Write a response explaining why the answer in bold is correct. I will upload the document that shows
the answers in bold because i copy and past it here but the bold font does not show.
Which of the following is the most important characteristic of a good sample
the sample should have freedom from bias
Inferential statistics are required for any report of journal article
false
Suppose you read “f = 50; 50%”. What type of statistics are these?
descriptive
What type of statistic is the range
descriptive
Suppose you read “M = 50 (SD = 5.00)”. Sixty-eight percent of the cases fall between which scores?
45-55
How is the mean calculated?
by summing the scores and dividing by the number of scores
Which of the following always have 50% of the cases at or below it?
median
In a correlation, the closer the value is to 1.00
the stronger the association
Which of the following indicates the strongest relationship? -.88, .05, .53, .77
-.88
Which of the following indicates the weakest relationship? .93, -.45, .23, .67
.23
A researcher’s expectation is known as:
the research hypothesis
What type of statistical techniques can be used to test decisions about the null hypothesis?
inferential
What is a synonym for the phrase rejecting the null hypothesis?
results are statistically significant
Which level has the strongest significance?
.001
When a report tells you that the significance level was p< .05 and you see a p value of .029, the p-value is
regarded as
statistically significant
Regarding rejecting the null hypothesis
It is impossible to do so with absolute certainty
The larger the random sample…
the more likely the null hypothesis will be rejected
How often do authors of journal articles explicitly mention the null hypo

Sample Solution

The post Pyrczak Analysis appeared first on homework handlers.

In Carroll v. United States (https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/267/132/) the Supreme Court held
that vehicles were held to a lesser standard of Fourth Amendment protection stating that a warrant wasn’t
required. Then, in Katz v. United States, (https://www.oyez.org/cases/1967/35) the Court established the
right to privacy as a defense against warrantless searches. Fast forward 45 years after the Katz decision
and we have the United States v. Jones case (https://www.oyez.org/cases/2011/10-1259). This case was an
appeal from the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals that went on to the Supreme Court, on the
issue of whether a warrant is needed to attach a GPS tracking device to a vehicle.
Please review the summaries of these three cases by clicking on the name of the case above.
Is it a reasonable progression based on the Court’s analysis to require a warrant before the government
places a GPS on a vehicle? Why or why not?
Based on the Court’s interpretation of the right to privacy under the 4th Amendment, should a warrant be
required to place a GPS? Why or why not?
Assuming that a warrant is required, what are the exceptions to this requirement that might apply when the
government legally places a GPS on a vehicle?

Sample Solution

The post Carroll v. United States appeared first on homework handlers.