Memo regarding the PwC

/in /by

Prepare a memo (typed, three pages, one staple, one-sided, double spaced, 12-pitch, New Times Roman, and 1 inch margins) addressing the following points:

    Discuss the role of the audit and perform an audit risk assessment for these two clients.

    Compare and contrast the two events encountered by PwC and discuss if they have violated any ethical or professional standards.

    In your professional opinion, which event would PwC suffer greater lost credibility?  Stated differently, which event was more egregious?  Your response should consider the position of both the client and main users of financial statements (e.i., shareholders and creditors).

    Briefly discuss PwCs potential legal liability for these two these events.

    Briefly discuss if PwC responded to these two events in an appropriate manner.

Discussion – 2 Paragraphs And 2 References

/in /by

The approach Intuit uses to measure the effectiveness of their ERM, and chapter 15 presented the process the City of Edmonton employed to develop and deploy their ERM. You are an ERM consultant, retained by Intuit to re-implement their ERM. They have decided to start over and develop a new ERM for their current organization. Would you recommend that the base their new ERM on PM2 Risk Scorecard or ISO 31000? Explain why you would choose one over the other. 

4 Discussion Board Questions

/in /by

 

After reading Chapters 7-9 and the ACA Guidelines, discuss the following:

1.  Discuss the similarities and difference among the career counseling processes for men, women, and sexual minorities.

2. Describe the process of Multicultural Career Counseling

3.  Identify resources that can be used by clients with special needs to cope with their problems.

4.  Identify the major problems facing individuals who bring special concerns to the career counseling process.

Research Proposal Review – Urgent – 4 Hours

/in /by

Write a 500-word review of one of your classmates proposals. Choose a proposal that has not already been reviewed. In your review, you may comment on topic selection, logic, clarity, scope of the project, audience appropriateness, sources, and anything else that stands out to you. Be kind, but do not just say that everything looks great; instead, give real feedback and suggestions that your classmate can use. One of the best things you can do is ask questions. If there is something you do not understand, ask about it. If something strikes you as very interesting and you want to know if your classmate is going to say more about it in the project, ask that. These are just some examples of questions you can ask.