vaping versus cigarettes claim essay

please follow orders instruction perfectly. Only use the articles attached to proof and to cite the essay. Use MLA formatting.Aristotelian or Claims Essay
1200 words minimum
3 sources minimum (4 sources maximum)
DUE: March 6th
Introduction:
A Claims Argument is otherwise known as an Aristotelian Argument, or a Classical Argument, and traces its formal academic history back to (not surprisingly) Aristotle (Greece, 4th century B.C.).  The tenets, though, of this argumentative model are, I argue, innate to human argumentation; sometimes called the Adversarial Model, its a strategy of using evidence to explain clearly why one thesis is correct, and another wrong.  Phrased most simply, its the why Im right strategy of argumentation.  Especially when making a claim regarding an important issue, one that is disputed in any capacity, this why Im right is often accompanied by an explanation of why the opposition is wrong.  Weve been doing this since we were very young, when we argued with our friends over the debatable superiority of various athletes, musical groups, movies, or books.  In a cultural context, these same methods of debate apply to numerous, supremely significant political and social issues: military conflict, the economy, womens rights, immigration, gun control, education, and so on.
         
For your Claims Essay, due March 6th, you will need to offer your own claim: an argument supported by at least three academically viable sources.  Here, however, is a wrinkle.  You may choose almost any stance, any topic that you like, keeping in mind that said topic needs to be researchable and academically appropriate, but Im asking you to give a lot of considerate thought to this choice.  Perhaps its the political landscape of the current age, but candidly, my spirit wont bear several dozen essays on gun control and health care.  Now, we will absolutely need to maintain academic viability, here; this is not some blog post or Facebook entry, and the research will need to be similarly viable.  But you’ll receive an extra point or two for original, especially thoughtful, or even lighthearted topics.  I don’t want “cats are better than dogs,” or “Jordan is better than LeBron,” but I do believe we can successfully offer an academically rigorous essay thats still a little bit of fun, or further off the beaten path.

Organization:
While I will be offering several resources for guidance throughout the project, its worth  note, here, that a Claims essay often follows a proven and predictable template for organization.  In fact, as the preeminent model for academic argumentation, this organization is likely the one with which we have been most familiar over the course of our own educational histories, i.e. the five paragraph essay.  While your essay may or may not consist of five paragraphs, it should adhere to the following paragraph structure:

Opening paragraph:  Introduction of thesis/claim in broad terms, situating the argument within a  larger context this paragraph should culminate with a clear statement of overarching thesis/identification of problem

Body paragraphs (3 or more):  Considerations and support, incorporating research

Refutation of opposition:  Accounting for and negating at least one chief oppositional perspective

Conclusion:  Reiteration of thesis given the discussion of the essay

Suggestions:

Above all else, follow fundamental rules of syntax (punctuation, conjugation, etc.).
Write with a close eye on clarity; every sentence must make fundamental sense, must be easily understood.
Avoid clichs, e.g. Agree to disagree, Everyone has their opinion, but  etc.
Do not objectify the essay, e.g. In this essay or, Im writing this because or, I had to think a long time about what to write
Cite sources according to MLA format; use RW pg. 468 as an example.
Write something you know, something you care about.

Primary Goals:

Apply rules of standard English and skills learned in ENG 112
Develop and elaborate upon a coherent, identifiable thesis from introduction through conclusion (using TSIS parts 1-4 for reference).
Incorporate researched sources into textunderstand how to choose academically viable sources

Requirements:

            Length :          1200 words minimum (12 point, Times New Roman)

            Sources:          3 academically viable sources, 4 sources maximum

            Format:            MLA (as discussed in class and RW)

            Due date:        3/6/2020

Assessment:
The Claims Essay is worth 30% of your final grade in the course.
Percentages reflect the approximate value of each element in relation to the final essay grade.

Format– 20%:

Written in proper MLA format, meeting length requirements.  Notes three research sources in the works cited page, as well as in in-text citations.

Basic language and essay writing skills–  50%:

Evinces mastery of fundamental mechanics: punctuation, capitalization, organization, verb/noun agreement, accurate vocabulary, coherence.

Contains sentences structured in a clear, readable fashion.  Presents an identifiable thesis and conducts appropriate discussion.

Critical thinking and analysis/ Insight and style– approx. 30%:

Explores the topic/subject dynamically through language. Achieves linguistic complexity without sacrificing thematic clarity.  Demonstrates strong analytical or critical thinking skills.

Introduces meaningful new insights and innovative ideas through sophisticated language and management of tone.  Fully meets the linguistic and philosophical expectations of English 112.

 

Finally, make sure to review the documents available under course resources to guide you; specifically, “Structuring the Claims Essay,” and “Getting Started on Essays,” as well as the resources on integrating quotations will be of great value.

Connecting Your Learning

Connecting Your Learning
Competencies Addressed in This Assignment
Competency 1: Dissect criminal justice ethical issues and practices.
Competency 2: Apply human rights standards.
Competency 3: Compare different ethics systems in a criminal justice community and leadership context.
Competency 4: Articulate how personal biases affect ethical approaches to criminal justice dilemmas.
Competency 5: Communicate effectively in writing.
Overview
Throughout the course, you have analyzed the ethical dimension of policing practice, examined the basis for personal and professional ethics, and reviewed the guidance provided by professional codes of practice and human rights standards. Your study of the ethical principles and how they are applied in a policing context highlighted the major ethical problems, such as discrimination, corruption, deception, racial profiling, and use of excessive force.
Instructions
For this assignment, prepare a 46-page paper (11.5 pages per competency for Competencies 1 through 4), focused on the course competencies and address two key areas of learning for each competency. Competency 5 will be showcased through your coverage of Competencies 14.
Ensure that this paper showcases your learning proficiency and describes the importance of your learning relative to application in a career context.
Requirements
Your paper should meet the following requirements:
Written communication: Must be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
References: Include one reference per competency.
APA formatting: Format resources and citations as per current APA style and formatting guidelines.
Length of paper: 46 pages (11.5 pages per competency for Competencies 1 through 4), not including the title page or the references page.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

Federal Judges Enforce or Interpret the Law?

Federal Judges Enforce or Interpret the Law?
Competencies Addressed in This Assignment
Competency 1: Dissect criminal justice ethical issues and practices.
Competency 3: Compare different ethics systems in a criminal justice community and leadership context.
Competency 4: Articulate how personal biases affect ethical approaches to criminal justice dilemmas.
Competency 5: Communicate effectively in writing.
Overview
Those who are strict constructionists believe that judges should enforce, not interpret law. This is considered an extreme view where an individual has no rights unless they are specified in the Constitution or are present in some other legal source. An interpretationist (or activist) utilizes a looser reading of the Constitution and reads into it rights that the framers might have recognized or that they believe should be recognized due to evolving standards. Critics of activism say that just because it has been used for good causes does not mean this is always the case. Proponents of activism argue that it is needed to counteract overreaching of federal powers.
For this assignment, assume you are a judge with the appropriate jurisdiction to decide the following case. You were raised in a very strict and sheltered household and must decide whether a particular piece of artwork is obscene. The artist has painted a series of sex scenes, including bondage, sadomasochism, bestiality, and necrophilia, interspersed with paintings of nude children at play. She states that her art has redeeming social qualities because it is a statement of the many faces of humanity. The series of paintings is being displayed in a public gallery supported by city and federal funds. The district attorney has filed for an injunction to close the show due to obscenity.
Instructions
Prepare a three-page memorandum to your clerk, who will draft your opinion, detailing the following:
Explain your ruling in the case, including the rationale for your decision.
Determine how you will dismiss any personal bias in reaching and explaining your decision.
Explore, as part of your dicta (non-legally binding opinion), whether you agree with the statement, “If the judicial system is not independent of political powers, and is a pawn or agent of political power, then due process is a sham and the very essence of democracy is threatened,” in the context of constitutional rights and other potential influences on your decision.
Requirements
Your paper should meet the following requirements:
Written communication: Must be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
APA formatting: Format resources and citations as per current APA style and formatting guidelines.
Length of paper: Three pages, not including the title page and the references page.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

Mid Term

 Class – Please review Chapter 21: The Role of Root Cause Analysis in Public Safety ERM Programs Case and provide response for following questions.

1. Identify an emerging crime issue in your community using data available from sources such as local newspapers, online police reporting, and so forth. Frame the situation, and then identify the restraining and driving forces that may be impacting the issue.

2. Using your force field analysis, develop a cause and effect diagram for the situation.

You are required to respond to the questions thoroughly, in 300 -to-350 words for each question. Be sure to include at least three reference sources. APA rules for formatting, quoting, paraphrasing, citing, and listing of sources are to be followed.