Ergogenic Aids and Performance

The assignment is to write a paper reflecting on 2-3 topics that were interesting in the second half of the semester and how you might apply them in the future to your profession.  The reflection paper must be at least minimum 2 pages in length but no longer than 3 pages.  The reflection paper must be completed in APA format and must provide at minimum 3 outside resources. Please take a few minutes to review the grading rubic, most of what you will review has to do with content and ensuring you are correct writing style.  When completing assignment, please upload the document.

Due Friday August 16th, 2019

 

Save your time - order a paper!

Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Order Paper Now

TOPICS ARE:

· Ergogenic Aids and Performance

&

· Training at Altitude

 

FUTURE PROFESSION: Physical Therapy

 

RUBRIC ~

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComprehension of Material
10.0 pts

Demonstrates excellent comprehension of the assignment’s key principles and issues.

8.5 pts

Demonstrates good comprehension of the assignment’s key principles and issues.

7.5 pts

Demonstrates fair comprehension of the assignment’s key principles and issues.

6.5 pts

Demonstrates poor comprehension of the assignment’s key principles and issues.

0.0 pts

No work submitted.

 

10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelopment of Main Points
10.0 pts

Develops main points well in a logical, organized manner.

8.5 pts

Ideas are mostly presented in a logical, organized manner.

7.5 pts

Ideas may stray from topic and are presented with little logic and organization.

6.5 pts

Logic and organization are missing.

0.0 pts

No work submitted.

 

10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking
10.0 pts

Offers thorough constructive critique and/or in-depth analysis, insight, reflection.

8.5 pts

Occasionally offers constructive critique and/or in-depth analysis, insight, reflection.

7.5 pts

Offers insufficient constructive critique and/or in-depth analysis, insight, reflection.

6.5 pts

Lacks constructive critique ad/or in-depth analysis, insight, reflection.

0.0 pts

No work submitted.

 

10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Resources
5.0 pts

Uses current and credible literature (peer-reviewed journal articles, etc.) beyond course materials to support claims and rationale.

4.0 pts

Mostly uses current and credible literature (peer-reviewed journal articles, etc.) beyond course materials to support claims and rationale.

3.0 pts

Sometimes uses current and credible literature (peer-reviewed journal articles, etc.) beyond course materials to support claims and rationale.

2.0 pts

Rarely uses current and credible literature (peer-reviewed journal articles, etc.) beyond course materials to support claims and rationale.

0.0 pts

Never uses current and credible literature (peer-reviewed journal articles, etc.) beyond course materials to support claims and rationale.

 

5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis Through Use of Words
10.0 pts

Always uses own words to synthesize literature. Uses terminology appropriately.

8.5 pts

Occasionally uses direct quotations rather than own words to synthesize literature. Mostly uses terminology appropriately.

7.5 pts

Rarely uses own words to synthesize literature. Sometimes uses terminology correctly.

6.5 pts

Never uses own words to synthesize literature. Uses terminology incorrectly.

0.0 pts

After being warned, plagiarizes through overuse of direct quotations and an inability to paraphrase or summarize. See Student Honor Code in syllabus and/or catalog. Instructor will confer with the program director.

 

10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting – Language
10.0 pts

Uses clear, concise language with appropriate word choice, sentence structure, and tone found in scholarly writing.

8.5 pts

Occasionally uses language that may not be clear and/or concise. Occasional lapses in word choice, sentence structure, and/or tone.

7.5 pts

Frequently uses language that may not be clear and/or concise. Frequent lapses in word choice, sentence structure, and/or tone.

6.5 pts

Uses language that is incomprehensible.

0.0 pts

No work submitted.

 

10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting – Punctuation, Grammar, Spelling
10.0 pts

Uses correct punctuation, grammar, and/or spelling. APA Style is used correctly with writing and citing.

8.5 pts

May use some incorrect punctuation, grammar, and/or spelling. APA Style is mostly used correctly when writing and citing.

7.5 pts

Uses non-scholarly writing that contains frequent punctuation, grammar, and/or spelling errors. APA Style Is occasionally ujsed when writing and citing.

6.5 pts

Uses non-scholarly writing that consistently has punctuation, grammar, and/or spelling errors.

0.0 pts

No work submitted.

 

10.0 pts
Total Points: 65.0