomlinson, EdD

Consider these five students:

· Sam has an avid curiosity and a learning disability. He reads three grades below level, is quite good in math and science, and loves performing in class skits.

· Priscilla is identified as gifted and talented, but she is easily bored in class. She loves drawing and often doodles when she is bored. She has begun distracting her peers, talking during instruction, and shunning homework.

· Greg is an average student who gets along well with his classmates. He falls on the high-functioning end of the autism spectrum. Procedures and routines are critical to his daily performance. He dreams of being a fireman someday.

· Isaiah is a good kid but is easily distracted. He has ADHD and is not medicated.  He is constantly in motion, moving about the room.   During discussion, he has a difficult time maintaining focus with so many ideas floating around. When he does participate, he is usually two or three thoughts behind. He is limited English proficient.  He has never passed the state assessment and still receives sheltered instruction because he is an ESOL student.  Isaiah loves playing soccer.

· Josue just moved from his native Mexico. He is economically disadvantaged, and his English is limited. He does well when he clearly understands what is expected and why he is learning the particular content. He loves spending time with his grandfather.

Throughout this course, these five students will be a part of your classroom roster with twenty-four other students with varying needs and backgrounds. As a classroom teacher, your major responsibility will be to make sure that each of these students learns the content at the appropriate level of rigor that is outlined in the state standards. The standards are the same for all students in a particular grade level regardless of a child’s social, cultural, or academic background.

 

 

 

IMPORTANCE OF DIFFERENTIATION

In classrooms around the country, teaching and learning are happening, but are they as effective as they could be?   Consider the traditional classroom: The teacher teaches the same lesson to all learners, gives them the same examples and the same time on task, and requires the same homework. Yet very few of these students have the same characteristics or learning behaviors, other than the commonality of all being in the same teacher’s classroom at the same time. Most will learn to their proficiency level even though the degrees of proficiency are different. Some students already know the material through experiences or background information they bring to the classroom.  On the other hand, some students struggle with the material for a variety of reasons: learning disabilities, language difficulties, behavioral issues, and/or lack of prior knowledge, opportunities, or experiences. No matter the starting point, when content is tested, the test is the same, and the standards for success are the same for all learners.

Differentiating instruction addresses student interests; considers differences in student backgrounds, abilities, and learning styles; and provides options for assignments and assessments. It works because just as students are individuals, learning is uniquely individual. Differentiation is not new. For many years, differentiation has been used in gifted and talented (GT) classrooms across the country. Much of the research on strategies for differentiation originated in the GT classroom.

Differentiated instruction means targeting the various learning and environmental needs of all students in the classroom. This can include students who qualify for Special Education, 504, and Gifted and Talented services, as well as English Language Learners. But it also includes students without a label—students who need more time, students who learn through different methods of instruction, students with attention difficulties, and students who have not been successful on standardized state assessments. All students need specialized instruction if they are to succeed. This does not mean a separate lesson plan for each student, rather it means evaluating the current lesson plan, structure of the room, and learning styles of the students in the classroom and responding accordingly.

Carol Ann Tomlinson, EdD, is a noted educator who has spent much of her career teaching students from varied backgrounds in a heterogeneous classroom. She has authored more than two hundred books, articles, book chapters, and professional development materials. More than most, Tomlinson is considered a leading expert in differentiating instruction. Her statement, “Differentiation is an approach to teaching that advocates active planning for student differences in classrooms,” gets to the heart of differentiation and provides the most necessary ingredient for successful teaching, that is, active planning. Our goal with this study is to engage the novice teacher in the aspects of active planning that provide for a well-managed, fully functional differentiated classroom.

 

Lesson 1 Topic 2: Differentiated Instruction

CHOOSING THE BEST INSTRUCTIONAL METHODS

Based on research, we know that some instructional methods are more effective than others. Sometimes, less is more. Presenting smaller amounts of critical material at a slower pace or through smaller increments, guiding students as they practice so that they can reach the finish line successfully and so that they understand the concept are important methods in teaching and learning. Providing students the time to process new material is critical for you to achieve success in your classroom.

 

With differentiated instruction, multiple instructional paths are taken to allow students of different abilities the opportunity to learn. Specifically, differentiated instruction gives students ownership in the learning process. Whether individually or cooperatively, differentiated instruction allows you to respond to the needs of students. Learning must be driven by the students’ readiness to learn, their background, their interests, and their learning profile.

Regardless of the classroom designation, while presenting concepts, you usually have three groups: 1) students who get it, 2) students who kind of get it, and 3) students who don’t get it at all. So when you think about it that way, about two-thirds of the students may not fully understand that concept, just as Katz states. If the learning is not differentiated so that they understand it, you put yourself and your students in a situation where, as you cover new material, they may not have the prior knowledge to succeed.

In many traditional classrooms, differences are usually addressed when they become problems. In a differentiated classroom, differences become the basis for planning and implementing instruction. In a traditional classroom, assessment tends to be summative. In a differentiated classroom, assessment is diagnostic and drives the planning process and instruction.

The first step in differentiating instruction is to consider your students individually, and then create lessons that account for these differences.  Using the commonalities, you will plan lessons for different groups. You should consider four factors:

· Student Readiness to Learn.

· Student Background.

· Student Learning Style.

· Student Interest.

Review the “Statement on the Integration of Faith and Work” and consider the Christian worldview perspective regarding carrying out work within the public arena

1

INTEGRATION OF FAITH, LEARNING AND WORK AT GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY

G rand Canyon University is a Christ-centered educational institution that seeks to promote the common good by intentionally integrating faith, learning and work. The university’s initiative to integrate faith stems from its

mission to educate students from a distinctively Christian perspective and prepare them for careers marked by kindness, service and integrity. In addition to helping students find their purpose, the university endeavors to carry out its mission in ways that are marked by compassion, justice and concern for the common good.

The message of Jesus Christ offers wisdom for the present and hope for the future. It is good news for individuals and for the communities in which individuals live and work. Jesus himself taught that Christians should live as salt and light within the world, which suggests that the Christian worldview relates as much to the public arena as it does to the private lives of individuals. As a university, we are convinced this calling should shape the ways we think and act within academic disciplines and various career fields.

Our desire to integrate faith, learning and work flows out of an institutional commitment to cultivate and exemplify the biblical ideals of glorifying God and loving neighbors as ourselves. By God’s grace we seek to honor Him in all that we do and to serve others in ways that are consistent with the loving kindness of Jesus Christ. These ideals are lofty but they represent appropriate goals and should serve as standards for Christian educational institutions. For these reasons, GCU is devoted to the intentional and pervasive integration of the Christian worldview.

What is the Integration of Faith, Learning and Work? The integration of faith and learning may be understood as the scholarly process of joining together knowledge of God and knowledge of the universe for the sake of developing true, comprehensive and satisfactory understandings of humans and the world they inhabit. As a Christian university, we view the integration of faith and learning as a matter of institutional integrity and a matter of practical wisdom.

At GCU, integration of the Christian worldview also extends to the workplace as we strive to instill a sense of vocational calling and purpose in our students, faculty and staff. It is our conviction that

our work within the world matters to God and our neighbors and must be carried out with integrity and excellence. While few doubt that it is possible to serve God through ministry and mission work, we are convinced that God is also honored by faithful service within “secular” vocations. Integrating faith and work is a practical and logical extension of faith-learning integration.

The integration of faith and work may be understood as the application of the Christian worldview within the context of work in ways that honor God, serve neighbors and contribute to the advancement of the society. Work represents a vital opportunity to integrate Christian convictions, ethical principles and vocations in ways that glorify God and benefit others. Thus, we seek to honor God by educating students from the perspective of the Christian worldview and by equipping them to serve others through their respective vocations.

 

Why Does GCU Integrate Faith, Learning and Work? GCU has grown from a small, Christian college into a large and comprehensive university in Phoenix’s West Valley with a significant national presence. Yet, the university remains committed to the central convictions that have long characterized quality Christian education and faithful Christian institutions. Chief among these convictions are the principles that God is both Creator and Redeemer, that fallen humans need to be redeemed and that God is restoring the entire world through his Son, Jesus Christ. These convictions represent foundational beliefs that are central to the Christian worldview and derive from the consistent biblical emphasis on creation, fall, redemption and restoration. This four-fold framework undergirds the university’s approach to education and career preparation by providing a comprehensive and compelling view of the world.

The understanding that God created the universe and everything within it serves as a unifying principle and vital starting point for making sense of the world in which we live. Furthermore, by faith we recognize that God continues to work in our day to redeem the brokenness and inadequacies of humanity and society in ways that offer hope for the future. God is not only Creator but also Redeemer, and He has promised to make all things new through Jesus our Lord.

15COT0122

 

 

2

In some cases Christians have placed emphasis on sin and the need for personal redemption to the neglect of the doctrines of creation and restoration. While concern for individual salvation is entirely appropriate, we are convinced that the Bible actually sets forth a more holistic vision for life. This vision encompasses the restoration of the created order as well as the renewal of human creatures and communities. These understandings are rooted in the biblical narrative and reflected in GCU’s Doctrinal Statement. As such, they deeply shape the identity, mission and vision of the university.

In accord with Christian values and convictions, GCU affirms the universality and objectivity of truth and considers the pursuit of knowledge a worthy and attainable goal. Within secular academic contexts the search for knowledge tends to exclude areas of inquiry and sources that are not consistent with secularized views of the world. By contrast, GCU is committed to the pursuit of understanding and affirms that genuine knowledge may be derived from a wide variety of sources, including human reason and introspection, scientific investigation and divine revelation. The university strives to cultivate an academic environment in which students are empowered to seek truth wherever it may be found.

Students are encouraged to raise questions that cannot be answered adequately without exploring matters of ultimate concern. By broadening the conversation, we urge students to explore their personal worldviews as well as the Christian worldview to find their purpose within a world that displays the wisdom and glory of God. This provides unique opportunities to develop knowledge, skills, self-awareness, self-knowledge and depth of character. This educational strategy enables thoughtful people to understand Christian beliefs and Christian believers to become more thoughtful. As a result, graduates of GCU are prepared to engage the world with a sense of vocational calling and purpose.

How Does GCU Integrate Faith, Learning, and Work? The university strives to integrate faith at all academic levels, which includes its undergraduate, graduate and doctoral programs. GCU’s basic strategy of integration centers on the concept of a worldview, which refers to the complex network of assumptions that shape thought and practice. By exploring various worldview commitments, students are able to reflect on implications and practical value of major options available within the marketplace of ideas.

Students are introduced to the Christian worldview from the start of their programs of study. By thinking from a worldview perspective, students learn to reflect carefully on the underlying assumptions, motives and intentions that shape views of themselves and the world. They will be challenged to consider the practical implications of their personal perspectives and to refine understandings on the basis of investigation, reflection and dialogue. Students are encouraged to consider the needs and interests of others in addition to their own,

and embrace the Christian values of love and service as they prepare to enter the workforce.

This is not to suggest that all students are required to personally embrace the Christian worldview. They are free to do so, of course, but they are also free to embrace other views of the world. Christians believe that God grants common grace to Christians and non-Christians alike, a grace by which all truth and all that is excellent in our work may be considered good, regardless of an individual’s beliefs. Faith is a matter of conscience that cannot and should not be forced upon anyone who is unwilling or resistant to embrace it for any reason.

As a Christian university, we aim to be persuasive in our presentation and practice of the Christian worldview, but renounce all forms of coercion and compulsion. Faith, when genuine, is a voluntary response to the person and work of Jesus Christ. As a matter of loving others as we love ourselves, we are committed to respectful dialogue and charitable engagement in all matters, especially in matters of faith and conscience. GCU invites students from all walks of life to seek truth and to find their purpose within a context marked by Christian charity and compassion. We welcome all who genuinely seek truth to join the conversation.

Conclusion: Faith Seeking Understanding As intelligent and moral creatures, human beings bear significant responsibility for what they know and how they live in light of such knowledge. Thus the pursuit of truth should be a means to the end of promoting human flourishing and the good of the communities in which we live. Similarly, we must carry out our work with excellence and integrity and serve others as if our service is unto the Lord. Strong economies, healthy organizations and virtuous people are foundational to vibrant communities and thriving societies. Realizing these ideals depends substantially on arriving at true understandings of who we are and how we are meant to live in this world.

As a Christian university, GCU encourages students to find their purpose in Christ while emphasizing biblical values and ethics within the workplace. GCU embraces the notion that faith is the appropriate starting point for honest inquiry and exploration. Faith, understood in this way, should not stifle research, suppress dialogue or inhibit scientific investigation. Rather, we believe in order to understand more fully and by doing so we expect to see the power of God at work in the lives of individuals and in the restoration of our culture and society.

This expectation is rooted in the steadfast character of the God of the Bible who has graciously promised favor and blessing to all who call on His name. To Him alone we look for wisdom as we pray and wait for the day when His kingdom comes, and His will is finally done on Earth as it is in Heaven. May He find us faithful on that day!