What makes the pain worse or better: movement makes it worse, lying supine

Caring for Clients with common Digestive/ Gastrointestinal Health Challenges.

Select any three (3) questions from Case Study # 1 or from Case Study # 2, and discuss the rationale by posting/ responding in the online learning activity/ discussion forum. Please identify the case study selected and copy the three questions chosen directly into the post. Include and properly reference information taken from the course readings to support your ideas.

CASE STUDY #2

(must be 3 pages with at least 5 references no older than 5 years)

Joshua Phelps, 37, arrives at the ED complaining of right lower quadrant abdominal pain. You obtain his vital signs and find out that he has no known allergies and takes no medications. His BP is 156/ 94; pulse, 100 and regular; respirations, 20; and temperature, 99.6 F (37.6 C).

What is the next step in investigating his problem?
Mr. Phelps’ pain began last evening and is associated with nausea, but he hasn’t vomited. Eating doesn’t seem to affect the pain, and he hasn’t had any bowel or bladder changes.

In assessing Mr. Phelps’s pain, what information should you obtain?
Mr. Phelps describes his pain as constant, deep and achy, and worse with movement. On a pain scale of 0- to 10, with 10 being the worst pain he has ever experienced, he rates the pain at a 7. He doesn’t want to lie supine and is guarding his right lower quadrant.

When assessing Mr. Phelps’ abdomen, describe the order and specifics associated with the assessment?
Abdominal assessment shows a normal inspection, normoactive bowel sounds, and no masses, enlargement, or tenderness of the liver or spleen. However, Mr. Phelps did display rebound tenderness and positive obturator and iliopsoas signs. Based on his history and physical assessment, the healthcare provider orders a complete blood cell count and urinalysis. The results indicate a total white blood cell (WBC) count elevation with 96% neutrophils. The urinalysis is normal.

Mr. Phelps’ signs and symptoms, history, physical assessment, and lab findings suggest which diagnosis? Explain your rationale.
Abdominal aortic dissection.
Acute appendicitis.
Renal calculi.
Acute Cholecystitis.

ONE PAGE OF SELF REFLECTION on
What is my knowledge concerning providing care for and with clients experiencing digestive and gastrointestinal challenges? (i am a community rpn)

ONE PAGE OF REFLECTION ON MY PEER WORK ( TWO REFERENCES)
Case Study #2
1) In assessing Mr. Phelps’s pain, what information should you obtain?The information that should be obtained about Mr. Phelps’s pain include:
Character of the pain: deep and achy
Duration: States it’s constant
Frequency
What makes the pain worse or better: movement makes it worse, lying supine
Location: right lower quadrant
Distribution of referred pain
Time pain started: last evening

2) When assessing Mr. Phelps’ abdomen, describe the order and specifics associated with the assessment?

Start with inspecting the abdomen noting colour, contour, symmetry, the umbilicus is midline etc.
Next we would auscultate because “percussion and palpation can increase peristalsis which would give a false interpretation of bowel sounds” (Jarvis, 2014). During auscultation we listen for bowel sounds(character and frequency) and vascular sounds.
Percussion comes next “to assess the relative density of abdominal contents, to locate organs, and to screen for abdominal fluid or masses”(Jarvis, 2014).
Palpation is last. You note whether their is tenderness, masses, involuntary rigidity, guarding etc.

3) Mr. Phelps’ signs and symptoms, history, physical assessment, and lab findings suggest which diagnosis? Explain your rationale.

Mr. Phelps’s assessments suggest acute appendicitis based on the following findings:positive obturator and iliopsoas sign, pain in RLQ. “when the iliopsoas muscle is inflamed (which occurs with an inflamed or perforated appendix) pain is felt in the RLQ” (Jarvis, 2014)
Rebound tenderness 
Pain aggravated by movement
Nausea
Fever
Total white blood cell count elevation with 96% neutrophils 

References

Jarvis, C. (2014). The Abdomen, Physical Examination and Health Assessment (2nd CanadIan ed., pp 557-569). Toronto, ON: Elsevier Canada.

Should the thin skull rule apply to persons who refuse medical treatment on religious grounds? Why or why not?

Philosophy of LAW

Paper topic

1. Should the thin skull rule apply to persons who refuse medical treatment on religious grounds? Why or why not?

Some general guidelines

1. These are not research papers. All you need to read to write them is in the course package. Bibliographies are not necessary.

2. Citations should be clear and consistent; the style is up to you. When in doubt, cite. Give credit where it’s due, and not only for direct quotes. Plagiarism will not be tolerated.

** You need the course package to do this essay. Do you have access to Philosophy 2821G
Book No.10457

For the Essay the material that is used is from pages 1-65

The topic of the essay involves the applicability of the thin skull rule to those who refuse medical treatment on religious grounds. The relevant readings from the textbook involve discussion of tort law generally, and more specifically the notion of the thin skull rule and how it should/shouldn’t apply to beliefs.

List and discuss the different types of burn injuries

  1. List and discuss the different types of burn injuries 
    1.
    2.
    3.
    1. Discuss the following:
      1. Determine the depth (degree) of burn.
        • 
        • 
  2. Determine the extent of the burn.
  3. Determine which parts of the body are burned.
  4. Determine the respiratory involvement.
  5. Determine whether other injuries or preexisting medical problems exist or if the victim is elderly (older than 55 years) or very young( younger than 5 years).
  6. Determine the burn’s severity
  7. Discuss the Following:
  8. Minor Burns 
     
     
  9. Moderate Burns 
     
     
     
     
  10. Critical Burns 
     
     
     
     
  11. Discuss Care for Thermal Burns
  12. Discuss Care and Caution (Thermal Burns) for the following : 
     First Degree Burns
  13.  Caution

    1.  Second Degree Burns

    2.  Third Degree Burns
  14. CautionList the Do Not for Burns
  15. Discuss Sunburn
  16. List and Explain the various skin types
  17. Discuss care and Prevention for sunburns?
  18. Discuss Care for Chemical Burns
  19. Discuss Electrical Burns
    1. 
    2.
    3.
  20. Care for electrical Burns
  21. 2.
    3.
    4.
    5.
    6.
    7.

Discuss at least two possible metrics or outcomes it might use. Be sure to explain why you chose the metrics you discuss and how they are indicative of a successful total rewards program.

Part A (Applied Research – 40% of the assignment score)- This is the task that you receivedin Week 4.

Located in Illinois for the last 8 years, your organization is a medium-sized company in the medical supplies industry. The Vice President of Operations stopped in your office to discuss a recent loss of staff. He said he has lost 3 key leaders in the last 4 months. In addition to 2 more employees he fired, several frontline workers have quit. As a good HR Director, you recognize that it would be wise to do a complete investigation of the turnover.

In a maximum of 2 double-spaced pages, explain:

a) How would you evaluate whether the experienced turnover is a problem?
b) What data/metricswould you gather and consider from the HRIS (Human Resource Information System) and/or external sources?

Consult additional sources in the HR literature, beyond the course readings, to formulate your response.

Part B (BT Green Case, 20% of the assignment value)
Refer to the BT Green case again, the one you received in Week 3. You had a chance to discuss the legal risk for the organization in the first assignment. You’ve responded to the CEO and received feedback about your assessment. The company decided to let Mr. Banks go. Considering the material you’ve read in Weeks 1-6, now respond to the terminated employee.

  1. Describe the desired outcome (or goal) for your response.
  2. Identify the issues you will consider in crafting your response.
  3. Explain how you will convey the information to the employee (i.e., in writing, verbally, through technology, in person) and why you chose this method.
  4. Write what you will say.

Limit your response to a maximum of 2 double-spaced pages of text.

Part C(Knowledge ofWeeks 4-6 Readings) (40% of assignment value)
Please answer the following questionswithin a maximum of 2 double-spaced pages.Note the limit requires you to be concise in synthesizing all the input from the classroom material and any external literature you gather.

  1. Assume an organization wants to gauge the success of its total rewards program. Discuss at least two possible metrics or outcomes it might use. Be sure to explain why you chose the metrics you discuss and how they are indicative of a successful total rewards program.
  2. Given what you have learned about employee relations and labor relations, explain whether it is possible for an HR practitioner to be an effective advocate for both employees and the organization at the same time? Why or why not?