What are some of the factors that affect social mobility? Can these be overcome?

We have studied social stratification and how it influences what goes on in many social interactions among people.

  1. What are some of the factors that affect social mobility? Can these be overcome?
  2. Do you believe the structural-functionalist or the social-conflict approach best explains social stratification? Why?
  3. Is it possible for members of a minority group to be racist? Why or why not?
  4. When you think of various groups (race, class, and gender) in society, which ones have the most power and which ones have the least? What and who are some examples? Has this changed over time? Do you think it will change in the future?  Why or why not?

Write your responses in two to three paragraphs. Be sure to incorporate terms, concepts, and theory from your readings to support your comments. Remember to respond to the posts of at least two other students in this class

 

Arrow

Dissertation Table

Page 1 of 5

2016 Dissertation Milestone Table

The table below shows the eight review levels required for dissertation approval. Each review levels is iterative and may be repeated until the documents meet the standards set for that document based on GCU criteria and general accepted standards of scholarly work for doctoral research across disciplines. Use this table to set target completion dates for the major milestones and levels of review. Then track and adjust your plan (if necessary) according to the actual completion dates.

Review Levels and Final Approval

Document(s) for Review

GCU D Form

Reviewing and/or Approval Authority

Target Completion Date

Actual Completion Date

Level 1 Review: Prospectus Review and Recommendation

 10 Strategic Points  Research Prospectus

No form Chair and Methodologist

Chair sends Prospectus to Methodologist through LDP email.

Level 2: Proposal Review and Recommendation by AQR Reviewer for Proposal Defense Conference Call

 Committee Reviewed Dissertation Proposal (Chapters 1-3) with Scored Criteria Tables

 Committee Reviewed Dissertation Proposal (Chapters 1-3) without Criteria Tables

No Form: Approval Email sent through LDP with AQR Reviewer’s Recommenda tion for Defense Call

Dissertation Committee

Chair loads required documents into LDP link, only accessible by the Chair, to initiate this review.

AQR Reviewer

 

 

Page 2 of 5

Review Levels and Final Approval

Document(s) for Review

GCU D Form

Reviewing and/or Approval Authority

Target Completion Date

Actual Completion Date

Level 3 Review:

Proposal Defense and Dissertation Committee Approval of Proposal

 Level 2 AQR Approved Dissertation Proposal (Chapters 1-3)

 Updated 10 Strategic Points document

 Dissertation Proposal PowerPoint Presentation for Defense Call

D-35 Dissertation Committee

Level 4 Review: IRB Review and Approval

 Completed GCU D-35 Form

 Approved Research Prospectus

 Updated 10 Strategic Points document

 Committee Approved Dissertation Proposal (Chapters 1-3) Clean Copy

 Data Collection Instruments

 Site Approvals  Final IRB documents

(updated from Level 2/3 reviews by the Learner/approved by

D-50 IRB Director

Learner loads required documents into IRBNet. Chair approves and submits documents from IRBNet to initiate this review.

 

 

Page 3 of 5

Review Levels and Final Approval

Document(s) for Review

GCU D Form

Reviewing and/or Approval Authority

Target Completion Date

Actual Completion Date

Chair if applicable) Level 5 Review: AQR Review and Recommendation for Dissertation Defense Conference Call

 Committee Reviewed Dissertation Proposal (Chapters 1-5) with Scored Criteria Tables

 Committee Reviewed Dissertation Proposal (Chapters 1-5) without Criteria Tables

No Form: Approval Email sent through LDP with AQR Reviewer’s Recommenda tion for Defense Call

Dissertation Committee

Chair loads required documents into LDP link, only accessible by the Chair, to initiate this review.

AQR Reviewer

Level 6 Review: Dissertation Review and Recommendation by Full Committee for Level 7 Review

 Level 5 AQR Approved Dissertation Manuscript (Chapters 1-5)

 Dissertation PowerPoint Presentation

D-65 Dissertation Committee

 

 

Page 4 of 5

Review Levels and Final Approval

Document(s) for Review

GCU D Form

Reviewing and/or Approval Authority

Target Completion Date

Actual Completion Date

Level 7 Review: Form/ Format Review & Approval

Recommendation of Dissertation for Level 8 Review

 Committee and AQR Approved) Dissertation with all final editing and revisions from Dissertation Defense completed and approved by Chair

 Form and Format Checklist Completed by Learner and Reviewed/Signed by Chair

 IRB Closeout Form

D-75 Chair loads required documents for Form and Format into LDP link, only accessible by the Chair, to initiate this review.

Form & Format Reviewer

Level 8 Review: Dean’s and Final Approval of Dissertation

 Final Dissertation Manuscript for Dean’s Approval and Signature

D-80 Dean, College of Doctoral Studies

Chair submits required documents for Dean’s Review into IRBNet to initiate this review

ProQuest Publication

 PDF of Dean Signed Dissertation Manuscript with

CDS administrative staff

 

 

Page 5 of 5

Review Levels and Final Approval

Document(s) for Review

GCU D Form

Reviewing and/or Approval Authority

Target Completion Date

Actual Completion Date

Signature Page Inserted

Solutions To Issues In Developmental Psychology

Solutions to Issues in Developmental Psychology 

Prior to beginning work on this discussion, please read the required Baltes (1987) articles for this week.

For your initial post, choose one contemporary issue or problem related to developmental psychology that is prevalent in today’s news and research a minimum of one peer-reviewed article on this issue in the Ashford University Library. Evaluate the issue based on one of the theoretical perspectives (Freud’s Psychosexual Theory, Erikson’s Psychosocial Theory, Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive Development, etc.) that we have studied across this course. Explain how the theory provides a deeper understanding of the contemporary issue. Propose one well-developed solution to address the issue or problem.read replies.55 replies.

Applying Learning Theory to Life

Applying Learning Theory to Life

Preparation is key to any good research paper and presentation. Next week, you will be creating your Final Paper and PresentationPreview the documentView in a new window. It is important to begin gathering your information and sources to fulfill this project successfully. For your Final Paper, you will be designing a training module proposal (not a full training module). The title of this training module is “The Importance of Understanding Your Learners’ Needs”. Essentially, you will be proposing the information you would include for assisting managers gain knowledge in how to meet the learning needs of their departmental employees.

ThinkstockPhotos_452955049.jpg

Based on your developed knowledge about learning theory, this week you will be developing the “bones” for your final paper/presentation. Thus, you are organizing the information you will apply and fully develop  next week, as well as, confirm your understanding of each area of content to be included.

Required elements:

  1. Explain Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism, and Humanism as applied to learning.
  2. List and briefly (two or three sentences) describe seven perspectives/principles that you have learned about that you think would be important to teach managers so they can better understand their employees’ learning needs. These perspectives (principles) will be aligned with Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism, or Humanism.

Examples include:

  • From Behaviorism (associationistic models of learning)
    • Associative Learning , Classical Conditioning , Operant Conditioning, Conditioning, Extinction, and Ratio/Interval Schedules
  • From Cognition (the cognitive science of information processing representations of learning).
    • Schema Theory, dialectical processing, Problem-Based Learning, memory development, categorization, Elaboration theory (i.e. Bloom’s Taxonomy), spiral curriculum, memory development, and coding.
  • From Constructivism (conceptions of knowledge are derived from the process of constructing individual interpretations of one’s experiences)
    • Cognitive Constructivism, Social Constructivism, Situated Cognition, Social Learning Theory, Zone of Proximal Development, and Discovery Learning
  • From Humanism
    • Motivational theories of learning (i.e. Self-determination Theory, Maslow’s hierarchy of Needs), Emotional Intelligence development, Multiple Intelligences, Experiential Learning , and Steiner pedagogy or Waldorf education.
  1. List and briefly explain seven strategies that could be applied in training based on the areas we have learned about the past weeks that you think would be the most successful based on the learning groupPreview the documentView in a new window.
  2. Explain how each strategy would help ensure learning is taking place.

Examples include:

  • From Behaviorism (associationistic models of learning)
    • Rewards and Punishments
  • From Cognition (the cognitive science of information processing representations of learning)
    • Practice, scaffolding of the content, repetition of curriculum/content, and application of Bloom’s Taxonomy
  • From Constructivism (conceptions of knowledge are derived from the process of constructing individual interpretations of one’s experiences)
    • Scaffolding by the instructor, interactive learning as seen in role-playing, discussions, and  discovery activities
  • From Humanism
    • Meeting individual needs, activities that encourage belonging, autonomy, and competence, metacognitive activities,  and alignment of learning to personal experiences.
  1. Apply your research skills to this content by synthesizing supporting evidence from at least three scholarly sources from the Ashford University Library that defend these strategies as the best options for your training. View this great tutorial provided by the Ashford University Library which will show you how to find scholarly articles and how to assess the scholarly quality of the resource.

Additional Requirements:

  1. Must be two to three double-spaced pages in length (excluding title page and references) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  2. The title page must include the following:
    • Title of paper
    • Student’s name
    • Course name and number
    • Instructor’s name
    • Date submitted
  3. Must begin with an introductory paragraph that introduces what you will be outlining in your paper.
  4. Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms the learning perspectives/principles and strategies you chose.
  5. Must use at least three scholarly sources, all of which must come from the Ashford University Library.
  6. Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  7. Must include a separate reference page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.