The assignment is to write a paper reflecting on 2-3 topics that were interesting in the second half of the semester and how you might apply them in the future to your profession. The reflection paper must be at least minimum 2 pages in length but no longer than 3 pages. The reflection paper must be completed in APA format and must provide at minimum 3 outside resources. Please take a few minutes to review the grading rubic, most of what you will review has to do with content and ensuring you are correct writing style. When completing assignment, please upload the document.
Due Friday August 16th, 2019
Save your time - order a paper!
Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines
Order Paper Now
TOPICS ARE:
· Ergogenic Aids and Performance
&
· Training at Altitude
FUTURE PROFESSION: Physical Therapy
RUBRIC ~
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComprehension of Material |
10.0 pts
Demonstrates excellent comprehension of the assignment’s key principles and issues. |
8.5 pts
Demonstrates good comprehension of the assignment’s key principles and issues. |
7.5 pts
Demonstrates fair comprehension of the assignment’s key principles and issues. |
6.5 pts
Demonstrates poor comprehension of the assignment’s key principles and issues. |
0.0 pts
No work submitted. |
|
10.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelopment of Main Points |
10.0 pts
Develops main points well in a logical, organized manner. |
8.5 pts
Ideas are mostly presented in a logical, organized manner. |
7.5 pts
Ideas may stray from topic and are presented with little logic and organization. |
6.5 pts
Logic and organization are missing. |
0.0 pts
No work submitted. |
|
10.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking |
10.0 pts
Offers thorough constructive critique and/or in-depth analysis, insight, reflection. |
8.5 pts
Occasionally offers constructive critique and/or in-depth analysis, insight, reflection. |
7.5 pts
Offers insufficient constructive critique and/or in-depth analysis, insight, reflection. |
6.5 pts
Lacks constructive critique ad/or in-depth analysis, insight, reflection. |
0.0 pts
No work submitted. |
|
10.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Resources |
5.0 pts
Uses current and credible literature (peer-reviewed journal articles, etc.) beyond course materials to support claims and rationale. |
4.0 pts
Mostly uses current and credible literature (peer-reviewed journal articles, etc.) beyond course materials to support claims and rationale. |
3.0 pts
Sometimes uses current and credible literature (peer-reviewed journal articles, etc.) beyond course materials to support claims and rationale. |
2.0 pts
Rarely uses current and credible literature (peer-reviewed journal articles, etc.) beyond course materials to support claims and rationale. |
0.0 pts
Never uses current and credible literature (peer-reviewed journal articles, etc.) beyond course materials to support claims and rationale. |
|
5.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis Through Use of Words |
10.0 pts
Always uses own words to synthesize literature. Uses terminology appropriately. |
8.5 pts
Occasionally uses direct quotations rather than own words to synthesize literature. Mostly uses terminology appropriately. |
7.5 pts
Rarely uses own words to synthesize literature. Sometimes uses terminology correctly. |
6.5 pts
Never uses own words to synthesize literature. Uses terminology incorrectly. |
0.0 pts
After being warned, plagiarizes through overuse of direct quotations and an inability to paraphrase or summarize. See Student Honor Code in syllabus and/or catalog. Instructor will confer with the program director. |
|
10.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting – Language |
10.0 pts
Uses clear, concise language with appropriate word choice, sentence structure, and tone found in scholarly writing. |
8.5 pts
Occasionally uses language that may not be clear and/or concise. Occasional lapses in word choice, sentence structure, and/or tone. |
7.5 pts
Frequently uses language that may not be clear and/or concise. Frequent lapses in word choice, sentence structure, and/or tone. |
6.5 pts
Uses language that is incomprehensible. |
0.0 pts
No work submitted. |
|
10.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting – Punctuation, Grammar, Spelling |
10.0 pts
Uses correct punctuation, grammar, and/or spelling. APA Style is used correctly with writing and citing. |
8.5 pts
May use some incorrect punctuation, grammar, and/or spelling. APA Style is mostly used correctly when writing and citing. |
7.5 pts
Uses non-scholarly writing that contains frequent punctuation, grammar, and/or spelling errors. APA Style Is occasionally ujsed when writing and citing. |
6.5 pts
Uses non-scholarly writing that consistently has punctuation, grammar, and/or spelling errors. |
0.0 pts
No work submitted. |
|
10.0 pts |
Total Points: 65.0 |