Differentiate between malleable versus rigid elements of personality

To prepare for this discussion, please read Chapter 9 of your textbook. In addition, complete the International Personality Item Pool Representation of the NEO PI-RTM (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., watch Correlation: Against All Odds: Inside Statistics (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., and read “The interplay between culture and personality”. Finally, review Instructor Guidance and relevant Announcements.  In this discussion, you will consider personality.  Be sure to use your own academic voice (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. and apply in-text citations (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. appropriately throughout your post.

Personality psychology explores individual differences:  what characteristics make you different, unique, and… well, you?

  • Complete the International Personality Item Pool Representation of the NEO PI-RTM (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. (either the short or long version).
    • Explain the five domains of personality.
    • Interpret your score, noting aspects of the assessment that are interesting to you.
    • Illustrate each dimension of your personality with personal examples.
  • Watch Correlation: Against All Odds: Inside Statistics (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. and read “The interplay between culture and personality”.
    • Differentiate between malleable versus rigid elements of personality.
    • Relate elements of your own personality that may be particularly impacted by social and cultural contexts that you have experienced.
  • Remember to use your own academic voice (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. and apply in-text citations (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. appropriately throughout your post.

Post your initial response of 250 words or more

Designing Qualitative Research

This week’s resources

Burkholder, G. J., Cox, K. A., & Crawford, L. M. (2016). The scholar-practitioner’s guide to research design. Baltimore, MD: Laureate Publishing.

· Chapter 7, “Quality Considerations”

Smith, J. K. (1984). The problem of criteria for judging interpretive inquiry. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 6(4), 379–391.

Discussion: Designing Qualitative Research

As you recall from earlier weeks, various philosophical orientations hold unique epistemological and ontological assumptions. These assumptions return to the forefront of attention when considering how to evaluate the rigor or quality of various qualitative research designs.

Typically, when speaking of validity, qualitative researchers are referring to research that is credible and trustworthy, i.e., the extent to which one can have confidence in the study’s findings (Lincoln & Guba, 1985). Generalizability, a marker of reliability, is typically not a main purpose of qualitative research because the researcher rarely selects a random sample with a goal to generalize to a population or to other settings and groups. Rather, a qualitative researcher’s goal is often to understand a unique event or a purposively selected group of individuals. Therefore, when speaking of reliability, qualitative researchers are typically referring to research that is consistent or dependable (Lincoln & Guba, 1985), i.e., the extent to which the findings of the study are consistent with the data that was collected.

References

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

For this Discussion, you will explain criteria for evaluating the quality of qualitative research and consider the connection of such criteria to philosophical orientations. You will also consider the ethical implications of designing qualitative research.

With these thoughts in mind:

By Day 4

Post an explanation of two criteria for evaluating the quality of qualitative research designs. Next, explain how these criteria are tied to epistemological and ontological assumptions underlying philosophical orientations and the standards of your discipline. Then, identify a potential ethical issue in qualitative research and explain how it might influence design decisions. Finally, explain what it means for a research topic to be amenable to scientific study using a qualitative approach.

Be sure to support your Main Issue Post and Response Post with reference to the week’s Learning Resources and other scholarly evidence in APA Style.

Theory of Mind and Information Processing

Resources for this week’s question

Beck, A. T., & Clark, D. A. (1997). An information processing model of anxiety: Automatic and strategic processes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35(1), 49–58. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(96)00069-1

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Hallford, G. S., & Andrews, G. (2010). Information processing models of cognitive development. In Goswami, U. (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Child Cognitive Development (2nd ed.) (pp. 697–722). Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.

Note: You will access this book from the Walden Library databases.

Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84(2), 127–190. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.127

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Optional Resources

Wellman, H. M. (2010). Developing a theory of mind. In Goswami, U. (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Child Cognitive Development (2nd ed.) (pp. 258–284). Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.

Discussion: Theory of Mind and Information Processing

One fascinating part of being human is that we can only completely know our own minds. We cannot read or fully understand the minds of others. However, we need to try and understand other people’s thoughts to socially interact with one another. For example, if a friend told you in conversation that her mother had died, you would try to understand how she is feeling, perhaps sad, upset, and depressed. You would likely then move forward with the social interaction in a sensitive manner. This example demonstrates the concept of theory of mind: you have made the presumption that your friend has a mind, you have tried to understand her mind, and then you acted accordingly. Having a theory of mind allows you to attribute thoughts, emotions, desires, and intentions to others, then explain their actions or intentions. It is a critical component in human social interaction.

Unfortunately, some people are impaired in this aspect of cognitive development. Sometimes called “mind blindness” or “theory of mind deficit,” this impairment means that a person has trouble with understanding others’ perspectives. Either they do not think about the thoughts of others, they interpret them incorrectly, or they have trouble seeing a perspective other than their own. Typically, these individuals have trouble in social interactions and do not reciprocate social cues and dynamics per societal norms. Impairment is strongly associated with several mental and physical disorders, such as autism, schizophrenia, depression, and excessive alcohol use.

Information processing theory refers to a different aspect of cognitive development. This theory says that humans process the information they receive, rather than just respond to the environment. As Dr. MacDonald explained in this week’s introduction, many have suggested that the best way to think about information processing is to think of the human brain as a computer: it takes in information, analyzes it, stores it, and creates output. For example, if you just asked your fiancée to marry you, your brain will take in his or her response as input, analyze it for meaning and context, store the memory in short-term and/or long-term memory, then create an output (hopefully of a smile and kiss!).

In this Week’s Discussion, you will search the Walden Library and/or other reputable academic sources for a scholarly article on theory of mind or information processing theory. Then, you will post a brief summary of the article you selected and provide a real-world application of the theory, explaining the strengths and limitations of the theory in explaining or testing this application. Finally, you will explain how the theory could apply to aspects of your daily life.

To prepare:

· Search the Walden Library or other reputable academic sources for a peer-reviewed article on theory of mind or information processing theory published within the last 10 years.

With these thoughts in mind:

By Day 4

Post a brief summary of the article you selected. Provide a real-world application of the theory within your current professional area or one in which you have interest. Also, explain how the theory could apply to one or two aspects of your daily life. Be specific and provide examples.

Recognizing and Projecting Trends in I/O Psychology

Assignment 3: Recognizing and Projecting Trends in I/O Psychology

Consider the trends discussed in the required readings for this module along with relevant learning from your courses throughout the MAIO program. Further, using the Argosy University online library resources and the Internet, choose one of the thirteen research areas suggested in the required reading article by Cascio and Aguinis (2008). Then, respond to the following:

  • Explain how societal events over this century have shaped the field of I/O psychology in general and your chosen research area specifically.
  • Identify trends you expect to emerge within the field of I/O psychology generally and your chosen research area specifically in the next ten years. Explain and support your predictions with evidence from scholarly literature.
  • Describe competencies you think will be especially important for an I/O professional for these future trends. Justify your reasoning for the importance of these competencies.

Your final product will be a 3- to 5-page Microsoft Word document written in APA format and utilizing at least three sources from professional literature. Professional literature may include the Argosy University online library resources, relevant textbooks, peer-reviewed journal articles, and websites created by professional organizations, agencies, or institutions (.edu, .org, and .gov). Your paper should be written in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrate ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and display accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.

Reference:

Cascio, W. F., & Aguinis, H. (2008). Research in industrial and organizational
psychology from 1963 to 2007: Changes, choices, and trends. Journal
of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1062-1081. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.
1062