Insight into Consumer Decision Making

Insight into Consumer Decision Making for 3-D TV
Various media equip consumers to make side-by-side comparisons
of brands’ relative strengths (e.g., Consumer Re- ports,
bizrate.com, etc.). These comparisons are not acclaimed from the
manufacturer, but a third party, so they’re perceived as objective
and neutral. The table below (based on reviews at cnet.com)
compares 3-D televisions on a number of criteria. The attribute of
“crosstalk” (in the table) is not a good thing—it’s the ghost-like
double images that shadow some 3-D objects, depending on the
technology; hence, less is better. All the TVs are about 65” cur-
rently. The 3-D glasses must be purchased with each TV (the
technology is proprietary within firm and TV, so the Panasonic
glasses won’t work with the LG TV, for example). The glasses run
about $150 a pair.
Sometimes customers know just what they want: a particular
brand, or a particular feature. Sometimes their thought processes
are little more meandering. Some consumers are rather systematic
decision makers, such as when they follow a procedure that will
eliminate some alternatives by some criteria. Use the table below
to simu- late the thought processes of a consumer.
ONLY USE THE CHART IN IMAGE

Please answer below questions:
What TV do you think you would buy?
On what criteria do you think you based that decision?

S Home My sac s x Group Case Spr x MKTG 12g Group x E Intructions and x Presentation-Ge x Cengage Brain x Cengag Bo x https:// cengagebra /H/books 9781337516167 /ch/43 /4/4@0:0.00 tal source.com Apps S My sac State ONI DAY O Pacheco, Laura VC Date Ideas World oppurtunties Intern MKT 129 GMO Table of Contents K 2-3 The Marketing Science of c 2-3 a Sensation and Perception $2,478 2-3b Learning, Memory, and Emotions Clear, deep back from angle 22 2-3c Motivation 3-D glaosea Ugly and 2-3d Attitudes and Decision 25 Making Case Discussion Questi thinking about buying DTV. Imagine you 2-3e HowY Do Cultural Differences First q-ody at a glance, what TV do you think you would buy? 27 2. On what criteria do you think you based that decision? Affect Consumers’ Behavior? Try these decision makingprocesses. for each, and how confident you feel about thi sulting brand suggested eech approach What attribute do you find least informative? Eiminate that brand of TV woul Continue until obviousdhoice results. to berisidest to buy? Eliminate it. 5. you made a price-based decision, wouldyou be happy 6 How would your finalbrandchoice defne you? Which of these criteria ldn’t have ncerned you? How similar this thought process to your netural you find if you ink along these lines?

Stomach Pains

Actions for Discussion 2.1: Stomach Pains Locked after Monday,
. Must post first. Scenario (based on a
real Michigan case): A patient went to his doctor complaining of
stomach pains. The doctor diagnosed the patient with a bleeding
ulcer, recommending certain procedures and “promising to cure” it.
However, ultimately the treatment(s) were unsuccessful. The patient
sued the doctor for breach of contract. Was a contract created in
this case-were all of the elements of a contract satisfied? Explain
your answer. If there was a contract, what type of contract was it
and why? Did the doctor breach a contract with the patient?
IMPORTANT NOTE: Some things to ponder as you respond to this
question: We can all agree that it was stupid of the doctor to say
what was said. No debate there, so don’t waste your time talking
about that. The question for you, though, is whether we can hold
him liable for damages for breach of contract. Now, let’s make a
distinction between a contract to treat the patient (which
obviously existed), and a contract to cure the patient, which is
what the two sides are arguing about. Remember that there are two
essential elements to contract formation: mutual assent +
consideration. Was there an exchange of consideration to support an
agreement to cure the patient? If so, what was it? There is a BIG
difference between a mere promise and a contract. Was this just a
promise, or did it meet all the requirements to be an enforceable
contract? What could the doctor have done differently to have
avoided being sued in this situation?

Utilitarianism

Act utilitarianism Individual Relativism General utilitarianism
Virtue Ethics Rule utilitarianism Preference Utilitarianism Custom
Ethics Truth Ethics Ethical relativism Kantian ethics Match the
ethical theory with the duty to tell the truth: An ethical theory
holds that we should always tell the truth. An ethical theory holds
that society determines if we have a duty to tell the truth. The
consequences determine if we have a duty to tell the truth. If the
consequences are good, we should tell the truth. If not, we should
not tell the truth. If society benefits from our having a duty to
tell the truth, we should always tell the truth, even if it is
sometimes counter-productive. To find out if we have a duty to tell
the truth an ethical theory holds that we should ask the question:
What would happen if everybody else considered not to tell the
truth?

Hysterectomy

Actions for Discussion 3.2: Hysterectomy Locked after Monday,
April 17, 2017 12:00 AM MDT. Must post first. Chapter 8. Scenario
(based on a real Texas case): A woman with pelvic pain eventually
underwent a hysterectomy by her gynecologist, which was successful
and relieved the woman’s pain. However, later the patient
complained of mild incontinence. The patient’s physician found that
she had both herniations of the bladder and the rectum through the
wall of her vagina. Since the patient’s stress incontinence had
progressed, the gynecologist recommended surgery, but she did not
discuss Kegel’s exercises with the patient (which are designed to
strengthen muscles in a woman’s pelvic floor and muscles supporting
the urethra). The surgery was performed and was successful in
correcting the patient’s incontinence and the anatomical defects
that caused it. However, after the surgery, the patient developed
pain in her right leg. A second surgery was performed to release
two sutures which the gynecologist believed might be impinging on
the patient’s obturator nerve and causing the pain. The pain
continued, and a second surgery on the patient’s leg was performed.
The second surgery did not alleviate the patient’s pain despite
referrals to and treatments by several sub-specialists. The pain
and impairment in the patient’s right leg was finally diagnosed as
due to nerve damage as a result of the hysterectomy. The patient
filed suit alleging: (1) the gynecologist negligently failed to
offer the non-surgical option of Kegel’s exercise; (2). The patient
would have chosen and performed the non-surgical option had it been
offered; (3.) the Kegel’s exercises probably would have corrected
the patient’s incontinence without surgery; and (4) the patient’s
nerve damage would have been avoided if the surgery had not been
done. Should the patient win her suit—why or why not? Applying the
elements of negligence, is there any problem with the patient’s
negligence theory? If you were the attorney for the physician, what
would you argue to absolve the physician of liability?