The book review is not a chapter by chapter synopsis. The book review is done to inform a
neophyte about a subject, and about the worthiness of applying their time to actually reading the book. It should not tell them everything, but give them enough information to discern if this is
worth their time and will give them knowledge or perspective they did not have previously.
Simply put: if done correctly, I will read, or not read a book, based on a good review. To do that,
the review will have four (4) sections: Strengths, Weaknesses, Importance and
Recommendations.
Strengths should do what it says, highlight the strengths of the book (in your opinion). Three
should be sufficient.
Weaknesses are just as simple. What did you not like about the book? Again, three examples
should be enough.
Importance will explain if you believe that the content is “important” to the subject matter you are currently studying. Does the book create a better understanding of the subject?
The recommendation is simply your opinion about the book, as to whether you either believe or don’t

Sample Solution

The post Review over the book United States Special Operations Forces by Christopher Lamb. appeared first on homework handlers.

You are required to submit different exercises during the semester, which include identifying the
case to be analyzed, drafting the brief, and providing other information as needed via the
conferences or Assignments folder. You must gain clearance from me to move forward. The
primary purpose of these assignments is to encourage you to collect and analyze information
throughout the semester and to prepare preliminary drafts, do not wait until the end of the
semester.
The required sections of the paper are as follows:
I. Elements of the crime. Identify and discuss the elements of the crime, as the prosecution
proved them.
II. Defenses claimed by the defense. Identify and discuss any defenses claimed by the
defendant.
III. Constitutional protection issues. Identify and discuss any constitutional protection issues
(e.g., Miranda warnings, search and seizure).
IV. Case brief. Use the required formula:

1. Title and citation
2. Facts of the case
3. Issues
4. Holding (the final decision)
5. Reasoning (how the court arrived at this holding)
6. Analysis (how the facts of the case meet the legal criteria for prosecution)
   V. Your judgment. If you were the judge or a juror in this case, would you have agreed with the
   outcome? If yes, explain why; if no, explain why.

Sample Solution

The post Weyhrauch V. United States Case Brief appeared first on homework handlers.