Draft Chapter 4: Expected Results

For this discussion, post your draft of Chapter 4: Expected Results.

• At the top of your post, include your research question. 
  • If your research question is quantitative, include your hypothesis or hypotheses.
• For qualitative studies, describe themes that might emerge from the distillation of concepts offered by narratives or observations of human experience.
  • Draw on the research conducted in your Unit 4 literature review.
• For quantitative studies, describe the potential interpretation of your hypothesis or hypotheses. 
  • Draw on the research from your Unit 4 literature review.
• When posting, please copy and paste the draft to the message box in addition to attaching an MS Word document.
• For both quantitative and qualitative studies, address possible interpretations of data and outcomes that were unlikely or unexpected. After all, in research we are investigating possibilities and do not know what we will find!

Note: In some cases, it is appropriate to refer to personal experience and knowledge as a source for anticipated and potential findings. It is important to take care when using subjective experience to describe potential findings; these expectations must be written with close attention to what has been documented in the literature. That said, it is permissible to note when your experience contrasts with the documented knowledge or motivates curiosity about possible scientific and alternative outcomes.

Description

Objective Write an essay that critically (and articulately) analyzes a science- or technology-related topic of broad societal relevance, impacting, for example: public health (vaccination, stem cell research); the environment (pollution, land-use, biodiversity); energy (renewables, nuclear); the future of humanity (space exploration, artificial intelligence). In discussing your topic and presenting your argument(s), be sure to address key issues involving ethical concerns, social, economic or religious implications, environmental consequences, etc.Requirements & GuidelinesThe submitted group essay (2 people) should address the chosen topic in a focused, well-written, and carefully organized way. Each group member will receive the same grade. (If there are concerns that someone isnt pulling their weight, please let me know as soon as possible.) The submission is through online submission in myCourses. The name of your document should follow the format below:20SpringENGR2301_WritingAssgnmentI_James&MaryThe essay should include a bibliography of at least three (3) reputable sources, and in-text citations referencing these sources. There is no specific style requirement, but the chosen format should be consistent throughout the paper.The essays should be written using Microsoft Word with the font size of 12 and single line spacing. The total length of the essay should be at least two pages (excluding the bibliography). Like any good essay, the paper should include an introduction with a clearly-stated thesis; body paragraphssupporting the thesis; and a conclusion that summarizes the principal points made, and reiterates the thesis. For full credit:i. The main positions of opposing sides of the issue should be clearly identified and discussed.ii. The scientific merits of opposing arguments on all sides should be carefully assessed to the best of your ability, drawing from your knowledge of physics, chemistry, geology, biology, etc.; your research on the topic; and the strategies we are developing in class. iii. Other key aspects of the controversyfor example, social, economic, and political considerationsshould also be discussed.iv. If possible, develop your own interpretation / solution to the issue or problem, based on the scientific merits identified (ii).Spelling, grammar, clarity, style, and effectiveness of argumentation will be taken into account in assigning a final grade.