Discuss in one to two paragraphs specific foods that influenced the levels of the nutrient/nutrient group, and discuss at least three dietary strategies to maintain or improve intake of nutrient/nutrient group.

Diet  Analysis  Project     Step 1. Screen Diet

Complete a 24-hour recall and Food Group Count List every food and beverage that you’ve eaten over the past 24 hours. Count the number of servings of each food group provided by the foods that you listed. (A sample recall form can be found in the textbook Appendix E; page A-44, or at McGraw Hill Connect Student Resources page. The form there is titled, ‘Daily Food Log Form’. You will not submit this form. If you need help estimating the number of servings provided by what you listed refer to the ‘What Counts as an ounce, cup, etc.’ link at: http://www.choosemyplate.gov/food-groups/fruits-counts.html

Step 2. Introduce Problem

Discuss the potential of a specific nutrient imbalance and how it relates to a health outcome. a. In one paragraph, discuss the results of the 24-hour recall (food group intake) and identify the most problematic food group (compared to My plate recommendations). If you need help determining if a group was over or under consumed, refer to the ‘How Much is Needed?’ link at: http://www.choosemyplate.gov/food-groups/fruits-amount.html b. In one paragraph, discuss the feature nutrients of that problematic food group that may be imbalanced. If you need help determining what nutrients are featured in a group, refer to the ‘Health Benefits and Nutrients’ link at: http://www.choosemyplate.gov/food-groups/fruits-why.html c. In one to two paragraphs, discuss the relationship or effect of a specific nutrient (or group of nutrients) to some health outcome that you are interested in. Cite at least two scholarly articles (at least one review article and one original research article) that support your understanding (DO NOT USE the Health Benefits and Nutrients’ link at MyPlate.gov, nor trade, industry or popular type publications such as livestrong.org). d. In one sentence, state the purpose of a prospective analysis.

Step 3. Diet Analysis a. Complete a prospective diet record

Without changing your usual diet, keep a detailed food log of food and beverage intake for one to seven days. (A sample daily food log form can be found in the textbook Appendix E; page A-38, at McGraw Hill Connect Student Resources page, or posted in Bb beneath the project instructions. You will not submit the form. b. Analyze Diet Record using Diet Analysis Software Transfer every food item from your food log into Nutrition Calc Plus. Demonstration to this is included in Diet Analysis Lecture Archive. c. View Results/Reports. Be sure the reports that you select provide the information needed to address the purposes of the analysis.

Step 4. Performance a. Discuss in a sentence or two, intake of the nutrient/nutrient group

discussed in Step 2 compared to DRI, or dietary goals as listed in Nutricalc.

b. Create one table or figure that shows the level of that nutrient/nutrient group consumed compared to dietary goals as listed in Nutricalc.

c. Discuss in one to two paragraphs specific foods that influenced the levels of the nutrient/nutrient group, and discuss at least three dietary strategies to maintain or improve intake of nutrient/nutrient group.

What are the implications and consequences of this research?

Introduction to the Activity:
Careful scrutiny and constructive criticism are an integral part of the scientific process. Publishing a research paper in a peer-reviewed journal is just one of many steps in the process of scientific inquiry. Students, however, commonly perceive the publication of a scientific research article as the end of scientific inquiry. On the contrary, one of the key features of the scientific process comes after publication, namely how the science community responds to claims put forth by scientists. The science community examines research articles carefully for errors in assumptions, procedure, logic, and conclusions drawn. Scrutinizing the ideas and work of other scientists is an important communication skill for students to learn because it is a critical step in the process of scientific inquiry.

Read the complete article once to get an overview of the paper’s purpose.

Malaria continues to select for sickle cell trait in Central Africa located at the following link.

 

http://www.pnas.org/content/112/22/7051.full.pdf?sid=22f13b4a-c85b-4e0e-bd17-594cf9c0be96

 

Once to get an overview of the paper’s purpose. Then, read it again, but this time with a critical eye. focus efforts on critically evaluating the Introduction and Methods sections, focuses on the Results and Discussion. then to work to synthesize your analysis into a cohesive essay in which you address many of the following questions:

1.Purpose:

    • Does the author express a clear purpose for his/her scientific reasoning?
    • Is the objective of the experiment or of the observations made important for the field?

2.Statement of Problem:

    • State in your own words the question being pursued by the author?
    • How can you further subdivide the original question into smaller questions?

3.Assumptions:

·        What assumptions has the author made?

·       Are these assumptions justifiable? Why or why not?

 

4.Procedure:

·       Are there errors in the procedure outlined by the author?

·       What changes, if any, would you make to the experimental design?

 

5.Data:

·       To what degree is the data collected accurate, clear, and relevant to the question under study?

 

6.Results:

·       To what degree does the data generated support the claim(s) being made?

·       What scientific theories and concepts support the reasoning?

 

7.Conclusion:

·       What are the implications and consequences of this research?

 

8.Point of View:

·       What is the author’s point of view?

·       How is the point of view expressed by the author scientific?

·       From what other points of view could the investigation be done?

 

Instructions to Learners:
Work an essay in which you provide an analysis of the selected article, providing your qualified opinion on its merits and shortcomings. The essay must be at least 3 pages and no longer than 4 pages (approximately 700 words). The title page and reference page are not included in the page or word count.

Begin your paper by providing the following information at the beginning of your critique:

1.Name of author

2.Title of article

3.Title of journal, volume number, and page numbers

Then, answer the questions posed in the ‘Introduction to the Activity’ section.

*APA format essay.
* Need original answers to avoid plagiarism.

Evolutionary Change and Natural Selection

Evolutionary Change and Natural Selection – Introduction

Evolution is descent with modification and includes small-scale evolutionary change (microevolution) as measured by changes in gene frequency in a population from one generation to the next and large-scale evolutionary (macroevolution) change as evidenced by speciation events. Several mechanisms contribute to evolutionary change, such as natural selection, a process in which individuals with certain beneficial traits are more likely to survive and reproduce. Natural selection is also responsible for the loss of lethal or detrimental traits from a population. It is important to keep in mind that evolution does not act on individuals; it acts on populations. Natural selection, however, does act on individuals within a population and can result in evolutionary change of that population over time.

Populations do not always change due to Natural Selection, since there are several conditions that must be met in order for Natural selection to occur:

  • Individuals within a population must vary; they do all exhibit identical traits.
  • Some traits are “better” than others or “worse” than others.
  • The traits that vary are heritable and not simply acquired.
  • The “better” individuals have more success reproducing and produce more offspring.

IF these conditions are met, then in successive generations, more offspring will exhibit the beneficial trait (or conversely, a detrimental trait will be lost).

Recall that DNA contains sequences that code for particular proteins or traits, these sequences are called genes. The alternate forms of genes are called alleles and these alleles exist in pairs because chromosomes exist in pairs. A dominant allele is one that masks another (recessive) allele; dominant does NOT mean a given allele is more frequent or necessarily better. A recessive allele is one that requires two copies to be expressed. Evolutionary biologists are interested in the frequency of alleles within a population and how they change over time (= microevolution).

Be sure that you read through our Unit 7 online lecture this unit on Evolution as well as your text book readings. Open the Unit 7 Experiment Answer Sheet and work through the first two exercises.


Mechanisms of Evolutionary Change – Introduction

There are other mechanisms besides Natural Selection that can lead to evolutionary change. These include:

  • Genetic drift (random changes in the gene pool)
  • Mutations
  • Gene flow (e.g., immigration and emigration)
  • Nonrandom mating (e.g., inbreeding, sexual selection, assortative mating)

Be sure to review our online lecture on Evolution and pp 260-264 in your book before starting this exercise. You will be using the following website for this exercise. Be sure you are able to open it and use it:

BioMan Biology. No date. Biology Games and Virtual Labs: Evolution
http://biomanbio.com/GamesandLabs/EvoClassGames/aaevo.html  (Links to an external site.)

When you are ready, open your Unit 7 Experiment Answer Sheet and complete Exercise 3: Mechanisms of Evolutionary Change.

What did you think of the response of the government agencies to the HIV AIDS epidemic?  Discuss the factors that influenced this response.

Write a one page reflection on the events of the film And the Band Played on .  You should address the following issues

1.  What did you think of the response of the government agencies to the HIV AIDS epidemic?  Discuss the factors that influenced this response.

2. How do you think the initial response impacted the pace of research? Do you think we would be closer to a cure if response had been different?

3. Why was it so important to identify the virus responsible for this disease?

4.  What were your overall impressions of the film, did you think this was a realistic portrait of the events?