Research Proposal (Term Project)

Each student will be required to complete the term project, which is a research proposal written in an APA Style. The project should have at least 1000-words of substance not counting the cover and reference page. Please include a Cover Page, an abstract and a list of references. The research proposal you write in this course will NOT be sent to the IRB for approval. This is because you will not be conducting actual research for the purposes of this class. You will however gain an insight as to how to write a research proposal.

Each student will be required to complete a research proposal, as the term project. The research proposal will include the following:

• Title page

• Abstract (100-120 words)

• Introduction

• Hypothesis/Problem Statement/Purpose Statement

• Literature Review and Definitions included in research

• Research methods/design

• References

• Appendices – as needed (annotated bibliography, example consent form, example survey if used)

The research proposal (Term Project) must be in a Word Document (.doc) uploaded to the student’s folder through the assignment section. Students will be required to use at least five scholarly references in their work.

Students are required to follow APA Style guidelines.

The research proposal (Term Project) must be in a Word Document (.doc) uploaded to the student’s folder through the assignment section. Students will be required to use at least three scholarly references in their work.

Students are required to follow APA Style guidelines.

Please make sure that you are using the course-writing rubric to use as a checklist so that you write a solid paper.

Students must use a topic, which was approved by the instructor or their research proposal.

Do not include quotes in your work. The student needs to display good critical thinking skills and not a string of quotes written by published authors. Your proposal is what is needed for a successful research project to be conducted in the future.

Do not wait to the last minute to research, write, format, and edit. Proper time management is required to turn in a quality research proposal that highlights your understanding of how to conduct scholarly research.

Your Term Project must be submitted by the end of week 7. No late submissions will be accepted past the official end of the semester.

Due Sunday 11:55 pm EST

Brandon Olsen

SSGS 300 Research Methods Jason Anderson

05JAN19

Preventing Juvenile Delinquencies

 

 

Abstract

 

The study aims at investigating the inside knowledge and awareness of juvenile delinquencies and the preventive approach non-justice systems in the six Great Lake States namely Illinois, Michigan, Ohio, Indiana, Wisconsin and Minnesota. The study analyzes the level at which the residents are knowledgeable about growing problems and the suggested policies that would help juveniles to access opportunities and economic mobility towards fruitful future lives. It adopted a cross-sectional survey model as the sample procedures, with 1000 questionnaires issued out to respondents, data collection and analysis courtesy of the statistical package for social sciences (SPSS). The outcomes availed that 58% had knowledge of juvenile crime in the six Great Lake States, 24.5% admitted to having witnesses juvenile theft, 82% admitted to having an idea on juvenile delinquency services, 42% blamed ignorance and exposure to the justice system as the leading causes of juvenile crimes while 33% considered non-justice system and sensitization as the suitable approach towards addressing juvenile crime. In conclusion, the study showed the residents of Great Lake understood juvenile delinquency, threats and the need for a non-justice system, separation of juveniles from adult offenders and creating awareness and proper policies to address the issue.

 

Preventing Juvenile Delinquency

 

Introduction

 

There are collective institutions and regulations through which juvenile offenders face until the pressed charges are disposed of or evaluated punishment has been finalized hence termed as juvenile services. Such systems constitute of the juvenile courts, remand homes, judges, borstal homes, lawyers, approved institutions, probation officers, law enforcement officers, and social workers (Alfrey, 2010). Amid the existence of numerous policies that protect children since 1959, the juveniles have continuously exposed to policies which denies them their fundamental rights. Throughout decades as catalyzed by the growth of urban centers courtesy of rural-urban migrations, the number of juvenile delinquency increased worldwide thanks to the negligence of juvenile welfare and increasing poverty (Hanson et al., 2010). Majority of the juveniles from poverty-stricken regions resorted to crime, violence and youth misdeeds with the modern society facing an extreme of the same. Various institutions were set up to help address juvenile delinquency yet the rates of juvenile delinquency continued to skyrocket. As a result, reforms exist only to limit the available juvenile care. In the presence of digitization, contemporary society has become vigorous that youths are more vulnerable to engage in crime. Consequently, the world has so far detained more than two million juveniles with about a half of the population confined due to petty crimes hence going against their rights provided in the constitutions of every sovereign state (Alfrey, 2010). Some of the rights include the proper issuing of prompt notification of charges, impartial adjudication, separate trial, examination of prosecution witness an adequate defense. The Great Lake juvenile justice system shows gross inadequacy in both qualitative and quantitative terms to comply with juvenile rights. The study would, therefore, examine juvenile crime knowledge and awareness and the impact of non-justice system of juvenile delinquencies. Comment by Anderson, Jason: Revise grammar Comment by Anderson, Jason: Revise grammar Comment by Anderson, Jason: Revise grammar Comment by Anderson, Jason: Revise grammar

 

Problem Statement

 

The future of the youths and society could be under threat in the cases where children who engage in gross-misconduct face mistreatment from the law hence denying the reformation, isolation, and reintegration in the community, a role given to the juvenile services (Hanson et al., 2010). More so, submitting the youths to the justice system and making them undergo stereotyping due to the demographic factors would only help to increase the magnitude of the problem rather than resolving this issue. The study would assess the knowledge and awareness of the juvenile delinquency and the influence of non-justice system to the juvenile crimes. Comment by Anderson, Jason: Revise for grammar

 

Research Questions

 

The study would get the guidance of the progressing questions: Comment by Anderson, Jason: What is a progressing question?

 

Do the Great Lake residents know juvenile delinquency services? Comment by Anderson, Jason: Know about? Please revise for coherency

 

What are some of the approaches of the non-justice system in addressing juvenile delinquency?

 

How is the justice system influence juvenile delinquency? Comment by Anderson, Jason: Revise grammar

 

Literature Review

 

The UNICEF reports of 2016 show that about two million youths have their liberty ignored as they continuously languish in prisons. They are likely to come in contact with the authority for various reasons ranging from the political issues among others. More so, the youths could engage the authority not as the real culprit’s, but as victims of circumstance, that is, being at the wrong place at the wrong time ( Alfrey, 2010). The modern digitization has further agitated the youths hence making them more violent and destructive. Some of the youths engage in armed fighting; teenage girls sneak out of school for prostitution, both male and female engage in theft to satisfy their urges for drugs with some youths used by the political class to cause havoc during the electioneering period. Comment by Anderson, Jason: Authorities? Comment by Anderson, Jason: Juveniles and political issues? Can you please clarify? Comment by Anderson, Jason: Revise grammar Comment by Anderson, Jason: Please define this. It is unclear Comment by Anderson, Jason: Citation needed.

 

Types of Juvenile Delinquency

 

Scholars such as Uqwuoke (2015) avails to broad categories of juvenile delinquencies namely the personal and sociologic delinquencies. The personal delinquency refers to the young youth whose misdeeds emerge from the unhealthy parent-child relationship as well as other numerous negative factors during the early developmental period that resulted in the inability to differentiate between the Do’s and Don’ts (Patacchini & Zenou, 2009). The sociologic delinquency, on the other hand, is the product of home, and other factors form the environment which intentionally made the youth aware of the fact that what the society deems wrong is embraced in the immediate surroundings. Sociologic delinquency is the cultural deviation of society’s norms and traditions.

Before talking about addressing adolescent crimes, one should have adequate knowledge of the risk factors. Bello(2006) presents the risk factors for juvenile crimes as home, society, school surroundings, peer groups, social and psychological trauma, lack of sex education in schools, stereotyping due to exposure to the justice system, the absence of social acceptability due to maladjustments away from home and the incitement among other factors.

 

Research Methodology and Design Comment by Anderson, Jason: Are you proposing your own research as the assignment intends? It seems like you are using the design from another study that has already been published or presented. The idea behind this assignment is to propose your own hypothetical research plan. This whole section appears to be copied and pasted from another source, hence leading me to believe that it is not your own material and not your own design.

 

The design utilized for the progressing research was cross-section-driven survey research design which targets at collecting data on certain variables within the research population at one area in a given time (Hanson et al., 2010). The design aided in studying a sample group of 1000 participants in the Great Lake states which were a suitable representation of the whole population of the region. The utilization of small segments of the said population enables the study partakers to acquire suitable information for the possible generalization of the total population (Patacchini & Zenou, 2009). Either, the application of a co-model titled the social Genome Model helped explore the influence of the criminal record on the family life resources in the Great Lake states. The primary tool used in the collection of study information was the questionnaire.

 

The study happened in six Great Lake states namely Illinois, Michigan, Ohio, Indiana, Wisconsin, and Minnesota. Out of the total population of 439,115 people, 1000 participants; 540 girls and 460 boys all below 18 years of age, availed the following responses (Hanson et al., 2010). 24.5% were witnesses of juvenile theft, 82% understood juvenile delinquency services and the impact of the justice system, and 42% blamed ignorance and exposure to the justice system as the leading causes of juvenile crimes and suggested the utilization of the non-justice system in and suitable policies to address the problem. Additionally, 33% considered and sensitization as a suitable approach towards addressing juvenile crimes.

 

The utilized questionnaire comprised of two sections: the first section highlighting the demographic data of the respondents while the remaining section contained very crucial research issues. The guiding principle for the questionnaire was the research questions and hypothesis, and it characterizes self-administration (Alfrey, 2010). The target sample received questionnaire courtesy of the five research assistants in every state once at a time. Data analysis and pressing happened courtesy of computation processes by use of the statistical package for social science (SPSS) version20. There was the application of the frequency distribution table and percentage to help interpret the availed information. The chi-square helped to determine the relationship among the variables.

 

References

 

Alfrey, C. (2010). Juvenile Delinquency and family Structure: Implications for marriage and Relationship education. Retrieved from

http://www.healthymarriageinfo.org/docs/juveniledelinquency.pdf April 20th, 2016.

 

Hanson, Rochelle, Genelle Sawyer, Angela Beagle, & Grace Hubel. (2010). “The Impact of Crime Victimization on Quality of Life.” Journal of Traumatic Stress 23 (2): 189–97.

 

Patacchini, E. & Zenou, Y. (2009). Juvenile Delinquency and Conformism. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 28 (1):1-31.

Appendices

 

Annotate Bibliography: Curbing Adolescence Criminology

 

Hanson, Rochelle, Genelle Sawyer, Angela Beagle, & Grace Hubel. (2010). “The Impact of Crime

Victimization on Quality of Life.” Journal of Traumatic Stress 23 (2): 189–97.

 

The above-given resource explores the insight of marginalization, societal stereotyping and other maltreatments affecting teens and the associated risk factors towards juvenile crime and the approach of preventing their participation in the vice. Exposing the youths to crime has a direct impact on their development and opportunities in various ways. Either, the cost of mitigating crime in the society raises courtesy most of the adolescents residing in marginalized areas with high rates of poverty, less organized social structures and high rates of crime. The situation could worsen as they enter a delicate stage of adolescence which requires proper parenting and guidance hence facing maltreatment by the society in which they reside. Lack of the latter further renders them helpless therefore could do anything to survive including violent activities and crime.

 

Relevant institutions should formulate the policies which lower the footprint of the justice system in which the judicial system does not over-enforce low-level offenses. More so, the non-justice approaches could help to address juvenile crime as coursed by various risk factors. Consequently, there is a need to invest in prevention for the vulnerable adolescents who could involve injustice crimes. Different prevention models such as the school-based Violence Mitigation Program, One Summer plus Job’s Program and Becoming a Man Program could help address the risk factors towards implicating in crime, the justice system, and delinquency. For instance, the application of Becoming a Man Program in Chicago public schools through the utilization of mental behavior-based treatment showed witnessed high rates of graduation among youths as levels of crime reduced drastically among. Other initiatives could solve the primary prevention in the broader community; secondary curbing which focuses on teens who are at risk of affiliating to gang-related crimes and the interventions activities for teenagers in groups seems to mitigate crime in areas with high rates of crime.

 

Among the required infrastructure are the clearly defined criteria according to the level of services offered, evaluative tools, and program guide. Among the drawbacks of effectively executing the initiatives include the inadequate capital the implementation of the efforts. The approach could, however, help to deter adolescents from engaging in crime for future patriotism and economic development

 

Patacchini, E. & Zenou, Y. (2009). Juvenile Delinquency and Conformism. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 28 (1):1-31.

 

The study examines the situation in the economically disadvantaged regions, the risk posed towards engaging in crime and the appropriate strategy towards preventing adolescents from involving in the offense. In their article, Patacchini and Zenou state that adolescents and families residing in poverty-stricken regions experience necessary scarcity wants as compared to those in the active areas. Their situation renders them vulnerable to any appealing option of accessing such amenities. In the case where the population could easily obtain firearms further create an unsafe environment with rampant cases of crime among the youths. The dual suggests some approaches of addressing gun violence through the reduction of the diversion of guns and other weapons from legitimate to the illegitimate users hence preventing the highly vulnerable individuals from accessing such weapons.

 

By lowering the supply of firearms, the teens would not fall victim to gun-related criminal acts or participate in the vice hence reducing the associated outcomes. Lack of regulation in firearm policies could lead to high rates of crime among the youths. The equilibrium or study evidence proves that the rule that helps to strengthen necessary checks and needs legal permits to acquire firearms have a link with the decline in gun violence. However, evidence-based research from Ohio revealed that the impact for the other weaponry regulations and homicide showing combination or negative. More so, in the absence of firearms, the teens and other perpetrators of crime could opt to use crude weapons to execute offense hence creating the same disturbing scenarios. There must, therefore, relevant to establish a framework to eliminate the root cause of the problem before implementing policies on firearms ownership. The society with adolescents who have proper upbringing and education poses future prosperity with the opposite realizing horrific consequences associated with insecurity, deaths, violence and all other unwanted behavior.

 

Liberman, Akiva, and Jocelyn Fontaine. 2015. “Reducing Harms to Boys and Young Men of Color from Criminal Justice System Involvement.” Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

 

The progressing study explores the shortage of monitoring by appropriate entities, as a risk factor towards juvenile crime hence suggesting the suitable approach towards preventing teen participation in the offense. There has been a debate on the impact of involving teens in the justice system with stereotyping and numerous other factors emerging to embody them in criminal activities continuously. As a result, there was an emphasis on the non-judicial system as the solution of preventing them from crime. An exposure of adolescents to trauma and stress from the violence surrounding (marginalized regions) rocked with skyrocketing criminal activities could influence decision-making and sound childhood development among the fast transiting adults. Additionally, the pressure from all dimensions of the society ranging from life hardships, peerpressure, and biological factors among others could catalyze their engagement in crime. The home, school, and social environment should avail the appropriate climate for proper characterization of adolescents. Lack of adequate monitoring from the parents, religious institutions, teachers and the relevant government institutions threatens to render the adolescents vulnerable to criminal activities and the associated vices.

 

Parents, religious institutions and schools should come up with an initiative which could help to guide and counsel adolescents and provide them with basic needs to help them focus on constructive activities that could positively impact their lives. An initiative that provides the youths with appropriate information and support to deter them from engaging in crime could help to reduce crime and facilitate sound behavior in the society. For instance, the application of the Restorative Justice Models in Ohio as the substitutive to institutional discipline as compared to the no-perseverance methods proved to mitigate adolescence criminality. There is also a thin line between adolescent crime and substance abuse thus eliminating the latter would automatically reduce the former. According to the Wisconsin study, the illegalizing and curbing all loopholes of drug and substance trafficking as well as rehabilitating the addicted teens, the rates of crime among teenagers dropped suddenly hence impacting the youths academically. However, the community lacked behind regarding infrastructure and capital to facilitate the program thus engaging the justice system. The relevance of the article emerges from the fact that, adolescent crime mitigation poses a bright future not only to the lives of the involved teens but also to the general society.

Analysis Of Approaches Paper

CHOSEN APPROACHES: Additive and Transformation approach to multicultural education

TOTAL LENGTH: 4-5 Pages, 1200-1600 words.

5 REFERENCES NEEDED

PROJECT INFO:

Follow the link below and select 2 approaches to multicultural education topics to compare and critique. Then, submit these approaches for the instructor’s approval. All that is needed is 2-3 sentences on which approaches you have selected and why.

Four Approaches to Multicultural Reform

http://people.uncw.edu/robertsonj/SEC210/MulticulturalCurriculumReform.pdf

This Topic Submission assignment is due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of Module/Week 2.

Paper:

Refer to the rubric attached in the Assignment Instructions folder and the links below as needed to describe and evaluate each of your approved approaches. Comment on the compatibility of these approaches with a Christian worldview.

1. Definitions of Multicultural Education

http://www.nameorg.org/definitions_of_multicultural_e.php

2. Varieties of Multicultural Education

http://www.ericdigests.org/1995-1/multicultural.htm

3. Multicultural Education/Curriculum Description

http://www.jstor.org/stable/2967262?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

4. A Synthesis of Scholarship in Multicultural Education

http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED378287.pdf

Be sure that the following guidelines are met:

* APA style format

* Length: 1,200-1,600 words (4–5 pages not including the title and reference pages)

* References: minimum of 5 (books or peer-reviewed academic journals)

This assignment is due via SafeAssign by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of Module/Week 3.

EDUC 848

 

Analysis of Approaches Paper Instructions

Topic Submission:

Follow the link below and select 2 approaches to multicultural education topics to compare and critique. Then, submit these approaches for the instructor’s approval. All that is needed is 2-3 sentences on which approaches you have selected and why.

Four Approaches to Multicultural Reform

http://people.uncw.edu/robertsonj/SEC210/MulticulturalCurriculumReform.pdf

This Topic Submission assignment is due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of Module/Week 2.

Paper:

Refer to the rubric attached in the Assignment Instructions folder and the links below as needed to describe and evaluate each of your approved approaches. Comment on the compatibility of these approaches with a Christian worldview.

1. Definitions of Multicultural Education

http://www.nameorg.org/definitions_of_multicultural_e.php

2. Varieties of Multicultural Education

http://www.ericdigests.org/1995-1/multicultural.htm

3. Multicultural Education/Curriculum Description

http://www.jstor.org/stable/2967262?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

4. A Synthesis of Scholarship in Multicultural Education

http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED378287.pdf

Be sure that the following guidelines are met:

* APA style format

* Length: 1,200-1,600 words (4–5 pages not including the title and reference pages)

* References: minimum of 5 (books or peer-reviewed academic journals)

This assignment is due via SafeAssign by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of Module/Week 3.

Discussion: Modeling In The Aviation Environment

 

Accident causation models have been around since the late 1800s. They  helped identify hazards and explain the nature of accidents.

Read Chapter 2 – Modelling a Dynamic World (Attached). Then do the following in the assignment directions.

Directions:

  • Review a model from the past or one that is used now and explain the theory of it.
  • Provide reasons for causation models (past and present) and their application to Human Factors.
  • Determine whether causation theories have made humans and/or  organizations better at being proactive or predictive in accident  prevention and in accident investigation.

About a page, APA with references

Chapter 2

Modelling a Dynamic World

1 Accident Causation Models

As Chapter 1 outlines, this project focusses on accident causation models and in particular their application to the field of Human Factors in aviation. In order to fully understand the current position and trends of accident causation modelling it is important to acknowledge the developments and history of the area and where there may be room for further investigation and work. This chapter aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the history and development of models and where opportunities and validation for this project arise.

The next section begins with an aviation accident case study. This is then referred to at salient points of the chapter in order to maintain a rooted discussion. It is appropriate to look at the history of accident investigation models by way of illustrating them with a contemporary accident case study.

2 Runway Overrun at Bangkok (QF1)

At about 22:47 local time on 23 September 1999, a Qantas Boeing 747-438 aircraft registered VH-OJH (call sign Qantas One, en route from Sydney to London) overran runway 21 Left (21L) while landing at Bangkok (Don Mueang) International Airport, Thailand. The aircraft landed long and aquaplaned due to the runway being affected by water following very heavy rain.

The first officer was the handling pilot for the flight. The crew elected to use the ‘normal’ company practice configuration for the approach and at various stages during the approach to runway 21L, the crew were informed by air traffic control

Introduction Literature Review

Applying the Approach to

Industry (British

Airways SMS)

Conclusions

Development of a Complex

Network Approach

Validation Study (Flight Simulator)

Application of a Complex

Network Approach

Extending the Mathematical

Model (Bayesian Approach)

C o p yr

ig h t ©

$ {D

a te

}. $

{P u b lis

h e r}

. A

ll ri g h ts

r e se

rv e d .

 

 

Human Factors Models for Aviation Accident Analysis and Prevention26

that although there was a thunderstorm and heavy rain at the airport, visibility was 2½ mi/4 km (or greater).

At 22:44:53, the tower controller advised that the runway was wet and that a preceding aircraft (which landed at approximately 22:40) reported that braking action was ‘good’. As the aircraft descended through the 200 ft/60 m point, it started to deviate above the 3.15° glideslope, passing over the runway threshold at 169 kt at a height of 76 ft/ 23 m. Those parameters were within company limits but both high and fast. When the aircraft was approximately 10 ft/3 m above the runway, the captain instructed the first officer to go-around. As the first officer advanced the engine thrust levers, the aircraft’s main wheels touched down and the captain immediately cancelled the go-around by retarding the thrust levers, without announcing his actions. This resulted in confusion among the flight crew and reverse thrust was not selected or noticed to be absent during the landing run. The aircraft came to rest some 720 ft/220 m after the end of the stopway with its nose resting on an airport perimeter road. The aircraft sustained substantial damage during the overrun. None of the 3 flight crew, 16 cabin crew or 391 passengers reported any serious injuries (ATSB 2001).

Single Perception Theory

1890s The birth of modern research into accidents and causation is mostly attributed to the work of Bortkiewicz (1898). He concluded, from limited studies, that accidents occur at random and are therefore inexplicable. This view luckily did not restrain further research into accidents but instead opened the gates for years of investigation, conjecture and argument.

1910s and 1920s The majority of the work and investigation into accidents was at first set with a pivotal view of a single event perception whereby an accident or incident is regarded as a solitary event for which there must be a solitary cause. The job of an air accident investigator was to find this cause and, by eliminating it, stop an accident from recurring. Elements of the idea of a ‘single event’ remain, and mistaken use of the concept still occurs in work with aviation or other complex systems. However, it was soon realised that these environments spawn much more complex interactions between human–human, human–system and system–system components. This view of accidents also allowed for a blame culture to flourish, in that a party was seen as responsible – as a ‘cause’ of the ‘event’. An accident had to have someone or something at fault, to blame, so that what had happened was not purely an ‘act of God’ that could not be explained. This rather simplistic view and the work of, for instance, Greenwood and Woods (1919) from the Industrial Fatigue Research Board (IFRB) gave rise to the ‘accident proneness’ model. This focussed solely on the individual (rather than the system) and came to dominate the research and accident reduction exercises for the first half of the twentieth century.

C o p yr

ig h t ©

$ {D

a te

}. $

{P u b lis

h e r}

. A

ll ri g h ts

r e se

rv e d .

 

 

Modelling a Dynamic World 27

Further work within the IFRB and clinical studies of reactions, coordination and distraction, among other elements, concluded that accident proneness existed. It was considered related to nervous instability and poor aestheto–kinetic coordination (Farmer and Chambers 1926 and 1929). The uncritical acceptance of such an accident proneness model by the community at the time is almost fully attributed to this work. This view persisted for many years, although it can be seen that other work, such as domino theory, was already being developed, exposing the shortfalls of the current theory. Indeed, studies continued long after this time, examining the concept and working around the broad theory base of accident proneness in individuals. For example, in their 1988 study, Mohr and Clemmer find no real evidence for a proneness that is measurable or useful in accident causation analysis and conclude that ‘it is unlikely that overall injury rates in the workplace can be effectively reduced by screening out workers with excessive numbers of injuries’ (Mohr and Clemmer 1988: 127). This work illustrates the shortfalls of this model of accident investigation and so highlights the limits of application to our Qantas Flight 1 Accident Case Study (QF1) If accident proneness were the case, then the pilots should have been involved in other incidents prior to and following on from this event. These ideas cannot be substantiated given the evidence. This view also suggests that these people can be selected out and, therefore, that all accidents can be prevented by removing the accident-prone individual, at the selection or at the training stage, or after any incident has occurred. This is now, almost universally, accepted as a flawed theory. Dekker (2006) describes this ‘Bad Apple Theory’ as the ‘Old View’ and contends that safety progress was made mainly from technological advances and not as the result of the application of these theories. Thus, further models were needed to attempt to explain accident causation.

The main problem with the simple explanation of single perception theories, other than the realisation that more complex interactions occur, is that it assumes an innate replicability in incidents. If a ‘cause’ can be removed, then the accident could not happen again. Were this applied to QF1 and the event investigated in the 1920s, the pilots could be sacked and so the incident should not recur. This does not address any of the real issues and would have a devastating effect on morale and reporting behaviour were it enacted. The inherent fact is that accidents are viewed, now, at least, as being so complex that many different ‘causes’ could have produced an incident. It is often very difficult to identify a certain cause or produce an effective barrier to similar accident types. The single event perception is very much suited to the type of investigation predating Human Factors influence, as that conclusive ‘part’ of an aircraft, etc. could often be found and blame attributed to structural facets of the system. However, a systems view had to be developed and adopted.

C o p yr

ig h t ©

$ {D

a te

}. $

{P u b lis

h e r}

. A

ll ri g h ts

r e se

rv e d .

 

 

Human Factors Models for Aviation Accident Analysis and Prevention28

2.2 Domino Models and their Development: The Demise of ‘Proneness’?

1930s and 1940s In his book Industrial Accident Prevention (1931), Herbert William Heinrich elaborated for the first time on his domino theory of industrial accidents. For the first time in Human Factors literature, accidents were attributed to a sequential chain of events rather than a single causal factor (normally an employee). In order to illustrate this Heinrich used the idea of a series of dominoes falling over, causing the final event.

It is fundamental to this model of accident causation that Heinrich labelled each of the dominoes with causes that may lead to an accident. It can be contended that this resulted in the basis for modern accident causation models.

Heinrich’s first domino was entitled ‘Social Environment and Heredity’. This referred to the personality traits that are believed to be inherited, or the social environment that the worker is immersed in, influencing the likelihood of that worker being involved in an accident. This, in particular, echoes elements of accident proneness theory whereby internal facets of a human contribute towards accidents regardless of external factors. This, in a way, shows a development in accident proneness rather than a complete deviation, but the other dominoes bring in factors that were being discussed in all the research of those times.

Second, and linked through the chain of events basis of the theory, is the ‘Fault of Person’. This refers to the effect a worker’s life (as an outside influencer) is having on events such as family problems, fatigue, and so on. This includes flaws developed in the context of the social environment and the system in which the worker operates. This is a significant drawing together of ideas that external influences on an individual and accident causation are as significant as internal ideas of proneness, if not more so. Today this is still an important area in the investigation of accidents and incidents. These ‘soft issues’ are often easy to gain from those involved in an incident or accident on a surface level. It can be contended that approaching Human Factors via the ‘soft issues’ of family life and social life allows the industry to merely tick a box and not truly understand the more complex facets of system interaction with humans at all levels. However, referring again to QF1, had the event occurred in the 1930s there would at least have been some form of defence for the flight crew. For the first time in an investigation, outside influences would be considered and from this came the potential for changes to regulations, training and standards.

The second domino was also developed in Heinrich’s later expansions to include the actual expression ‘Mistake’ as a result of these personal factors. The third domino illustrates Heinrich’s direct cause of accidents/incidents. This domino was called either an ‘Unsafe Act’ or ‘Unsafe Condition’. The very idea that this domino is required in order to knock over the fourth, ‘Accident’, shows that Heinrich postulated that one or both of these must be present for an accident to occur. This model was the first to really develop the importance of behaviour on influencing safety and accident causation and Heinrich felt that this third domino was the most

C o p yr

ig h t ©

What does he say about assumptions, and why does he discuss them?

Education professionals respond to meet the needs of students from a variety of backgrounds, varied experiences, with different abilities and needs. This video provides important insight into how to respond to meet the needs of students in the classroom and offers important advice to teachers and families.

After viewing the video “F.A.T. City: A Look Back, a Look Ahead—A Conversation about Special Education,” in a 500-750 word video analysis, discuss:

  1. How Richard D. Lavoie defines and explains fairness.
  2. What does he say about assumptions, and why does he discuss them?
  3. What are three key concepts from the video that were especially meaningful to you? How will they affect your professional teaching practice?

Cite specific examples from the video in your analysis.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

 

View “F.A.T. City: A Look Back, a Look Ahead-A Conversation about Special Education,” located on Films on Demand.

URL:

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://fod.infobase.com/PortalPlaylists.aspx?wID=96349&xtid=41097