Define from the beginning if you are working with qualitative or quantitative paradigm

/in /by

Question description

As previously there are again some comments from professor in the attached document. Please make sure you make changes as per professor comments and also the below description.

  • Pay attention to the logic of your document – I mean logic the document flow. You need to write as if you were explaining all the steps in a good sequence for people to understand what you have done.
  • Logic means that you discover in literature review the justification of your work, the important contributions to your work etc. You need to see these elements of literature review represented in your analysis, in your problem definition in your hypotheses etc. Nothing is from the AIR
  • Define from the beginning if you are working with qualitative or quantitative paradigm
  • If you adopt the quantitative paradigm first review your population of interest and your capacity to gather the data for description or generalizations
  • In the quantitative study search for possible methods/models and test them. Your report is about the one that you selected mentioning the work done to select it

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE….. FOCUS……. GO THROUGH THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION AND COMMENTS BY PROFESSOR IN THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT AGAIN AND AGAIN/…….

NEED SOME SPECIAL WORK.

Two things to follow

1) Make changes as per his comments in the documents

2) Go through the below description requirement again and again. and work accordingly.

complete the “Value Systems” assessment

/in /by

Question description

This week’s self-assessment, located in your text, is a brief individual leadership assessment entitled, “Value Systems.” This simple assessment is designed to initiate your thinking on the topic of values in leadership and how your values might impact your leadership in the field of public health.

For this Professional Leadership Journal, complete the “Value Systems” assessment. As a scholar-practitioner in the field of public health, reflect on what the assessment may reveal about your leadership values. What values may be important to you as a leader in the field of public health?

The Assignment (2–3 paragraphs):

  • Explain new insights gained based on your results of the “Value Systems” assessment
  • Explain how these new insights might impact your role, or future role as a public health leader

NAHAVANDI, A. (2014). THE ART AND SCIENCE OF LEADERSHIP (7TH ED.). UPPER SADDLE RIVER, NJ: PEARSON.

  • CHAPTER 1, “DEFINITION AND SIGNIFICANCE OF LEADERSHIP”
  • SELF-ASSESSMENT 4-1: VALUE SYSTEMS (P. 132)

KOH, H. K. (2009). LEADERSHIP IN PUBLIC HEALTH. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 24(SUPP. 2), S11–S18.

NOTE: YOU WILL ACCESS THIS ARTICLE FROM THE WALDEN LIBRARY DATABASES.

LEISCHOW, S. J., & MILSTEIN, B. (2006). SYSTEMS THINKING AND MODELING FOR PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTICE. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 96(3), 403–405.

NOTE: YOU WILL ACCESS THIS ARTICLE FROM THE WALDEN LIBRARY DATABASES.

TROCHIM, W. M., CABRERA, D.A., MILSTEIN, B., GALLAGHER, R.S., & LEISCHOW, S.J. (2006). PRACTICAL CHALLENGES OF SYSTEMS THINKING AND MODELING IN PUBLIC HEALTH. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 96(3), 538–546.

NOTE: YOU WILL ACCESS THIS ARTICLE FROM THE WALDEN LIBRARY DATABASES.

VROOM, V. H., & JAGO, A.G. (2007). THE ROLE OF THE SITUATION IN LEADERSHIP. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 62(1), 17–24.

NOTE: YOU WILL ACCESS THIS ARTICLE FROM THE WALDEN LIBRARY DATABASES.

ZALEZNICK, A. (2004). MANAGERS AND LEADERS: ARE THEY DIFFERENT? HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, 82(1), 74–81.
RETRIEVED FROM HTTPS://CB.HBSP.HARVARD.EDU/CBMP/PL/57132551/57132…

DOCUMENT: SCHOLAR-PRACTITIONER PROJECT OVERVIEW (WORD DOCUMENT)

NOTE: YOU WILL USE THIS DOCUMENT TO COMPLETE THE SCHOLAR-PRACTITIONER PROJECT.

OPTIONAL RESOURCES

CHANGING MINDS. (2011). LEADERSHIP VS. MANAGEMENT. RETRIEVED FROM HTTP://CHANGINGMINDS.ORG/DISCIPLINES/LEADERSHIP/AR…

Identify two hazardous chemicals to which workers are exposed in your facility

/in /by

Question description

In this SLP, you will be a health and safety manager in a company that has a manufacturing facility with multiple occupational hazards. This setting could be a place where you currently work, one that you may be familiar with, or one that you just find interesting.

This SLP will address chemical hazards in the workplace:

  1. Identify two hazardous chemicals to which workers are exposed in your facility.
  2. Explain the routes by which workers can get exposure to these chemicals, and the associated potential health risks.
  3. Choose one method to sample for each of these chemicals in the facility. Justify your choice.
  4. Consider how the hazards may be controlled and select the best approach, the one that protects workers best.

SLP ASSIGNMENT EXPECTATIONS

Use information from your module readings/articles as well as appropriate research to support your paper.

Length: The SLP assignment should be 4-5 pages long (double-spaced).

References: At least three references must be included from academic sources (e.g., peer-reviewed journal articles). Required Reading is included. Quoted materials should not exceed 10{0e601fc7fe3603dc36f9ca2f49ef4cd268b5950ef1bbcf1f795cc00e94cdd119} of the total paper (since the focus of these assignments is critical thinking). Use your own words and build on the ideas of others. Materials copied verbatim from external sources must be enclosed in quotation marks. In-text citations are required as well as a list of references at the end of the assignment. (APA format is recommended.)

Organization: Subheadings should be used to organize your paper according to the questions.

Format: APA format is recommended for this assignment.

REQUIRED READING

Bhavsar, S. P., Awad, E., Mahon, C. G., & Petro, S. (2011). Great lakes fish consumption advisories: Is mercury a concern? Ecotoxicology, 20(7), 1588-98.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012). Workplace safety & health topics: Chemicals. Retrieved on 4/17/16 at http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/chemical.html

National Library of Medicine. (2015). Tox town: Chemicals. Retrieved on 4/17/16 at http://toxtown.nlm.nih.gov/text_version/chemicals….

National Institutes of Health. (2015). National library of medicine toxicology tutor II: Toxicokinetics. Retrieved on 4/17/16 at http://sis.nlm.nih.gov/enviro/toxtutor.html

National Institutes of Health. (2015). National library of medicine toxicology tutor III: Cellular toxicology. Retrieved on 4/17/16 at http://sis.nlm.nih.gov/enviro/toxtutor.html

Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (n.d.), Sampling and analysis. Retrieved on 4/17/16 at https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/samplinganalysis/

Philip, R. B. (2012). Chapter 2: Water pollution, the usual culprits. In Environmental issues for the twenty-first century and their impact on human health. SAIF Zone, Sharjah, UAE: Bentham Science Publishers.

Nutritional Health Alliance v. Food and Drug Administration

/in /by

Question description

Module 2 – Case

Law and Public Health

CASE ASSIGNMENT

Review Nutritional Health Alliance v. Food and Drug Administration, and answer the following:

  1. Who are the parties in the case and what are their respective interests?
  2. Why was the lawsuit filed?
  3. What is the role of the FDA and what were the policy considerations for the regulation that served as the central focus of the NHA case?
  4. What was/is the proper resolution of the ultimate issue/question?

ASSIGNMENT EXPECTATIONS

Length: Assignment should be from 3 to 4 pages (750 to 1000 words) in length. 3 cited sources from required reading NO PLAGIARISM!

REQUIRED READING

Read Chapters 5 and 6 of the following text:
Wing, K. R., & Gilbert, B. (2007). The law and the public’s health. Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press.

Hall, M. (2003). The scope and limits of public health law. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 46(3), S199.

Harrington, S. E. (2010). The health insurance reform debate. Journal of Risk & Insurance, 77(1), 5-38.

Hartsfield, D., Moulton, A. D., & McKie, K. L. (2007). A review of model public health laws. American Journal of Public Health, 97S56-S61.

Nutritional Health Alliance v. Food and Drug Administration, 318 F. 3d 92 (U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 2003). Retrieved fromhttp://openjurist.org/318/f3d/92/nutritional-healt…