Feedback 2 AssignmentsAnswers 2Bids 1Other questions 10

/in /by

360-Degree FeedbackCase AssignmentContinuing on the themes of the Module 1 and 2 Case Assignments, for this module you will also be doing a self-assessment as well as applying the concepts from the module to your own organization. Make sure to thoroughly review the required background materials before starting this assignment, as you need to apply concepts from readings such as Carelli (2010) and Mukherjee (2014) as part of this assignment.This assignment has five sections. For each section, the suggested length is one half to one full page, for a total length of four to five pages not including the title page and references. You should also make sure to cite Carelli (2010) and Mukherjee (2014) multiple times throughout the paper as well as any additional references that you find:Most 360-degree surveys are not free and in fact are very expensive if you want to get a license to use them at your organization. However, there are a few free sample 360-degree surveys out there. Do a search on Google or other search engines using terms such as “free 360-degree feedback survey.” Find two or three free surveys and choose one of them that you think would be most applicable to your organization. Explain the reasoning for your choice, and try to use criteria from Carelli (2010) (such as her checklist on page 175) for selecting your survey.Now take the survey that you chose in your answer to Question 2 above. Fill out the survey as a self-evaluation – that is, use the survey to evaluate your own leadership skills and other skills. Report the results of your survey. Do you think the survey was useful? What areas for improvement in your leadership skills did you find from using the survey?As a next step, fill out the survey again but this time evaluate your current supervisor or a previous supervisor that you worked with. Report your results. Were the results fair to your supervisor? What are the main areas for improvement for your supervisor based on your results?Now that you have taken the survey twice, what is your overall evaluation of the survey that you took? Did the survey ask the right questions necessary for you and your supervisor? Are there different or additional questions that you think should be added to this survey? Use the “Selecting a 360 System” on page 175 of Carelli (2010) as well as your own experiences filling out the survey to assess the usefulness of the survey that you took.Finally, take a look at pages 153-155 of Carelli (2010) where she discusses pitfalls and potential biases of a 360-degree survey. Which pitfalls do you think would apply to your organization and the leaders you work with? How might you overcome these pitfalls if you were to lead a 360-degree survey process in your organization?Assignment ExpectationsFollow the assignment instructions closely and follow all steps listed in the instructionsStay focused on the precise assignment questions, don’t go off on tangents or devote a lot of space to summarizing general background materialsList supporting references and cite sources in proper formatUse appropriate writing style in essay form (organization, grammar, and spelling).Include both a bibliography and in-text citations. See the Student Guide to Writing a High-Quality Academic Paper, including pages 13-14 on in-text citations. 360-Degree FeedbackFor this assignment you will be applying the concepts from the background readings to some specific scenarios that you might face if you were a leadership development coach. Make sure to thoroughly review Carelli (2010) and Mukherjee (2014) before starting on this assignment.For each of the scenarios below, use at least one reference from the required readings to answer the specific question. Your paper should be 2-3 pages in length:An organization decides that they don’t want to spend the large amount of money to use a 360-degree survey from an established vendor and instead decides to develop their own survey. An employee in the human resource department is asked to create a list of 50 questions about different areas of leadership performance. Two of the senior managers look at the questions briefly and then send out the survey as part of a 360-degree process. Once the results come in, there is no rhyme or reason to the results. For example, one top performing leader in the organization gets perfect performance scores from some employees and very negative scores from other employees. Management is not sure if the results from the survey can be trusted or not.A unit in one organization is having a lot of performance issues and senior management is not sure of the reasons for this. They don’t want to fire any employees but they do think some of the supervisors need to improve their leadership skills. The survey is sent to five employees, which includes two supervisors and three direct reports. They are told that the survey will be anonymous but the results of each survey will be shared with all five employees – only the names will be removed from each survey but they will all be able to see the evaluation scores on each question. When senior management sees the survey results, they find that all five employees received almost perfect scores and no useful information from the surveys can be found.A software company is concerned that they are losing market share to their competitors and that their software is not as high in quality as it used to be. In an effort to improve their competitiveness, they decide to use a 360-degree survey process to identify areas for improvement in leadership skills among their top supervisors in their software design department. After searching through a few different 360-degree instruments offered by different vendors, they find a survey that focuses on communication and teamwork skills. The process seems to go very well as supervisors who score low on communication or teamwork agree to go through training to improve these skills. One year later the 360-degree process is repeated and most supervisors show greatly improved communication and teamwork skills. However, the quality of the company’s software does not seem to have improved at all in spite of the improvements in communication and teamwork.SLP Assignment ExpectationsFollow the assignment instructions closely and follow all steps listed in the instructionsStay focused on the precise assignment questions, don’t go off on tangents or devote a lot of space to summarizing general background materialsList supporting references and cite sources in proper formatUse appropriate writing style in essay form (organization, grammar, and spelling).Include both a bibliography and in-text citations. See the Student Guide to Writing a High-Quality Academic Paper, including pages 13-14 on in-text citations.

The post Feedback 2 AssignmentsAnswers 2Bids 1Other questions 10 appeared first on homeworkhandlers.com.

Bunss LawAnswers 1Bids 1Other questions 10

/in /by

Choose one of the options below for discussion. Be sure to elaborate and explain.Rotten Food (United States v. Parks, p. 161)Do you think that Parks should have been charged with a criminal offense when he was not directly running the warehouse where the contaminated food was stored? Should he be convicted when he did not intend to hurt anyone? Discuss why or why not. What precedent does the court rely on in this case? For one of your posts, do a little exploring online and discuss another white-collar crime story in the news. Include one source, properly cited in APA format.It’s in the Mail (United States v. Cohen, p. 156)  Note:   As you can see the one that I chose is below which is United States versus Parks page 161.  please remember to do a little exploring online and discuss another white collar crime story,  in the news include one source, properly cited in APA format.CASE   7-2  UNITED STATES v. PARKUNITED STATES SUPREME COURT 421 U.S. 658 (1975) Defendant Park, the president of a national food-chain corporation, was charged, along with the corporation, with violating the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act by allowing food in the warehouse to be exposed to rodent contamination. Park conceded that his responsibility for the “entire operation” included warehouse sanitation but claimed he had delegated the responsibility for sanitation to dependable subordinates. He admitted at trial that he had received a warning letter from the Food and Drug Administration about unsanitary conditions at one of the company’s warehouses. The trial court found him guilty, the court of appeals reversed, and the case was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.CHIEF JUSTICE BURGER:  The question presented was whether “the manager of a corporation, as well as the corporation itself, may be prosecuted under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938 for the introduction of misbranded and adulterated articles into interstate commerce.” In Dotterweich, a jury had disagreed as to the corporation, a jobber purchasing drugs from manufacturers and shipping them in interstate commerce under its own label, but had convicted Dotterweich, the corporation’s president and general manager.p. 162   Central to the Court’s conclusion that individuals other than proprietors are subject to the criminal provisions of the Act was the reality that “the only way in which a corporation can act is through the individuals who act on its behalf.”   The rationale of the interpretation given the Act in Dotterweich, as holding criminally accountable the persons whose failure to exercise the authority and supervisory responsibility reposed in them by the business organization, resulted in the violation complained of, has been confirmed in our subsequent cases.… In order to make “distributors of food the strictest censors of their merchandise,” the Act punishes “neglect where the law requires care, and inaction where it imposes a duty.” “The accused, if he does not will the violation, usually is in a position to prevent it with no more care than society might reasonably expect and no more exertion than it might reasonably extract from one who assumed his responsibilities.”   Thus, Dotterweich and the cases which have followed reveal that in providing sanctions which reach and touch the individuals who execute the corporate mission—and this by no means necessarily confined to a single corporate agent or employee—the Act imposes not only a positive duty to seek out and remedy violations when they occur, but also, and primarily, a duty to implement measures that will insure that violations will not occur. The requirements of foresight and vigilance imposed on responsible corporate agents are beyond question, demanding, and perhaps onerous, but they are not more stringent than the public has a right to expect of those who voluntarily assume positions of authority in business enterprises whose services and products affect the health and well-being of the public that supports them.   The Act does not, as we observed in Dotterweich, make criminal liability turn on “awareness of some wrongdoing” or “conscious fraud.” The duty imposed by Congress on responsible corporate agents is, we emphasize, one that requires the highest standard of foresight and vigilance, but the Act, in its criminal aspect, does not require that which is objectively impossible. The theory upon which responsible corporate agents are held criminally accountable for “causing” violations of the Act permits a claim that a defendant was “powerless” to prevent or correct the violation to “be raised defensively at a trial on the merits.”   … [I]t is equally clear that the Government established a prima facie case when it introduced evidence sufficient to warrant a finding by the trier of the facts that the defendant had, by reason of his position in the corporation, responsibility and authority either to prevent in the first instance, or promptly to correct, the violation complained of, and that he failed to do so. The failure thus to fulfill the duty imposed by the interaction of the corporate agent’s authority and that statute furnishes a sufficient causal link. The considerations, which prompted the imposition of this duty, and the scope of the duty, provide the measure of culpability.CRITICAL THINKINGThe Court relied heavily on the Dotterweich decision in coming to its present conclusion. Why? Do you think the Court should have relied so much on this case? ETHICAL DECISION MAKINGSuppose you were in Park’s position and allowed food in your warehouse to be exposed to rodent contamination. If you were guided by the public disclosure test, what would you decide to do?Since United States v. Park (Case 7-2), the general rule that corporate executives may be held accountable for crimes arising from their failure to meet their responsibility has remained intact. In fact, it has broadened; now executives can be held criminally liable for offenses we generally do not think of as crimes. In United States v. Iverson,13 a corporate officer of a waste treatment facility was convicted and sentenced for violating the Clean Water Act after he ordered employees to illegally dispose of wastewater. This case demonstrates that corporate executives can be sentenced not only for committing common law crimes we have traditionally understood to be criminal offenses but also for violating provisions of regulatory statutes that permit criminal sanctions. Using the idea of vicarious liabilityThe liability or responsibility imposed on a person, a party, or an organization for damages caused by another; most commonly used in relation to employment, with the employer held vicariously liable for the damages caused by its employees., courts have held employers liable for the wrongful acts of their employees if the employer directed, partook in, or authorized the wrongful act.p. 163Legal Principle: As a general rule, when a lower-level employee commits a crime, she or he will be individually liable for the crime, and under the responsible corporate officer doctrine, the employee’s manager, and any other corporate official who could have prevented the crime, can also be held vicariously liable for the crime.

The post Bunss LawAnswers 1Bids 1Other questions 10 appeared first on homeworkhandlers.com.

10 Discussion Board (Need answers weekly), 1 World view chart (Need answers on then weekly)1 EssayAnswers 4Bids 1Other questions 10

/in /by

10 Discussion Boards (only have 3 as of yet)First 3 are as follows: 1. ‘Understanding Religions and Indigenous Sacred Ways’  Please respond to the following:Define indigenous religion, and describe at least one aspect of indigenous religions that exists in a similar form in a traditional mainstream religion.Define religion, and discuss why it is useful in society. Explain why it is important for you personally to understand the beliefs of other religious groups. 2. ‘Hindu Way of Life’  Please respond to the following:Explain the key ways in which the teachings of the Vedas influence the daily lives of Hindus. 3. ‘Noble Action, Sacred Call, or Desire’  Please respond to the following:Explain whether or not you think Siddhārtha Gautama’s quest to find enlightenment falls under the category of noble action, sacred call, or desire. Discuss how his decision to leave his family would be received in today’s culture. Discussion questions 4-10 will be provided as soon as possible.  World View Chart AssignmentsDue every week A world view is a fundamental or basic orientation of thinking – like a mindset – which guides a culture and / or a person’s life. Like a point of view, it can be built of concepts, ideas, values, emotions, and ethics. Weltanschauung is the German word for this idea. Your goal for this course is to understand the world views of these various religions. In order to prepare you for your final assignment, you will outline the world views of various religions in the chart below, adding to it each week.For this assignment, students will complete the weekly area of the chart, filling in the aspects of each religion as it is presented in the readings and resources. This chart, when complete, will be the starting point for the written assignment, due in Week 10.For each weekly submission:1.       Review the weekly lectures and supplemental materials provided, then complete the chart by elaborating on each section related to the weekly content.2.       Identify key details and examples from the weekly resources to serve as a basis for the content being recorded in your chart.3.       Write clearly and coherently using correct grammar, punctuation, spelling, and mechanics.     Religion Cosmogony – Origin of the Universe Nature of God View of Human Nature View of Good and Evil View of “Salvation” View of After Life Practices and Rituals Celebrations and Festivals Week 2 Hinduism and Jainism                 Week 3 Buddhism                 Week 4 Daoism and Confucianism                 Week 5 Shinto                  Week 6 Judaism                 Week 7 Christianity                 Week 8 Islam                 Week 9 Sikhism                 Week 10 New Religious Movements                The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:·         Analyze what is meant by religion.·         Analyze the similarities and differences in the primary beliefs held by major religious traditions and the cultures in which these religions evolved.·         Describe the varieties of religious experience and practice in a wide range of cultures.·         Recognize how daily life within various religions and current affairs are influenced by religion.·         Use technology and information resources to research issues in religion.·         Write clearly and concisely about world religions using proper writing mechanics.    FINAL PAPER: World View Chart Writing AssignmentThis assignment uses the information you have gathered for your weekly World View Chart Assignments.Choose ONE (1) category (origin of all things, nature of god, view of human nature, view of good and evil, etc.) from the chart to focus on for this assignment. Consider how the selected category relates to all of the religions covered and to your own social or work experiences.Write a two to three (2-3) page paper in which you:1.     Select ONE (1) category from the completed World View Chart. Provide a rationale for choosing this category. What is compelling about this category? Why is it important in the study of religion?2.     Describe the selected content and explain the significance of the selected category across all of the religions studied. Show in what ways the category is significant for each religion.3.     Give an example of how you have noticed this category in your life, town or country. What impact does this category have in the everyday lives of people who practice religion in your area? (You do not have to give examples of all the religions in your area, just one you have noticed besides any you practice). For example, in Cincinnati, Ohio we have Hindu, Greek Orthodox, Catholic festivals in the summer. So if my category were “Festivals and Celebrations” I could use those events as my example.4.     Use at least three (3) quality resources as references for the assignment and document your sources using APA Style for in-text citations and references. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.5.     Write clearly and coherently using correct grammar, punctuation, spelling, and mechanics.Your assignment must:Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:Analyze what is meant by religion.Analyze the similarities and differences in the primary beliefs held by major religious traditions and the cultures in which these religions evolved.Describe the varieties of religious experience and practice in a wide range of cultures.Recognize how daily life within various religions and current affairs are influenced by religion.Develop written pieces that demonstrate an analysis of a topic relevant to the course.Use technology and information resources to research issues in religion.Write clearly and concisely about world religions using proper writing mechanics.

The post 10 Discussion Board (Need answers weekly), 1 World view chart (Need answers on then weekly)1 EssayAnswers 4Bids 1Other questions 10 appeared first on homeworkhandlers.com.

Healthcare Policy and Economics

/in /by

Description

Freshman Transcript

Create a freshman transcript for a student of your choice. The students should have accumulated at least 30 credits over the span of fall and spring semesters. Select courses for your student to take, based on a major in the NEC Academic Catalog, and then give the student final course grades. This transcript should have a mixture of final grades. Some may be straight letter grades, but the majority should be a combination of letters and plus or minus (B+, A-, etc.). (See page 394 in your textbook)

Use the table (Links to an external site.) below to identify the quality point value per credit for each grade earned.
Letter Grade

Quality Points Per Credit

A

4.0

A-

3.7

B+

3.3

B

3.0

B-

2.7

C+

2.3

C

2.0

C-

1.7

D

1.0

D-

0.7

F

0

Based on the number of credits, compute the point value of credit hours for each course.
Find the student’s grade point average for Semester 1 and Semester 2 and the student’s cumulative grade point average.
Based on your computations, is this student eligible for the Deans List Semester 1, Semester, 2, or both semesters? (See catalog (Links to an external site.))
Please answer all the questions in your response.

When posting substantive entries to others’ problems, think about the way the problem was solved (Was it solved the same way you would have solved it?), the accuracy of the solution, if the reasoning behind the solution made sense to you, whether or not it helped you solve a similar problem, etc.’

Sample Solution

The post Healthcare Policy and Economics appeared first on homework handlers.