Chapter 5-First Amendment: Basic Freedoms
Each of the following
© 2015 Cengage Learning
Save your time - order a paper!
Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines
Order Paper NowPrepared by Tony Wolusky, J.D. , Metropolitan State University of Denver
Chapter 4
Equal Protection Under the Law: Balancing
Individual, State and Federal Rights
© 2015 Cengage Learning
The framers of the Constitution wanted to prevent excessive federal authority.
They wanted to give states more authority, but resulted in problems the national government could not overlook.
There were several issues:
o State bank and money versus national banks and currency,
o federal aid versus state aid to improve roadways and railway
o freedom versus slavery
© 2015 Cengage Learning
President Lincoln was elected in 1960.
o Soon after many states passed a resolution to
withdraw from the Union.
President Lincoln was faced with trying to keep the
Union together.
He promised to abolish slavery in the territories,
but under the Constitution, slavery was legal in the
states where it had been established.
© 2015 Cengage Learning
Dred Scott v. Sandford
o Supreme Court ruled that even free blacks could not be
citizens of the United States and that they “had no
rights which a white man was bound to respect.”
The southern states were not convinced and the Civil
War ensued.
It pitted American against American and sometimes
brother against brother.
Hundreds of thousands wounded and killed.
Caused a divide that still affects the country to this
day.
© 2015 Cengage Learning
April 1862, slavery was abolished in the District of
Columbia and 2 months later in all the territories.
January 1, 1863, President Lincoln declared free
all the slaves in all districts of the United States in
his Emancipation Proclamation.
o Set a national tone toward abolishing slavery.
13th Amendment was ratified in 1865 and
abolished slavery.
© 2015 Cengage Learning
Even though slavery was now abolished with the 13th
Amendment, states continued to discriminate.
o Many southern states passed Black Codes
Congress passed the 14th Amendment in 1868 which
gave blacks citizenship, and granted citizenship to all
persons born or naturalized in the United States.
The 14th Amendment also forbids the states to deny
their citizens due process of law or equal protection of
the law.
o Certain provisions of the Bill of Rights were made
applicable to the states as well
© 2015 Cengage Learning
Section 1 of the 14th Amendment states that all
people born or naturalized in the United States are
citizens of the United States and of the state in
which they reside, effectively overriding the Dred
Scott decision.
It also prevents federal and state governments
from abridging the privileges of citizens or to deny
any citizen equal protection of the law or deprive
them of life, liberty or property without due
process of the law.
© 2015 Cengage Learning
Due process provides rules and procedures to
ensure fairness and prevent arbitrary government
actions.
Procedural due process refers to how laws are
applied.
Substantive due process, on the other hand,
requires that the laws themselves be fair, not just
how the laws are enforced.
© 2015 Cengage Learning
Prevents state or local governments from
infringing on people’s rights when federal
government would not be allowed to.
It holds that only the provisions of the Bill of
Rights fundamental to the American
scheme of justice are applied to the states
through the due process clause of the 14th
Amendment.
© 2015 Cengage Learning
Facts: Duncan requested a jury trial and was denied, then
found guilty of battery with a maximum sentence of two
years imprisonment.
Issues: Is the denial of the jury trial in a state criminal
prosecution, where a sentence of up to two years
imprisonment is possible, a violation of the 6th and 14th
Amendments?
Holding: Yes.
Rationale: The right to a jury trial is fundamental to the
American scheme of justice.
© 2015 Cengage Learning
The Supreme Court found that the Connecticut law
making contraceptives illegal violated a “right to
privacy” in regard to marriage within the 14th
amendment.
The Court asserted that certain rights and
liberties, even though not specifically stated in the
Constitution, exist because specific guarantees in
the Bill of Rights have penumbras or peripheral
rights implied along with them.
© 2015 Cengage Learning
Rights explicitly listed in the Bill of Rights (enumerated) are
applied to the states through incorporation and are almost
always evaluated with the strict scrutiny test.
Nonenumerated rights are those that are implied in the
concept of ordered liberty, using the due process section of
the 14th Amendment covering proceedings involving life,
liberty and property.
If state interference in these nonenumerated rights
involves a fundamental right (generally those involving civil
rights), strict scrutiny is applied. If not fundamental, the
courts apply the rational basis test instead.
© 2015 Cengage Learning
Issue: Does a state law forbidding a baker to work
more than 10 hours in a day or 60 hours a week
violate the liberty protected by the 14th
Amendment?
Holding: Yes.
Rationale: The Supreme Court decided the law is
not reasonable and interferes with the right
contract found in the liberty aspect of the Due
Process Clause.
© 2015 Cengage Learning
Issues: Does New York law that establishes a minimum
milk price violate the Due Process Clause?
Holding: No.
Rationale: The Supreme Court in contrast to the older
Lochner case, decided that in the area of social and
economic legislation, if the law is not arbitrary and has a
reasonable relation to promoting public welfare, the courts
are without authority to override it.
© 2015 Cengage Learning
Prejudice- is an attitude, commonly known as a
negative attitude regarding a person or thing.
Discrimination- is an action or behavior based on
prejudice.
In a democratic society, people are free to think
what they want.
When these thoughts become socially unacceptable
behaviors, the government is justified in intervening.
Laws exist to punish the actor and protect the victim.
© 2015 Cengage Learning
Racial discrimination existed well before colonization and
the Constitution.
The 13th Amendment did not outlaw unequal treatment or
change racial attitudes.
o Dred Scott (1856) decision ruled that freed slaves did
not have the right to remain free in a territory where
slavery was still legal.
o Plessy v. Feguson (1896) showed the Court’s desire to
avoid civil rights issues, declaring discrimination to be
outside the realm of the Court.
© 2015 Cengage Learning
Racial tension mounted as states passed
laws to ensure that Whites could maintain
their privileged status.
These laws were known as Jim Crow Laws
o Strictly segregated Blacks from Whites in
schools, restaurants, streetcars,
hospitals, and cemeteries.
© 2015 Cengage Learning
Many laws were passed that prohibited
discrimination based on race, color, religion,
sex or national origin in employment and
education in public and private sectors at
the federal, state and local levels.
o The Equal Pay Act of 1963
o The Civil Rights Act of 1964
o The 1972 Equal Opportunity Act
o 1972 Equal Education Act
© 2015 Cengage Learning
The Nixon Administration formed the affirmative
action programs.
They were created to spread equal opportunity
throughout the diverse American population.
They were designed to cure discrimination in hiring
and eliminate past, present and future
discrimination using race, sex, color, and age as
deciding criteria.
© 2015 Cengage Learning
Facts: The defendant was African-American and the
prosecutor used the state’s peremptory challenges to
remove all four prospective black jurors, leaving an all
white jury that ultimately convicted Batson.
Issues: Can use of peremptory challenges be
unconstitutional?
Holding: Yes.
Rationale: The Court ruled that the use of peremptory
challenges to deliberately produce a racially unbalanced
jury was unconstitutional.
© 2015 Cengage Learning
Must distinguish between discrimination and
disparity.
o Disparity is a difference, but one that does not
necessarily involve discrimination.
o Discrimination is the differential treatment of groups
without reference to an individual’s behavior or
qualifications.
• The degree and prevalence of discriminatory treatment
within the criminal justice system exists along a continuum
between the extremes of pure justice and systematic
discrimination.
© 2015 Cengage Learning
Criminal justice system is characterized by
contextual discrimination.
o Racial minorities are treated more harshly
at some points and in some places in the
criminal justice system but no differently
than Whites at other points and in other
places.
© 2015 Cengage Learning
Facts: Evidence established the systematic exclusion of
African-Americans from jury service in 2 Alabama cities.
Issues: Is this consistent with the 14th Amendment?
Holding: No.
Rationale: Court acknowledged that exclusion of African
Americans on juries constituted an equal protection
violation.
The ruling was ineffectual and African Americans remained
underrepresented on juries.
© 2015 Cengage Learning
Right- a legally protected claim.
Privilege- a claim that is not legally
protected.
Cooper v. Pate (1964)
o Inmates could sue the warden for
depriving them of their constitutional
rights under Section 1983 of the U.S.
Code.
© 2015 Cengage Learning
Race discrimination
o Segregating racial groups, assuming they will be
in conflict otherwise, violates the equal
protection component of the 14th Amendment.
Discrimination against the disabled
o Correctional facilities were required to provide
special accommodations, programming and
services to disabled inmates.
any one of the two following scenarios. In 250-words or more, discuss/describe when “fighting words” and the advocacy of illegal conduct may be constitutionally prescribed. You must reply to at least one classmate’s posting in a minimum 150-word reply. Points will be deducted for failing to meet the requirements!
To get full credit you will need to: Provide an example of researched, recent case law.
Scenarios:
- Dick calls Harry a “damned fascist” and a “damned racketeer” in the presence of several people, while attending a crowded party. Is Dick’s expressive activity protected by the First Amendment?
- Tom walks into a public park, sees two police officers, and exhorts 20 people who happen to be in the vicinity to: “Get your guns and come out shooting. That’s the only way to protect our liberties from big government.” Is Tom’s expressive activity protected by the First Amendment?