Describe your assessments. How do these assessments evaluate students’ reading skills and/or progress?

Week 5 – Final Project

Summative Assessment – Balanced Literacy Plan

Summative Assessment – Balanced Literacy Lesson Plan

As you found in Week Four, there are many variations of balanced literacy. The main consistencies are that balanced literacy includes reading, writing, listening, and speaking. In addition, the main blocks of balanced literacy are known as Read-Aloud/Shared Reading, Guided Reading, Word Study, and Independent Reading.

  1. For your final assignment, you will create a balanced literacy lesson plan for grades pre-K to third. In a 10- to 12-page paper (not including title and reference pages) written in APA style, include the following components: Grade Level (pick a grade from pre-K to third)
  2. Anchor Standard
  3. Text—include author/illustrator, title, brief summary
  4. Complete this chart. Make sure all your activities support each other and align with the anchor standard. See below for guidance/prompts.

Balanced Literacy Block

Your Example

Read-Aloud/Shared Reading

Word Study

Guided Reading

Independent Reading

  1. Explain how reading, writing, listening, and speaking are promoted in your lesson plan. (All four should be featured in each block.)
  2. Describe how your activities support the anchor standard.
  3. Describe your assessments. How do these assessments evaluate students’ reading skills and/or progress?
  4. Discuss the benefits of teaching from a balanced literacy approach.

Below are some prompts to help you plan your balanced literacy blocks:

Balanced Literacy Block

Guidance—Do not include this column in your chart

Read-Aloud/Shared Reading (30 minutes)

Revise your Week Four, Discussion 1 assignment.

In this block, the teacher activates prior knowledge and interactively reads aloud a piece of quality writing to the whole class. The teacher will stop at planned points to ask a variety of questions that elicit student response. Following the teacher’s modeling and prompting, students learn to think deeply about text, to listen to others, and to develop their own ideas. This block is not meant for students to just listen to the teacher reading aloud; it is designed for students to interact with the teacher and learn how to think about text from the teacher. The teacher uses this time to explicitly model reading strategies and skills that the students need to learn. For younger readers, you might want to read from a “big book” that has large print and pictures. Logistically, you could also use the document camera to show the book pages on the big screen. Traditionally, teachers have read on the carpet as well. You need to somehow arrange it so students can see your text.

Describe or show via video how you will read aloud the text and how you will model questioning and thinking strategies. Be very specific about listing the questions you will ask and at which points in the book or text you will ask the questions or model the critical thinking. Indicate page numbers, etc.

Write this out so that a substitute teacher can implement your lesson plans.

Word Study(10 minutes)

Revise your Week Four, Discussion 2 assignment.

In this block, the teacher works with the whole class to develop word study or vocabulary skills. Word study is the study of our alphabetic symbol system. This includes mini-lessons that address one of more of the following: phonics (letter/sound relationships), morphemic analysis (using word parts to denote meaning), and automaticity for sight words. Word study involves both the decoding (reading) and encoding (phonics and spelling) of our symbol system; the objectives of word study are to help students make meaning from an author’s message and to help them convey meaning in their own messages.

Describe one word study activity that supports your Read-Aloud and that can be implemented to the whole class. How would you present this to your whole class? How will you facilitate the students’ learning and make sure they are all engaged and challenged?

Write this out so that a substitute teacher can implement your lesson plans.

Guided Reading (40 minutes; you will meet with each group for 10-20 minutes)

Revise your Week Four Written Assignment.

Guided reading groups are also known as strategy groups. In this block, the teacher meets with a small group of students who read at the same reading level. The teacher works on specific strategies or skills. Each student has a copy of the text, which can be a basal, passage, or trade book. The teacher uses this time to explicitly model and practice.

Create a guided reading lesson plan for one of the following reading level groups: Far Below Grade Level Reading Expectations, Below Grade Level Reading Expectations, At Grade Level Reading Expectations, Above Grade Level Reading Expectations, or Far Above Grade Level Reading Expectations. Your guided reading lesson plan must include the following components: group level, text, objectives, phonics skills or word study, pre-reading, new vocabulary, during-reading, after reading, and writing connection.

Write this out so that a substitute teacher can implement your lesson plans.

Independent Reading

Review your work for Week Five, Discussion 2.

In this block, the teacher sets up routines for students to engage in independent reading. There may be time for SSR or DEAR, but for the most part, teachers are conducting guided reading group lessons while students are independently reading and/or participating in literacy centers. Independent reading is a time when students read text (either self-selected or teacher recommended) at their independent reading level to practice reading strategies and/or develop fluency and automaticity. This is not free reading; it is purposeful reading. Teachers may also confer with individual students at this time for brief reading conferences. Teachers also have students respond to the text in meaningful ways through writing, sketching, etc.

Describe how you will accommodate independent reading. Be specific about routines, student expectations, teacher expectations, texts, etc. Include a description of your classroom library.

Write this out so that a substitute teacher can implement your lesson plans.

Source: Adapted from: http://www.methuen.k12.ma.us/images/ELA_Mapping/Balanced Literacy Model.pdf (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

Note: As you have noticed, this final assignment pulls various tasks from the course. You may use your previous assignments from this course, but make sure to revise appropriately to ensure alignment and flow. You need to make sure that you include reading, writing, listening, and speaking in each block. You also need to make sure that all your activities in each block support the anchor standard and, that together, all the activities make sense. Include all instructional materials, including handouts, word cards, manipulatives, etc. Be as detailed and specific as possible. You want to include scripts and procedures. Pretend that you are writing lesson plans for a substitute teacher.

Compare and contrast the two (2) selected systems using a SWOT analysis on each system and summarize the main findings from your analysis.

Assignment 2: SWOT Analysis and Presentation

Based on the feedback from your professor for the first assignment,

You will continue working on your recommendations for an LMS for your organization. You must compare and contrast two (2) different LMSs using a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) analysis on each system that you have identified as two (2) potential solutions.

Once you have completed the SWOT analysis, you will create a presentation for the organization so that they are able to make the best choice possible.

You must submit the SWOT analysis and your recommendation as two (2) separate files for the completion of this assignment. Label each file name according to the section of the assignment it is written for.

******Professors Feedback (This paper was very difficult to grade because you didn’t follow the required APA format in the organization of your paper! You must always provide headers for each section that coincides with assignment instructions. This is required in APA style papers.  In APA, you must have at least level one and level two headers! APA requires them, because they give structure to your writing. They not only tell the reader what content to expect but also speak to its relative position within a hierarchy.)
The following resources may help you with this assignment:

· Article titled “SWOT Analysis”, located at http://www.washington.edu/research/rapid/resources/toolsTemplates/SWOT_analysis.pdf

· Article titled “SWOT Analysis”, located at http://www.mcafee.cc/Classes/BEM116/PDF/SWOT.pdf.

Note: You may also use Internet for articles on SWOT analysis.

Write a two to four (2-4) page paper in which you:

1. Select one (1) proprietary LMS and one (1) open-access LMS that provide viable solutions for your organization. Provide a rationale for your selections.

2. Compare and contrast the two (2) selected systems using a SWOT analysis on each system and summarize the main findings from your analysis.

3. Based on your SWOT analysis, recommend the LMS that you believe will best support the organization’s needs. Justify your response.

4. Create a five to ten (5-10) minute presentation for your organization explaining your recommendation for an LMS. Note: The presentation may be completed in PowerPoint, Prezi, video, other presentation software, or as a written script. The presentation file is not included in the required assignment page length. You can record the audio for your presentation or include a written script. Typically, you should allocate about one (1) minute per slide.

5. Provide at least three (3) reliable, relevant, peer-reviewed references (no more than one [1] used previously), published within the last five (5) years that support the paper’s claims.

6. Format your assignment according to the following formatting requirements:

a. Typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides.

b. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length.

c. Include a reference page. Citations and references must follow APA format. The reference page is not included in the required page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

· Analyze an organization’s learning needs and rationale for selecting a Learning Management System (LMS).

· Differentiate between proprietary and open-access LMS.

· Describe the components of a typical LMS.

· Recognize strengths and constraints of an LMS.

· Evaluate assessment tools and capabilities of an LMS.

· Use technology and information resources to research issues in technology tools to manage learning.

· Write clearly and concisely about issues in technology tools to manage learning using proper writing mechanics.

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Assignment 2: SWOT Analysis and Presentation

 

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below   70% F

Fair

70-79%   C

Proficient

80-89%   B

Exemplary

90-100%   A

 

1. Select one (1) proprietary LMS   and one (1) open-access LMS that provide viable solutions for your   organization. Provide a rationale for your selections.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely   selected one (1) proprietary LMS and one (1) open-access LMS that provide   viable solutions for your organization. Did not submit or incompletely   provided a rationale for your selections.

Partially selected one (1)   proprietary LMS and one (1) open-access LMS that provide viable solutions for   your organization. Partially provided a rationale for your selections.

Satisfactorily selected one (1)   proprietary LMS and one (1) open-access LMS that provide viable solutions for   your organization. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your selections.

Thoroughly selected one (1)   proprietary LMS and one (1) open-access LMS that provide viable solutions for   your organization. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your selections.

 

2. Compare and contrast the two   (2) selected systems using a SWOT analysis on each system and summarize the   main findings from your analysis.
Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely compared   and contrasted the two (2) selected systems using a SWOT analysis on each   system; did not submit or incompletely summarized the main findings from your   analysis.

Partially compared and   contrasted the two (2) selected systems using a SWOT analysis on each system;   partially summarized the main findings from your analysis.

Satisfactorily compared and   contrasted the two (2) selected systems using a SWOT analysis on each system;   satisfactorily summarized the main findings from your analysis.

Thoroughly compared and contrasted   the two (2) selected systems using a SWOT analysis on each system; thoroughly   summarized the main findings from your analysis.

 

3. Based on your SWOT analysis,   recommend the LMS that you believe will best support the organization’s   needs. Justify your response.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely   recommended the LMS that you believe will best support the organization’s   needs. Did not submit or incompletely justified your response.

Partially recommended the LMS that   you believe will best support the organization’s needs. Partially justified   your response.

Satisfactorily recommended the LMS   that you believe will best support the organization’s needs. Satisfactorily   justified your response.

Thoroughly recommended the LMS   that you believe will best support the organization’s needs. Thoroughly   justified your response.

 

4. Create a five to ten (5-10)   minute presentation for your organization explaining your recommendation for   an LMS. Note: The presentation may be completed in   PowerPoint, Prezi, video, other presentation software, or as a written   script. The presentation file is not included in the required assignment page   length. You can record the audio for your presentation or include a written   script. Typically, you should allocate about one (1) minute per slide.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely   created a five to ten (5-10) minute presentation for your organization   explaining your recommendation for an LMS.

Partially created a five to   ten (5-10) minute presentation for your organization explaining your   recommendation for an LMS.

Satisfactorily created a five   to ten (5-10) minute presentation for your organization explaining your   recommendation for an LMS.

Thoroughly created a five to   ten (5-10) minute presentation for your organization explaining your   recommendation for an LMS.

 

5. Provide at least three (3)   reliable, relevant, peer-reviewed references (no more than one [1] used   previously), published within the last five (5) years that support the   paper’s claims.

Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number   of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required   references; most references high quality choices.

Meets number of required   references; all references high quality choices.

 

6. Writing Mechanics, Grammar, and   Formatting

Weight: 5%

Serious and persistent errors in   grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Partially free of errors in   grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Mostly free of errors in grammar,   spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Error free or almost error free   grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

 

7. Appropriate use of APA in-text   citations and reference section

Weight: 5%

Lack of in-text citations and / or   lack of reference section.

In-text citations and references   are provided, but they are only partially formatted correctly in APA style.

Most in-text citations and   references are provided, and they are generally formatted correctly in APA   style.

In-text citations and references   are error free or almost error free and consistently formatted correctly in   APA style.

 

8. Information Literacy /   Integration of Sources

Weight: 5%

Serious errors in the integration   of sources, such as intentional or accidental plagiarism, or failure to use   in-text citations.

Sources are partially integrated   using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

Sources are mostly integrated   using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

Sources are consistently   integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and   summarizing.

 

9. Clarity and Coherence of   Writing

Weight: 5%

Information is confusing to the   reader and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support   ideas.

Information is partially clear   with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Information is mostly clear and   generally supported with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Information is provided in a   clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and evidence that   logically support ideas.

  • attachment

    W3A1order_18137_w5_d1.doc

History Of Graphic Design: Ch.9 Postmodernism

Chapter 9 Postmodernism

 

 

#1: Questions: Brief Answers:

 

 

1. Did new technology in the 1980s change design and typography (and the profession)

for better or for worse? Explain both sides of this argument.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. What influences the artists of Push Pin Studios? What’s distinctive about their style?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3. Explain Post-Modern typography through Émigré magazine, Rudy Van Der Lans and

Zusanna Licko.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short Essay:

Explain the style and content of the psychedelic poster.

Who are the artists and what influenced them in art and culture?

Discipline Process

 

Review the following case scenario and answer the questions that follow in a 500-750 word response.  Support your answer with in text references to specific sections of the IDEA as applicable:

Charlie is a 5th grader who receives special education services for a learning disability. Charlie is on grade level in math and two years below grade level in reading. He receives services in a resource setting for one hour each day. Charlie has no history of behavior problems.

Charlie was caught stealing software from the computer lab at his school. His teacher referred him to the assistant principal who issued a three-day suspension and required him to return the stolen materials.

Charlie returned to the classroom to gather his belongings and confronted his teacher. He called her names, threatened to come back to school with a knife to “cut her,” and pretended to swing his fists toward her. Charlie’s teacher called the principal, who, in accordance with the student code of conduct at the school, issued an additional 10-day suspension for Charlie, bringing his total days of suspension to 13.

  1. What      happens immediately to Charlie?
  2. What      services, if any, are provided to Charlie during his removal to an IAES?
  3. Who      needs to be contacted?

Assume a manifestation determination review is held for Charlie, and it’s determined that his behavior was not a manifestation of his disability.

  1. What      disciplinary actions are permissible?
  2. What,      if any, services will be provided to Charlie during the duration of the      disciplinary action?
  3. What      happens if Charlie’s parents appeal the manifestation determination?

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

Source:   Bradley, R. (2007, October). Key issues in discipline. Building the legacy: IDEA 2004 training curriculum. Washington, DC: National

Dissemination Center for Children with Disabilities.

Chapters 6-7

Council for Exceptional Children. (2015). What Every Special Educator Must Know: Professional Ethics and Standards. Arlington, VA: CEC 1

Code of Ethics

Professional special educators are guided by the CEC professional ethical principles, practice standards, and professional policies in ways that respect the diverse characteristics and needs of individuals with exceptionalities and their families. They are committed to upholding and advancing the following principles:

1. Maintaining challenging expectations for individuals with exceptionalities to develop the highest possible learning outcomes and quality of life potential in ways that respect their dignity, culture, language, and background.

2. Maintaining a high level of professional competence and integrity and exercising professional judgment to benefit individuals with exceptionalities and their families.

3. Promoting meaningful and inclusive participation of individuals with exceptionalities in their schools and communities.

4. Practicing collegially with others who are providing services to individuals with exceptionalities.

5. Developing relationships with families based on mutual respect and actively involving families and individuals with exceptionalities in educational decision making.

6. Using evidence, instructional data, research, and professional knowledge to inform practice.

7. Protecting and supporting the physical and psychological safety of individuals with exceptionalities.

8. Neither engaging in nor tolerating any practice that harms individuals with exceptionalities.

9. Practicing within the professional ethics, standards, and policies of CEC; upholding laws, regulations, and policies that influence profes- sional practice; and advocating improvements in the laws, regulations, and policies.

10. Advocating for professional conditions and resources that will improve learning outcomes of individuals with exceptionalities.

11. Engaging in the improvement of the profession through active participation in professional organizations.

12. Participating in the growth and dissemination of professional knowledge and skills.