Discuss what makes Thales’ method of knowing distinctly philosophical

 Discuss what makes Thales’ method of knowing distinctly philosophical (as opposed to mythology and religion).

(2) Explain how Thales’ approach would be considered radical during his time, yet also simplistic.

(3) Thales’ approach to making sense of the world would be handled by what academic field(s) of study today?Be sure to quote from the readings to illustrate your points, followed by MLA citation, both in-text and on a Works Cited page.

Compare and contrast these religions from an anthropological perspective.

The US culture has a broad spectrum of religious affiliations and religiosity. As a result of interacting with people who share similarities, people seldom evaluate the main premises of other religions. This assignment will give you the opportunity to explore two religions that are new to you.

Using Argosy University online library resources, identify and research

  • Two religions which are unfamiliar to you.
  • Select two peer-reviewed academic resources on these selected religions.

Based on your research, complete the following:

  • Compare and contrast these religions from an anthropological perspective.
  • Describe the history of the religion. Be sure to include the following:
    • When and how it was first founded
    • Details of initial leaders of the movement and spread of the religion
  • Explain the main principles of each religion’s belief systems, the religious texts—if utilized—and the significant practices.
  • Examine the role religious leaders have in these religions as well as the roles devotees or followers play.
  • Describe how the religions view at least three varying social norms or cultural issues.
  • Examine how these two religions coexist in a globalized world.

Support your statements with examples. Be sure to include a list of scholarly references.

Write a 3–4-page paper in Word format. Apply APA standards to citation of sources

Analyzing Religions

Analyzing Religions
The US culture has a broad spectrum of religious affiliations and religiosity. As a result of interacting with people who share similarities, people seldom evaluate the main premises of other religions. This assignment will give you the opportunity to explore two religions that are new to you.
Identify and research
Two religions which are unfamiliar to you.
Select two peer-reviewed academic resources on these selected religions.
Based on your research, complete the following:
Compare and contrast these religions from an anthropological perspective.
Describe the history of the religion. Be sure to include the following:
When and how it was first founded
Details of initial leaders of the movement and spread of the religion
Explain the main principles of each religion’s belief systems, the religious texts—if utilized—and the significant practices.
Examine the role religious leaders have in these religions as well as the roles devotees or followers play.
Describe how the religions view at least three varying social norms or cultural issues.
Examine how these two religions coexist in a globalized world.
Support your statements with examples. Be sure to include a list of scholarly references.
Write a 3–4-page paper in Word format. Apply APA standards to citation of sources.

Assignment 2 Grading Criteria Maximum Points
Compared and contrasted two world religions from an anthropological perspective and provided well-researched information on their histories, main principles, and practices. 36
Evaluated these two religions in the context of a globalized world and included a detailed explanation of their varying social norms and cultural issues. 32
Supported your statements with relevant examples and additional scholarly references. 12
Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. 20
Total: 100

Annotated Bilbliography

Annotated Bilbliography

Lamott’s book offers honest advice on the nature of a writing life, complete with its insecurities and failures. Taking a humorous approach to the realities of being a writer, the chapters in Lamott’s book are wry and anecdotal and offer advice on everything from plot development to jealousy, from perfectionism to struggling with one’s own internal critic. In the process, Lamott includes writing exercises designed to be both productive and fun.

Lamott offers sane advice for those struggling with the anxieties of writing, but her main project seems to be offering the reader a reality check regarding writing, publishing, and struggling with one’s own imperfect humanity in the process. Rather than a practical handbook to producing and/or publishing, this text is indispensable because of its honest perspective, its down-to-earth humor, and its encouraging approach.

Chapters in this text could easily be included in the curriculum for a writing class. Several of the chapters in Part 1 address the writing process and would serve to generate discussion on students’ own drafting and revising processes. Some of the writing exercises would also be appropriate for generating classroom writing exercises. Students should find Lamott’s style both engaging and enjoyable.

In the sample annotation above, the writer includes three paragraphs: a summary, an evaluation of the text, and a reflection on its applicability to his/her own research, respectively.