Math Experts Only

 

Please respond to both POST1: and POST2: in at least 200 words each.

Initial post that both POST1: and POST2: are responding to.

Consider the following two functions:

  • F(m): The average temperature in Fahrenheit during month (m) of the year.

Month (m)

F(m)

Month (m)

F(m)

Month (m)

F(m)

January

42

May

72

September

73

February

43

June

83

October

63

March

52

July

84

November

55

April

63

August

84

December

44

  • C(f): The conversion formula to calculate the temperature in Celsius based on the temperature in Fahrenheit (f).

For this discussion, your task is as follows:

  • Calculate (C F) for the month of your choice.
  • Discuss the meaning of the function (C F)(m).
  • How does the composition of functions in parts (a) and (b) compare to (F C)(m)? Are they the same?

POST1:

Hello Class,

The month I will use to calculate will be F(August)=84.

In this example we are using two known functions to produce desired outputs. These are functions because for every input there is only one output.

a) C(F)=5/9*(F-32)= C(84)=5/9*(84-32)= 28.89

b) (C F)(m) is used to describe the function that converts F(m) from a average temperature in Fahrenheit to an average temperature in Celsius. In the above example F(August)=84 so we can substitute the value of F to find an equivalent output in Celsius.

c) (F C)(m) would be used to convert the Average temperature in Celsius to Average temperature in Fahrenheit. This conversion would need a known value of C(m). That value would be an input into the function F(C).

POST2:

For this example, I chose to calculate by birth month of February averaging 43 degrees Fahrenheit. Using c(f) = 5/9 (f-32)

A) The temperature in Celsius is calculated as:

c(43) = 5/9 (43-32)

=5/9(11)

=6.1 degrees Celsius

B) The function (C F)(m) is to take the average temperature, in Fahrenheit, from the months in a year and convert this into Celsius.

C) (C F) (m) would be different from (F C) (m). While (C F) (m) gives the average temperature of a particular month in Celsius, (F C) (m) converts visa versa.

Sheryl Hogan Only

Identify a cross-cultural challenge related to dialogue from your professional life. Visit the Claremont Lincoln University Library to find two articles that present viewpoints relating to this challenge. 

Some examples of cross-cultural challenges that might arise in the workplace:

  • Some cultures have communication that is precise and more emotionalthis is called low context, and countries where this is common include the US, Australia, and the UK.
  • Some cultures have communication that is subtler, with meanings not explicitly statedthis is called high context, and countries where this is common include China, Japan, and India.

Other differences include:

  • Individualism vs. collectivism refers to the emphasis on individual or collective success.
  • Masculinity vs. femininity refers to the extent to which the culture emphasizes masculine, work-related goals rather than humanist goals.
  • Uncertainty avoidance refers to the need for rules and direction rather than ambiguity.
  • Long-term orientation vs. short-term orientation refers to the level of goal-setting in a timeframe context.
  • Thinking before you speak vs. shooting from the hip in sharing ideas.
  • Being at ease with overlapping conversations and interruptions, vs. needing to have more orderly patterns of communication.
  • Feeling comfortable raising ones voice and expressing disagreement, vs. being uncomfortable showing emotion at work or disagreeing in a professional setting.
  • Feedback considered a positive thing to pursue and receive, vs. feedback being seen as criticism and shameful to receive, especially in groups.

Introduction:

Identify a cross-cultural challenge from your professional life. Analyze the social dimensions and cultural styles of communication that create this cross-cultural challenge. Include your personal and cultural bias and critical moments in the interaction that makes it challenging.

Define the focus of your cross-cultural challenge and include the intersections this challenge brings to communication and dialogue.

Body:

For EACH article include these headings and address the questions:

  • Title/Author(s) of article. (Include the library link to the article in your references.)
  • Purpose of the Study. What is the authors rationale for selecting this topic? Does she/he build a strong case?
  • Social and Cultural Dimension. What is the impact? Is a change really needed, and how will it affect social and/or cultural dimensions?
  • Article Summary. How is this article organized? What are the main themes found in the review? Who are the main authors?
  • Sample Population(s). What group(s) is/are being studied?
  • Results/Conclusions. What did the author find through the study? Was the original question answered?
  • Application to your challenge. How can you apply the research in this article to resolve your challenge? How does it relate to the suggestions provided through dialogue theory as we have been examining it this term?

Conclusion:

Using the two articles, craft a resolution plan for your challenge. Provide a rationale for how you devised the plan using a variety of the course materials and dialogue concepts to support your solutions. Explain why your idea will work to address the scenario.

Mechanics: This assignment is to be submitted as an academic essay with appropriate references and citations. Dont just answer the questions, develop an outline and structured paper that addresses all of the points in the instructions.

Writing should include the logical organization of major points and structure. Sentences should be complete, clear and concise. Add a title page, introduction and conclusion. Analysis needs to be supported by the course materials. Adhere to the American Psychological Association (APA) guidelines for all references and citations. The assignment should be (5-6 pages), typed, double-spaced, Times New Roman, 12-point font, 1″ margins. 

Argument Analysis Assignment

This assignment is designed to measure your ability to analyze someone elses written argument by using the tools of rhetorical analysis, critical thinking, and persuasion.  Use the article provided. You will be specifically analyzing the article writers argument.  As part of your essay introduction, give your reader a quick summary of the article on which you are focusing.  Then analyze the writers argument, considering his or her claim and evidence as well as his or her use of logos, pathos, and ethos.  You may agree or disagree with the writers point of view.  In doing such, however, you must use secondary sources to support your point of view on the argument.  Your own point of view on the topic should become clear, although this is not to be the focal point of your essay.  Keep as your focus a critical, rhetorical analysis of the other writers argument.  Ask and answer questions about the writers argument throughout your essay.  Your conclusion should leave the reader of your essay with a very clear impression of your thoughts on the other writers ability to formulate a strong argument.
 
Besides the original article on which you will be focusing your essay, you will need to use two additional research sources, which will be used to strengthen your discussion on the original article authors argument. Be sure to work these support sources smoothly into your essay, properly citing both in text and on your works cited page. You will also want to strive for clarity and precision in your writing, following the rules of English grammar and composition.  This essay should be 3-5 pages in length.  Your essay will be graded using the essay rubric found on our course site.

Use this article –

Readmisson to graduate program

I had life events which ultimately resulted in me failing my graduate classes at my college. To appeal this, I need to write a letter with my justification. I can provide answers for all the questions they want answered. I just need it structured.
The email read: Your statement should include the personal, professional, or educational reasoning behind the dismissal, the grades, what assistance you reached out for (example: Grade Forgiveness Waivers, repeat courses, etc.), and anything else you feel is necessary to explain your educational history. Its also important to include personal, professional, or educational accomplishments that were achieved during or since the low GPA. To wrap your letter up, its recommended to include why your past grades do not reflect your current or future academic ability, and how ERAU can help fulfill your educational goals. In short, you want to include the key parts of why you feel your academic past will not reflect your future with Embry-Riddle. These items do not guarantee admission into Embry-Riddle; however, they help the committee understand the reasoning behind your previous educational history.