econamcis engineering hw I need it done in 3 hours

I uploaded a video for you to watch to answer these questions. However,  the 3rd Question you need to use the charts that I added ( lead SDS and Arsenic), for the fourth Question you need to google the Flint Water crisis in 2014 and how is it related to the case of the study. I need a paragraph for each question and support your answers with a good reason from the video   

2.Need Response to below discussion

 

There are multiple phases in decision-making, namely 1. Identifying the problem 2. Generating alternative solutions 3. Evaluating those alternatives 4. Making the right choice 5. Implementing the decision 6. Evaluating the outcome. As a part of todays discussion, I will be talking about the decision that I have made at work.

Identifying the problem: 

We use Agile as our framework while we do Program increment planning AKA PI planning. It helps enable to take quick decisions in the unforeseeable environment. The organizations, which can adapt quickly and flexibility to changes in the environment. So, as a part of the planning team of scrum masters, developers and product owners will be identifying the existing issues and planning for any product changes. In the last sprint, we could not predict the number of production issues that are going to be raised, which led to a lot of confusion on how to fix this as we were already allocated with our work which includes the production defects too, but not in huge numbers. Now the team as a whole wants to analyze why this issue has happened.

Generating alternative solutions:

As a part of the analysis and the discussion, there were many ideas on how to go about this issue. Some of them were hiring additional resources, allocating 75% of hours to the development and the remaining for issues like this, reduce the number of meetings and loan resources. There were many other ideas, which would lead us into the rabbit holes.

Evaluating those alternatives:

Now that we have alternative solutions in place, it is time to evaluate the solutions by doing a SWOT analysis. At first, looking at hiring additional resources would solve the problem, but the problem includes hiring takes time, increases the budget and making them get used to the environment and the workflow will be time-consuming. However, the advantages are down the lane you will have a team, which can handle the worst-case scenarios.

The second alternative is to allocate only 75% of the work hours during the sprint, so the team can take up the production defects on time and resolve them. The problem with this alternative is the work that needs to complete will take longer than before. However, we will have reduced the stress on the team, which leads to a quality product.

The remaining alternatives are reducing the number of meetings would change the workflow and these scrum calls cannot be avoided as a part of the Agile framework and loaning resources would take a similar time as hiring a new resource except for the paperwork.

Making the right choice:

After evaluation, those alternatives, Allocating 75% of the work to development and the rest for unexpected production issues like this would increase the efficiency of the team and the application that we are building and supporting on the go. Not only this would reduce the amount of stress on the employee, but this can also be helpful for the team to be creative and learn new things if we do not have more issues as expected. This alternative does not affect the existing workflow in a way that we have to reduce any meetings or to increase the budget.

Implementing the decision: 

Once the decision has been taken by the team as a whole, it was communicated to the program managers and Release Train Engineers by showing the SWOT analysis for the alternatives and make them understand why this is the right choice for the problem. Then they have provided us with the green signal, we started writing stories and creating features for the coming sprint by allocating only 75% of the work by taking holidays and PTOs into consideration.

Evaluating the decision:

Once the Program increment planning was done, the team started developing the application and as we have predicted we have faced production issues. However, this time as a team we are prepared for it, the development team has enough time to analyze, fix and validate the issue. Nonetheless, we had delivered on time for the sprint by within the milestone dates and have delivered a quality product, which would lead to fewer defects going forward.

6610 dis5

View Amy Cuddy Ted talk Conversation
Organizational Change is a key part of the BA job – not just what you do but how you do it.  How do we as BA’s instill confidence in our own selves – and, how do we as BA’s understand what others body language may be telling us?
Primary Post –  as a result of reviewing the Ted Talk, what is one action you can apply to support you in BA work?  What challenge(s) does it help you address and what are the specific ways you will implement your action?

Critique

Instructions:

  1. Write your evaluation in the Word document provided (Critique 1 answer sheet).  You can insert the cursor after each question, and type in your answers.  Use full sentences, with paragraph breaks, to describe each point.  Double space all writing; number pages.
  2. Provide rationales for your decisions (citing sources). For example, if you write that the theory framework is strong, describe how it is strong with at least one citation (Author, year) to a theory book, research book, or article.
  3. List all sources at the end of the answer sheet, following APA format for a reference list.  Remember to cite the article you are evaluating at least once in the text, and put it in the reference list as well.
  4. Remember to type your NAME at the top of the answer sheet to get credit for it!

Critique #1 Content:

Authors, Title, and Abstract

  1. Discuss author(s) qualifications to conduct the study, including educational preparation and clinical experience of author[s].
  2. Discuss the clarity of the article title (type of study, variables, and population stated).
  3. Discuss the quality of the abstract (purpose, design, sample, intervention, and key results presented). (10 pts)

Literature Review/Background

  1. Briefly describe the clinical problem that prompted the study.  This is not the research question, but the clinical issue that needed investigation.
  2. Discuss the data provided for the significance of the clinical problem, and whether or not you believe it is an important problem for nursing science.
  3. Identify the major topics discussed in the background section and evaluate whether there were any missing ideas or topics.
  4. Briefly explain whether the background section included sources current at the time of the study (ie. within 5 years of publication).
  5. Discuss whether the studies were critically evaluated and synthesized to provide a clear summary of the current knowledge about the problem of interest.
  6. Evaluate whether or not the background section provided support for the current research study. In other words, whether a gap(s) in research knowledge was/were clearly described.  (20 pts)

Research Problem, Purpose, Research Questions/Hypotheses

  1. State the study purpose and evaluate whether or not the purpose clearly addresses the gap in nursing knowledge identified in the background section.
  2. If there are research questions and/or hypotheses, list them, and discuss whether they logically follow from the research problem and purpose. If questions/hypotheses were only implied, rather than explicitly stated, describe that. (10 pts)

Theoretical Framework

  1. Describe the theory/framework that supported the study, and list the important concepts in the theory framework. 
  2. Evaluate the clarity of the presentation of the framework. If it was vague or had missing elements, describe those.
  3. Discuss how well the theorys concepts were linked to the study variables.  (10 pts)

Writing Style & Format

  1. Grammar: full sentences, precision, clarity, spelling, and punctuation.
  2. Use APA format throughout this paper, specifically citations and a reference list. (10 pts)