Identify the Common Core State Standard being assessed for mastery

Over the past four weeks you’ve had the opportunity to create a classroom environment that supports the foundations of differentiated instruction (DI), brainstorm differentiated strategies that align with the Common Core State Standards, and create the foundation for a unit plan based that incorporates instructional technology while adhering to UDL and DI principles.
This week, you will use what you’ve learned to create a summative assessment for the unit plan you created using one of the strategies from your PLC blog, and with the classroom environment you’ve outlined in Week Two.
This summative assessment must:

a. Identify the Common Core State Standard being assessed for mastery (it can be the same one you used in Week Four’s assignment).

b. Identify a unit goal that aligns with the Common Core State Standard.

For example: The students will (Measurable Verb) by (A specific outcome with a specific tool) with ___% accuracy. 

You will also address:

Measurable mastery – Describe how mastery can be measured. (e.g., classify, discriminate, create, construct, defend, predict, evaluate, etc.). Be sure to avoid subjective words such as know, understand, learn, or appreciate.

A specific outcome – Explain what students will do to demonstrate mastery. (e.g., skill or knowledge that has been gained as a result of this unit).

Measurable progress – Identify the tool that will be used to measure mastery. (e.g., project, journal, test, etc.).

Proficiency Level – Determine the acceptable level of achievement to demonstrate mastery.

a. Create three formative assessments using the three day lesson plan outline from the unit plan. Be sure that each formative assessment addresses:

o a unique, differentiated teaching strategy for each day’s lesson,

o multiple intelligences,

o student’s different learning styles, and

o how the assessment results will be used to drive instruction.

b. Create a summative assessment that appraises mastery of the Common Core State Standard and the Unit Objective. Be sure to use the summative assessment outline plan from the unit plan. The summative assessment must include:

o Directions to complete the assessment written using vocabulary and terms geared towards your identified student population.

o A rubric that clearly details how each part of the assignment will be graded.

o Provisions for addressing multiple intelligences and various learning styles.

The assignment should be a minimum of five pages in length, not including the title and reference pages, and must include reference to the course text and one additional resource (scholarly article or online resource). The assignment must be cited in proper APA format. A title and reference page must be included.

Week 5 Assignment Differentiated Assessment

Over the past four weeks you’ve had the opportunity to create a classroom environment that supports the foundations of differentiated instruction (DI), brainstorm differentiated strategies that align with the Common Core State Standards, and create the foundation for a unit plan based that incorporates instructional technology while adhering to UDL and DI principles. This week, you will use what you’ve learned to create a summative assessment for the unit plan you created using one of the strategies from your PLC blog, and with the classroom environment you’ve outlined in Week Two. This summative assessment must:

a. Identify the Common Core State Standard being assessed for mastery (it can be the same one you used in Week Four’s assignment).

b. Identify a unit goal that aligns with the Common Core State Standard.

For example: The students will (Measurable Verb) by (A specific outcome with a specific tool) with ___% accuracy.

You will also address:

· Measurable mastery – Describe how mastery can be measured. (e.g., classify, discriminate, create, construct, defend, predict, evaluate, etc.). Be sure to avoid subjective words such as know, understand, learn, or appreciate.

· A specific outcome – Explain what students will do to demonstrate mastery. (e.g., skill or knowledge that has been gained as a result of this unit).

· Measurable progress – Identify the tool that will be used to measure mastery. (e.g., project, journal, test, etc.).

· Proficiency Level – Determine the acceptable level of achievement to demonstrate mastery.

a. Create three formative assessments using the three day lesson plan outline from the unit plan. Be sure that each formative assessment addresses:

· a unique, differentiated teaching strategy for each day’s lesson,

· multiple intelligences,

· student’s different learning styles, and

· how the assessment results will be used to drive instruction.

b. Create a summative assessment that appraises mastery of the Common Core State Standard and the Unit Objective. Be sure to use the summative assessment outline plan from the unit plan. The summative assessment must include:

· Directions to complete the assessment written using vocabulary and terms geared towards your identified student population.

· A rubric that clearly details how each part of the assignment will be graded.

· Provisions for addressing multiple intelligences and various learning styles.

The assignment should be a minimum of five pages in length, not including the title and reference pages, and must include reference to the course text and one additional resource (scholarly article or online resource). The assignment must be cited in proper APA format. A title and reference page must be included.

Instructor Guidance

Week 5

Introduction

This week you will:

1. Explain how assessment drives current and future differentiated instruction.

2. Evaluate formal and informal assessment tools in collecting data for student’s readiness, interest, and learning profile as a guideline for differentiating instruction.

3. Create effective formative and summative assessments that are based on differentiated learning principles.

This week you will evaluate and create pre-assessments, formative assessments, and summative assessments that incorporate differentiated instructional theory.

We will leave behind the old idea that assessment is a system to mete out rewards and punishments and move to an understanding that they are instead used as an effective classroom tool to improve student and teacher performance.

 

Discussion Board

Think about when you were in school and you heard the world “TEST” – what do you think of? Pencil and paper? Textbooks? Scantron forms? Were you a successful test-taker? How much did you study? Did you study for hours and still fail? Now imagine if you could have designed your own test in class; what would it look like? How would it be designed? Now is your chance to make that change! One of the key principles of differentiation is providing students with authentic experiences that evaluate their lesson objective and standard mastery without the possible negative impact of language barriers, learning style, disability, or other influencing factors. Luckily this isn’t as difficult as it sounds! Take some time to view the discussion by Reeves (2011) that provides the basic guiding principles, getting started, and examples. In addition, during each class period you will want to make sure all your students are on the same page, following along with the instruction and ready to meet the lesson objective. Just asking “Does anyone have any questions” isn’t enough anymore. When you were in school and didn’t understand something, were you willing to stand out? Beginning with a pre-assessment helps you determine student’s readiness, or where they are starting. Check out what Forest Lake Elementary school is doing (Edutopia, 2014) about providing some great pre-assessment strategies that will get students excited to learn, engage them in the learning process, and evaluate their level of readiness.

 

Assignment

Watch this short video (Hoffman, 2013) about some of the differences between formative and summative assessments to refresh your thinking about the assignment for the week. Using both formative and summative assessment to drive instruction is an essential part of curriculum development as you gauge student’s level of readiness and standard mastery. Formative assessments are typically used as a quick ‘check in’ to see how students are doing and their level of comprehension on a specific task during a lesson. One very helpful webpage designed for differentiated instruction is “25 Quick Formative Assessments (Links to an external site.)” (Dodge, 2009) as it provides examples for all subjects and grade levels. You can browse through and use what is provided or personalize it with your own ideas. They can also be used at the conclusion of a daily lesson with a quick 5-minute activity, often called an “exit ticket.” A summative assessment on the other hand is at the end of a unit or weekly lesson and assigned a grade that evaluates mastery. A summative assessment can be completed individually or in a group over one or several class periods including projects, essays, presentations, video recordings, or demonstrations.

 

References

Dodge, J. (2009). 25 quick formative assessments for a differentiated classroom . Retrieved from http://store.scholastic.com/content/stores/media/products/samples/21/9780545087421.pdf Edutopia (2014). Use formative assessment to differentiate instruction (Links to an external site.) [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.edutopia.org/stw-differentiated-instruction-learning-styles-video Hoffman, M. (2013, October 30). Formative vs. summative assessments (Links to an external site.) [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjmM1iN-m-E Reeves, D. (2011). From differentiated instruction to differentiated assessment (Links to an external site.). ASCDExpress, 6(20). Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/ascd-express/vol6/620-reeves.aspx

Required Resources

Required Text

Puckett, K (2013). Differentiating Instruction: A Practical Guide [Electronic version]. Retrieved from https://content.ashford.edu/

· Chapter 6: Assessment

Articles

Chapman, C., & King, R. (n.d.). Differentiated strategies for assessment (Links to an external site.) . (Links to an external site.) Retrieved from http://celi.olemiss.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2016/03/Differentiated-Assessment-Strategies-Preassessment-Formative-Summative-and-Digital.pdf

Dodge, J. (2009). 25 quick formative assessments for a differentiated classroom. Retrieved from http://store.scholastic.com/content/stores/media/products/samples/21/9780545087421.pdf

Multimedia

Casey Koschmeder. (2012, June 23). What is Differentiated Assessment? (Links to an external site.) [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DvzRcArujOU

videocourse4teachers (2012, April 2). Differentiated Assessment Strategies: Identifying Learners Strengths and Needs.  (Links to an external site.)[Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnCO9eM2D1Y

Recommended Resources

Articles

Brighton, C. (2009). Pre-assessment in the differentiated classroom Preview the document. Retrieved from http://www.diffcentral.com/examples/brighton_preassess.pdf

Multimedia

LEARN NC (2012, March 13). “Who cares” in action: Formative and summative assessment.  (Links to an external site.)[Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBrzQJOM1Ug

Synthesized Annotated Bibliography On Transformational Leadership

Post a synthesized annotated bibliography (Transformational Leadership) narrative that includes an explanation of how these references relate to one or more components of your Doctoral Study on transformational leadership on organizational performance.

you will research and select three (3) peer-reviewed, scholarly sources to develop an annotated bibliography that you can use in your Doctoral Study.

You will need to take the three sources and synthesize the references into a single narrative annotated bibliography that compares/contrasts or supports your study.

Note: Sources/references Cannot be older than 4 year.

Please follow the guidelines from the attached sample.

PAGE

1

Sample Annotated Bibliography

Student Name Here

Walden University

Sample Annotated Bibliography

Autism research continues to grapple with activities that best serve the purpose of fostering positive interpersonal relationships for children who struggle with autism. Children have benefited from therapy sessions that provide ongoing activities to aid autistic children’s ability to engage in healthy social interactions. However, less is known about how K–12 schools might implement programs for this group of individuals to provide additional opportunities for growth, or even if and how school programs would be of assistance in the end. There is a gap, then, in understanding the possibilities of implementing such programs in schools to foster the social and thus mental health of children with autism.

Annotated Bibliography

Kenny , M. C., Dinehart, L. H., & Winick, C. B. (2016). Child-centered play therapy for children with autism spectrum disorder. In A. A. Drewes & C. E. Schaefer (Eds.), Play therapy in middle childhood (pp. 103–147)Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

In this chapter, Kenny, Dinehart, and Winick provided a case study of the treatment of a 10-year-old boy diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ADS). Kenny et al. described the rationale and theory behind the use of child-centered play therapy (CCPT) in the treatment of a child with ASD. Specifically, children with ADS often have sociobehavioral problems that can be improved when they have a safe therapy space for expressing themselves emotionally through play that assists in their interpersonal development. The authors outlined the progress made by the patient in addressing the social and communicative impairments associated with ASD. Additionally, the authors explained the role that parents have in implementing CCPT in the patient’s treatment. Their research on the success of CCPT used qualitative data collected by observing the patient in multiple therapy sessions .

CCPT follows research carried out by other theorists who have identified the role of play in supporting cognition and interpersonal relationships. This case study is relevant to the current conversation surrounding the emerging trend toward CCPT treatment in adolescents with ASD as it illustrates how CCPT can be successfully implemented in a therapeutic setting to improve the patient’s communication and socialization skills. However, Kenny et al. acknowledged that CCPT has limitations—children with ADS, who are not highly functioning and or are more severely emotionally underdeveloped, are likely not suited for this type of therapy .

Kenny et al.’s explanation of this treatments’s implementation is useful for professionals in the psychology field who work with adolescents with ASD. This piece is also useful to parents of adolescents with ASD, as it discusses the role that parents can play in successfully implementing the treatment. However, more information is needed to determine if this program would be suitable as part of a K–12 school program focused on the needs of children with ASD .

Stagmitti, K. (2016). Play therapy for school-age children with high-functioning autism. In A.A. Drewes and C. E. Schaefer (Eds.), Play therapy in middle cildhood (pp. 237–255). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Stagmitti discussed how the Learn to Play program fosters the social and personal development of children who have high functioning autism. The program is designed as a series of play sessions carried out over time, each session aiming to help children with high functioning autism learn to engage in complex play activities with their therapist and on their own. The program is beneficial for children who are 1- to 8-years old if they are already communicating with others both nonverbally and verbally. Through this program, the therapist works with autistic children by initiating play activities, helping children direct their attention to the activity, eventually helping them begin to initiate play on their own by moving past the play narrative created by the therapist and adding new, logical steps in the play scenario themselves. The underlying rationale for the program is that there is a link between the ability of children with autism to create imaginary play scenarios that are increasingly more complex and the development of emotional well-being and social skills in these children. Study results from the program have shown that the program is successful: Children have developed personal and social skills of several increment levels in a short time. While Stagmitti provided evidence that the Learn to Play program was successful, she also acknowledged that more research was needed to fully understand the long-term benefits of the program.

Stagmitti offered an insightful overview of the program; however, her discussion was focused on children identified as having high-functioning autism, and, therefore, it is not clear if and how this program works for those not identified as high-functioning. Additionally, Stagmitti noted that the program is already initiated in some schools but did not provide discussion on whether there were differences or similarities in the success of this program in that setting.

Although Stagmitti’s overview of the Learn to Play program was helpful for understanding the possibility for this program to be a supplementary addition in the K–12 school system, more research is needed to understand exactly how the program might be implemented, the benefits of implementation, and the drawbacks. Without this additional information, it would be difficult for a researcher to use Stigmitti’s research as a basis for changes in other programs. However, it does provide useful context and ideas that researchers can use to develop additional research programs.

Wimpory, D. C., & Nash, S. (1999). Musical interaction therapy–Therapeutic play for children with autism. Child Language and Teaching Therapy15(1), 17–28. doi:10.1037/14776-014

Wimpory and Nash provided a case study for implementing music interaction therapy as part of play therapy aimed at cultivating communication skills in infants with ASD. The researchers based their argument on films taken of play-based therapy sessions that introduced music interaction therapy. To assess the success of music play, Wimpory and Nash filmed the follow-up play-based interaction between the parent and the child. The follow-up interactions revealed that 20 months after the introduction of music play, the patient developed prolonged playful interaction with both the psychologist and the parent. The follow-up films also revealed that children initiated spontaneously pretend play during these later sessions. After the introduction of music, the patient began to develop appropriate language skills.

Since the publication date for this case study is 1999, the results are dated. Although this technique is useful, emerging research in the field has undoubtedly changed in the time since the article was published. Wimpory and Nash wrote this article for a specific audience, including psychologists and researchers working with infants diagnosed with ASD. This focus also means that other researchers beyond these fields may not find the researcher’s findings applicable.

This research is useful to those looking for background information on the implementation of music into play-based therapy in infants with ASD. Wimpory and Nash presented a basis for this technique and outlined its initial development. Thus, this case study can be useful in further trials when paired with more recent research.

�The format of an annotated bibliography can change depending on the assignment and instructor preference, but the typical format for an annotated bibliography in academic writing is a list of reference entries with each entry followed by an annotation (hence the name, “annotated bibliography”).

 

However, APA does not have specific rules or guidelines for annotated bibliographies, so be sure to ask your instructor for any course-specific requirements that may vary from the general format.

�An introduction is a helpful addition to your annotated bibliography to tell your reader (a) your topic and focus for your research and (b) the general context of your topic.

 

Although your assignment instructions may not explicitly ask for an introduction, your instructor might expect you to include one. If you are not sure, be sure to ask your instructor.

�Use a Level 1 heading titled “Annotated Bibliography” or any other wording your instructor has given you to indicate to your reader that the annotations will go next and separate this section from the introduction paragraph above.

�Format your reference entries per APA, as well as follow APA style when writing your paragraphs. However, as mentioned above, this is the extent of the formatting requirements APA has for annotated bibliographies.

 

The content of the paragraphs and how many paragraphs you include in each annotation follows academic writing conventions, your assignment guidelines, and your instructor preferences.

�This first paragraph of the annotation summarizes the source. It outlines the main findings and primary methods of the study.

�This second paragraph of the annotation analyzes the source. It explains the benefits of the source but also the limitations.

�This third paragraph of the annotation applies the source. It explains how the source’s ideas, research, and information can be applied to other contexts.

 

In general, annotated bibliographies should avoid referring to the first or second person (I, me, my, we, our, you, and us). Instead, students should aim to be objective and remove themselves from annotations. However, there may be some exceptions to this guideline. Check with your instructor if you are unsure about whether he/she will allow you to use “I” in your annotated bibliography.

Predict major challenges teams will face in the future.

BSL 4060, Team Building and Leadership 1

Course Learning Outcomes for Unit VIII Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

5. Describe team-building activities leaders can incorporate for better managing internal teams and interorganizational alliances.

8. Predict major challenges teams will face in the future.

8.1 Explain why the need for teamwork will remain high in the future. 8.2 Describe work activities that will require a team for task completion.

 

Reading Assignment Chapter 14: Managing Interorganizational Alliance Teams Chapter 15: Challenges for Building Effective Teams

Unit Lesson In this unit, we will discuss how alliances are formed to allow different individuals and companies to merge to reach greater results. Through this effort, there is a growth in alliances where organizations are depending on other companies to offer complementary skills that will benefit both parties in obtaining particular established goals. While achieving this type of synergy, the two companies must create an inter-organizational alliance team. However, with combined efforts and a positive mindset, it is still inevitable that problems will arise at some point (Dyer, Dyer, & Dyer, 2013). Research indicates that possible alliance failure could result from the following:

 incompatible partner failure,

 a difference in culture,

 poor alliance leadership, and

 poor integration processes. However, one of the most common reasons for failure is because of the leader’s inability to manage the alliance team effectively (Dyer et al., 2013). An alliance team offers many benefits to a company. Yet, it is different from an internal team in several ways. Some common differences include the following: (a) cultural clashes, (b) a lack of trust, (c) a lack of control over decision-making, and (d) team expertise duplication. A due diligence team is needed to evaluate the other partner’s assets, resources, processes, and organizational culture (Dyer et al., 2013). “During the cultural assessment, the team examines the potential partner’s corporate values and expectations” (Dyer et al, 2013, p. 252). It also explores its organizational structure, reward systems and incentives, leadership styles and decision-making processes, human interaction patterns, work practices, history of partnerships, and human resource management practices. Ultimately, it is easier to identify potential areas of conflict if leaders and members understand the potential differences in corporate values, organizational structure, decision-making and leadership styles, and practiced reward systems. For example, even though colleges around the world are thought to offer education at its finest with the same goals in mind, they are all very different in the way they approach certain aspects of their mission (Dyer et al., 2013).

UNIT VIII STUDY GUIDE

Managing Inter-Organizational Alliance Teams More Effectively for the Future

 

 

 

BSL 4060, Team Building and Leadership 2

UNIT x STUDY GUIDE

Title

It has been proven that team members will work better together if they clearly recognize what factors might throw the team off track. Often, strategic futures exercises are performed to ensure that the team understands exactly what objectives are key goals for the team. Common key barriers to teams reaching their goals are usually found in technological and regulatory challenges, marketing and distribution challenges, or relationship indifferences (Dyer et al., 2013). When communicating, the team must decide which form of exchange will be utilized. For instance, some members may opt to email while others may prefer voice mail, videoconferencing, electronic data exchange, or a type of meeting (either face-to-face or through an online method). Basically, alliance teams are becoming an important part of the business landscape, and organizations will have a distinct advantage in the workplace if they learn how to manage teams effectively (Dyer et al., 2013). All teams will face challenges. Yet, it is important that leaders understand what key factors must be considered when building a team that is expected to excel in today’s competitive market. For instance, leaders must identify what tasks are to be completed and by whom. They must emphasize team membership for accomplishing organizational goals. Also, they must encourage positive relationships throughout the working of teams. Members must be trained and competent in their work performances. They must also be rewarded for the completion of their tasks and a job well done. Team-building activities should be incorporated regularly. In addition, an ample amount of resources, support, and evaluations should also be provided. Research indicates that educators must be trained in team learning and development, and they should allow students to develop team skills and have a positive attitude through team experiences. Families and educators should prepare future generations to work effectively in teams. Basically, the key aspects for building effective virtual and alliance teams is found in building trust, promoting effective means of communication, enhancing problem-solving techniques, and finding incentives that will motivate team members to work more productively and efficiently together. Click the link below to view an interactive tutorial from MyCourseTools on communicating across cultures. http://www.pearsoncustom.com/mct-enterprise/asset.php?isbn=1256689785&id=11611 Click the link below to view an interactive tutorial from MyCourseTools on business communication. http://www.pearsoncustom.com/mct-enterprise/asset.php?isbn=1256689785&id=11572

Reference Dyer, W. G. Jr., Dyer, J. H. & Dyer, W. G. (2013). Team building: Proven strategies for improving team

performance (5th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Suggested Reading The global nature of business has created a demand for virtual teams. The effectiveness of virtual teams can have an impact on an organization, so optimizing the effectiveness of virtual teams is advantageous. Please use the Business Source Complete database in the CSU Online Library to read the following article that shares some insight on enhancing virtual teams. Berry, G. R. (2011). Enhancing effectiveness on virtual teams. Journal of Business Communication, 48(2),

186-206.

 

http://www.pearsoncustom.com/mct-enterprise/asset.php?isbn=1256689785&id=11611
http://www.pearsoncustom.com/mct-enterprise/asset.php?isbn=1256689785&id=11572
http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/viewarticle?data=dGJyMPPp44rp2%2fdV0%2bnjisfk5Ie46bFRsKevUbCk63nn5Kx95uXxjL6nr0evpq1KrqeyO

Fink Steps 1 And 2 Using 5th Grade Math Lesson 7-9 Pages

Assignment 1: Fink Steps 1 and 2

Due Week 4 and worth 330 points

For this first paper, you will work through the first two steps of Fink’s Initial Design Phase using A Self-Directed Guide to Designing Courses for Significant Learning, L. Dee Fink, PhD.

First, select a short unit of study for the grade level that you teach or would like to teach. The unit should be about 3-5 lessons long. Select a classroom/in-person course that is at least 20 hours long (2.5 days). Briefly describe your unit of 5th grade math and the intended grade level or audience for training (2 pages).

Then briefly describe the education technology that you want to incorporate into your lessons. You can replace existing ED tech with new ED tech or you can add in ED tech where there was none. For example, instead of using an interactive whiteboard like a SMART board, you could have students work on interactive tablets instead. At this point, you do not have to be specific, but you should have a general idea of what you would like to do (2 pages).

Next, work through the first two steps of Fink’s Initial Design Phase, found on pages 6-12 (listed below )of the Self-Directed Guide. Answer all of the questions on the page 7 worksheet for Step 1 (listed below ). For Step 2, answer the questions as noted in the outline provided on page 8, (listed below) and pages 11-12 (3-5 pages total).

Step 1: Situational Factors to Consider

Answer all the questions in the Step 1 Worksheet, “Situational Factors to Consider,” on page 7 of Fink’s guide. Your answers must be in complete sentences and in paragraph form, except when it would make sense to use a bulleted list for items in a sequence. You will have to copy each question into your document in order to answer it.

For question 1 of the worksheet on page 7, do the following activity and include your results in your analysis:

Using the survey in the EdTech Global Survey, analyze the state of technology at your school or place of work.

Where is it?

Where do you want it to be?

For question 4 of the worksheet on page 7 of Fink’s guide, include the following information:

Using the National Education Technology Plan as a guide, describe the digital divide that exists in your situation.

For question 5 of the worksheet on page 7 of Fink’s guide, include the following information:

Incorporate the information that you shared in the Week 1 discussion question on NETS standards.

Step 2: Identify Important Learning Goals

For Step 2 of your paper, you must include the following:

Answer the following questions from page 8 of Fink’s guide (approximately 1-2 paragraphs each):

What would I like the impact of this course (unit or training) to be on students 6 months to a year after the course is over? (Note: this is different from what Fink says of 2-3 years because you are working with either K-12 students or adult students who need to demonstrate their skills immediately.)

What would distinguish students who have taken this course (unit or training) from students who have not?

Define your unit or training goals and how students will meet them.

From the outcome of the EdTech survey you completed for Step 1, how will the technology help you achieve these goals?

Work through the worksheet on pages 11-12 of Fink’s guide.

Expand upon the goals that you have already defined and either map them to the following goals or create new goals to address these points:

Foundational Knowledge

Application Goals

Integrational Goals

Learn-How-to-Learn Goals

It would be a good idea to work through the entire worksheet and include all of the types of goals.

Refer to the responsible use policy that you created for the Week 3 discussion question.

How does the responsible use policy help students achieve the learning goals?

To help you get ideas for this part of your paper, refer to the Week 2 discussion question on updating a lesson with learning technology.

Include the following two items in the appendix. These do not count towards the total page count:

Your results of the EdTech Global Survey (save your results as a PDF)

Responsible Use Policy that you developed as part of the Week 3 Discussion question

Use at least 2 peer-reviewed sources besides your textbook and the reports provided to support your use of technology. A good place to start is the Strayer library at research.strayer.edu.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date.

Include a reference page of all citations used, including the textbook and the reports provided.

Include an appendix with the required information.

The cover page, the reference page, and the appendix are not included in the required assignment page length.

A Self-Directed Guide to Designing Courses for Significant Learning

L. Dee Fink, PhD Director, Instructional Development Program University of Oklahoma

Step 1. Situational Factors

The first thing to do when designing a course is to size up the situation carefully. This means reviewing information already known about the teaching and learning situation and, in some cases, gathering additional information. This information will be used to make important decisions about the course.

There are several potentially important situational factors affecting a course. The general categories I have found useful to consider are the following:

· Specific Context of the Teaching/Learning Situation

· General Context of the Learning Situation

· Nature of the Subject Characteristics of the Learners

· Characteristics of the Teacher

The specific context factors are always important. The other factors are sometimes important, sometimes not. But it’s always useful to review all of them.

The general categories (and the specific factors associated with each category) are shown in the Step 1 Worksheet. Review each of these factors with regards to your specific course. If you have information about any factor, write it down. If you don’t have information, but think it could be important, write down ideas about how you might obtain it.

Step 1. Worksheet

SITUATIONAL FACTORS TO CONSIDER

1. Specific Context of the Teaching/Learning Situation

How many students are in the class? Is the course lower division, upper division, or graduate level? How long and frequent are the class meetings? How will the course be delivered: live, online, or in a classroom or lab? What physical elements of the learning environment will affect the class?

2. General Context of the Learning

Situation What learning expectations are placed on this course or curriculum by: the university, college and/or department? the profession? society?

3. Nature of the Subject

Is this subject primarily theoretical, practical, or a combination? Is the subject primarily convergent or divergent? Are there important changes or controversies occurring within the field?

4. Characteristics of the Learners

What is the life situation of the learners (e.g., working, family, professional goals)? What prior knowledge, experiences, and initial feelings do students usually have about this subject? What are their learning goals, expectations, and preferred learning styles?

5. Characteristics of the Teacher

What beliefs and values does the teacher have about teaching and learning? What is his/her attitude toward: the subject? students? What level of knowledge or familiarity does s/he have with this subject? What are his/her strengths in teaching?

Step 2. Learning Goals

After you have reviewed the situational factors, decide what you want students to get out of the course. Many people take a content-centered approach to this task: “I want students to learn about topic X, topic Y, and topic Z.” This is an easy, natural approach but it generally results in an overemphasis on “understand and remember” kinds of learning. These are important. But when teachers take a learning-centered approach, they usually identify several additional kinds of significant learning.

I recommend that teachers ask themselves: “What would I like the impact of this course to be on students, 2-3 years after the course is over? What would distinguish students who have taken this course from students who have not?”

When students and teachers think about what students can learn that is truly significant, their answers usually include, but do not focus on, “understand and remember” kinds of learning. More often they emphasize such things as critical thinking, learning how to creatively use knowledge from the course, learning to solve real-world problems, changing the way students think about themselves and others, realizing the importance of life-long learning, etc.

After many years of studying people’s responses to the question of what constitutes significant learning, I have proposed a taxonomy of significant learning. It consists of six major types of significant learning, with a number of sub-categories. This taxonomy is shown in Figure 1 (next page). The taxonomy identifies significant kinds of learning that you may want to include as important learning goals for your course.

image1.jpg

One important feature of this particular taxonomy is that each kind of learning is interactive, as illustrated in Figure 2 (next page). This means that each kind of learning can stimulate other kinds of learning. This has major implications for the selection of learning goals for your course. It may seem intimidating to include all six kinds of significant learning. But the more you can realistically include, the more the goals will support each other—and the more valuable will be your students’ learning.

INTERACTIVE NATURE OF SIGNIFICANT LEARNING

image2.jpg

Step 2. Worksheet Questions for Formulating Significant Learning Goals

“A year (or more) after this course is over, I want and hope that students will _____________________ .”

Foundational Knowledge

· What key information (e.g., facts, terms, formulae, concepts, principles, relationships, etc.) is/are important for students to understand and remember in the future?

· What key ideas (or perspectives) are important for students to understand in this course?

Application Goals

· What kinds of thinking are important for students to learn?

· Critical thinking, in which students analyze and evaluate

· Creative thinking, in which students imagine and create

· Practical thinking, in which students solve problems and make decisions

· What important skills do students need to gain?

· Do students need to learn how to manage complex projects?

Integration Goals

· What connections (similarities and interactions) should students recognize and make…:

· Among ideas within this course?

· Among the information, ideas, and perspectives in this course and those in other courses or areas?

· Among material in this course and the students’ own personal, social, and/or work life?

Human Dimensions Goals

· What could or should students learn about themselves?

· What could or should students learn about understanding others and/or interacting with them?

Caring Goals

· What changes/values do you hope students will adopt?

· Feelings?

· Interests?

· Ideas?

“Learning-How-to-Learn” Goals

· What would you like for students to learn about:

· how to be good students in a course like this?

· how to learn about this particular subject?

· how to become a self-directed learner of this subject, i.e., having a learning agenda of what they need/want to learn, and a plan for learning it?