Triads And The Dominant Seventh Chord Quizlets

/in /by

Question 1

Question text

A diminished triad can be indicated by

Select one:

[removed]a. a lower-case Roman numeral and +.

[removed]b. an upper-case Roman numeral and °.

[removed]c. an upper-case Roman numeral and +.

[removed]d. a lower-case Roman numeral and °.

Feedback

The correct answer is: a lower-case Roman numeral and °.

Question 2

Not answered

Marked out of 1.00

Question text

A dominant seventh chord is built on the ______ scale degree.

Select one:

[removed]a. http://media.wwnorton.com/college/music/fundamentals2/img/scale-degree-symbols/scale-degree-7.png

[removed]b. http://media.wwnorton.com/college/music/fundamentals2/img/scale-degree-symbols/scale-degree-1.png

[removed]c. http://media.wwnorton.com/college/music/fundamentals2/img/scale-degree-symbols/scale-degree-4.png

[removed]d. http://media.wwnorton.com/college/music/fundamentals2/img/scale-degree-symbols/scale-degree-5.png

Feedback

The correct answer is:

Discussion Introduction To Philosophy “Socrates’s Philosophical Life”

/in /by

Introduction to Philosophy “Socrates’s Philosophical Life”

Near the end of our excerpt, Socrates passionately assets “And therefore, Athenians, I say…whether you acquit me or not, I shall not change my way of life; no, not if I have to die for it many times” (p. 34).

 

What exactly is the philosophical way of life that Socrates cares so much about, and why exactly does he think it is so important that he maintain that way of life? post should be 75-150 words in length

 

 

PL201 Introduction to Philosophy Assignments and Discussions

 

– PL201 week 1 Discussion Introduction to Philosophy “Socrates’s Philosophical Life”

– PL 201 week 1 1 Assignment – Introduction to Philosophy – Short Paper on Socrates

– PL201 week 2 discussion “Descartes’ Method of Hyperbolic Doubt”

– PL 201 week 2 Assignment “Short Paper on Descartes”

– PL 201 Week 3 Discussion “Immanuel Kant’s Epistemology”

– PL 201 Week 3 Assignment “Short Paper on Kant”

– PL 201 Week 4 Discussion “Aristotle’s Conception of Virtue”

– PL 201 Week 4 Assignment “Short Paper on Aristotle”

– PL 201 Week 5 Discussion “Mill’s Principle of Utility”

– PL 201 Week 5 Assignment “Short Paper on Mill”

– PL 201 Week 6 Assignment Short Paper On Locke

– PL 201 Week 7 Discussion “Universal Human Rights”

– PL 201 Week 7 Assignment “Short Paper on Human Rights.”

– PL 201 Week 8 Discussion “What We Have Learned”

– PL 201 Week 8 Assignment Self-Evaluation

Improvements In The Manufacturing Industry Versus Health Care Industry

/in /by

Plagiarism Free….  APA Style… Three or more references…

Need back on TuesdayMarch 22, 2016  3pm Central time

 

 

As health care looks at continuous improvement (as done in manufacturing), one of the most prominent questions that has arisen is, “Can the principles that worked in manufacturing really transfer over to health care? Taking care of a patient is not like building a car on an assembly line. Can standardized processes really work in a setting that focuses on humans and their needs?”

 

Write a paper of (1,100) words that takes a position on this argument. Justify the rationale for your position.

 

Refer to the assigned readings to incorporate specific examples and details into the paper.

 

View Rubric  attachment

1-Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2-Less Satisfactory 65.00% 3-Satisfactory75.00% 4-Good 85.00% 5-Excellent 100.00%

Top of Form

   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
Content 70%  
40.0 %

Compare and contrast the competing visions among stakeholders, identifying the areas where they conflict and discussing how those conflicts could be seen in the delivery system.

 Does not demonstrate understanding of the competing visions for health care delivery systems , including the issues and implications. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the material. Demonstrates only minimal understanding of the competing visions for health care delivery systems, including the issues and implications. Demonstrates only minimal abilities for critical thinking and analysis. Demonstrates knowledge of the competing visions for health care delivery systems, including the issues and implications, but has some slight misunderstanding of the implications. Provides a basic idea of critical thinking and analysis. Include examples or descriptions. Demonstrates above-average knowledge of the competing visions for health care delivery systems, including the issues and implications (in your own words). Develops an acceptable analysis of the conflicts. Utilizes some examples. Demonstrates thorough knowledge of the competing visions for health care delivery systems, including the issues and implications. Clearly develops a strong analysis of the conflicts and implications. Introduces appropriate examples.  
30.0 %Use references and examples to support main points. Does not provide supporting examples. Provides some supporting examples, but minimal explanations and no references. Supports main points with examples and explanations, but includes few references to support claims and ideas. Supports main points with references, explanations, and examples. Analysis and description are direct, competent, and appropriate of the criteria. Supports main points with references, examples, and full explanations of how they apply. Thoughtfully analyzes, evaluates, and describes major points of the criteria.  
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness  
7.0 %Assignment Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.  
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.  
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.  
10.0 %Format  
5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.  
5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.  
Total Weightage 100%    

 

Bottom of Form

Reading Tartuffe, Backwards And Forwards

/in /by

ackwards and Forwards (Outline)

 

1. Action “occurs when something happens that makes or permits something else to happen.” Actions are a play’s primary building blocks.

 

2. What happens next? “A play is like a series of dominoes: one event triggers the next.” (Never skip a step)

 

3. Backwards. “Going forwards allows unpredictable possibility. Going backwards exposes that which is required.” A domino can fell only the domino next to it.

 

4. Stasis and Intrusion. Stasis is an unchanging stability; intrusion is a pushing, thrusting, forcing in. Dramatic stasis is upset by intrusion until a new stasis can be secured, often then intruded upon again. This pushes the action forward.

 

5. Conflict and obstacles. A play’s conflict is between what somebody wants and whatever hinders that want (the obstacle).

 

6. Ignorance is bliss. Why its best not to read a play before going to see it! The core of dramatic tension lies in withholding information from the audience.

 

7. Things theatrical. Important information is conveyed in the heightened moments.

 

8. Exposition. Exposition must be directly relevant to the action. Two kinds: 1. Information known to everyone in the play; 2. Information known only to some.

 

9. Forwards. Anything that arouses an audience’s interest in things yet to come.

 

10. Character. A character is revealed only through actions. A scripted character is nothing more than an outline.

 

11. Image. Something we already know or can easily be told that is used to describe, illuminate, or expand upon something we don’t know or cannot easily be told.

 

12. Theme. Not what a play means, nor the “purpose” of a play. Theme is a result. Look for it last.