Discuss the science of psychology: how psychology functions as a science today and how psychological research fits into the field of psychology

/in /by

PSYCH 540 Week 1 Fundamentals of Research Methodology Paper Individual Assignment – Fundamentals of Research Methodology Paper Prepare a 1,400 to 1,600-word paper in which you examine fundamental concepts of research methodology in the field of psychology. Base your discussion on research into the psychological literature you have done using peer-reviewed journals in our university library or other sources for peer-reviewed psychological literature. Your paper, citations, and reference list need to be formatted properly in APA format. As a part of your examination, be sure to address the following items: • Discuss the science of psychology: how psychology functions as a science today and how psychological research fits into the field of psychology. • Explain the scientific method and its relationship to psychological research. • Distinguish between qualitative and quantitative data and each methodology’s role in psychological research. • Describe the process of scientific theory construction and testing. Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.

Analyze the different components of the radex model of criminal differentiation, looking at expressive and instrumental criminal conduct against person and property on a continuum of increasing

/in /by

Offender Profiling and Criminal Inferences, law homework help Question description   Forensic psychology addresses scientific questions about criminal actions, where the understanding of the actions leads to inferences about offender characteristics. Canter (2000) introduced the radex of criminality, the combination of quantitative and qualitative aspects of a crime. In addition, these quantitative and qualitative characteristics are viewed through the prism of development and change over time. The radex can be applied to any criminal behavior. One of the most important investigative events of the last century was the creation of behavioral analysis units (BAUs) by the FBI. There are three BAUs. They are known not because of their ability to solve serial murders but because of their creation of a database, the Violent Criminal Apprehension Program (ViCAP), on which criminal justice professionals around the country and even the world have relied ever since. Offender character assessment is the derivation of inferences about a criminal from evidentiary and psychological aspects of the crimes he or she has committed. For this process to move beyond deduction based on personal opinion and supposition to an evidence-based science, a number of aspects of criminal activity need to be examined, analyzed, and categorized. The notion of a hierarchy of criminal differentiation is introduced to highlight the need to search for consistencies and variations at many levels of that hierarchy. However, current research indicates that the key distinctions are those that differentiate, within classes of crime, between offences and between offenders. This also leads to the hypothesis of a circular ordering of criminal actions, analogous to the color circle, a radex. The radex model, tested using multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) procedures, allows specific hypotheses to be developed about important constituents of criminal differentiation: ·         Salience: MDS analyses reveal the importance of the frequency of criminal actions as the basis on which the significance of those actions can be established. ·         Models of differentiation: The research reviewed mainly supports distinctions between criminals in terms of the forms of their transactions with their explicit or implicit victims. ·         Consistency: Offenders have been shown to exhibit similar patterns of action on different occasions. The most reliable examples of this currently are in studies of the spatial behavior of criminals. ·         Inference: Under limited conditions, it is possible to show associations between the characteristics of offenders and the thematic focus of their crimes. In general, these results provide support for models of thematic consistency that link the dominant themes in an offender’s crimes to characteristic aspects of his or her lifestyle and offending history. We never analyze anything in isolation but compare new information to the existing knowledge about similar past and parallel events. Both psychological evaluations and crime investigations follow this pattern of determining what a criminal is and what a crime is. That is what the radex model addresses. INSTRUCTIONS In your main post: ·         Analyze the different components of the radex model of criminal differentiation, looking at expressive and instrumental criminal conduct against person and property on a continuum of increasing seriousness. ·         Include in your analysis a summary of the domains and a critique of how they can be or cannot be useful for forensic psychology and for criminal justice professionals. What are the limitations you see in relying on this approach?

Discuss four consequences of the clinical trial challenges and the effects on study personnel.

/in /by

Part 1. Google “Transforming a Clinician Into an Investigator”. Click on the top Medscape.org hit. Watch the FDA panel discussion and answer the questions below in your own words, together with your thoughts on the topic discussed. The video maybe slow to load, and you may have to create an account. 1. Discuss four challenges in conducting clinical trials today. 2. Discuss four consequences of the clinical trial challenges and the effects on study personnel. 3. Discuss the investigator responsibilities regarding “Clinical Trial Staff Training”. 4. Discuss the 3 components to consider for trial supervision and oversight. Part 2. Go to “Clinical Investigators – Disqualification Proceedings” at http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/SDA/sdNavigation.cfm?sd=clinicalinvestigatorsdisqualificationproceedings&previewMode=true&displayAll=true Pick 1 investigator whose last name starts with the same letter as yours and who was disqualified, preferably, after year 2000. If no investigator- last name matches, then settle for the closest letter to yours, or one disqualified before 2000. Discuss the specific violations committed by the investigator that led to the disqualification. Take note of your notable investigator violations as I will be asking some of you to write the violations on the board

Write an essay about HIPAA and the Patient Bill of Rights Act.

/in /by

Part I For the first part of this Assignment, you will write an essay about HIPAA and the Patient Bill of Rights Act. Your essay should address the information and questions presented below. This essay must be a minimum of 200 words. Please include a title page and reference page. The creation of privacy and security laws has been a huge step toward more efficient healthcare and faster reimbursements. Visit the United States Health and Human Services website(http://www.hhs.gov/) and research HIPAA Regulations & Standards as they apply to the medical records. Also, please see the information in your text. ● Question: Explain how HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules benefit and support the integrity of the healthcare industry, patient, and physician. The Patient Bill of Rights act was created with 3 goals in mind; to assist patients in being more comfortable with health care delivery systems, to develop partnerships with patients and health care providers, and to stress important roles that patients play in staying healthy. Please see the information in your text for additional information. ● Question: Name 3 areas within the Patient Bill of Rights Act that you feel are important for health care providers/patients to abide by, and provide an explanation as to why you feel each area you selected is important. Part II Please read each scenario and select the appropriate policy within the Patient Bill of Rights Act that applies to each scenario. For each scenario, describe in a paragraph why that specific policy in the Patient Bill of Rights Act is critical for demonstrating integrity within the medical assisting profession. Scenarios: 1. Donna Jackson- physician, Dr. Jones is retiring and is recommending that Donna continue services with Dr. Smith who also works in the same office. Donna is not comfortable with Dr. Smith and would like the option to select her own physician. 2. Keith Davidson is in need of emergency services because of a life threatening condition. Keith is currently uninsured and would like to make payment arrangements at a later time. 3. Jingle Smith has just been diagnosed with a chronic condition. She is interested in knowing all of her treatment options to combat this diagnosis. Jingle would also like for husband to be a part of the treatment process. 4. During Lisa Smith- visit with her primary care physician, he made derogatory and discriminating comments regarding her weight. Lisa is very uncomfortable with these remarks and wishes to file a complaint with administration. 5. Bianca White has just discovered that someone in her primary care physician office released her medical information without her consent. Bianca is not happy about this and wishes to file a complaint with the Office of General Inspector. Policies within the Patient Bill of Rights Act A. Confidentiality of Health Information Policy B. Participation in Treatment Decisions Policy C. Access to Emergency Services Policy D. Choice of Providers and Plans Policy E. Respect and Nondiscrimination Policy