Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to the components, relationships among the components, and application to advanced nursing practice.

/in /by

Within the profession of nursing, multiple theories, models, and conceptual frameworks have been created to serve as a foundation for practice. The purpose of this assignment is to appraise the value of the model in serving as a theoretical framework and apply the model to your selected area of future professional nursing practice (your MSN track). For this assignment, you will select one of the following nursing models to address within the paper: the Patient-Centred Nursing (PCN) Framework or the Chamberlain Care Model.
Course Outcomes
Through this assessment, the student will meet the following Course Outcomes:

  • Apply nursing theory as a framework to guide the translation of knowledge and implementation of evidence-based practice in future professional settings. (CO #2)
  • Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to the components, relationships among the components, and application to advanced nursing practice. (CO#4)

Total Points Possible
This assessment is worth 175 points.
Due Date
Submit your file(s) by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5.
Students are given the opportunity to request an extension on assignments for emergent situations. Supporting documentation must be submitted to the assigned faculty. If the student’s request is not approved, the assignment is graded and a late penalty is applied as follows:

  • Monday = 10% of total possible point reduction
  • Tuesday = 20% of total possible point reduction
  • Wednesday = 30% of total possible point reduction

If the student’s request is approved, the student will be informed of the revised due date. Should the student fail to meet the revised due date, the assignment is graded and a late penalty is applied as follows:

  • Monday = 10% of total possible point reduction
  • Tuesday = 20% of total possible point reduction
  • Wednesday = 30% of total possible point reduction

Requirements
Criteria for Content
Select one of the two models presented in the week five lesson (either the Person-Centred Nursing Framework, or the Chamberlain Care Model).

  1. In athree- to four-pagescholarly paper, address the following:

Provide a succinct overview of the model you have selected and discu

Structured Formative Literacy Activities: Academic Paragraphing

/in /by

Structured Formative Literacy Activities: Academic Paragraphing

Students will submit the structured formative literacy activities for this assessment as an academic paragraphing reflection paper (1200 words) based on learning from the summaries and unit content.You will be provided with six (6) designated extracts taken from the weekly chapter readings in the essential texts for this Unit.In addition to the six (6)designated extracts for your academic paragraphing reflection paper, you will need to summarise and include two (2) relevant, reliable and current sources to support your ideas, one (1) from a nursing journal article, and one (1) from a reputable Website report or source. Allsources used in your assessment must be referenced using APA 6thboth in-text and in the separate reference list submitted with your paper.

For extract 5

( self reflection in nursing) journal article

Bagay, Joann Marie

Journal of Professional Nursing, 2012, Vol.28(2), pp.130-131 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

reflective questions of themselves and their patients. This posture in nursing will… planet. This reflection is written by someone who has practiced nursing

For extract 3

Professional communication ( I got the source from this link)

http://www.health.vic.gov.au/qualitycouncil/downloads/communication_paper_120710.pdf

In a 1000-1,250 word essay, summarize the study, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.

/in /by

Second time submitting this assignment, please follow instructions well. I have attached the rubric, the articles and guidelines.
It needs to be Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations

Use the practice problem and a qualitative, peer-reviewed research article you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment.

In a 1000-1,250 word essay, summarize the study, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.

Refer to the resource “Research Critique Guidelines” for suggested headings and content for your paper.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Rubric

Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%		2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%		3
Satisfactory
83.00%		4
Good
94.00%		5
Excellent
100.00%
75.0 %Content
15.0 %Background of StudyBackground of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is incomplete.Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Method of StudyDiscussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is incomplete.Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Results of StudyDiscussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is incomplete.Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Ethical ConsiderationsDiscussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete.Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %ConclusionConclusion does not summarize a critical appraisal and applicability of findings.Conclusion is vague and does not discuss importance to nursing.Conclusion summarizes utility of the research and importance to nursing practice.Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal and the findings importance to nursing practice.Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal, knowledge learned, and the importance of the findings to nursing practice.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Thesis Development and PurposePaper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
5.0 %Argument Logic and ConstructionStatement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage

Establish goals for priority of nursing care related to the nursing problem/issues identified

/in /by

NRSG370 – Clinical Integration – Speciality PracticeAssessment: Case Study Outline- Information For StudentsAssessment 2: Case Study – North SydneyStudents will complete a case study which discusses the provision of ethical, legal, evidence based, holistic person-centred care including the establishment of realistic and relevant goals through the theoretical examination of a particular nursing specialty case study using the Clinical Reasoning Cycle (Levett-Jones, 2013). Students must select and respond to the case study question that reflects their allocated clinical placement specialty. If you have not been allocated a specialty placement, OR you are repeating this unit, please refer to your LEO campus announcements forum and the 3-hour lecture for instructions on how to proceed (you should not repeat the same case study question twice). Case study questions can be found on LEO via this link: https://leo.acu.edu.au/course/view.php?id=27543&section=4• There are a variety of case studies on LEO page under the case study tile• Choose the one that best reflects your specialty placement• BNBP students – must do ‘High Dependency’ Case StudyThe Clinical Reasoning CycleStudent are expected to use the Clinical Reasoning Cycle (Levett-Jones, 2018) as a framework to plan and evaluate person-centred care. You are being asked to think through the case scenario and then discuss how data was collected and the type of data collected, identify problems and nursing issues, identify and state the objectives and discuss how care was provided in order to address the issues and evaluate the interventions carried out: (analyse and identify a nursing issues/problems/needs, set objectives, discuss the nursing interventions and evaluate the interventions of care carried out). As per lecture notes, students are expected to apply the clinical reasoning cycle to address the case scenario:• Consider the person’s situation• Collect, process and present related health information• Identify and prioritise at least three (3) nursing problems/issues based on the health assessment data that you have identified for the person at the centre of care.• Establish goals for priority of nursing care related to the nursing problem/issues identified• Discuss the nursing care of the person; link it to assessment data and history.• Evaluate your nursing care strategies to justify the nursing care provided• Reflect on the person’s outcomesAdapted from Tracy Levett-Jones, et al. (2010)Application of the Clinical Reasoning CycleBased on the stages of the clinical reasoning cycle, the outline of the essay should have:Title Page: (not included in the essay)• Unit Title: NRSG370 – Clinical Integration – Speciality Practice• Student Name:• Student ID Number:• Speciality Area:• Scenario:• Total number of words:• Essay should be formatted1. Introduction• introduces/outlines/situates the topic of the essay• clearly describes the way in which the essay will proceed• the essay is structured in a logical sequence so that the content flows (headings may be used to develop the structure of the paper)2. Contenta) Consideration of facts from the patient or situationConsider the case scenario of your choosing based on your clinical elective as per assessment “Choose the one that best reflects your specialty placement” this is where you determine what information should be collected and how information is going to be collected.b) Collection of informationYou need to discuss the type of information collected and why this information was collected based on the scenario for the clinical elective. For instance, the type of information collected should consider and include the history, current presenting issues and treatment plan, observations, results of investigations done medical records etc.c) Processing gathered information (analysing and interpreting)• The most important thing is to analyse the information that you have collected and identify areas of nursing care needs and problems. In this section, your discussion should reflect analysis and interpretation of the patient’s current health status using your established knowledge of physiology, pharmacology, pathology, culture, and ethics to establish needs and issues drawn from the information. This stage allows you to demonstrate synthesis of theory and experience acquired in previous and concurrent nursing units.d) Identify the problem• Identify and state the problems/needs or issues you have identified. It is important to identify the problems/needs/issues and the potential cause to determine the reason behind the patient’s current issue. Examples:• Dehydration as a result of loose bowel motion x 4 and vomiting x 2 during am shift• Falls risk as a result of confusion and unsteady gait• Loss of weight as a result of poor oral intake for one week• Pain due to post -operative procedure – laparotomy• Hyperglycaemia due to poor diet and lack of knowledge on diabetesPlease note these are examples only, the nature of the problems you identify will depend on the nature of the case study and your analysis and interpretation of the situation.e) Establish goals• Here, you determine the nursing goals for the patient’s situation. Identify and prioritise at least three (3) nursing problems/issues based on your assessment and collected data.f) Take action• Here you discuss the nursing interventions or measures you will undertake in order to address the three nursing issues or problems. These measures should take in consideration the ethical, legal, evidence based, holistic -person-centred approach.g) Evaluation and Reflection• Evaluate the effectiveness of the nursing interventions you have discussed (presumably which could have been carried out or actually carried out) and reflect on how the interventions could have been improved or done better- State the potential measures that could have been considered or could have been carried out to address the problem. This phase allows you to critically analyse what has been done and how best the care was carried out or could have been improved.•3. Conclusion• the essays ends with a cogent, defendable conclusion that summarises the discussion4. References• Provide a list of references used in your discussionTHE MARKING CRITERIAPlease refer to the marking criteriaHere are some of the points in conjunction with the marking criteria which you should consider when applying the marking criteria to your case study essay:1) Sequencing: 5%• introduces/outlines/situates the topic of the essay• clearly describes the way in which the essay will proceed• the essay is structured in a logical sequence so that the content flows (headings may be used to develop the structure of the paper)2) Content: 50%• Refer to the stages of the clinical reasoning cycle• Clearly identifies and prioritises 3 relevant nursing issues/ problem• the case study essay focus has been addressed and discussed as per clinical reasoning cycle• the case study essay content has clear links to contemporary nursing practice of the clinical elective area and discusses the provision of ethical, legal, evidence-based, holistic person-centred care, including the establishment of realistic and relevant goals• the case study paper demonstrates a depth of understanding of the topic and significant issues as per scenario and clinical elective area.•3) Critical thinking, reasoning and evaluation of evidence: 30%o the essay demonstrates a high degree of critical thought and insight by:o providing a justification/rationale for the argument/discussiono demonstrating you have reflected on the complex issues surrounding the three problems identifiedo discussing the topic from differing perspectives, ethical, legal, evidence-based, holistic person-centred care thereby providing a balanced discussion of the problems.o analysis is related to nursing care and issues/problems, and is presented and supported by adequate and appropriate evidence.4) Paragraph, structure/intelligibility: 5%• Organisation and presentation of content• There are clear linking sentences that link each paragraph to the next area consistently5) Sources & Referencing: 10%• credible and relevant references are used. A broad range of in-text citations has been used• accurate use of APA referencing style in all instances. the referencing style used throughout the paper is congruent with the APA style• the reference list is accurate (i.e. no missing page numbers, volumes, correct title etc), complete (i.e. no references in the body of the paper are missing from the reference list) and consistent with the APA referencing style.• the references cited are contemporary (i.e. not more than 10 years)• there is evidence in the paper that the student has searched widely for information related to the topic/issue• the student has acknowledged all sources of information usedPlease refer to the unit outline, case study scenario on LEO and marking guide for information about assessment.