If Poem Analysis Essay

POEM BELOW

Do you think the poem is successful in conveying a message or portraying experiences, thoughts or feelings? What does the poem make you think or feel?

Instructions
No explication can take into account everything that goes on in a poem. So your paper should focus on one or two elements that you think contribute to the overall meaning or purpose of the story. A good explication concentrates on details: you should quote portions of the story to show how the text supports your thesis. Then you should offer comments that show how the portion you’re interpreting contributes to the story as a whole.

Read the poem, “If” under “Reading and Tools.”  Prepare a 1 – 2 page essay as a personal response to the poem as a whole.

Poem:

If, by Rudyard Kipling (broken down and numbered by stanza):
1) If you can keep your head when all about you Are losing theirs and blaming it on you, If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you But make allowance for their doubting too,
2) If you can wait and not be tired by waiting, Or being lied about, don’t deal in lies, Or being hated, don’t give way to hating, And yet don’t look too good, nor talk too wise:
3) If you can dream–and not make dreams your master, If you can think–and not make thoughts your aim; If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster And treat those two impostors just the same;
4) If you can bear to hear the truth you’ve spoken Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools, Or watch the things you gave your life to, broken, And stoop and build ’em up with worn-out tools:
5) If you can make one heap of all your winnings And risk it all on one turn of pitch-and-toss, And lose, and start again at your beginnings And never breathe a word about your loss;
6) If you can force your heart and nerve and sinew To serve your turn long after they are gone, And so hold on when there is nothing in you Except the Will which says to them: “Hold on!”  
7) If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue, Or walk with kings–nor lose the common touch, If neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you; If all men count with you, but none too much, 8) If you can fill the unforgiving minute With sixty seconds’ worth of distance run, Yours is the Earth and everything that’s in it, And–which is more–you’ll be a Man, my son!

Format:

INTRODUCTION (1 paragraph)
Use key words from the essay title in a brief description of what the poem is about. Comment briefly on the themes, issues, thoughts and feelings the poem explores. Identify the narrator, the tone and viewpoint of the poem.

STRUCTURE (1 or 2 paragraph)
Divide the poem into sections and explain in more detail what the poem is about, section by section. Write about the development of ideas and themes from one section to another and one stanza to another. Consider the significance of shifts in tone between sections. Consider the shape of stanzas, line length, sentence length, enjambment and caesura.

DICTION (WORDS) (1 or 2 paragraphs)
Write about the significance and effect of the poems words and their connotations. Look at semantic fields, hyperbole, contrasts, allusions, level of formality etc. Include short quotations and analysis of the effects of language.

IMAGERY (1 or 2 paragraphs)
Write about the significance and effect of the imagery used in the poem. Consider symbolism, metaphors, similes, personification, oxymoron etc. Include short quotations and analysis of the effects of language.

GRAMMATICAL FEATURES (1 or 2 paragraphs)
Write about the functions of word classes. Consider nouns, pronouns, verbs, adverbs, adjectives, conjunctions, prepositions, articles. Also consider syntax. Include short quotations and analysis of the effects of language. Only write about features which have significant effects. 

SOUNDS (1 or 2 paragraphs)
Write about the significance of rhyme, rhythm and meter. Consider the use of repetition .Consider alliteration, sibilance, assonance, short and long vowel sounds, harsh or soft consonant sounds and onomatopoeia.

NARRATIVE ARGUMENT ESSAY

NARRATIVE ARGUMENT ESSAY is about a desert trip with family that focused on (Plastic pollution)
USE THESE INFO;
-the desert was full of plastic bags and bottles.
-I was feeling guilty that my family was using a huge amount of plastic.
-I saw a black cow chewing on plastic bag ( the cow was very very thin)
-the weather was calm, sunny, and clear.
_ use more sensory language
– figurative language

PLEASE NOTE:
(MAKE IT EASY FOR NON NATIVE WRITER/ SIMPLE GRAMMER AND WORDS/ USE YOUR IMAGINATION OF THE PLASTIC POLLUTION SITUATION ON DESERT TRIP.
PLAY THE ROLE OF SOMEONE WHOSE GUILTY OF USING PLASTIC BECAUSE YOU ARE VERY MUCH AWARE OF PLASTIC POLLUTION. 
YOU CAN USE SOME SOURCES BUT MAKE SURE ITS VERY POPULAR SOURCES.
( INTERESTING TITLE) ( THESIS MUST BE CLEAR AND SIMPLE) ( THE HOOK MUST BE CLEAR AND INTERESTING)
YOU CAN EXPLAIN ABOUT PLASTIC WASTE IN THE INTRO.

Current Religious or political topic both-have a position and a proposed solution

Research proposal:
The research proposal should include a working thesis statement, 3 possible outside sources that you will be using for the paper, cited using MLA format, and a brief outline of the argument that you think you will be following

DUE DATES:
1.) Research proposal- This includes a working thesis statement, 3 possible sources cited using MLA format, and an outline of the argument that you think you will be following.

For a proposal argument paper, writers will do the following:

1. pick a current social/political issue that has 2 sides. You may refer to articles from nytimes.com or any other online news-source that you feel strongly about and have something to propose in order to make better. There is also a list of possible topics on the Library Research page of the Course Menu titled, Research paper and argument topics;

2. pick a topic that allows you to do both-have a position and a proposed solution. A topic without a possible proposed solution is not going to be an effective proposal argument paper;

3. ascertain that the topic is relevant to socio-politico-cultural contexts of your time, and to your experiences as a thinker, scholar, and writer within the context of college or higher education;

4. work on expanding and/or fine-tuning the thesis and argument so that the argument is organized and manageable;

5. think and plan carefully how the paper appeals to your audience;

6. think and plan carefully about how the paper maintains clear, logical progression of the argument as you write;

7. develop a counter-argument: after you have drafted sections speaking to the primary points as evidence in support of the primary claim of the paper, you will research and develop a section which provides an overview of possible counter-arguments to the your position;

8. research and provide a rebuttal (a refutation) to the counter-argument. Research-based refutation/rebuttal sections will speak to the points made in the counter-argument. Thus, you will end up arguing why your particular position and your particular proposal is more valid than, or at least as valid as, the counter-arguments;

9. use multiple academic sources – books, journal articles, or valid academic internet websites- to develop the refutation to the counter-argument in making a powerful case for both position and proposed solution;

10. use multiple academic sources in order to make the transition from specific topic to its relationship to a larger, socio-politico-cultural context, and thus enlarge the context of your argument paper.

GUIDELINES:
1.) The research paper will defend an argument based on a current social/political issue that interests you, and it will give possible solutions to said issue. Issues that are off limits: gun control, abortion, religion, steroids, animal rights, euthanasia, etc. Remember, this is not an informational report, but a paper that defends an argument based on a current social/political issue. Once you decide on a topic, you need to limit your topic and develop an opinion about your topic. Your opinion will be the foundation of your thesis statement, which will guide your entire paper;
2.) Length: 6 pages, typed, double-spaced (not including the title and Works Cited page);
3.) MINIMUM of six credible sources that support your thesis (Required: one book and one scholarly journal);
4.) Use parenthetical citations to give credit to the words and thoughts taken from others, and cite them according to MLA guidelines as discussed in class (See The Little, Brown Compact Handbook for more information on MLA documentation guidelines). Remember to follow MLA guidelines for all aspects of this paper and include a properly formatted Works Cited page.

Neorealism and its (reluctant) critics

Answer the questions on  Neorealism and its (reluctant) critics

1. After reading the article “Is anybody still a realist?” what are your thoughts on creating a “new paradigm” for realism?

2. What does the author suggest creates the unity within neorealism?

3. What are the key differences in realism vs neorealism?

4. Is neorealism an improvement on classical realism?

5. According to critics, Waltz defect in his approach lacks a historicist approach and it more-so ahistorical. When it comes to international relations theory and practice, pg 244 talks about choosing between two approaches (problem solving and critical purpose), which of these approaches/theory provides more room for development?

6. Would you describe neorealism as a social science or diplomatic practice?

7.Do you think theory and practice are interconnected, if so to what degree, or are they/should they be separate?