What are some of the challenges in diagnosing an individual with persistent depressive disorder or cyclothymic disorder versus their more severe counterparts?

1. What are some of the challenges in diagnosing an individual with persistent depressive disorder or cyclothymic disorder versus their more severe counterparts? Explain with examples.

2. Read the case study of “Jack” located in the Topic 4 materials and provide the appropriate DSM-5 diagnoses in descending order, from the dominant, to the least dominant. For each diagnosis you assign, provide an explanation of the diagnostic criteria you assessed to be compelling, as found in the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria monograph for each disorder.

3. Review the vignettes located in the topic five materials and then diagnose Robin and Becky with a psychotic disorder. What are the justifications for your diagnosis? Include differential diagnoses that were considered and discarded.

4. Review the vignette of Brett located in the topic five materials, and then provide a DSM diagnosis. Based on your cultural background/worldview, what is your perspective on the nature of psychotic disorders?

Briefly review the biblical narrative in Mark 5: 1-20. How would you help a psychotic individual who presents to your treatment center and insists that the etiology of his disorder is spiritual in nature and not biochemical?

Review Mercer’s article and identify two or three recommendations/practices you find relevant in this source as pertaining to a clinician that considers treating Brett.

5. Obsessive-compulsive and related disorders (e.g., hoarding disorder) have gained popularity in the media in recent years. How do portrayals of these disorders in popular culture differ from the descriptions of them in the DSM? How might the media popularity affect a person’s likelihood to seek treatment?

6. In what ways do people treat their own symptoms of anxiety disorders, and trauma and stress disorders? Review the case study of Rebecca, located under the Topic 6 topic materials. Provide and justify a diagnostic impression for Rebecca.

7. It can be difficult to distinguish between symptoms of personality disorders and other psychological disorders. What are some key differences between these disorders that can assist a counselor in making an accurate diagnosis?

8. Borderline personality disorder is often viewed as a diagnosis largely given to women, whereas antisocial personality disorder is considered a man’s diagnosis. Given your understanding of gender roles in society, why do you think this dichotomy exists?

9. In the DSM-5, Gambling Disorder was moved from the “Impulse Control Disorders” category to the “Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders” category. Do you think that this was a good decision? Why or why not?

10. What are some of the popular myths about addiction with which you are familiar? Use examples.

Each answer must have 150-200 words and a cite in the answer. Should look like this

question

answer

question

answer

Describe what you found interesting regarding this topic, and why.

PART1- Due Thursday

Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

Review this week’s course materials and learning activities, and reflect on your learning so far this week. Respond to one or more of the following prompts in one to two paragraphs:

  1. Provide citation and reference to the material(s) you discuss. Describe what you found interesting regarding this topic, and why.
  2. Describe how you will apply that learning in your daily life, including your work life.
  3. Describe what may be unclear to you, and what you would like to learn.

PART2-University of Phoenix Material

 

Case Study One Worksheet- Read Case Study One in the text.

*ALL CASE STUDIES ARE LOCATED IN THE APPENDIX IN THE BACK OF THE BOOK. You will need to download the entire book to access them. Some students have had difficulties downloading the entire book in the Blackboard system. You will need to call tech support if you have difficulties downloading it and they will walk you through the process.

Respond to the following questions in 1,250 to 1,500 words.

  • Why is this an ethical dilemma? Which APA Ethical Principles help frame the nature of the dilemma?
  • How might Dr. Romaro’s ambivalence toward the death penalty influence his decision to offer a forensic diagnosis of intellectual disability?
  • How might John’s “confession” or his comment about the “boy waiting for the bus” influence the decision? To what extent should these factors play a role in Dr. Romaro’s report?
  • How are APA Ethical Standards 2.0f, 3.06, 4.04, 4.05, 5.01, 9.01a and 9.06 relevant to this case? Which other standards might apply?
  • What steps should Dr. Romaro take to ethically implement his decision and monitor its effect?

Reference

Fisher, C. B. (2013). Decoding the ethics code: A practical guide for psychologists. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

PART3-I WILL HAVE TO SEND THE INFORMATION  Select an ethical dilemma related to professional competence.

Obtain faculty approval prior to beginning the assignment.

Develop a 5- to 10-minute debate based on your selected dilemma.

Address the following items:

  • Describe your selected ethical dilemma and why it is a dilemma.
  • Provide an argument for two methods of resolving the issue and justify the ethical resolution process you would take under each method.
  • Provide an argument for why each method should be used.

Submit a transcript of the debate.

Include a reference page with two to three peer-reviewed sources.

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

Describe the specific steps you would take in responding to the subpoena.

Discussion 1

Sheila came to your office about 8 months ago seeking counseling. She stated that she, “hoped to save her marriage.” After a few sessions with Sheila, you suggested that couples counseling might be helpful, but her husband, Roy, refused to participate. Three months ago, Sheila and Roy went through a very nasty breakup of their marriage, and now you have been subpoenaed to produce all of your records pertaining to Sheila’s treatment. Sheila has told you not to comply with the subpoena.

What should you do? Why?

Describe the specific steps you would take in responding to the subpoena.

This discussion question meets the following NASAC Standards:

20) Understand the addiction professional’s obligation to adhere to generally accepted ethical and behavioral standards of conduct in the helping relationship.

21) Understand the importance of ongoing supervision and continuing education in the delivery of client services.

35) Seek appropriate supervision and consultation.

47) Inform the client of his/her confidentiality rights, program procedures that safeguard them, and the exceptions imposed by statute.

65) Apply confidentiality-related legal restrictions appropriately.

66) Demonstrate respect and nonjudgmental attitudes toward the client in all contacts with other professionals or agencies.

110) Protect client rights to privacy and confidentiality in the preparation and handling of records, especially in relation to the communication of client information with third parties.

112) Prepare and record treatment and continuing care plans that are consistent with agency standards and comply with applicable administrative rules.

116) Demonstrate ethical behaviors by adhering to established professional codes of ethics that define the professional context within which the counselor works, in order to maintain professional standards and safeguard the client.

118) Adhere to federal and state laws, and agency regulations, regarding addictions treatment.

120) Utilize a range of supervisory options to process personal feelings and concerns about clients.

122) Obtain appropriate continuing professional education.

123) Assess and participate in regular supervision and consultation sessions.

Discussion 2

Marcie is a new client and a 22-year-old female who works as a receptionist in a doctor’s office. She has just revealed to you during the intake session that she has recently lost interest in most activities, has been sleeping a great deal yet feels tired all the time, and sometimes wishes she could cease to exist. She mentioned feeling as though she has been “on an emotional roller coaster” during the past year, throughout her on-again/off-again relationship with a 35-year-old married man. The last breakup with him seemed final, and Marcie has felt herself sinking deeper and deeper into depression ever since. When probed further about suicidal ideations, Marcie admitted that she has considered killing herself, although she is uncertain whether or not she would actually do it. She said that she is currently in possession of a gun that her friend allowed her to keep in her home following a rash of burglaries in the neighborhood, but she does not know whether she would actually use it.

You have consulted with your supervisor, who has agreed that Marcie should be referred immediately for a psychiatric evaluation and has instructed you to arrange for Marcie to go directly from your office to a nearby hospital. Marcie told you that her mother accompanied her and is in the waiting room, but she has emphatically stated that she does not want her mother to know what is going on with her. How should this delicate situation be handled? Why? What are three ethical and/or legal concerns about this case?

This discussion question meets the following NASAC Standards:

20) Understand the addiction professional’s obligation to adhere to generally accepted ethical and behavioral standards of conduct in the helping relationship.

35) Seek appropriate supervision and consultation.

47) Inform the client of his/her confidentiality rights, program procedures that safeguard them, and the exceptions imposed by statute.

65) Apply confidentiality-related legal restrictions appropriately.

66) Demonstrate respect and nonjudgmental attitudes toward the client in all contacts with other professionals or agencies.

110) Protect client rights to privacy and confidentiality in the preparation and handling of records, especially in relation to the communication of client information with third parties.

112) Prepare and record treatment and continuing care plans that are consistent with agency standards and comply with applicable administrative rules.

116) Demonstrate ethical behaviors by adhering to established professional codes of ethics that define the professional context within which the counselor works, in order to maintain professional standards and safeguard the client.

118) Adhere to federal and state laws, and agency regulations, regarding addictions treatment.

Major Depressive Disorder, Recurrent, with Psychotic Features

· Provide/identify the diagnosis

o Major Depressive Disorder, Recurrent, with Psychotic Features

o Bipolar I Disorder

o Antisocial Personality Disorder

o Erectile Disorder

Explain, in detail, your choice of diagnosis?

 

· Please Identify the two most appropriate therapeutic interventions & explain why they are appropriate in this instance

o Psychotropic medication

o Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)

o Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT)

 

· Calculate Mr. Soprano’s Full Scale IQ ____________________

· Describe the Full Scale range of scores ___________ – ___________

· Mr. Soprano’s full-scale IQ falls at the 45th percentile; please explain what this means.

 

· Of those listed, please select three potential resources for a client such as Mr. Soprano, and explain why based on emotional/psychological needs.

o Grief support groups

o MHMR (Helen Farabee Mental Health and Mental Retardation Center)

o Individual therapy

o Inpatient hospital facility

o Group therapy

 

· Please write a 1 paragraph summary for the provided case study

8

 

Signature ASSIGNMENT

 

The following is a brief, highly incomplete case study of a fellow who presents with symptoms of a specific psychiatric illness. He is interviewed and given some IQ testing. IQ testing would not be the best test to understand his problems, in fact it might be contraindicated in his current state but for the purposes of the assignment, IQ testing provides the clearest example of data and its use in a critical thinking exercise which is one of the goals of this assignment.

CASE STUDY

Mr. A. Soprano is a 55-year-old white male who presented as an “emergency” to a psychologist at a local ER. After establishing rules of confidentiality he revealed he was a high level crime boss; essentially a mobster. Throughout the interview he spoke in a rather pronounced Brooklyn accent. He preferred to call himself “a highly creative business man.” The client’s chief complaint was a concern over a vague desire to “hurt” himself, sleep problems and was experiencing disturbing “thoughts that don’t make any sense.” He stated his thinking had become very negative, “and weighs heavy on me”, where he doesn’t see anything good or positive in his life, “and I’m normally a positive kinda guy.” Dr. Psychologist proceeded to request the client cooperate with psychological testing to help determine potential causes for the client’s reported problems. This included a clinical interview.

Mr. Soprano began his interview by telling a story about ordering a fellow mobster killed, “a couple months ago.” He said, “I liked the guy. He was my right hand man, but he screwed up Doc and coulda’ got me whacked so ahh, ya know, he had to go but I felt really bad about it. Hey ‘fergit’ about it, it was a business decision. Sometimes ya make those tough one’s but this one really bothered me ya know.” He stated he noticed in the days following, his thoughts would race and be dominated by feelings of guilt. In the last seven weeks, he went through periods of sleeping much more than normal or suffering from insomnia when he felt “stressed out and I don’t get stressed out, Doc. Normally I sleep like a baby.” He also related in the last month, he had been battling with the strong desire to stay home and “hibernate” and would struggle to fight the fatigue and loss of interest through these times “but I have a business to run. So I get out but most days I don’t wanna.” On the days where he simply couldn’t bring himself to leave home he said he sometimes hears voices telling him he is a “bad man” and deserves to die. He added he finds himself peering out the curtains fearing the cops will come arrest him at any moment. He added he’s noticed other changes that cause him concern, “I don’t know Doc, I used to really enjoy roughin’ people up a little. You know, gettin’ their attention, a busted finger or a knee, but here lately I don’t enjoy it so much.” He said these changes in his feelings, thoughts and behaviors had been going on for “a couple months.” When asked if he had any thoughts of suicide he said, “I’ve thought about wanting to die a couple times, here lately when whoever this is talking to me in my head, but I don’t think I’d actually do it. I don’t want my kids livin’ with that, ya know. I just sometimes feel like hurtin’ myself for what I’ve done, but I’m not sure what that would be.”

Two days prior to this interview, Mr. Soprano said he was very disturbed when his wife came up to the restaurant table he was sharing with his girlfriend and called him a, “cheater and a murderer.” He added, “First time in a while since I went to restaurant ‘cause my appetite’s been off for weeks. I’ve lost about 30 pounds.” He said his wife knew he had a girlfriend but had never confronted him. His wife stormed out and he cut the evening short because of intense feelings of guilt and the sudden onset of deprecating voices that led to a brief consideration of suicide but he said he had no plan, just fleeting “thoughts of dying or deserving to die. But it went away.” He added that he has noticed frequent mood changes, ”Doc, these ‘blue moods’ just come over me. I ain’t no crier but suddenly I’m sad and ballin’ like a baby and I don’t even know why.” He also reported a loss of sexual interest, “My girlfriend is a real good lookin’ broad Doc, ya know buddaboom(!) but she’s frustrated with me cause I ain’t really interested lately, if ya know what I mean. And that really ain’t like me.”

The client reported a very similar episode at age 28, with most of the same symptoms, many years ago after he began his life of crime. After killing his first victim, a “business” associate, Mr. Soprano recalled becoming withdrawn and emotional and hearing a similar voice repeatedly speaking to him that he was “a bad man.” At that time, Mr. Soprano’s wife actually considered having him committed but decided against doing so. After several weeks his symptoms subsided without treatment. “I just threw myself into my work and got over it.” He also reported that he never wanted to be in this life. He said he was “a good kid”. Until he was 24 he worked for a second cousin in a successful chain of shoe stores and looked forward to becoming a partner but his father was killed and he was enlisted to “take over the family business. “Just like in the godfather movie Doc. I’m like a real life version of Michael Corleone.”

After assurances that he would not try to harm himself he agreed to come in for testing.

 

END OF CASE STUDY

 

One of the requirements of this assignment is to diagnose what psychiatric illness Mr. Soprano is suffering from. Be assured he is suffering from one of the four diagnoses listed in the answer sheet portion.

The following list of diagnostic criteria and symptoms is not comprehensive but gives sufficient information for you to determine which diagnosis best fits. Many psychiatric problems share similar symptoms and this can be confusing. What you are looking for is the best match for the largest group of symptoms that match Mr. Soprano’s story. For the most part these are the same criteria any professional would use to diagnose Mr. Soprano, only some of the wording has been simplified. Confine your consideration of symptoms to the facts of the story to determine THE BEST FIT.

The four diagnoses for you to consider are:

· Major Depressive Disorder, Recurrent, with Psychotic Features

· Bipolar I Disorder

· Antisocial Personality Disorder

· Erectile Disorder

 

1. These are the diagnostic criteria of Major Depressive Disorder and regardless of the other symptoms must include either depressed mood or loss of interest or pleasure.

· Must have at least 5 of the following symptoms for at least 2 weeks.

· Feels sad, hopeless, helpless and empty

· Significant decrease in interest or pleasure in all or almost all activities.

· Significant weight loss not from dieting or weight gain with decrease or increase in appetite daily.

· Sleeping too much or too little

· Fatigue or loss of energy

· Feelings of worthless or inappropriate guilt

· Decreased ability to think or concentrate or indecisiveness.

· Recurrent thoughts of death or thoughts of suicide

Sometimes the person may or may not experience psychosis (a distortion of reality in some way that can be problems with who they are, when it is or where they are, or strange thoughts that are not logical or hearing or seeing things that no one else can see or hear that reinforces their depression. Meaning, the psychosis seems somehow tied to the depression, appears driven by the depression and may make it worse. Where if the depression goes away, the psychosis goes away.

2. The diagnostic criteria of Bipolar I Disorder

Bipolar disorder is a cycling mood disorder. That means the sufferer has distinct episodes where they are markedly (very) different from their normal personality. These episodes can come frequently or may have years between. However to be considered a bipolar episode it must persist for a week or more and they come in two types: Bipolar I and Bipolar II.

Bipolar I is an episode of mood and behavior change dominated by mania. They may have also suffered from depression in the past, or prior to, or following a manic episode. Lastly, the depression portion can be like the symptoms of depression described above but episodes of depression are not necessary for the diagnosis of Bipolar I Disorder.

Bipolar II is dominated more by episodes of depression with a least one time where the person exhibited some symptoms of mania called hypomania (manic light) and is not offered for your consideration.

The symptoms of mania in Bipolar I Disorder are listed below for you to consider for Mr. Soprano.

 

Bipolar I:

· Must exhibit a period where there is a distinct episode of abnormal and persistent elevated or irritable mood. Increased focus on activities or energy for at least a week.

· During this period of elevated mood the person must exhibit at least three of the following

· Inflated self-esteem/ grandiose

· Much less need for sleep

· More talkative or a pressure to keep talking

· Racing thoughts

· Either increased focused on work, sex or other endeavors or unfocused purposeless activity

· Overly involved in activities that involve high risk of painful consequences such as spending or sex.

· These changes are sufficient to cause significant impairment in functioning.

· Not attributable to drugs. Some stimulants can cause a similar presentation as mania.

 

3. The diagnostic criteria for Antisocial Personality Disorder.

A personality disorder is a pervasive personality style that would describe the person. It is not a mental illness in that the person may not clearly appear psychiatrically ill. The main feature of this disorder is a pervasive pattern of disregard for, and violation of, the rights of others that begins in childhood or early adolescence and continues into adulthood.

Antisocial Personality Disorder:

· Does not obey the law by engaging in behaviors that are grounds for arrest.

· Is deceitful with patterns of lying, using aliases or conning others for profit or pleasure

· Impulsive with no planning

· Irritable with arguments or physical fights

· Reckless disregard for safety of self or others

· Irresponsible including failure to sustain consistent work or honor financial obligations

· Lack of remorse with indifference to hurting others or rationalizing hurting or mistreating others.

· Must be 18 or older

· Evidence of conduct problems before age 15.

· The behaviors of the disorder can’t be tied to a more severe mental illness such as schizophrenia.

4. The diagnostic criteria for Erectile Disorder.

Erectile Disorder is part of a group of Sexual Dysfunction Disorders. These are disorders where the person has a significant problem in their ability to respond sexually or to experience sexual pleasure. Erectile Disorder is essentially a problem for a man to get and/or keep an erection during sexual activity.

Erectile Disorder:

· Must have one of the three of the following on all or almost all (75%-100%) occasions of sexual activity.

· Significant difficulty obtaining an erection during sexual activity

· Or maintaining an erection until completion of sex.

· Significant decrease in erectile rigidity.

The symptoms must be for a period longer than 6 months and are distressing to the sufferer. It is not better explained by stress or relationship problems and is not the result of drugs, alcohol or a medical condition.

Test Results and Interpretations

Intelligence

The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) is a cognitive assessment for those aged 16-89. It provides scoring representative of intellectual functioning in specific cognitive domains, as well as a composite score representing general cognitive ability. This administration of the WAIS-IV of Mr. Soprano yielded the following results. All the ranges are calculated at the 95% confidence interval.

 

 

Factor Standard Score Percentile Description Range
         
Verbal Comprehension 96 42nd Average 91-101
Perceptual Reasoning 92 30th Average 87-97
Working Memory 102 51st Average 97-107
Processing Speed 102 51st Average 97-107
         
Full Scale IQ (FSIQ)   45th Average  

 

 

 

Assignment Assist and Guidance Sheet

This is to help you complete the assignment.

Critical Thinking: Choose the diagnosis. This is what clinical psychologists do. A clinical psychologist is provided information through interviews, outside information and assessment and then they put it together to ‘figure out’ what is going on. Those conclusions are then used to guide treatment. In explaining why you did not choose the other three diagnoses, focus on a few symptoms that are not present that caused you to rule that diagnosis out.

Interventions – pick two. There is one intervention that is not appropriate for Mr. Soprano. The other two address specific symptoms both physiologic and psychological that Mr. Soprano clearly presents. However there is one treatment that is just not indicated. One helpful hint; many studies show that two of the treatments in combination are much more effective in treating Mr. Soprano’s problem than either one alone.

Quantitative skills:

An IQ test is made up of many smaller tests. These then produce the subtest scores you see on the left. The Full Scale IQ is that one number we always hear when talking about a person’s Intelligence Quotient or IQ. For the purposes of the assignment the Full Scale IQ is an overall average of the individual subtest scores.

The column with all the “average”(s) merely means that all the scores fall in the average range of IQ scores. Meaning most people have scores like these. Not exceptionally high or low; they are average.

Understanding and calculating confidence intervals:

No one will get exactly the same score on an IQ test every time. There are variables in the person and in the administration that can introduce variance in the scores. The assumption is there is an optimal or true performance score for this person. This true IQ score would reveal itself as the most common score through multiple administrations of the test but of course you can’t keep giving the test over and over again because of something called ‘practice effect’. So you calculate using statistical methods how confident you are that the score you got would be captured in a range of scores the vast majority of the time if you could give the test repeatedly; say a hundred times. This is called a confidence interval. Another way to say it as a percentage, how confident am I, as the tester that the client’s actual, true IQ score falls in a specific range of scores most of the time on repeated administrations? In this case we are looking at ranges that capture a 95% confidence interval. Simply stated, as the tester, “I am confident that 95% of the time the person’s true IQ will be in the range of __A___ to __B____. Where A and B are the outside limit of the range of possible scores with the actual tested IQ score as the middle of that range. Or conversely there is a 5% chance their true IQ score falls above or below the range of scores given.

The percentile is where the person’s score falls, in relation to the standard distribution of scores. For instance a person with a score of 115 is at the 84th percentile, meaning about 84% of the population would score at or below below 115 and 16% at or above 115. (Average IQ is 100 at the 50th percentile).

Now, look closely at the scores and ranges. As stated these are at 95% confidence interval. It remains the same for the blank confidence interval for you to fill in for the Full Scale IQ. Again, because we don’t exactly know where the range of scores fall in relation to the person’s true IQ, we consider the score we do have as the center of the interval (with the understanding it may not be). With this information you should be able to calculate the FSIQ and the confidence interval numbers and explain Mr. Soprano’s percentile rank.

Social Responsibility: Now that you know the person a bit, what community resources would best fit Mr. Soprano needs? To do this you have to have some understanding of what those resources try to accomplish and would that be beneficial to this person and explain why. There is no singular right answer. It rests more on your explanation and educated knowledge of those listed resources.

Communication skills: This is to see if you can distill the background, interview content, test results and treatment recommendations into a short summary where the reader would still have a good understanding of the case without all the quotes or details.

Writing is a combination of aptitude and knowledge of grammar and sentence structure. As a college educated person the ability to write is essential to the appearance of competence. You don’t have to be an accomplished author but basic skills are a necessity. So here are a few rules:

· This is a professional, formal writing task. It is not writing a note or sending a text.

· Do not refer to yourself. No “I” or “me”. If you must, you are “this writer”.

· Do not use slang

· Do not use abbreviations. Texting has ruined people in this regard. IMHO 😉

· Read what you’ve written, aloud. If it sounds disjointed or doesn’t make sense then guess what?

· Do not answer with your opinion

For the case summary let’s see what a summary would look like of a similar length case study of Ms. Jane summarized in 1 paragraph as follows:

Ms. Jane is a 44 year old, white, female who presented with a complaint of anxiety. She reported experiencing anxiety in the form of severe nervousness, panic, fear and foreboding in most social situations, especially where she feels pressured to meet and speak to unfamiliar people. She is terrified she will embarrass herself by having nothing to say or humiliate herself in some way. She stated she has suffered with this for years but never sought treatment until now because her daughter is marrying in 6 months. She is terrified she will embarrass herself and her daughter. She was assessed and found to meet the criteria for Social Anxiety Disorder. IQ testing indicated that Ms. Jane’s intellectual functioning is in the average range. She was prescribed short term psychotropic medication in the form of an anxiolytic to relieve her sense of panic and nervousness. She also contracted for at least 5 sessions of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy to help her identify triggers for her anxiety and strategies to reduce her fearfulness. She was also referred to a support group of people with social phobias.

This reads very similarly to an actual summary paragraph of a psychological assessment. Note most of the details of the interview and assessment are omitted but there is enough to give you a pretty good idea what is going on with Ms. Jane and her treatment plan. Obviously Mr. Soprano’s will read differently because he has a different history and disorder but it should contain similar kinds of points.