How does Risk information change depending on different decision-makers? 

Instructions: Please answer the following questions using proper APA format and citations.  Each question should be answered with a 2 pages response.

1.      How does Risk information change depending on different decision-makers?  Describe one scenario and explain how different decision-makers (e.g., a facility manager, a governor, a public health official, or a federal infrastructure protection official, etc.) would have different needs for inputs and outputs.
2.      Discuss who “owns” risk associated with critical infrastructure nationally, regionally, or locally.  Discuss the same issue in the cyber world.
3.      What are some of the key roles and responsibilities of government, industry, academia, and other non-governmental organizations with respect to critical infrastructure risk?
I have attached the Assignment Rubric.  How does Risk information change depending on different decision-makers?   How does Risk information change depending on different decision-makers?

Number of Pages: 6 Pages

Deadline: 2 days

Academic Level: College

Paper Format: APA

Should Pharma Heal Corporation file additional compensation claims with the arbitral tribunal to seek recovery for the equipment losses and the employees’ personal injuries caused by the local university students?

ScenarioPharma Heal Corporation was founded in 1995 by Akosua Sowa and Isabella Suarez, two PhD program classmates at a world-renowned technology institution. In their graduate program, Akosua and Isabella researched methods for getting HIV-treating drugs manufactured, distributed, and properly administered in developing world nations. They collaborated intensely on these projects. After receiving their PhD degrees, Akosua and Isabella decided to translate that research and their deep personal commitments into a business enterprise. Akosua and Isabella approached public health officials and prominent business leaders in their home countries of South Africa and Mexico. With their advice and financial support, they founded Pharma Heal Corporation to realize the practical application of their research to saving lives in developing world nations.The President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Pharma Heal Corporation is Akousa; the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and Director of Technologies of Pharma Heal Corporation is Isabella. They both hold seats on the board of directors, a board which is comprised of an array of leading figures in international medical technology and public health.Akosua and Isabella have devised a three-part business plan for Pharma Heal Corporation:1. Partner with pharmaceutical manufacturers located in the developing world to manufacture lower cost drugs for treating HIV and working toward an HIV vaccine.2. Establish key distribution channels in each developing world country to make the lower costing HIV treatments available efficiently and economically to those in each country needing treatment.3. In each developing world country, partner with indigenous healthcare personnel as well as representatives of international, religious, and charitable organizations that support medical personnel.Akosua and Isabella have retained you as their international business consultant to advise them about the growth of their business to achieve these three ambitious goals. They are aware of the many legal regimes and diversity of legal cultures in countries of the developing world where they aspire to achieve their three-part business plan. They are particularly impressed by your business education and are counting on you to give them excellent business advice and provide troubleshooting. AssignmentThe government of Sustainia, a developing world country, approached Pharma Heal Corporation about leasing to the company a concession to run pediatric HIV clinics throughout the cities of Sustainia. Akosua and Isabella signed an agreement with Sustainia’s minister of health, granting the concession and containing a stabilization covenant by which both parties agreed that the agreement could not be altered except by their mutual concurrence.Shortly thereafter, Pharma Heal Corporation established a separate subsidiary company, Pharma Heal-Sustainia, to conduct the business of building, hiring for, and managing the pediatric HIV clinics. Pharma Heal-Sustainia accomplished these tasks very quickly and efficiently, establishing an excellent and effective network of clinics. However, a coup d’etat occurred, installing a fundamentalist theocratic government. The theocratic government condemned any effort to treat HIV sufferers, insisting that HIV was a heaven-sent plague upon earthly demons, and the righteous must refuse to intervene. The theocratic government had the military take over Pharma Heal-Sustainia’s clinics. Medical clinics of other countries, primarily countries that are members of the Red Crescent, were allowed to continue to operate—provided that they did not treat HIV-caused conditions. At the same time, the Sustainia court system was “suspended,” leaving no place for Pharma Heal Corporation to apply for reparations or compensation. Before Pharma Heal-Sustainia personnel could vacate the clinic in Sustain City (the country’s capital), students from a local university who supported the theocratic government captured, gutted, and burned the clinic, destroying hundreds of thousands of dollars in medical equipment and severely injuring half a dozen Pharma Heal-Sustainia doctors and nurses.The minister of health has informally stated to Akosua that he is willing to move the government to provide some compensation. However, the minister has agreed to do so only if Akosua pays him a US$500,000 bribe for his intervention with the theocratic government.Assume that Sustania is a party to an international arbitration treaty that requires the government to arbitrate claims filed against it.Akosua seeks a memorandum from you to the board of directors that outlines your evaluation of the following issues:Part 1: Is going to arbitration with the Sustainia government over the seizure of its clinics worthwhile? What are the odds of Pharma Heal Corporation prevailing?Part 2: Should Pharma Heal Corporation file additional compensation claims with the arbitral tribunal to seek recovery for the equipment losses and the employees’ personal injuries caused by the local university students?Part 3: Is a better course to obtain some compensation without legal proceedings by paying the minister of health the money he has demanded to act as an emissary to the theocratic government?Grading CriteriaContent DevelopmentDemonstrates use of appropriate, relevant, and innovative content. All requirements of the assignment are met.40{0e601fc7fe3603dc36f9ca2f49ef4cd268b5950ef1bbcf1f795cc00e94cdd119}Critical AnalysisDemonstrates ability to evaluate, integrate, and critique a wide range of options, beliefs, abstract ideas, and data to inform judgment, identify and solve problems, and where appropriate, propose new hypotheses.20{0e601fc7fe3603dc36f9ca2f49ef4cd268b5950ef1bbcf1f795cc00e94cdd119}Research and Information LiteracyDemonstrates selection and use of high quality, credible, and relevant sources to develop ideas that are appropriate to the assignment.Sources are consistently cited according to required documentation.20{0e601fc7fe3603dc36f9ca2f49ef4cd268b5950ef1bbcf1f795cc00e94cdd119}Grammar, punctuation, spelling and other mechanics of the English language Demonstrates correct use of grammar, spelling, punctuation, and other mechanics of the English language.20{0e601fc7fe3603dc36f9ca2f49ef4cd268b5950ef1bbcf1f795cc00e94cdd119}

.Explain the role that the WHO plays in the prevention of communicable diseases

Primary Task Response:Within the Discussion Board area, write 400–600 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas.As a health care professional for an international health care network, you plan to visit 7 foreign countries this year as part of a communicable disease prevention program. Before you travel, you need to provide information to your assistants about the health care services in the countries you will be visiting, as well as on the World Health Organization (WHO), the agency that is concerned with international public health.Research using the Library and other resources to address the following:Provide examples that show how the WHO is involved with global health care assistance.Explain the role that the WHO plays in the prevention of communicable diseases.Select 7 foreign countries, and briefly describe the communicable disease situation in the selected countries. Include your statistics in a table format.What are the possible sources of financing for programs like the one in which you are involved?Be sure to support your information by citing at least 2 scholarly references using APA format.

How HIV and AIDS Education may Influence young Adults to change their life style in Nakuru Kenya?

Question 1. 350 words Discussion: Understanding Systematic Reviews Research topic: How HIV and AIDS Education may Influence young Adults to change their life style in Nakuru Kenya? Systematic review has been used to combine research related to public health. Reviewing a published systematic review will assist you in understanding the use of this study design. Use any university’s library and Academic Search Premier and the search terms “systematic review” and “public health” to identify published studies. Limit the search to articles published in the last year. Then introduce another broad search term based on your interests. From the final list of articles, select one to use for this discussion. You must use a true quantitative or qualitative systematic review for this discussion and your Week 1 assignment. Your chosen published systematic review will be used multiple times during this course. Read the article and post narrative responses to the following questions: 1. How were the included articles identified? Do you agree? 2. What criteria, if any, was used to exclude articles? Why? 3. Were included studies qualitative, quantitative, or both? 4. How does the methodology of the included studies affect the systematic review? 5. Was a systematic review appropriate in this situation? Why or why not? 6. How might the results influence public health? Question 2. 350 words Week 1 – Discussion: Topic Selection Post Discussion: Topic Selection 1. What topic have you selected? 2. How did you select this topic? 3. What problem will you address with your research? 4. What research questions relate to your problem? 5. Will you be able to use a systematic review to contribute to the body of knowledge on your topic? Why or why not? References Bui, Y. (2014).How to write a master’s thesis. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications Bolland, A., Cherry, G., & Dickson, R. (Eds.) (2014).Doing a systematic review; a student’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Safe Publications Question 3. Assignment: Systematic Review Checklist Submit Assignment: Systematic Review Checklist This week, you have been learning about systematic reviews and have been asked to identify your topic, research question(s), and hypotheses. A thorough review of already published systematic reviews can provide you with ideas and examples that you can use in your research. Using the published quantitative or qualitative systematic review article you chose for this week’s discussion, complete the Systematic Review Checklist