write an essay about pollution prevention in the dry cleaning and hydraulic fracturing industries. Include the following items: 1. one-paragraph introduction (4-7 well-constructed sentences is considered one paragraph).; 2. five-paragraph review of the Sinshelmer, Grout, Namkoong, Gottlieb, and Latif (2007) dry cleaning article, including an explanation of the common dry cleaning process using perchloroethylene (PCE), problems with PCE, and a review of options to PCE presented in the paper; 3. five-paragraph review (total—not five paragraphs for each article) of the Heywood (2012) article and the Chen, Al-Wadei, Kennedy, and Terry (2014) article on hydraulic fracturing, including environmental issues with hydraulic fracturing and the P2 solutions presented in each of the two articles (include the use of liquid carbon dioxide); 4. five-paragraph review of the Taylor, Carbonell, and Desimone (2010) article on using liquid carbon dioxide for P2, focusing on how liquid carbon dioxide can be used as a substitute in the dry cleaning industry and in the hydraulic fracturing industry; and a 5. two-paragraph summary/ conclusion to include your overall thoughts about P2 in the dry cleaning and hydraulic fracturing industries, and specifically whether liquid carbon dioxide is a reasonable, cost-effective, and environmentally-friendly alternative to traditional methods. Use at least the following references attached and others as needed: Chen, J., Al-Wadei, M. H., Kennedy, C. M., & Terry, P. D. (2014). Hydraulic fracturing: Paving the way for a sustainable future? Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 1-10. Heywood, P. (2012, April). Fracking safer and greener? TCE: The Chemical Engineer, 850, 42-45. Sinshelmer, P., Grout, C., Namkoong, A., Gottlieb, R., & Latif, A. (2007). The viability of professional wet cleaning as a pollution prevention alternative to perchloroethylene dry cleaning. Air and Waste Management Association, 57, 172-178. Taylor, D. K., Carbonell, R., & Desimone, J. M. (2010). Opportunities for pollution prevention and energy efficiency enabled by the carbon dioxide technology platform. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 25(1), 115-148. Your paper must be at least three full pages in length, not including the title page and reference pages

The purpose of the final project is to engage you in writing a health policy analysis. There are five steps in the health policy analysis process. Using South University Online Library or the Internet, research on a sexually transmitted disease (STD) policy of the state of Minnesota. Once you identify an STD policy from the state of Minnesota, visit your state health department or browse your state’s website and search for the STD policy you selected. Next, write a research paper describing this public health policy analysis and background. The final paper should include the following: • A title page • An introduction of policy analysis in two to three paragraphs discussing the following: o Overview o Purpose • A body o Health policy background (one page):  The state’s role in the policy-making process  The purpose of public health policy o Public health policy analysis five-step process discussing the following:  A problem statement (in the form of a question) (two paragraphs)  Background of a policy analysis provides factual information needed to understand the problem. Include economic issues of policy as well as regulatory policy (two pages).  The landscape section of a policy analysis identifies key stakeholders and describes the factors that are needed to analyze the problem. Write the landscape section on policy analysis. Include balance of patient rights versus protecting the population. Include any influence from government insurance programs. Your response should be of at least three pages.  Options (three or four) to address the policy problem. Your response should be of at least three pages.  Recommendations section should clearly identify three options. Which of the three options is favored and why is it is preferred over the other ones. Your response should be of at least one page. • A conclusion o Your conclusion (one page) should address the following main points:  Your recommendation and the reasoning behind it.  Summarize your findings.  Explain the barriers to implementing policy analysis process and how they could be overcome. Your paper should be a minimum of 12- to 13-pages in a Microsoft Word document. You need a minimum of six scholarly sources for both in-text citations and citations on the reference page. Support your responses with reasoning and examples. Cite any sources in APA format.