Linear Regression/Scatterplot

Linear Regression/Scatterplot
Statistics also play an important part in the tools and techniques of change management, which is why we are continuing to explore SPSS.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
• Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
• You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
View the following:
SPSS for Beginners 4: Regression
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVwEdhEiGJg
2. Open SPSS and complete the following:
Obtain an output with a simple linear regression and a scatterplot graph (as in the tutorial, with the values as seen below); highlight the model summary and coefficients table, and upload it into LC:

Caffeine Dose  IQ Score
50                   100
60                   102
80                   107
90                   105
110                   112
150                   108
150                   103
160                   109
180                   109
200                   112
200                   120
210                   114
210                   118
220                   121
220                   120
250                   130
260                   127
260                   131
280                   132
300                   135

Explain how you will use your findings in your future professional practice.

Scripting dialogues between teacher and student is a strategy used to intentionally teach the integration of written and spoken language. Scripted dialogues are used in a variety of contexts, and are especially helpful when students are practicing phonics, word recognition, and spelling.

Part 1: Scripting D

Stories

Minarik, Else Holmelund. Little Bear. Illustrated by Maurice Sendak. New York: HarperCollins, 1957. (1957) From “Birthday Soup”

“Mother Bear, Mother Bear, Where are you?” calls Little Bear.

“Oh, dear, Mother Bear is not here, and today is my birthday.

“I think my friends will come, but I do not see a birthday cake. My goodness – no birthday cake. What can I do?

The pot is by the fire. The water in the pot is hot. If I put something in the water, I can make Birthday Soup. All my friends like soup.

Let me see what we have. We have carrots and potatoes, peas and tomatoes; I can make soup with carrots, potatoes, peas and tomatoes.”

So Little Bear begins to make soup in the big black pot. First, Hen comes in. “Happy Birthday, Little Bear,” she says. “Thank you, Hen,” says Little Bear.

Hen says, “My! Something smells good here. Is it in the big black pot?”

“Yes,” says Little Bear, “I am making Birthday Soup. Will you stay and have some?”

“Oh, yes, thank you,” says Hen. And she sits down to wait.

Next, Duck comes in. “Happy Birthday, Little bear,” says Duck. “My, something smells good. Is it in the big black pot?”

“Thank you, Duck,” says Little Bear. “Yes, I am making Birthday Soup. Will you stay and have some with us?”

“Thank you, yes, thank you,” says Duck. And she sits down to wait.

Next, Cat comes in.

“Happy Birthday, Little Bear,” he says.

“Thank you, Cat,” says Little Bear. “I hope you like Birthday Soup. I am making Birthday Soup.

Cat says, “Can you really cook? If you can really make it, I will eat it.”

“Good,” says Little Bear. “The Birthday Soup is hot, so we must eat it now. We cannot wait for Mother Bear. I do not know where she is.”

“Now, here is some soup for you, Hen,” says Little Bear. “And here is some soup for you, Duck, and here is some soup for you, Cat, and here is some soup for me. Now we can all have some Birthday Soup.”

Cat sees Mother Bear at the door, and says, “Wait, Little Bear. Do not eat yet. Shut your eyes, and say one, two, three.”

Little Bear shuts his eyes and says, “One, two, three.”

Mother Bear comes in with a big cake.

“Now, look,” says Cat.

“Oh, Mother Bear,” says Little Bear, “what a big beautiful Birthday Cake! Birthday Soup is good to eat, but not as good as Birthday Cake. I am so happy you did not forget.”

Common Core State StandardS for engliSh language artS & literaCy in hiStory/SoCial StudieS, SCienCe, and teChniCal SubjeCtS

appendix b | 15

“Yes, Happy Birthday, Little Bear!” says Mother Bear. “This Birthday Cake is a surprise for you. I never did forget your birthday, and I never will.”

TEXT COPYRIGHT © 1957 BY ELSE HOLMELUND MINARIK. ILLUSTRATIONS COPYRIGHT © 1957 BY MAURICE SENDAK. Used by permission of HarperCollins Publishers.

ialogues Table

Using the “Scripting Dialogues Table” with the “Birthday Soup” excerpt, create teacher‐student dialogues specific to using single‐letter and consonant digraphs, short vowel and long vowel sounds, and appropriate use of word building and word building‐spelling. Review the examples in your text as a guide.

Part 2: Rationale

In a 250‐500 word rationale, summarize how each dialogue is effective and developmentally appropriate for teaching phonics, word recognition, and spelling.

Explain how you will use your findings in your future professional practice.

Support your findings with 2‐3 scholarly sources.

Studying The Old Testament Narratives Passage: 2 Kings 4:1-7

Instructions: 

For this assignment, you will be studying the Old Testament story of Elisha and the Widow’s Oil found in 2 Kings 4:1-7. You will use the template below in order to complete a study of this passage. In your study, you will use the skills of Observation, Interpretation, Correlation, and Application that you have become familiar with through your reading in Everyday Bible Study.

I. Observation

A. I have read 2 Kings 4:1-7 in both a formal translation (KJV, NKJV, NASB, ESV, or CSB)

and a functional translation (NIV, NLT, or NCV). Highlight the correct answer. You will find a copy of the NASB, ESV, CSB, and NLT in your myWSB Library.

o Yes

o No

B. Identify the basic elements of the story you are studying

1. Main characters: (List them)

2. Plot: (50-100 words)

3. Narrative structure: (50-100 words)

C. List basic observations about this passage using the “Key Question” for observation.

1. Who:

2. What:

3. Where:

4. When:

5. Why:

6. How:

II. Interpretation

A. Determine the author’s main point. In 1-2 paragraphs (100-400 words) explain what you

think the author is trying to communicate in this passage. Remember, the Old Testament narratives frequently communicate truth by showing it to us in story form instead of telling it to us by way of teaching or sermon.

B. Based on your answer above, write out one principle from this passage. You should be able

to express this principle in 1-3 sentences.

III. Correlation

A. How does this Old Testament narrative fit within the metanarrative of the Bible? State what

type of story you believe this to be (creation, fall, redemption, or new creation) and explain why you believe this to be so. Your explanation should be 1 paragraph (100-200 words) in length.

B. How does your principle fit with the rest of the Scripture? This principle is the one you have

written out in 1-3 sentences in the Interpretation section. If your principle is a true Biblical principle it will be reflected throughout the Scriptures. Where is the principle discovered in this Old Testament narrative found elsewhere in the Scriptures? Your explanation should be 1 paragraph (100-200 words) in length.

C. How does this Old Testament narrative reflect the person and work of Jesus Christ? State

and explain at least one way that the principle of this narrative can be identified in the person and work of Jesus Christ. Your explanation should be 1 paragraph (100-200 words) in length.

IV. Application

What points of application can be made using the Four Questions for Application? State and explain 1 point of application for each of these four questions. Your explanation for each of these points should be 1 paragraph (100-200 words) in length.

A. The question of duty

B. The question of character

C. The question of goals

D. The question of discernment

Discussion 1: Evidence-Based Practices: How Do You Know They Are Working?

Discussion 1: Evidence-Based Practices: How Do You Know They Are Working?

For this Discussion you will develop a working definition of “evidence-based practice” after reading different perspectives on what it means for practices to have a strong evidence base. This definition will assist with future modules as you explore what evidence-based practice looks like in academic and social-emotional instruction within special education.

To prepare:

  • Review this module’s Learning Resources and analyze the perspectives for what makes a strategy evidence-based.
  • Develop a definition of “evidence-based practice” based on the information gathered from the readings.
  • Select two peer-reviewed articles written within the past 3 years that report on a study using evidence-based practices to support your definition.
  • Review the Appendix B Checklist from the U.S. Department of Education’s Identifying and Implementing Educational Practices Supported by Rigorous Evidence article in the module’s Learning Resources.
  • Review the CEC Standards for Evidence-Based Practices in Special Education.
  • Review the CEC evidence-based practice news release.

By Day 3 of Week 1 (June 3, 2020)

Post your “evidence-based practice” definition and an evaluation of your selected articles addressing the following:

  • *A citation for each article and an explanation as to why it was selected
  • *How would you evaluate the findings based on the checklist? How do the articles measure up to the standards addressed in the checklist? (THIS CHECK LIST IS APPENDIX B in the US Dept of Education resource 2003).
  • *How might someone evaluate an observed teaching practice to determine the extent to which it is research-based?
  • *In what ways might there be differences in the interpretation of what evidence-based specialized instruction is, depending on the particular disability area?

Text Book is:

Coyne, M. D., Kame’enui, E. J., & Carnine, D. W. (2011). Effective teaching strategies that accommodate diverse learners (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

  • Chapter 1, “Introduction”
  • Chapter 2, “Characteristics of Students with Diverse Learning and Curricular Needs”

    For immediate release

    Contact: Diane Shinn, 703-264-9478, dianes@cec.sped.org

     

    CEC Releases Evidence-Based Practice Standards

    New standards define quality indicators and criteria for evidence-based practice

    Arlington, Va., Jan. 23, 2014 – The Council for Exceptional Children (CEC), the leading voice

    in special education, has released its CEC Standards for Evidence-Based Practices in Special

    Education.

     

    A workgroup comprised of seven special education researchers developed, vetted, and piloted

    the new standards for determining evidence-based practices (EBPs) in special education. CEC’s

    goal is that the standards will be applied to better understand the effectiveness of a range of

    practices for learners with disabilities.

     

    “The new CEC Standards for Evidence-Based Practices in Special Education will change the

    landscape within the special education research community and their application will be critical

    to the future success of research in our field,” said CEC President Robin D. Brewer.

     

    The standards were guided by and build upon the separate standards for identifying EBPs in

    special education previously developed by Gersten, Fuchs, Compton, Coyne, Greenwood, and

    Innocenti (2005) and Horner, Carr, Halle, McGee, Odom, and Wolery (2005) for group

    comparison and single-subject research, respectively.

     

    “Our Workgroup owes a tremendous debt to the pioneering work of Gersten et al. and Horner et

    al.,” said Bryan Cook, chair of CEC’s EBP workgroup. “Our goal was to build on their work by

    creating a single set of standards that incorporates both group comparison and single-subject

    research studies and ensuring that the standards reflect the views of the special education

    research community.”

     

    The workgroup accomplished these objectives by developing a set of standards that considers

    both group comparison and single-subject studies, and conducting a Delphi study to solicit and

    incorporate the feedback of a group of expert special education researchers.

     

    Rather than classify practices simply as evidence-based or not, the new standards provide more

    detailed classifications of practices’ evidence bases.

     

    Specifically, the new standards result in instructional approaches being categorized as:

    Evidence-based practices.

    Potentially evidence-based practices.

    Having mixed effects.

    Having negative effects.

    Having insufficient evidence to categorize their effectiveness.

     

    2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 1000, Arlington, VA 22202-3557 (P) 800.224.6830 (TTY) 866.915.5000 (F) 703.243.3961 www.cec.sped.org

     

    http://www.cec.sped.org/

     

     

    “We hope the new standards will be helpful to the special education research community in

    classifying the evidence base of instructional practices in special education and that their

    application will, in turn, provide a knowledge base that special educators can use to improve the

    instruction they provide to exceptional children and youth,” Cook said.

     

    Brewer acknowledged CEC’s appreciation to its expert members in the workgroup. “I would

    like to express CEC’s deepest appreciation to Bryan Cook, chair of the workgroup, and all the

    workgroup members – Virginia Buysse, Janette Klingner, Tim Landrum, Robin McWilliam,

    Melody Tankersley, and Dave Test – for their dedication to this important effort over the past

    five years,” she said.

     

    Download CEC Standards for Evidence-Based Practices in Special Education.

     

     

    The Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) is an international community of educators who

    are the voice and vision of special and gifted education. CEC’s mission is to improve the quality

    of life for individuals with exceptionalities and their families through professional excellence and

    advocacy. Visit us at www.cec.sped.org.

     

     

    # # #

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    2

     

    http://www.cec.sped.org/~/media/Files/Standards/Evidence%20based%20Practices%20and%20Practice/EBP%20FINAL.pdf
    http://www.cec.sped.org/