Zulilly

Instructions
Case Study 1

Read zulily in Chapter 1 (pages 33-34). Answer questions, 1-9, 1-10, 1-11, 1-12, 1-13 and 1-14.

Your case study should be a minimum of  three (3) pages in length, 1 spaces, 12 font, and a minimum of two sources cited outside of the book. Number each question according to the book with the question stated; yes, please state each question.

DUE: January 25, 2020. Late submissions are not allowable.

Deliverable

The grading of the write-up will be based on the quality of your responses to the questions. Quality is more important than quantity. Number each question according to the book with the question stated. Again, please state each question.

There are many ways in which you can answer the questions in the case. I am not looking for one perfect solution because it does not exist; instead, I look for the overall quality of your answers. I pay special attention to the quality of your arguments and that you followed directions.

Submission

Case analyses have to be submitted through the assignment tool in D2L as a Word document.

Please pay close attention to the question and allow yourself sufficient time to submit quality work.  If the question has multiple parts to it, be sure to answer all parts.

Microsoft Word will mark any spelling or grammar errors. There is no excuse to hand in a document with such errors. Word will also automatically correct some typos, but it will not always correct them in the right way, which at times makes for interesting reading.  I do take points off for writing that is unclear, too informal, or clearly too short.

The following outlines more specific grading criteria:

Grading Components

Percentage of the Score

Answered the questions?

25%

Answered the questions coherently

25%

Grammar, Punctuation, and Spelling Correct

10%

Does the writing effectively assert claims and provide support?

25%

Followed instructions?

15%

A Feasability study in project management, discuss 5 topics

A feasibility study in project management

You have to discuss 5 out of 6 topics given by the lecturer in detail; from literature perspective. It’s attached in the documents below you can check.( YOU HAVE TO READ THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT TO UNDERSTAND THE QUESTIONS)

the paper needs to cite 4 journals ( The economist, Forbes, business week)

books: project management

news papers: Irish times, Financial times, Guardian, sunday business post)

times new roman
12 font
400 words per paragraph

NO INTRO OR CONCLUSION NEEDED.
STRAIGHT INTO 5 TOPICS
OPENING- 2 LINES  THEN STRAIGHT TO TOPICS.
NO MOANING AROUND.
REFERENCES MINIMUM 9 ( 4 JOURNALS, 2 BOOKS, 3 MAGAZINES OR NEWSPAPER)
Quotations in Italic 2-3 lines maximum ( 5 quotations minimum)

Discussion response 1

Your company has a downtown campus that contains its main corporate offices, but also two other company buildings onsite.

Management tasked you to set up a Local Area Network to Local Area Network (LAN-2-LAN) network between the main corporate offices and remote buildings on the campus. 

Discuss considerations organizations take into account when generally planning for wireless network capacity and growth for future buildings, including the importance of “Line of Sight” technical requirements for network implementation across multiple buildings.

What are some real world scenarios that you could see this type need? How many types of implementations can work with this?

Note you do not need to discuss the considerations just bottom two questions. No plagiarism. Only need 100 words total. Need this by 11pm est.

Should development projects such as highways, dams, oil, mining and other infra-structural projects that force the displacement of local communities be built?

Reflection Paper Question:

Should development projects such as highways, dams, oil, mining  and other infra-structural projects that force the displacement of local communities be built? Reflect on why is your answer to this question is either Yes OR No, please take a side!

Reflection Paper General Instructions and Rubric

Purpose of Reflection Papers: In this assignment, you will be expected to show that you have read, understood and reflected on 3 of the readings assigned for this class, which was covered in session # 2.

Format:

All reflection paper should be 5 pages, typed, double-spaced and in a 12 point font with one-inch margins.

Despite the fact that these papers are designed to reflect your thinking process, they must cite the assigned scholarly sources as these will help you develop an informed opinion based on the readings/film.  You must use MLA citation.

Reflection Paper Guidelines:

This Reflection Paper constitutes 25% of your grade.
The Reflection Paper should analyze at least 3 readings that are provided for this class (additional external readings could be used but are NOT required.)
The Reflection Paper should not only summarize the central arguments raised in these readings/films but should also demonstrate your exploration and critical analysis– in your own words.
It should be doubled spaced, 12-point font– please do NOT use bullet format.
You must use MLA citation.
Please check the below reflection grading rubric.

HOW TO REFLECT?

In this course, you have been reflecting on the assigned readings.  In this assignment, I am asking you to answer the provided reflection question and expand your reflections by sharing some of the followings, which may apply:

Thoughts
Feelings
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
Ideas, words or phrases that have struck you, and why?
Further questions this reflection brings up