Discussion 1: Conceptualizing A Qualitative Research Question

Good research is driven by the synthesis of one’s passion or interest with a topic that has been under-studied in the professional literature. Out of that synthesis emerges a gap—an area in need of further study that is consistent with your interests—that defines the research problem. Clarifying the research problem takes time, effort, and thought.

Once you have developed your research problem, the research purpose and research question become self-evident.

What also becomes evident is your position with respect to the topic, the question, and what you hope to find. Qualitative research recognizes that the research “space” is shaped by both the participants and the researcher.

… the identities of both researcher and participants have the potential to impact the research process. Identities come into play via our perceptions, not only of others, but of the ways in which we expect others will perceive us. Our own biases shape the research process, serving as checkpoints along the way. Through recognition of our biases, we presume to gain insights into how we might approach a research setting, members of particular groups, and how we might seek to engage with participants (Bourke, 2014, p. 1).

For this Discussion, you will examine a research question based on the purpose for inquiry, a rationale for the study, and issues of positionality.

To prepare for this Discussion:

· Consider the research topic you are developing for your Major Assignment 1.

· Review Chapter 3 of the Ravitch and Carl text and use Table 3.1, page 69 to help you create a rationale using the questions as your guide.

· Review Chapter 3 of the Ravitch and Carl text and specifically use pages 70–76 to create a positionality memo to reflect on your relationship to the topic.

· Review the Fundamentals of Qualitative Research Methods: Developing a Qualitative Research Question media program as a guideline to help you create a research question.

By Day 3

Transform your notes from your preparation work into four paragraphs and briefly explain in your post the following:

1. The research purpose of your inquiry

2. The rationale

3. Issues of positionality

4. The research question

Be sure to support your main post and response post with reference to the week’s Learning Resources and other scholarly evidence in APA style.

Ravitch, S. M., & Carl, N. M. (2016). Qualitative research: Bridging the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

· Chapter 3, “Critical Qualitative Research Design” (pp. 85–89) (previously read in Week 2)

Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

· Chapter 3, “Qualitative Data-Gathering Methods and Style” (pp. 25–39)

· Chapter 4, “Designing Research for the Responsive Interviewing Model” (pp. 42–57)

Exegetical Paper Passage And Bibliography

Grading Rubric for Exegetical Passage and Bibliography Paper

Criteria Levels of Achievement
Content

70%

Advanced 92-100% Proficient 84-91% Developing 1-83% Not present
Content

 

7 points

The passage selection is clearly stated and obvious to the instructor. Seven or more scholarly and credible sources are cited in the bibliography.

 

6 points

The passage selection is stated and made available to the instructor. A minimum of seven credible sources are cited in the bibliography.

1 to 5 points

The passage selection is not clearly stated. There are less than seven sources cited in the bibliography. Two or more of the sources are not scholarly and credible.

0 points

Not present

Structure 30% Advanced 92-100% Proficient 84-91% Developing 1-83% Not present
Thread: Grammar and Spelling, Turabian formatting

 

3 points

Spelling and grammar are correct. Sentences are complete, clear, and concise.

Bibliographic references are cited in current Turabian format.

2 points

Spelling and grammar has some errors. Sentences are presented as well. Bibliographic references are cited with some Turabian formatting.

1 point

Spelling and grammar errors distract. Sentences are incomplete or unclear. Bibliographic references are minimally or not cited in current Turabian format.

0 points

Not present

Instructor’s Comments      

What are some goals you have set for yourself?

During the last 4 weeks, you reflected on what success looks like, how to manage your time, setting attainable goals, and the importance of self-esteem and positive thinking. In our final week we examine intrinsic and extrinsic motivation along with self-discipline. Motivation helps drive us toward our goals while self-discipline and critical thinking can keep us on track.

Consider your own motivation and decision making habits that can either drive you toward or push you away from your goals.

Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

  • What are some goals you have set for yourself?
  • Reflect on your own self-discipline and critical thinking habits. What are some changes you have made over the last 5 weeks to remain focused on your goals?
  • What strategies can you use to remain committed to and on track towards achieving your goals over the next 12 months?
  • What role does intrinsic and extrinsic motivation play in your ability to achieve your goals?

Explain the idea that art is mimesis (Plato and/or Aristotle) and how this is like the avocado idea of the self.

Reality, Art, and Truth

This 5 – 6 page essay assignment will be completed in three parts. You may want to use section headers to organize your paper. Remember to explain the theories you reference with supporting citations to the textbook and online lectures in correct APA format. Here is a guide to help you with APA-style citations. Use this APA Citation Helper as a convenient reference for properly citing resources.

Part I. The Self

Discuss the avocado idea of the self and explain at least one version of the idea that human beings have a shared essential nature (such as Cartesian rationalism or Greek philosophy). Contrast this account with the artichoke idea of the self (drawing upon existentialism to develop your account) and a discussion of how the modern/avocado and postmodern/artichoke ideas of the self differ. You may use your analysis from the Week 2 assignments to develop your account in Part I.

Part II. The Avocado Self and Art as Representation

Explain the idea that art is mimesis (Plato and/or Aristotle) and how this is like the avocado idea of the self. Discuss a character/narrator/subject in a work of art (novel, poem, film, graphic novel, short story, television show, song, painting, etc.) who you think captures the avocado/art as mimesis idea that we have an essential, shared human nature and that art reflects this reality for us.

Part III. The Artichoke Self and Art as Transformation

Explain the idea that art is transformative/how artistic creation expresses the unity of subject and object (Nietzsche, Schelling, and/or Heidegger). Discuss how this reflects the artichoke idea of the self. Discuss a character/narrator/subject in a work of art (novel, poem, film, graphic novel, short story, television show, song, painting, etc.) who you think captures the artichoke/post-modern idea of the self and the idea that art creates truth.

Part IV. Art and Philosophy

Finally, reflect upon the relationship between art and philosophy by considering some of the following questions:

1. Are the self and the material world distinct entities, as Descartes thinks? What are some examples of representative art that illustrate the idea that the subject/mind and the object/world/body are distinct? Alternatively, are the self and the world organic unities, as Schelling argues? How might artistic creation express this unity of subject and object?

2. Is art mimesis/representation (as in Platonism and Aristotelian aesthetics) or is it a means of transforming the self and reality? Might it be aspirational, allowing us to achieve catharsis, as Aristotle suggests? Consider, too, how the idea of art as representation is akin to the avocado view while the idea of art as transformative is more like the artichoke view.

3. What is the relationship between art and philosophy? Do you agree with Descartes that logic and critical thinking are the best means of achieving certainty about reality and existence, or is your view more akin to the perspective of Keats, Schelling, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, and/or Heidegger that art is the ultimate expression of truth? How are these views a rejection of the natural standpoint we see adopted by empiricism and rationalism and rejected by phenomenology?

4. Do some kinds of art (music, for example) express the truth more fully than others? How so? How does the idea and purpose of art differ across cultures?

Do not plagiarize, work must be original. Also, you must use citations, credible references and APA format. When done with assignment please go back over work and check for grammar, punctuation and spelling errors and please attach a Turnitin report.