Budgetary Variance Model

Prior to completing this assignment, review Assignment 9 in Chapter 17 of your course text. Prepare an evaluation of the performance of the Radiology Department Manager for a hospital.

The service unit, or output, for this department is the number of procedures performed. A static budget was prepared at the beginning of the year. Examine that budget in relation to actual experience. The relevant data are included in Table 17-18 in your course text. The department manager is pleased because the department has a favorable $120,000 cost variance. Evaluate the effectiveness claims of the manager using the budgetary variance mode described in Chapter 17. What is your analysis of the department manager’s performance? Explain your reasoning.

Your paper must include an introduction, thesis, and conclusion. Your paper must be four to five double-spaced pages in length (excluding title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.  Utilize three scholarly and/or peer-reviewed sources (excluding the course text) that were published within the last five years. Cite your sources within the text of your paper and provide complete references for each source used on the reference page.

D journal article by Clark and the following summary:

Read the ETR&D journal article by Clark and the following summary:

 

http://www.ucs.mun.ca/~bmann/0_ARTICLES/Media_Clark.html

I will posted it with homework.

 

Clark claims that the delivery medium will never influence learning. He originally wrote this in 1984 sparking a near revolt among academics in educational technology- remember this was the height of educaiotnal television and the emergence of the computer as an educational tool. In this article (1994) he repeats the claim and provides substantial research for is assertions. Then again in 2002 in his summary.

 

Please answer the following questions:

Q 1: Was/Is he correct?

Q 2: Are there other ways?

Q 3: Enthusiasm over evidence?

Media  Will  Never  Influence  Learning     Richard  E.  Clark     The  purpose  of  this  discussion  is  to  explain  and  sharpen  different  points  of  view   about  the  impact  of  media  and  attributes  of  media  on  learning,  motivation  and   efficiency  gains  from  instruction.  This  paper  is  an  attempt  to  summarize  my   arguments  about  the  research  and  theory  in  this  area  and  to  respond  to  Robert   Kozma’s  criticism  of  my  earlier  discussion  of  these  issues.  I  will  first  briefly   summarize  my  arguments  about  media  effects;  next  I  will  attempt  to   characterize  the  many  reactions  to  the  controversial  claim  that  media  do  not   influence  learning  or  motivation.  Finally,  I  will  respond  to  the  specific  criticisms   advanced  by  Robert  Kozma  this  issue.     INTRODUCTION     A  Brief  History  of  Media  Research     The  claim  of  “no  learning  benefits”  from  media  has  been  made  and  substantiated   many  times  in  the  past.  Many  researchers  have  argued  that  media  have   differential  economic  benefits  but  no  learning  benefits.  For  example,  in  the  first   Handbook  of  Research  on  Teaching,  Lumsdaine  (1963)  concluded  that  the   benefits  of  media  were  primarily  economic  and  that  their  use  was  “to  develop   the  technology  of  instructional  method”  (p.  669).  Mielke  (1968)  was  eloquent  on   the  topic  in  an  article  he  wrote  for  the  now-­‐defunct  Educational  Broadcasting   Review  (Mielke,  1968)  titled  “Questioning  the  Questions  of  ETV  Research.”  He   predicted  that  adequately  designed  research  on  the  learning  benefits  of  various   media  would  yield  no  significant  differences  between  treatments.  Another   example  of  the  argument  came  from  this  century’s  most  prolific  media  research   reviewer,  Wilbur  Schramm  (1977),  who  claimed  that  learning  is  influenced  more   by  the  content  and  instructional  strategy  in  a  medium  than  by  the  type  of   medium.  Levie  &  Dickie  (1973)  made  the  same  point  as  Schramm  in  their   chapter  on  media  and  technology  research  in  the  Second  Handbook  of  Research   on  Teaching.  Finally,  this  was  the  conclusion  I  reached  with  Gavriel  Salomon  in   our  review  in  the  third,  and  most  recent,  Handbook  of  Research  on  Teaching   (Clark  &  Salomon,  1986).  It  is  therefore  a  bit  of  a  mystery  why  my  restatement  of   the  claim  of  “no  differences  expected”  a  decade  ago  (Clark,  1983)  received  so   much  attention.  A  colleague  has  suggested  that  previous  discussions  of  this   argument  have  put  the  claim  in  very  tentative  terms  (as  befits  our  training  as   researchers)  and  left  the  door  open  to  media  effects  on  learning.  I  made  the   explicit  and  clear  claim  that  there  were  no  learning  benefits  possible  and  urged   that  we  not  continue  to  waste  effort  on  the  question  until  a  “new  theory”  was   developed.  I  intended  to  stimulate  discussion  and  I  was  not  disappointed.  Before   I  describe  the  reactions  however,  the  discussion  turns  to  a  brief  review  of  the   argument.     The  Important  Aspects  of  the  Learning  From  Media  Argument

 

 

My  early  articles  (Clark,  1983,  1985a)  claimed,  in  part,  that  media  are  “mere   vehicles  that  deliver  instruction  but  do  not  influence  student  achievement  any   more  than  the  truck  that  delivers  our  groceries  causes  changes  in  our  nutrition”   (1983,  p.  445).  The  articles  presented  evidence  in  support  of  the  hypothesis  that   instructional  methods  had  been  confounded  with  media  and  that  it  is  methods   which  influence  learning.  Further,  I  claimed,  that  any  necessary  teaching  method   could  be  designed  into  a  variety  of  media  presentations.  I  also  questioned  the   unique  contributions  of  media  attributes.  Gavriel  Salomon  and  others  (Salomon,   1979)  had  argued  that  it  was  not  the  medium  which  influenced  learning  but   instead  certain  attributes  of  media  that  can  be  modeled  by  learners  and  can   shape  the  development  of  unique  “cognitive  processes.”  Examples  of  media   attributes  are  the  capacity  of  television  and  movies  to  “zoom”  into  detail  or  to   “unwrap”  three-­‐dimensional  objects  into  two  dimensions.  The  problem  with  the   media  attribute  argument  is  that  there  is  strong  evidence  that  many  very   different  media  attributes  accomplish  the  same  learning  goal  (for  example,  there   are  a  variety  of  equally  effective  ways  to  highlight  details  other  than  zooming).  In   every  attempt  to  replicate  the  published  media  attribute  studies  (see  studies   cited  by  Clark,  1985c;  Clark  &  Sugrue,  1988),  a  number  of  very  different  media   attributes  served  the  same  or  similar  cognitive  functions.  This  point  is  critical  to   my  argument.  If  there  is  no  single  media  attribute  that  serves  a  unique  cognitive   effect  for  some  learning  task,  then  the  attributes  must  be  proxies  for  some  other   variables  that  are  instrumental  in  learning  gains.     A  Replaceability  Challenge     It  may  be  useful  to  apply  the  following  “armchair  experimental  criteria”  to  any   situation  where  it  appears  that  media  or  attributes  of  media  have  been   instrumental  in  fostering  learning  gains:  We  need  to  ask  whether  there  are  other   media  or  another  set  of  media  attributes  that  would  yield  similar  learning  gains.   The  question  is  critical  because  if  different  media  or  attributes  yield  similar   learning  gains  and  facilitate  achievement  of  necessary  performance  criteria,  then   in  a  design  science  or  an  instructional  technology,  we  must  always  choose  the   less  expensive  way  to  achieve  a  learning  goal.  We  must  also  form  our  theories   around  the  underlying  structural  features  of  the  shared  properties  of  the   interchangeable  variables  and  not  base  theory  on  the  irrelevant  surface  features.   I  challenge  Robert  Kozma  and  other  colleagues  in  this  area  to  find  evidence,  in  a   well  designed  study,  of  any  instance  of  a  medium  or  media  attributes  that  are  not   replaceable  by  a  different  set  of  media  and  attributes  to  achieve  similar  learning   results  for  any  given  student  and  learning  task.  This  replaceability  test  is  the  key   to  my  argument  since  if  a  treatment  can  be  replaced  by  another  treatment  with   similar  results,  the  cause  of  the  results  is  in  some  shared  (and  uncontrolled)   properties  of  both  treatments.  Of  course  it  is  important  for  instructional   designers  to  know  that  there  are  a  variety  of  treatments  that  will  produce  a   desired  learning  goal.  However,  the  utility  of  this  knowledge  is  largely  economic.   The  designer  can  and  must  choose  the  less  expensive  and  most  cognitively   efficient  way  to  represent  and  deliver  instruction.  It  cannot  be  argued  that  any   given  medium  or  attribute  must  be  present  in  order  for  learning  to  occur,  only   that  certain  media  and  attributes  are  more  efficient  for  certain  learners,  learning   goals  and  tasks.  This  allows  the  discussion,  and  our  mental  set  as  theorists,  to

 

 

shift  from  media  attributes  as  causal  in  learning  to  media  attributes  as  causal  in   the  cost-­‐effectiveness  of  learning.  While  this  may  seem  a  small  shift  in  the   representation  of  the  problem,  it  would  have  major  consequences  for   instructional  research,  theory  and  for  design.  Cognitive  instructional  theory  can   shift  to  a  concern  with  instructional  methods  that  support  the  structural   elements  of  cognitive  processing  during  learning  and  transfer.     What  is  an  Instructional  Method,  and  How  is  it  Different  From  a  Medium?     An  instructional  method  is  any  way  to  shape  information  that  activates,   supplants  or  compensates  for  the  cognitive  processes  necessary  for  achievement   or  motivation  (Salomon,  1979).  For  example,  students  often  need  an  example  to   connect  new  information  in  a  learning  task  with  information  in  their  prior   experience.  If  students  cannot  (or  will  not)  give  themselves  an  adequate   example,  an  instructional  presentation  must  provide  it  for  them.  It  is  likely  that   many  different  types  of  examples,  with  many  different  attributes  presented  by   many  different  media  would  serve  similar  cognitive  functions  for  any  given   student.  Instructional  technology  attempts  to  specify  the  need  for  and  type  of   instructional  methods  required  for  the  essential  psychological  support  of   students  as  they  learn.  Delivery  technology  formats  and  packages  essential   instructional  methods  based  on  available  resources  and  the  cost-­‐effectiveness   qualities  of  media  attributes  for  specific  learners  and  learning  contexts.     A  Confusion  of  Technologies     In  a  presentation  for  the  Association  for  Educational  Communications  and   Technology  at  their  1987  Atlanta  convention  I  attributed  our  media  research  and   practice  problem  to  a  “confusion  of  technologies”  (Clark,  1987).  Instructional  or   training  design  technologies  draw  on  psychological  and  social-­‐psychological   research  to  select  necessary  information  and  objectives  (as  a  result  of  task   analysis)  and  design  instructional  methods  and  environments  that  enhance   achievement.  A  very  different  technology  -­‐-­‐  delivery  technology  -­‐-­‐  is  necessary  to   provide  efficient  and  timely  access  to  those  methods  and  environments.  Both   technologies  make  vital  but  very  different  contributions  to  education.  Delivery   technologies  influence  the  cost  and  access  of  instruction  and  information.  Design   technologies  make  it  possible  to  influence  student  achievement.  In  my  view,   there  is  a  long  history  of  a  basic  confusion  between  these  two  technologies  that   strangles  our  study  of  the  contributions  of  media.     Motivation  With  Media     I  also  claimed  that  media  not  only  fail  to  influence  learning,  they  are  also  not   directly  responsible  for  motivating  learning.  Here  I  agreed  wholeheartedly  with   the  views  of  Salomon  (1984)  and  others  who  draw  on  the  new  cognitive  theories   which  attribute  motivation  to  learners’  beliefs  and  expectations  about  their   reactions  to  external  events  -­‐-­‐  not  to  external  events  alone.  There  is  compelling   research  evidence  that  students’  beliefs  about  their  chances  to  learn  from  any   given  media  are  different  for  different  students  and  for  the  same  students  at   different  times.

 

 

WHAT  ARE  THE  COUNTER-­‐ARGUMENTS?     While  there  have  been  a  great  variety  of  counter-­‐arguments,  I  categorize  them   into  four  types  of  rebuttals  to  the  basic  argument;  1)  reasoning  based  on  the   usual  uses  of  a  medium:  2)  the  meta-­‐analysis  evidence;  3)  problems  with   empiricism  and  logical  positivism;  and  4)  a  lingering  hope  for  media  attributes.     Usual  Uses     The  majority  of  informal  letters  which  I  received  took  Marshall  McLuhan’s  view   that  media  and  method  were  identical  and  inseparable.  I  think  of  it  as  the  usual   uses  argument.  It  seems  to  develop  because  media  specialists  generate  beliefs   about  the  “best”  contents  and  methods  for  each  medium.  So,  for  example,   television  is  usually  thought  to  convey  “realistic,”  visual,  real  time,  documentary   information.  Computers  most  often  give  semantically  dense  simulations  of   complex  phenomena  as  well  as  drill  and  practice.  Textbooks  have  tended  to  focus   on  the  development  of  encyclopedic  knowledge  with  illustrated  examples  and   heavy  verbal  content.  Many  writers  seemed  to  suggest  that  these  methods  were   somehow  intrinsic  to  a  given  medium.  My  argument  is  that  the  usual  uses  of  a   medium  do  not  limit  the  methods  or  content  it  is  capable  of  presenting.   Computers  can  present  realistic  visual,  real-­‐time  documentary  information,  and   television  can  present  semantically  dense  simulations.  The  method  is  the   simulation  or  the  real-­‐time  depiction.  A  good  example  of  this  point  was   uncovered  in  one  of  the  earliest  and  largest  (and  best  designed)  studies  of   computers  by  Suppes  (in  Clark,  1983)  during  the  1960s.  In  a  study  of  computers   versus  teachers  using  drill  and  practice  in  mathematics,  Suppes  found  that  one  of   his  control  school  districts  had  messed  up  the  data  collection  by  delivering  more   drill  and  practice  in  mathematics  than  was  permitted  by  the  study-­‐using   teachers  and  not  computers.  The  result  was  that  in  that  school  district,   mathematics  achievement  increased  at  exactly  the  same  rate  as  it  did  in  districts   where  computers  were  giving  drill  and  practice.  Suppes  concluded  then  that  it   was  not  the  medium  but  the  drill  and  practice  method  that  influenced   achievement  but  he  noted  that  the  cost  of  the  intervention  might  have  been  less   with  computers.     Meta-­‐analytic  Evidence     Meta-­‐analytic  reviews  of  media  research  have  produced  evidence  for  the  positive   learning  benefits  of  research  with  various  media,  particularly  computers  (see   reviews  in  Clark,  1983,  1985a,b).  These  analyses  report  an  approximate  20   percent  increase  in  final  exam  scores  following  computer-­‐based  instruction   (CBI)  when  it  is  compared  to  traditional  forms  of  instruction  (generally  live   instruction).  After  a  number  of  discussions,  Kulik  (1985),  one  of  the  primary   authors  of  many  of  the  meta-­‐analytic  surveys,  agreed  that  it  is  not  the  computer   but  the  teaching  method  built  into  CBI  that  accounts  for  the  learning  gains  in   those  studies.  More  important,  Kulik  agreed  that  the  methods  used  in  CBI  can  be

 

 

and  are  used  by  teachers  in  live  instruction  (Kulik,  1985).  In  fact,  I  reanalyzed  a   30  percent  sample  of  the  studies  he  used  and  found  that  when  the  same   instructional  design  group  produces  CBT  and  presents  the  live  instruction  with   which  it  is  compared  in  many  studies,  there  is  no  achievement  difference   between  the  CBT  and  live  conditions  (Clark,  1985c).  To  characterize  the  fact  that   these  powerful  methods  can  be  and  are  used  in  a  variety  of  media,  Kulik   employed  the  catchy  phrase  .  .  .  diffusion  of  the  innovative  treatment  to  the   control  condition”  (Kulik,  1985,  p.  386).  This  statement  more  or  less   acknowledges  that  most  of  the  studies  which  are  grist  for  the  meta-­‐analytic  mill,   are  confounded  because  the  teaching  method  is  not  controlled  (if  it  were   controlled  it  could  not  “diffuse”  anywhere).     Empiricism  Envy     Cunningham  (1986)  did  not  dispute  my  argument  that  media  made  no  difference   to  learning  or  motivation  but  argued  against  my  empirically-­‐based  claims  that   instructional  methods  were  responsible  for  achievement  gains.  Cunningham  is   well  trained  as  a  quantitative  researcher  but  is  increasingly  attracted  to   qualitative  research  and  not  to  empirical  method  or  logical  positivism.  I  think  his   argument  was  with  the  unreconstructed  empiricism  of  my  argument  rather  than   with  the  theoretical  claims.  I  agreed  with  him  that  my  claim  that  it  is   instructional  methods  which  account  for  learning  gains  is  a  hypothesis,  not  a   conclusion  (Clark,  1986).     Necessary  Media  Attributes     A  number  of  researchers  have  argued  with  my  claim  about  the  unique   contribution  of  what  Gavriel  Salomon  calls  “media  attributes.”  Remember  that   the  capacity  of  movies  to  zoom  into  detail  or  to  unwrap  three  dimensional   objects  has  led  some  to  claim  that  new  media  have  attributes  that  make  unique   cognitive  representations  available  (Salomon,  1979).  A  few  go  so  far  as  to  claim   that  new  “intelligence”  might  be  possible  as  a  result  of  exposure  to  these   attributes  (for  example,  Salomon,  Perkins  &  Globerson,  1991).  I  presented   evidence  (Clark,  1985a,b)  that  many  very  different  media  attributes  could   accomplish  the  same  learning  goal  (i.e.  there  were  a  variety  of  equally  effective   ways  to  highlight  details  other  than  zooming)  and  so  no  one  media  attribute  has   a  unique  cognitive  effect.  Petkovitch  and  Tennyson  (1984)  took  me  to  task  with   an  argument  which  I  still  do  not  completely  understand  but  which  seems  to  be   related  to  the  attributes  argument.  They  seemed  to  agree  that  media  comparison   studies  are  useless  but  claimed  that  certain  media  attributes  make  necessary   contributions  to  learning.  The  evidence  they  offered  was  a  study  where  a   computer  simulation  was  used  to  teach  students  some  skills  required  to  fly  a   plane.  I  responded  that  people  learned  to  fly  planes  before  computers  were   developed  and  therefore  the  media  attributes  required  to  learn  were  obviously   neither  exclusive  to  computers  nor  necessary  for  learning  to  fly.  A  similar  and   more  extensive  argument  has  been  made  by  Kozma  (1991).  The  next  section  of   this  paper  addresses  Kozma’s  (1994)  points  in  this  debate  and  in  his  earlier   work.

 

 

Kozma’s  Reframed  Argument  about  the  Influence  of  Media  on  Learning     First,  it  is  important  to  notice  that  Kozma  (1994)  agrees  with  me  that  there  is  no   compelling  evidence  in  the  past  70  years  of  published  and  unpublished  research   that  media  cause  learning  increases  under  any  conditions.  Like  all  other   researchers  who  have  made  a  careful  study  of  the  arguments  and  research   studies  (e.g.,  Winn,  1990),  he  reaches  a  conclusion  that  is  compatible  with  my   claims  (Clark,  1983).  Kozma  then  asks  that  we  reframe  the  argument  about  the   future  possibilities  of  media  as  causal  agents  in  learning.  In  his  discussion  (this   issue)  Kozma  interprets  my  claim  that  media  attributes  are  not  “necessary”   variables  in  learning  studies  by  quoting  scholars  from  the  philosophy  of  science   who  suggest  that  “sufficient  conditions”  are  important  to  a  design  science.   Kozma  states  that  “.  .  .  scientists  concerned  with  necessary  conditions  are  those   interested  in  eliminating  something  undesirable,  such  as  disease  .  .  .  On  the  other   hand,  scientists  interested  in  the  production  of  something  desirable,  such  as   learning,  are  concerned  with  establishing  conditions  that  are  sufficient  to  bring  it   about.  .  .  Necessary  conditions  are  those  in  whose  absence  an  event  cannot  occur,   while  sufficient  conditions  are  those  in  whose  presence  an  event  must  occur”   (1994,  p.  14).  Kozma  offers  those  studies  where  media  attribute  treatments  are   sufficient  for  learning  as  evidence  for  the  value  of  attribute  research.     This  argument  contains  some  of  the  most  important  elements  of  our   disagreement.  My  reply  is  relatively  simple.  When  a  study  demonstrates  that   media  attributes  are  sufficient  to  cause  learning,  the  study  has  failed  to  control   for  instructional  method  and  is  therefore  confounded.  It  is  true  that  in  some   cases  instructional  treatments  containing  media  attributes  are  sufficient  to  cause   learning.  When  this  happens,  the  necessary  condition  to  cause  learning  is   embedded  in  the  sufficient  treatment.  We  know  that  the  active  ingredient  in   successful  media  treatments  is  not  the  media  attributes  because  in  all  known   attempts  to  replicate  these  studies,  different  attributes  produce  similar  learning   results-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐provided  that  the  required  instructional  method  is  present  in  the   compared  versions  of  the  media  attributes.  That  necessary  condition  or  “active   ingredient”  of  the  treatment  which  was  sufficient  to  cause  learning  from   instruction  is  best  characterized  as  an  instructional  method  which  activates,   compensates  or  supplants  the  cognitive  processes  necessary  for  learning  to   occur  (Salomon,  1979).  In  other  words,  any  treatment  that  is  sufficient  for   learning  must  embody  whatever  is  necessary  to  cause  learning.     Structural  and  Surface  Features  of  Research  Constructs     The  concepts  of  necessary  and  sufficient  are  similar  to  the  concepts  of  structural   and  surface  features  in  research  on  the  role  of  analogies  in  transfer  during   problem  solving  (for  example,  Gick  &  Holyoak,  1987).  Surface  features  of   analogies  are  those  whose  characteristics  are  of  only  limited  and  domain-­‐specific   importance.  For  example,  in  science  and  mathematics  instruction,  irrelevant   features  of  analogies  often  cause  misconceptions  in  learning.  When  told  that  an   atom  is  like  the  solar  system,  students  often  believe  that  electrons  must  attract   each  other  and  be  attracted  to  the  nucleus  of  the  atom  because  planets  are   attracted  to  each  other  and  to  the  sun  by  gravity.  Gravity  is  a  surface  feature  that

 

 

is  important  to  understanding  the  solar  system  but  not  the  atom.  The  structural   (necessary)  features  that  underlie  both  systems  are  central  bodies  (nucleus,  sun)   that  are  encircled  by  rotating  spheres  (electrons,  planets).  The  point  that  I  had   hoped  to  make  in  my  earlier  reviews  is  that  media  attributes  are  surface  features   of  learning  systems.  Those  surface  features  may  affect  the  economics  but  not  the   learning  effectiveness  of  instruction.  Instructional  methods  are  structural   (necessary)  features  of  media  attribute  studies.  On  the  other  hand,  instructional   methods  may  be  surface  features  of  treatments  concerned  with  the  economics  of   learning.     I  accept  the  point  that  whenever  learning  occurs,  some  medium  or  mix  of  media   must  be  present  to  deliver  instruction.  However,  if  learning  occurs  as  a  result  of   exposure  to  any  media,  the  learning  is  caused  by  the  instructional  method   embedded  in  the  media  presentation.  Method  is  the  inclusion  of  one  of  a  number   of  possible  representations  of  a  cognitive  process  or  strategy  that  is  necessary   for  learning  but  which  students  cannot  or  will  not  provide  for  themselves.  Kozma   (1994)  accuses  me  of  creating  an  “unnecessary  and  undesirable  schism”  (p.  16)   between  method  and  medium.  My  claim  is  that  Kozma  has  confounded  the  two   constructs.  He  is  asking  you  to  consider  media  as  an  integral  aspect  of  method.  I   am  suggesting  that  if  we  take  his  advice,  we  will  continue  to  misinterpret  the   research  on  instructional  media  and  learning  and  continue  to  fail  in  our  efforts  to   construct  powerful  learning  environments  for  all  students.     All  methods  required  for  learning  can  be  delivered  by  a  variety  of  media  and   media  attributes.  It  is  method  which  is  the  “active  ingredient”  or  active   independent  variable  that  may  or  may  not  be  delivered  by  the  medium  to   influence  learning.  The  derivation  and  delivery  of  a  method  to  support  learning   is  always  necessary.  A  great  variety  of  media  “translations”  of  any  given  method   are  sufficient  to  cause  learning.  Therefore,  aside  from  the  identification  of   necessary  methods  for  learners  and  tasks,  it  is  important  to  derive  media  that   are  capable  of  delivering  the  method  at  the  least  expensive  rate  and  in  the   speediest  fashion.  Media  influence  cost  or  speed  (efficiency)  of  learning  but   methods  are  causal  in  learning.     Let  me  try  to  illustrate  my  point  one  more  time  with  a  medical  analogy.  People   often  have  preferences  for  one  or  another  way  to  use  a  chemical  medicine   prescribed  by  a  physician  to  improve  health.  Some  people  will  argue  for  tablets   and  others  for  liquid  or  injected  forms  of  treatment.  Is  it  sufficient  that  one  take  a   tablet  medicine?  Only  if  the  tablet  contains  the  active  ingredient  required  to  help   us.  Different  forms  of  a  medicine  might  help  us  provided  that  they  all  contain  the   same  method  or  active  ingredient.  The  different  forms  of  medicine  are  similar  to   different  media.  The  media  include  a  variety  of  tablets,  liquid  suspensions,   suppositories  or  injections.  All  of  these  different  media  are  often  capable  of   delivering  a  necessary  active  chemical  ingredient  with  different  levels  of   efficiency,  but  with  more  or  less  equal  effects  on  our  physical  symptoms.  The   active  chemical  ingredient  of  these  medical  media  is  analogous  to  the  necessary   method  in  instruction.  We  could  not  construct  an  adequate  medical  design   science  using  different  (sufficient)  forms  of  delivery  media  alone  and  it  would  be   irrelevant  to  measure  whether  these  delivery  forms  reduce  our  symptoms

 

 

(unless  we  were  concerned  with  the  effects  of  belief  on  health).  Scientific   arguments  about  the  necessary  or  sufficient  nature  of  oral  ingestion  of  tablets   versus  an  injection  of  the  liquid  form  of  a  medicine  would  be  largely  irrelevant.   Yet  the  discussion  of  delivery  forms  for  medicine  is  very  important.  Each  of  these   delivery  forms  has  different  efficiency  characteristics.  Some  forms  of  delivery  get   the  active  ingredient  to  the  patient  much  faster  (or  slower)  in  quantities  which   are  more  “pure”  or  more  “diluted”  at  greater  or  less  cost  to  the  patient.  For  this   reason  I  disagree  with  Kozma’s  suggestion  that  we  not  separate  medium  and   method  in  instructional  research.  Instead  I  claim  that  our  failure  to  Separate   medium  from  method  has  caused  enormous  confounding  and  waste  in  a  very   important  and  expensive  research  area.     We  continue  to  invest  heavily  in  expensive  media  in  the  hope  that  they  will   produce  gains  in  learning.  When  learning  gains  are  found,  we  attribute  them  to   the  delivery  medium,  not  to  the  active  ingredient  in  instruction.  When  learning   gains  are  absent,  we  assume  we  have  chosen  the  wrong  mix  of  media.  In  any   event,  many  educators  and  business  trainers  are  convinced  that  they  must  invest   scarce  resources  in  newer  media  in  order  to  insure  learning,  performance  or   motivational  gains.     Evidence  for  Kozma’s  View     Finally,  Kozma’s  evidence  for  his  view  is  to  describe  the  latest  round  of  studies   that  utilize  the  currently  fashionable  media  -­‐-­‐  ThinkerTools  to  teach  force  and   motion  problem  solutions  and  the  Jasper  Woodbury  Series  intended  to  help   students  solve  mathematics  problems  (see  Kozma,  this  issue).  These  studies   were  not  designed  so  that  their  results  would  provide  evidence  about  the  claims   being  made  in  this  dispute.  The  research  conducted  to  validate  these  very   creative  instructional  programs  did  not  control  for  the  sources  of  confounding   that  lie  at  the  root  of  the  argument.  The  computer-­‐  based  ThinkerTools  program   was  compared  with  a  standard  curriculum  for  teaching  force  and  motion.  It  is   not  clear  whether  the  standard  curriculum  used  similar  instructional  methods   but  it  is  very  doubtful.  The  videodisk-­‐based  Jasper  program  group  was  compared   with  a  control  group  that  did  not  receive  instruction  in  “decomposition  and   solution  strategies.”  One  must  question  whether  this  missing  instruction  could   have  been  delivered  with  a  very  different  medium  or  set  of  media  attributes.  One   must  assume  that  these  comparisons  confound  method  and  content  in  the  same   way  that  many  previous  studies  in  this  area  fail  to  control  for  important   alternative  hypotheses.  One  way  to  begin  to  answer  questions  about  the   structural  necessity  of  media  attributes  is  to  ask  whether  other  learners  have   achieved  similar  learning  results  with  different  instructional  treatments.  Have   learners  acquired  problem-­‐solving  techniques  similar  to  those  presented  in   ThinkerTools  or  Jasper  in  the  past?  If  so,  the  media  attributes  available  from   expensive  computers  and  video  disks  are  not  structurally  important  in  learning   problem-­‐  solving  skills.  Yet  in  making  this  point,  I  do  not  want  to  appear  to  be   critical  of  the  developers  of  these  two  excellent  programs.  The  substantive  point   of  both  design  activities  was  to  explore  the  utility  of  different  combinations  of   instructional  method.

 

 

CONCLUSlON     Kozma  agrees  with  me  that  evidence  does  not  yet  support  the  claim  that  media   or  media  attributes  influence  learning.  This  has  been  the  conclusion  of  all  media   researchers  who  have  entered  into  a  dialogue  about  this  issue  (e.g.,  Winn,  1990).   However,  Kozma  hopes  that  future  media  research  will  be  more  positive.  He   accepts  the  claim  that  in  thousands  of  media  research  studies  conducted  over  a   period  of  70  years,  we  have  failed  to  find  compelling  causal  evidence  that  media   or  media  attributes  influence  learning  in  any  essential  and  structural  way.   However,  Kozma  remains  optimistic  that  with  careful  consideration  of  cognitive   processes,  we  will  find  a  critical  connection  between  media  attributes  and   learning.  He  suggests  that  my  insistence  that  educational  researchers  separate   these  two  classes  of  variables  will  retard  a  very  promising  area  of  research.     In  brief,  my  claim  is  that  media  research  is  a  triumph  of  enthusiasm  over   substantive  examination  of  structural  processes  in  learning  and  instruction.   Media  and  their  attributes  haven  important  influences  on  the  cost  or  speed  of   learning  but  only  the  use  of  adequate  instructional  methods  will  influence   learning.  I  define  methods  as  the  provision  of  cognitive  processes  or  strategies   that  are  necessary  for  learning  but  which  students  can  not  or  will  not  provide  for   themselves.  I  claim  that  absolutely  any  necessary  teaching  method  can  be   delivered  to  students  by  many  media  or  a  variety  of  mixtures  of  media  attributes   -­‐  with  similar  learning  results.     The  media  research  question  is  only  one  of  a  number  of  similarly  confounded   questions  in  educational  research.  It  is  difficult  for  alternative  questions  to  gain   acceptance,  even  though  adequate  research  exists  to  refute  invalid  but  intuitively   appealing  beliefs.  The  development  of  an  instructional  design  science  is   necessary  but  very  complex.  Part  of  the  difficulty,  in  my  view,  is  that  we  tend  to   encourage  students  (and  faculty)  to  begin  with  educational  and  instructional   solutions  and  search  for  problems  that  can  be  solved  by  those  solutions.  Thus  we   begin  with  an  enthusiasm  for  some  medium,  or  individualized  instruction,  or   deschooling  -­‐  and  search  for  a  sufficient  and  visible  context  in  which  to  establish   evidence  for  our  solution.  Negative  evidence  is  suspect  and  we  are  predisposed   to  believe  that  it  is  flawed.  In  the  case  of  media  research,  70  years  of  largely   negative  evidence  has  been  and  continues  to  be  ignored  by  many  researchers.   Positive  evidence  is  accepted  easily  because  it  confirms  our  expectations  and   helps  to  attract  research  support.  We  need  a  greater  appreciation  for  negative   evidence  and  to  begin  with  a  focus  on  the  problem  (for  example,  the  need  to   increase  achievement,  or  access  to  instruction,  or  to  address  the  labor   intensiveness  of  instruction)  and  then  search  relevant  research  literatures  for   robust,  research-­‐based  theories  that  can  support  the  development  of  a  variety  of   solutions  to  those  problems.  If  we  begin  by  implicitly  and  explicitly  attempting  to   validate  a  belief  about  the  solutions  to  largely  unexamined  problems,  we  are  less   open  to  evidence  that  our  intuitions  might  be  very  far  off  the  mark.

 

 

If  the  arguments  advanced  here  have  failed  to  convince  you,  I  ask  you  to  consider   one  or  two  questions  as  you  reason  about  media  research.  Whenever  you  have   found  a  medium  or  set  of  media  attributes  which  you  believe  will  cause  learning   for  some  learners  on  a  given  task,  ask  yourself  if  another  (similar)  set  of   attributes  would  lead  to  the  same  learning  result.  If  you  suspect  that  there  may   be  an  alternative  set  or  mix  of  media  that  would  give  similar  results,  ask  yourself   what  is  causing  these  similar  results.  It  is  likely  that  when  different  media   treatments  of  the  same  informational  content  to  the  same  students  yield  similar   learning  results,  the  cause  of  the  results  can  be  found  in  a  method  which  the  two   treatments  share  in  common.  Design  science  (and  a  world  with  limited  resources   and  many  competing  problems)  requires  that  you  choose  the  least  expensive   solution  and  give  up  your  enthusiasm  for  the  belief  that  media  attributes  cause   learning.

Is there a connection between Dani’s anxieties and her ability to believe in God?

1. At the start of the article, the author says “in Judaism, faith is less a matter of affirming a set of beliefs that of trust in God and fidelity to his law” (423), and he introduces the important term Halakha. Keeping in mind these words, find an example from the DAILY section on the handout A Partial Listing of Jewish Ritual Obligations and explain how Halakha may deeply influence a religious Jew’s daily life.

2. Read the section of the article called “Central Doctrines” (pp. 430-431). Describe ONE of the central doctrines that is very DIFFERENT from Christianity. Describe ONE of the central doctrines that seems to be SHARED with Christianity.

3. The section of the Judaism article “Sacred Symbols” describes at least six central symbols of Judaism. Describe one of them, and explain just what it symbolizes.

4. REVIEW the Judaism article, pp. 433-434 on Sacred Symbols – this section will help you with Dani’s description of her father’s religious practices. What memories of her father’s religious rituals bring Dani comfort? Why?

5. Is there a connection between Dani’s anxieties and her ability to believe in God?

Judaism

F O U N D E D : c. eighteenth century

B.C.E.

R E L I G I O N A S A P E R C E N T A G E O F

W O R L D P O P U L A T I O N : 0.25

percent

OVERVIEW Judaism had its beginnings some 3,800 years ago in Mesopotamia, today part of Iraq, with Abraham, the founding patriarch of the tribes of Israel. Judaism is a monotheistic faith affirming that God is one, the creator of the world and everything in it. God is also a transcendent being above and beyond the world and is thus without material form, and yet he is present in the world. His will and presence are especially, but not exclusively, manifest in his relationship with Israel (the Jewish people), to whom he has given the Torah (teaching), stipulating the laws that are to govern their religious and moral life, by virtue of which they are to be “a light unto the nations” (Isa. 49:6). Accordingly, Jews understand themselves as a chosen people, bound by a covenant with God.

In Judaism faith is less a matter of affirming a set of beliefs than of trust in God and fidelity to his law. Faith is thus primarily expressed “by walking in all the ways of God” (Deut. 11:22). These ways are specified in God’s revealed law, which the rabbis, or teachers, ap- propriately called the Halakhah (walking). The com- mandments of the Halakhah embrace virtually every as- pect of life, from worship to the most mundane aspects of daily existence. The precise details of the Halakhah are but adumbrated in the Torah, and they require elab-

oration to determine their contemporary applicability. This process is ongoing, for the Torah must be continu- ally reinterpreted to meet new conditions, and the rabbis developed principles to allow this without violating its sanctity. The modern world has thus witnessed the emergence alongside traditional, or Orthodox, Judaism various movements—Reform, Conservative, and Re- constructionist—that have introduced new criteria for the interpretation of the Torah and for Jewish religious responsibility.

As early as 597 B.C.E.hasis>, with conquest by Babylonia, the Israelites were exiled from their home- land. Over the centuries the Jewish Diaspora came to include communities throughout the world but particu- larly in the Middle East, around the Mediterranean, and in Europe. In modern times Europe was the center of Jewish religious and cultural life until more than two- thirds of European Jews were murdered during the Holocaust. The center of Judaism then shifted to the United States and to the State of Israel, founded in 1948. Today there are smaller Jewish communities in Canada, Central and South America, and Australia, as well as several European countries.

HISTORY Judaism traces its origins to Abraham, who in the judgment of most scholars lived in the eighteenth century B.C.E. Jewish tradition regards Abraham as the first person to have believed that God is one. At the age of 75 Abraham was commanded by God to leave Meso- potamia and settle in the land of Canaan: “Go forth from your native land and from your father’s house to the land that I will show you. I will make you a great

Worldmark Encyclopedia of Religious Practices 423

 

 

T H E M E N O R A H . The Menorah, a seven-

branched candelabrum, is the most enduring sym-

bol of Judaism. First constructed by Moses at Godís

instruction (Exodus 25:31–38), it was placed in the

portable sanctuary carried by the Israelites in the

wilderness and then to the Temple of Jerusalem.

When the temple was destroyed, the Menorah

became the emblem of Jewish survival and continu-

ity. The Star of David is a modern symbol of Jewish

identity, although it has no religious content or

scriptural basis. ( T H O M S O N G A L E )

nation” (Gen. 12:1–2). His descendants were to be called the Children of Israel, and the country they were promised the Land of Israel. Only much later, in the Hellenistic period (333–63 B.C.E.), were the Israelites called Jews.

According to the Bible, the history of the Israelites was determined by their relationship to God, which was sealed by two events. The first was the Exodus of the enslaved Israelites from Egypt, where they had settled after a famine had blighted the Promised Land. The de- liverance of the Children of Israel from servitude marked their birth as a nation. Previously they had been a loosely knit group of 12 tribes, descendants of Abra- ham. God’s intervention on their behalf was understood to be an act of love and undeserved grace, solely the ful- fillment of a promise he had made. Acknowledging that its existence was owed to God, Israel was henceforth be- holden to him. The Exodus story, which the Israelites were enjoined to remember through constant retelling, thus constituted Israel’s understanding of itself as a peo- ple destined to serve God in love and gratitude.

The second event shaping the spiritual history of Israel occurred some three months after the Exodus. Wandering in the wilderness, the Israelites stopped at the foot of Mount Sinai when their divinely appointed leader, Moses, ascended the mountain. He returned with a decree from God calling upon them to enter into a covenant (brit). The people agreed, after which they ex- perienced God’s presence in “thunder, and lightning, and a dense cloud upon the mountain, and a very loud blast of the horn” (Exod. 19:16). Through Moses, God bestowed the Ten Commandments, proclaiming the people’s duties to him and to their fellow humans. Overwhelmed by the experience, the people beseeched Moses to serve as their mediator with God. He obliged them and ascended the mountain once again. What fol- lowed was an extensive body of divine decrees, which Moses recorded in the books called the Torah and sub- mitted to the people. With this act a covenant between Israel and God was established. The Mosaic Covenant is generally understood to be a renewal and elaboration of the original covenant between God and Abraham, confirmed by his son Isaac and grandson Jacob, but this time with the entire House of Israel.

Some 230 years after the Israelites returned from Egypt, they built the Temple in Jerusalem. This was the central site of Jewish prayer and pilgrimage and for the bringing of sacrifices as an expression of submission to God, as thanksgiving, and as atonement for sins. The Temple rites were conducted by a hereditary priesthood. In 587 B.C.E. the Temple was destroyed by the conquer- ing armies of Babylonia, which resulted in the exile of most of the Israelite nobility and leadership. It was ap- parently during the Babylonian Exile that the institution of the synagogue as a house of prayer began to emerge. In 586 the Persian king Cyrus, who had defeated the armies of Babylonia, gave the exiles permission to return. Many, however, remained in Babylonia, which, together with Egypt, where Jews had also voluntarily settled, be- came the first community of the Diaspora. Those who did return found not only the Temple in ruins but also a dispirited people, bereft of spiritual leadership, who had neglected the Torah and had mixed with the hea- then population and adopted their culture and religious practices.

The reconstruction of the Temple, which was re- dedicated in 516 B.C.E., failed to reassert the authority of the Torah. It was not until the return of two leaders that the process of assimilation was decisively reversed. The scribe and priest Ezra arrived in Jerusalem in 458,

J U D A I S M

Worldmark Encyclopedia of Religious Practices424

 

 

J u

d a

is m

M o

re t

h a n 4

m ill

io n a

d h e re

n ts

B e tw

e e n 7

0 ,0

0 0 a

n d

6 5 0 ,0

0 0 a

d h e re

n ts

S lig

h t

p o

p u la

ti o

n s

to n

o a

d h e re

n ts

© 2 0 0 6 T

h o

m so

n G

a le

J U D A I S M

Worldmark Encyclopedia of Religious Practices 425

 

 

Brit Milah, a traditional Jewish circumcision ceremony, is carried out by a rabbi in a synagogue. Brit Milah is an important rite of passage among Conservative Jews. © B O J A N B R E C E L J / C O R B I S .

and three years later the Persian overlords appointed Nehemiah governor of the province of Judea. Together Ezra and Nehemiah set out to uproot pagan influences and to reform the life of the Jewish community. Nehe- miah instituted civil regulations ensuring social justice and the rule of law. Ezra, who, according to the tradi- tional account, was authorized by the Persian king to impose the laws of the Torah on the community, an- nulled the marriages with heathen wives and introduced strict observance of the Sabbath, including a ban on business transactions. Perhaps most important was his codification of the Torah as the five books of Moses, which were read and expounded before the people at the Sabbath afternoon prayer and during the morning prayers on Mondays and Thursdays. Overseeing the people’s solemn rededication to the Torah and its study, Ezra was said to be a second Moses, and his comprehen- sive program of reform laid the foundation for what was to become known as rabbinical Judaism.

The destruction of the Second Temple by the Ro- mans in 70 C.E. found the Jews prepared to face the trag- edy. A body of teachers and expositors of the Torah— the rabbis—was solidly in place. The synagogue, estab- lished in virtually every community, replaced the Temple as the focus of ritual and prayer. Led by Joha-

nan ben Zakkai, the rabbis transferred many of the rites and ceremonies that had belonged to the Temple to the synagogue, where they were often recast as symbolic ges- tures. Sacrifices were replaced by acts of charity and re- pentance. The rabbis also recognized that, with the de- centralization of religious authority, it was urgent to fix the biblical canon. Hitherto, aside from the Torah, the corpus of sacred writings had been fluid, with several competing versions. By the end of the first century the biblical text was sealed, with 31 books organized ac- cording to three parts—Torah (Pentateuch), Nevi’im (Prophets), and Ketuvim (Hagiographa), collectively known by the acronym Tanakh.

Sixty years after the destruction of the Temple, Simeon Bar Kokhba led the Jews in a revolt against their Roman overlords. After three years the tenacious and valiant forces of the revolt were put down, and Bar Kokhba himself was killed in the last decisive battle, in the summer of 135. (According to one account, he was taken captive and enslaved.) In the aftermath the Jews were banished from Jerusalem, and Jewish ritual prac- tices, including circumcision, study of the Torah, and observance of the Sabbath, were prohibited. The spiritu- al leadership was summarily executed, and most of the remaining Jewish population fled. The Romans quickly repopulated Judea with non-Jews, and the Land of Isra- el, aside from Galilee, ceased to be Jewish.

The fugitives from Judea scattered throughout the Mediterranean. Joined by scholars, these Jews spread to Asia Minor and westward to Spain, Gaul (France), and the Rhine valley, where they organized self-governing communities. Those Jews remaining in the Land of Isra- el also slowly reorganized themselves. The Sanhedrin (Greek for Council of the Elders), which formerly had its seat in Jerusalem, was reconstituted in Jabneh (Yav- neh) as the supreme representative body in religious and communal affairs. The institution continued until the early fifth century, when the Roman authorities abol- ished the office of the presidency of the Sanhedrin.

With the vast majority of the Jews living outside the Land of Israel, many in distant lands, the rabbis re- ferred to the emerging Diaspora as the Exile, as a tragic national and religious state of homelessness. While many answers were given to explain the indignity and spiritual dislocation wrought by the Exile, the rabbis were united in their faith that God would redeem the exiles and regather them. This redemption was associat- ed with the advent of God’s appointed deliverer, the Messiah, who would be chosen from among the descen-

J U D A I S M

Worldmark Encyclopedia of Religious Practices426

 

 

dants of King David. A redeemed Jerusalem became the symbol of the hope for the coming of the Messiah, who would herald not only the liberation of the Jews from Exile but also the establishment of the universal king- dom of God upon earth. The messianic age would wit- ness the perfection of creation and of the human order. The rabbis also taught, however, that in Exile the Jews were not utterly bereft of God’s providential presence. Earlier God had told the Israelites, “Fear not to go down to Egypt, for I will go down with you into Egypt and surely bring you again” (Gen. 46:3–4), and he ac- companied the Jews in Exile. This teaching allowed the Jews to develop a creative spiritual and religious life while they mourned the desolation of Zion, or Israel, and new centers of Jewish life emerged throughout the Diaspora.

The Babylonian Diaspora, whose origins date to the destruction of the First Temple and the decision of most of the exiles not to return, was the oldest and larg- est settlement of Jews for at least the first thousand years of the Exile. By the second century C.E. the Jewish com- munity of Babylonia had reached between 800,000 and 1.2 million, constituting from 10 to 12 percent of the total population. Under the leadership of an exilarch (head of the Exile), a hereditary office occupied by de- scendants of King David, the Jews enjoyed religious freedom and communal autonomy. The exilarchs ruled according to the Torah and Halakhah and encouraged the establishment of rabbinical academies (yeshivas), which initially acknowledged the authority of the acade- my in Jabneh and elsewhere in the Land of Israel. But with the decline of Israel, the Babylonian academies be- came the center of Jewish learning and culture. They produced the commentary on the Mishnah (collection of oral teachings on the Torah) known as the Babylo- nian Talmud, a labor of seven generations and hundreds of scholars, who completed their task in approximately 500, and communities throughout the Diaspora turned to Babylonian rabbis for guidance. The preeminence of the Babylonian Jewish community lasted until the tenth century, when it was superseded by centers of Jewish learning in the West.

The establishment of Christianity as the official re- ligion of the Roman Empire by Constantine (ruled 306–37) marked a turning point in the life of Western Jewry. Christians had an ambivalent attitude toward Jews. On the one hand, Jews were the people from whose midst Jesus and the first apostles of the church came, and they were the living custodians of the Old

A Jewish man worships at the first functioning synagogue since World War II, in Lviv, Ukraine. Europe was the center of Jewish religious and cultural life until more than two-thirds of European Jews were murdered during the Holocaust. © P E T E R T U R N L E Y / C O R B I S .

Testament, which contained the prophecies of the ad- vent of Jesus as the Messiah. On the other hand, Jews were despised for rejecting Jesus. Despite the resulting history of antagonism, which often occasioned discrimi- nation and persecution, there was also a rich cultural ex- change. Early Christians adopted many Jewish beliefs and practices. The Gregorian chants of the Orthodox Church, for instance, are said to bear traces of the music of the Temple, and the structure of the Christian liturgy and many of its prayers are derived from Judaism, as is the practice of baptism. Medieval Jewish scholars took Greek philosophy, a knowledge of which they had ac- quired under the tutelage of Islamic sages, to Christian Europe. In turn, Christianity exercised an influence on popular Jewish religious practices, music, folklore, and thought, especially mysticism.

Within Christian Europe, Jews developed an intel- lectually and spirituality vibrant culture. Communities in southern Italy, where Jews had lived since the second century B.C.E., were particularly creative in composing liturgical poetry in Hebrew, and they thereby laid the foundations of what was to be called the Ashkenazi rite,

J U D A I S M

Worldmark Encyclopedia of Religious Practices 427

 

 

Jews in Brooklyn, New York, observe the festival of Sukkoth by spending time in succahs, or temporary dwellings. Conservative Jews follow the traditional Jewish calendar in celebrating Sukkoth, one of three pilgrimage festivals. © D A V I D H . W E L L S / C O R B I S .

a term designating the Jews who lived in medieval Ger- many and neighboring countries. In northern France and on the eastern banks of the Rhine, important cen- ters of rabbinical scholarship crystallized in the tenth and eleventh centuries. The comprehensive commentary on the Bible and the Talmud by the French rabbi Rashi (1040–1105) continues to serve as the basic text of a traditional Jewish education. In the second half of the twelfth and in the thirteen centuries, these communities produced highly original mystical theologies, collective- ly known as Hasidei Ashkenaz. The Jewish communi- ties of Provence, in southern France, and of Christian Spain witnessed not only a flowering of philosophy, biblical exegesis, and Talmudic learning but also the un- folding of a mystical literature that culminated in the composition of the Zohar (“Book of Splendor”) in the thirteenth century.

In the wake of the Crusades of 1096, 1146–47, and 1189–90 and of the Black Death in 1348–49, however, the situation of the Jews in Europe steadily deteriorated. Whole communities were massacred, and others were

expelled. By 1500, except for isolated communities in France and Italy, western Europe was virtually empty of Jews. By then Jewish life was largely centered in the Kingdom of Poland-Lithuania, where a unique brand of Ashkenazi piety and learning developed, and in the Is- lamic world.

Under Muslim rule, which spread rapidly from the far corners of Persia to Spain, Jews on the whole enjoyed a less precarious lot than in Christian Europe. The very fact that some of the most important works of Jewish philosophy and even of Halakhah were written in Ara- bic, whereas in medieval Europe Jews wrote exclusively in Hebrew, illustrates the degree to which they were in- tegrated into Muslim culture. Islamic philosophers, who revived the dormant thought of the Greeks, recruited disciples among Jews, the best known being Maimoni- des (1135–1204). The efflorescence of Jewish culture reached its height in Muslim Spain in the tenth and elev- enth centuries, which was a golden age of Talmudic scholars, poets, philosophers, and mystics.

J U D A I S M

Worldmark Encyclopedia of Religious Practices428

 

 

Glossary

Aggadah nonlegal, narrative portions of the Talmud and Mishna, which includes history, folklore, and other subjects

Ashkenazim Jews whose ancestors in the Middle Ages lived in Germany (Ashkenaz in Hebrew) and the surrounding countries

bar mitzvah (son of commandment) initiation ceremo- ny for boys at age 13, when they are held to be responsible for their actions and hence are obliged to observe all of the commandments of the Torah; bat mitzah, a similar ceremony for girls at age 12, is observed by some Jews

Brit Milah circumcision of a male infant or adult convert as a sign of acceptance of the covenant

Conservative Judaism largest denomination of American Judaism, with affiliated congregations in South America and Israel; advocating moderate modifications of Halakhah, it occupies a middle ground between Reform and Orthodox Judaism

Diaspora communities of Jews dispersed outside the Land of Israel, traditionally referred to as the Exile

Haggadah book used at the Passover seder, contain- ing the liturgical recitation of the Passover story and instructions on conducting the ceremonial meal

Halakhah legal portions of the Talmud as later elab- orated in rabbinic literature; in an extended sense it

denotes the ritual and legal prescriptions governing

the traditional Jewish way of life

Hasidism revivalist mystical movement that originat- ed in Poland in the eighteenth century

Kabbalah mystical reading of the Scriptures that arose in France and Spain during the twelfth centu-

ry, culminating with the composition in the late thir-

teenth century of the Zohar (“Book of Splendor”),

which, especially as interpreted by Isaac Luria

(1534–72), exercised a decisive influence on late

medieval and early modern Jewish spiritual life

kasruth rules and regulations for food and its prepa- ration, often known by the Yiddish “kosher”

Midrash commentary on the Scriptures, both Halakhic (legal) and Aggadic (narrative), originally in

the form of sermons or lectures

Mishnah collection of the Oral Torah, or commentary on the Torah, first compiled in the second and third

centuries C.E.

Orthodox Judaism traditional Judaism, characterized by strict observance of laws and rituals (the

Halakhah)

The Christian Reconquista (Reconquest) of Spain in the twelfth century led to the expulsion of the Jews at the end of the fifteenth century. Jews were allowed to remain in Spain only on the condition that they con- vert to Catholicism. Among the converts, however, were those who secretly maintained allegiance to their ances- tral faith and who, as a consequence, later became sub- ject to the Inquisition. Most of those who refused to convert sought refuge in Muslim countries, their descen- dants becoming known as Sephardic Jews, from the He- brew name for Spain. Beginning in the late sixteenth century there was a steady stream of Jews from Spain and Portugal, popularly known as Marranos, who set- tled in the Netherlands, where they returned to Judaism. Members of this community founded the first Jewish settlements in the New World.

Hence, on the threshold of the modern era the Di- aspora was in the midst of a radical reconfiguration. Se- phardic Jewry was establishing itself throughout the Ot- toman Empire and North Africa, where it became the dominant constituency in Jewish cultural life. A much smaller but dynamic Sephardic community was estab- lished in the Netherlands and its colonies in the Ameri- cas. Ashkenazic Jewry was overwhelmingly concentrated in eastern Europe, particularly in Poland and Lithuania. The remaining Jews of Germany slowly began to recov- er. This process was encouraged by the Protestant Ref- ormation, which in alliance with nascent capitalism adopted a more pragmatic and thus tolerant attitude to- ward Jews. In time democratic forces led to the political emancipation of the Jews and their integration into the social and cultural life of Europe.

J U D A I S M

Worldmark Encyclopedia of Religious Practices 429

 

 

Passover (Pesach) festival marking the deliverance of the Israelites from Egyptian bondage

Prophets (Nevi’im) second of the three part of the Tanakh, made up of the books of 7 major and 12

minor prophets

Reconstructionist Judaism movement founded in the United States in the early twentieth century by

Mordecai M. Kaplan (1881–1983) that holds

Judaism to be not only a religion but also a dynamic

“civilization” embracing art, music, literature, cul-

ture, and folkways

Reform Judaism movement originating in early nine- teenth-century Germany that adapted the rituals and

liturgy of Judaism to accommodate modern social,

political, and cultural developments; sometimes

called Liberal Judaism

Rosh Hashanah Jewish New Year; also known as the Day of Judgment, it is a time of penitence

Sanhedrin supreme religious body of ancient Judaism, disbanded by the Romans early in the fifth century C.E.

Sephardim Jews of Spain and Portugal and their descendants, most of whom, in the wake of expul-

sion in 1492, settled in the Ottoman Empire and in

North Africa; in the early seventeenth century small

groups of descendants of Jews who had remained on

the Iberian Peninsula and accepted Christianity set-

tled in the Netherlands, where they reaffirmed their

ancestral religion

Shabuoth (Feast of Weeks) originally a harvest festi- val, now observed in commemoration of the giving of

the Torah to the Israelites

Talmud also known as the Gemara, a running com- mentary on the Mishnah written by rabbis (called

amoraim, or “explainers”) from the third to the fifth

centuries C.E. in Palestine and Babylonia; the work

of the former is called the Jerusalem Talmud and

the latter the Babylonian Talmud, which is generally

regarded as the more authoritative of the two

Tanakh anagram for Jewish Scriptures, comprising the Torah, Prophets, and Writings

Torah (Pentatuch or Law) first division of the Tanakh, constituting the five books of Moses

Writings (Ketuvim or Hagiographa) third division of the Tanakh, including the Psalms and other works

said to have be written under holy guidance

Yom Kippur (Day of Atonement) end of 10 days of penitence that begin with Rosh Hashana; the most

holy of Jewish days

The effect on Judaism was far-reaching. The Jews’ embrace of the Enlightenment and of liberal culture gave birth to new expressions of self-understanding and of religious belief and practice. One of the tragic ironies of the integration of Jews into modern European culture and society, however, was the intensification of anti- Semitism. Virulent opposition to the civic and political parity of the Jews, which for the most part was based on secular and not religious grounds, culminated in the fanatic hatred of Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist German Workers’ Party (Nazis) and in their efforts in the Holocaust (Shoah) to exterminate all Jews. More than two-thirds of the Jewish people of Europe, a third of Jews worldwide, were murdered in Auschwitz and other death camps. The survivors sought to rehabilitate themselves in the State of Israel, established in 1948,

or in Jewish communities unscathed by the Holocaust, particularly in North and South America.

CENTRAL DOCTRINES Principally a way of life, Juda- ism emphasizes religious practices rather than articles of faith. Upon his descent from Mount Sinai, Moses ex- plained to the Children of Israel, “And now, O Israel, what does God demand of you? Only this: to revere the Lord your God, to walk only in His paths, to love Him, and to serve the Lord your God with all your heart and soul, keeping the Lord’s commandments and laws, which I enjoin upon you today . . .” (Deut. 10:12–13). Judaism thus began not with an affirmation of faith but with an acceptance of what the rabbis came to call “the yoke of the Torah.” Even the Ten Commandments stress basic duties rather than principles of faith. Implic-

J U D A I S M

Worldmark Encyclopedia of Religious Practices430

 

 

it in the Torah and its teachings are, of course, funda- mental beliefs, for example, the belief in God as re- corded in the declaration “Hear, O Israel, the Lord is our God, the Lord is One” (Deut. 6:4), which is incor- porated into the morning and evening prayers.

In Judaism heresy is thus defined as denial of the existence of God and of his oneness. Nonetheless, the rabbis did not formulate a binding statement of Juda- ism’s principles of faith. The philosopher Philo (c. 20 B.C.E.–50 C.E.) was the first to attempt the outline of such a statement. Focusing on the creation narrative in Genesis, he enumerated five essential articles of Jewish belief: the eternal existence and rule of God, the unity of God, the divine creation of the world, the unity of creation, and divine providence that extends over the whole world. Philo’s summary of the Jewish creed had virtually no resonance in subsequent theological dis- course, however.

From time to time other Jewish philosophers, like Philo prompted by the need to explain and defend Juda- ism in the face of rival faiths, sought to formulate a suc- cinct statement of essential beliefs. But it was only the philosopher and rabbinical scholar Maimonides who, in the twelfth century, succeeded in formulating a state- ment of Jewish doctrine that obtained an authoritative status. In his commentary on the Mishnah, he delineated the “Thirteen Principles of Faith”:

1. Belief in the existence of God

2. Belief in God’s unity

3. Belief in God’s incorporeality

4. Belief in God’s eternity

5. Belief that God alone is to be worshiped

6. Belief in prophecy

7. Belief that Moses was the greatest of the prophets

8. Belief that the Torah was given by God to Moses

9. Belief that the Torah is unchangeable

10. Belief that God knows the thoughts and deeds of each human being

11. Belief that God rewards and punishes

12. Belief in the coming of the Messiah

13. Belief in the resurrection of the dead

These principles were soon incorporated into the prayer book as the hymn “Yigdal” (“May He be magni- fied . . . “), which in 1517 was supplemented by a more elaborate prose explication in the form of a personal at- testation of belief (“I believe in perfect faith . . .”).

With their inclusion in the traditional liturgy, the “Thirteen Principles” thus gained the status of an offi- cial catechism. Maimonides even went so far as to claim that anyone not subscribing to all of the principles of faith, even if the person observes the laws of Moses, will not have a share in the world to come. To underscore the overarching significance he attached to the princi- ples, Maimonides held that an utter sinner, although he or she will be appropriately punished, will share in the world to come if the principles are affirmed. For Mai- monides, then, a Jew is defined by what he believes and not by what he does, which amounted to a radical revi- sion of Judaism. It is, therefore, not surprising that many rabbis and philosophers disputed the authority of the “Thirteen Principles,” contending that they were not as basic and essential as Maimonides contended. For instance, the Spanish philosopher Yosef Albo (c. 1380– 1444) argued that there are only three basic doctrines constitutive of Jewish belief: the existence of God, di- vine revelation, and divine reward and punishment. An- other Spanish philosopher and biblical scholar, Isaac Abravanel (1437–1508), questioned whether it was necessary at all to formulate articles of belief. To his mind the faith implicit in the observance of the Torah was sufficient. He concluded nonetheless that Maimon- ides’ “Thirteen Principles,” although not to be con- strued as dogma, might be helpful for those unable to comprehend on their own the theological presupposi- tions of the Torah and its commandments.

Although Maimonides’ “Thirteen Principles” as formulated in the liturgy are still affirmed by Orthodox and Conservative Jews, they are subject to interpreta- tion. Reform Jews have periodically formulated alterna- tive statements of the essential Jewish beliefs, but by and large they continue to endorse the first five, namely, the existence of God, that he is one, that he has no bodily form, that he is eternal, and that he alone is to be wor- shiped.

MORAL CODE OF CONDUCT Judaism does not distin- guish between duties toward fellow human being and duties toward God. The Hebrew Bible and the rabbis regard moral and religious duties as inseparable. The emphasis is on attaining holiness, on “walking in God’s ways” (Deut. 10:12–13), thus allowing his presence to dwell in one’s midst. Through Moses, God told the Children of Israel, “You shall be holy, for I, the Lord your God, am holy” (Lev. 19:2), which is recited today by observant Jews in their morning and evening prayers.

J U D A I S M

Worldmark Encyclopedia of Religious Practices 431

 

 

This commandment is followed immediately by the in- junction to honor one’s parents and to observe the Sab- bath. The weave of moral and ritual duties is maintained in a long list of commandments, from measures to aid the poor and secure their dignity to proper worship at the Temple, from fairness in commerce to the avoidance of pagan rites, from respect for the stranger to the sanc- tity of the firstfruits (Lev. 19:3–37), the earliest prod- ucts of the harvest that are offered to God. A person attains holiness by observing the commandments and laws of God. As God is manifest only through his deeds, so a person is beckoned to imitate those deeds (Deut. 10:17–19).

The prophets, and the rabbis after them, typically warned that ritual piety unaccompanied by moral deeds is unacceptable to God. As the prophet Micah taught, “With what shall I approach the Lord, Do homage to God on high? Shall I approach Him with burnt offer- ings? . . . He has told you, O man, what is good / And what the Lord requires of you: Only to do justice / And to love goodness / And to walk humbly with your God . . .” (Mic. 6:6–8). But while upholding the primacy of morality over ritual, it was not the intention of Micah, or of any other prophet, to distinguish moral from reli- gious virtue. The biblical conception of social responsi- bility as the axis of the ethical life was incorporated by the rabbis into the Halakhah. The rabbis elaborated bib- lical injunctions, codifying in great detail alongside the Jew’s ritual duties the ethical principles of justice, equi- ty, charity, and respect for the feelings and needs of oth- ers.

When asked to identify the overarching principle of the Torah, the rabbis pointed to its moral dimension. Hence, according to a Midrash on Leviticus 19:18, “Rabbi Akiva [c. 50–c. 136] said of the command, ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself,’ that is ‘a great prin- ciple of Torah.’” Rabbi Hillel (c. 70 B.C.E.–c. 10 C.E.) formulated the same principle with psychological in- sight: “What is hateful unto yourself do not to your fel- low human being. This is the entire Torah, the rest is commentary. Go and study.” Implicit in these encapsu- lations of biblical morality is that the ethical life requires sensibilities that often must go, as the rabbis would put it, “beyond the letter of the law.” To love one’s neigh- bor or to avoid treating one’s neighbor in a manner that one would find repugnant—offensive, hurtful, humili- ating—when done to oneself, requires a sensitivity that cannot be legislated.

The religious significance of the moral teachings of the Torah was summarized by a sixteenth-century rab- binical scholar from Prague, Judah Loew, popularly known as the Maharal. Through adhering to the moral teachings of the Torah, the Maharal taught, a person imitates God’s ways and thus realizes his or her destiny as a being created in the image of God. Moral behavior, therefore, draws a person to God. Conversely, immoral conduct distances a person from God. The nineteenth- century German rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch observed that “the Torah teaches us justice towards our fellow human beings, justice towards the plants and animals and the earth, justice towards our own body and soul, and justice towards God who created us for love so that we may become a blessing for the world.”

SACRED BOOKS Judaism is a text-centered religion, the writings it regards as sacred constituting a vast library of thousands of volumes. Its foundational text is the Hebrew Bible, which is divided into three parts: the Torah, forming the five books of Moses (also called the Pentateuch); the Prophets (Nevi’im); and the Writings (Ketuvim or Hagiographa). Jewish tradition holds the Torah to be the direct, unmediated Word of God, whereas in the Prophets men said to be divinely inspired speak in their own voices, while the Writings are consid- ered to be formulations in the words of men guided by the Holy Spirit.

Alongside the Torah and the other books of the Bible there developed an elaborate commentary explicat- ing their teachings. This commentary was initially not written, but since it was regarded as divinely inspired, it was called the Oral Torah. Over the centuries the Oral Torah expanded to such a degree that it could no longer be contained by sheer memory. Hence, around the end of the second and the beginning of the third century C.E., Rabbi Judah the Prince (that is, the head of the su- preme rabbinical council) compiled a comprehensive di- gest of the Oral Torah. This work, known as the Mish- nah, assumed a canonical status. Written in Hebrew, the Mishnah is a multivolume work covering such subjects as the laws governing agriculture, Temple service, festi- vals and fast days, marriage and divorce, business trans- actions, ritual purity and purification, adjudication of torts, and general issues of jurisprudence. The Mishnah does not confine itself to Halakhic, or legal, matters. Under the rubric of Aggadah (narration), it contains re- flections on Jewish history, ethics, etiquette, philosophy, folklore, medicine, astronomy, and piety. Typical of

J U D A I S M

Worldmark Encyclopedia of Religious Practices432

 

 

rabbinical discourse, the Aggadah and Halakhah are in- terwoven in the text of the Mishnah, complementing and amplifying each other.

Post-Mishnaic teachers and scholars in the Land of Israel and in Babylonia wrote running commentaries on the Mishnah. These commentaries, together with those on other, smaller works, were collected in two massive collections, one known as the Palestinian, or Jerusalem, Talmud and the other as the Babylonian Talmud. (An- other term for the Talmud is Gemara, from an Aramaic word for “teaching.”) These were completed around 400 and 500 C.E., respectively. The two Talmuds were written in Aramaic, a language related to Hebrew. Simi- lar to the Mishnah, the Talmuds contain Aggadah and Halakhah woven into a single skein. In the centuries that followed numerous commentaries were written on the Talmuds, particularly on the Babylonian, which became the preeminent text of Jewish sacred learning. In the age of printing the Talmuds were published with the princi- pal commentaries on them adorning the margins of each page.

From time to time collections of scriptural com- mentaries, originally in the form of sermons or lectures at rabbinical academies from the period of the Mishnah and Talmud, were made. They appear under the general name Midrash (inquiry, or investigation). The collec- tions are classified as Halakhic and Aggadic Midrash- him. The Halakhic Midrashim focus on explicating the laws of the Pentateuch, whereas the Aggadic Midrashim have a much larger range, employing the Bible to explore extralegal issues of religious and ethical meaning. The most widely studied Aggadic Midrashim are the Midrash Rabbah (“The Great Midrash”), compiled in the tenth century by Rabbi David ben Aaron of Yemen, and the Midrash of Rabbi Tanhuma in the fourth century. Ag- gadic Midrashim were written until the thirteenth cen- tury, when they yielded to two new genres of sacred writings, philosophy and mysticism (Kabbalah).

The most widely studied Jewish philosophical work is The Guide of the Perplexed, written by Maimonides at the end of the twelfth century, and the seminal work of the Kabbalah is the Zohar (“Book of Splendor”), from the late thirteenth century. Written in form of a mystical Midrash, the Zohar purports to present the revelations of the mysteries of the upper worlds granted to the sec- ond-century sage Rabbi Simeon ben Yohai and his cir- cle. It is a work of unbridled imagination and symbolism that exercised a profound impact on the spiritual land- scape of Judaism. The Zohar’s far-reaching influence was

registered in prayers and in such popular movements as Hasidism (the pious ones), which arose in eighteenth- century Poland and which produced hundreds of mysti- cal teachings and tales, all of which are considered to illuminate divine truths and hence are regarded as sa- cred.

SACRED SYMBOLS Judaism has a culture rich in reli- gious symbols, objects, and rituals that represent ab- stract concepts, particularly of God and his teachings and of his providential presence in Israel’s history. Thus, God commanded Moses to instruct the Israelites to wear fringes, or tassels, on the corners of their garments as a reminder “to observe all My commandments and to be holy to your God” (Num. 15:38–40). On the basis of this commandment there arose the practice of wearing a shawl (tallith) with tassels (zizith). This is ei- ther a tallith katan, a small four-cornered shawl generally worn under garments, or a larger tallith worn over clothes during prayer.

As a reminder of their deliverance from Egyptian bondage, the Israelites were commanded to place a sign upon their heads and a symbol on their foreheads (Exod. 13:9, 16). Jewish tradition interpreted this com- mandment as an injunction to wear tefillin, or phylac- teries, small leather boxes fastened to the forehead and the upper left arm by straps; each cube-shaped box con- tains the Scriptural passages in which the command- ment appears (Exod. 13:1–10; Exod. 13:11–16; Deut. 6:4–7; Deut. 11:12–21). The tefillin are worn during the morning service except on the Sabbath and on holi- days, which are themselves symbols of God’s presence.

The Bible also enjoins Jews to fix a mezuzah to the doorposts of their dwellings (Deut. 6:9; 11:20). The mezuzah, from the Hebrew word for “doorpost,” con- sists of a small scroll of parchment, usually placed in a case or box and often ornately decorated, on which are inscribed two biblical passages (Deut. 6:4–9; 11:13– 21). The first includes the commandments to love God, study the Torah, read the Shema prayer (attesting to the unity of God), wear the tefillin, and affix the mezuzah. The second passage associates good fortune and well- being with the observance of God’s commandments.

The preeminent symbol of Judaism is Brit Milah, the covenant of circumcision performed on a male child when he is eight days old or on an adult male convert as a sign of his acceptance of the covenant. The removal of the foreskin is a “sign in the flesh” of the covenant

J U D A I S M

Worldmark Encyclopedia of Religious Practices 433

 

 

God made with Abraham and his descendants (Gen. 17:9–13).

The kippah, known in Yiddish as the yarmulke, is the name of the skullcap, which may be any head covering, worn by males in prayer and by Orthodox Jews through- out the day. Covering the head is regarded as a sign of awe before the divine presence, especially during prayer and while studying sacred texts. The kippah was appar- ently introduced by the Talmudic rabbis, for there is no commandment in the Bible giving this instruction.

The menorah, a seven-branched candelabrum, is the most enduring symbol of Judaism. First constructed by Moses at God’s instruction (Exod. 25:31–38), it was placed in the portable sanctuary carried by the Israelites in the wilderness and then in the Temple of Jerusalem. When the Second Temple was destroyed, the menorah became the emblem of Jewish survival and continuity. In modern times the six-pointed Star of David was adopted as a symbol of Jewish identity, although it has no religious content or scriptural basis.

EARLY AND MODERN LEADERS Abraham was the founding patriarch of the Jewish people and the para- digm of the moral and spiritual virtues—humility, mag- nanimity, and steadfast faith in God—incumbent upon Jews to attain. He was born into a heathen family in Mesopotamia in the eighteenth century B.C.E., and his path from idolatry to an affirmation of the one God is related in Genesis (11:27–25:18). The Bible does not tell why he was singled out by God, who promised to make of him a great nation, with abundant blessings, nu- merous offspring, and a land of its own. Abraham’s se- lection is presented as an act of pure grace. The cove- nant God established with Abraham was symbolized by the rite of circumcision, which is reenacted by the cir- cumcision of all Jewish male children. But Abraham was not only the father of his physical descendants; he is also the spiritual father of all who convert to Judaism. The prototypical Jew, Abraham is emblematic of a faith that resists all temptation, as when, to test his trust in God, he was commanded to sacrifice his son Isaac.

The leadership of the Israelite nation passed to Abraham’s son Isaac and then to his grandson Jacob, the progenitor of the 12 tribes of Israel. (Jacob was renamed Israel by an angel with whom he wrestled [Gen. 32:25– 33].) Jacob’s favorite son, Joseph, persecuted by his en- vious brothers, found his way to Egypt, first as a slave to a high-ranking official and eventually as vice-regent of the country. When Joseph encountered his brothers,

he urged them to bring Jacob and their families to Egypt to avoid the famine blighting the Land of Israel. After Joseph’s death the Children of Israel were enslaved by the Egyptians.

Among the Hebrew slaves was the child Moses. He was raised by the pharaoh’s daughter, who found him as an infant among the reeds of the Nile, where his mother had hid him from the Egyptian soldiers ordered to kill every Israelite male infant. Brought up as an Egyptian prince, Moses nonetheless commiserated with his people. On one occasion, when he witnessed an Egyptian taskmaster about to kill a Hebrew slave, Moses intervened and slew the Egyptian. Obliged to flee, he found refuge in the desert. God appeared to Moses in a burning bush and ordered him to return to the pharaoh to demand that the Children of Israel be set free. After God had unleashed 10 plagues upon the Egyptians, the pharaoh freed the Children of Israel under Moses’ leadership. As they were crossing the de- sert, however, the pharaoh had second thoughts, and he sent an army to recapture them. At the Red Sea, whose waters had miraculously parted to allow the Israelites to cross, the pursuing army drowned as the waters closed over them. When the Israelites arrived at Mount Sinai, God gave them the Ten Commandments. Moses then ascended the mountain, where he stayed for 40 days and received further laws and instructions, called the Torah. For 40 years he led the people through the wilderness, until they came to the Promised Land. Before being able to enter the land with his people, Moses died at the age of 120.

The successor of Moses was Joshua (twelfth centu- ry B.C.E.), leader of the Israelite tribes in their conquest of the Promised Land. As depicted in the Bible, he was a composite of a prophet, judge, and military leader. Upon Joshua’s death the people were ruled by judges. Except for Deborah, they were not judges in the techni- cal sense but rather inspired leaders who, guided by the spirit of God, arose on the occasion of a crisis. As tem- porary leaders, they generally had limited influence, and thus the period was one of political and social instabili- ty.

Samuel (eleventh century B.C.E.) was the last of the judges and a prophet who led Israel during a transitional period. In the face of a growing threat from the neigh- boring Philistines, conflict among the tribes of Israel, and the weak and corrupt leadership of the judges, the people called upon Samuel to anoint a king over them. In accordance with God’s will, Samuel anointed Saul,

J U D A I S M

Worldmark Encyclopedia of Religious Practices434

 

 

but only after warning the people of the disadvantages of a monarchy. Indeed, Samuel was profoundly disap- pointed with the king, and he secretly appointed David to replace Saul. Jewish tradition judges Samuel to be of equal importance with Moses.

Saul (c.1029–1005 B.C.E.) was a successful military leader, but his differences with Samuel and his melan- cholic disposition led to fits of depression, which were eased by music. A young harpist named David was often summoned to play for him. David’s increasing populari- ty, culminating in his slaying of the Philistine giant Go- liath, along with his marriage to Saul’s daughter Michal and his friendship with Saul’s son Jonathan, served only to deepen the king’s jealousy. His suspicion that David was bent on wresting the throne from him drove Saul mad with rage, and he tried to kill David, forcing him to flee. Saul met an inglorious end when a force of Phi- listines defeated the armies of Israel and the wounded Saul took his own life. The victorious Philistines dis- played his decapitated body on the wall of the Israelite city of Beth-Shan.

David was anointed king and reigned from c.1010 to 970 B.C.E. He led the remaining troops of Israel to swift victories over the Philistines and other enemies. He then captured Jerusalem, declared it the capital of his kingdom, and had the Ark of the Covenant, contain- ing the tablets of laws given by God to Moses, taken there. His plan to build a Temple was thwarted by the prophet Nathan, who claimed that God found David, a man of war, unsuitable for the sacred project. A war- rior and statesman, David united the tribes of Israel and greatly expanded the borders of the kingdom. Although his reign was not free of intrigue and ill fortune, Jewish tradition regarded him as the ideal ruler. Indeed, it was held that the redeemer of Israel, the Messiah, would be a scion of the House of David (Isa. 9:5–6; 11:10).

It was given to David’s son Solomon to build the Temple in Jerusalem. His 40-year reign was marked by peace, prosperity, and amiable ties with the surrounding countries. But Solomon taxed the people heavily to fi- nance the construction of the Temple and an opulent palace and to strengthen his army. His many political marriages with foreign wives were also suspect in the eyes of the people. The festering resentment surfaced after his death and led to the division of the kingdom.

Upon the death of Solomon in 928 B.C.E., the 10 northern tribes of Israel seceded to establish the King- dom of Israel. Solomon’s son Rehoboam thus ruled over the southern Kingdom of Judah, which included only

the tribes Judah and Benjamin and which was greatly di- minished in territory. For the next 350 years the King- dom of Israel was constantly beset by internal instability and external enemies. Although at times the rulers of the northern kingdom proved their mettle in battle, they failed to provide effective moral and religious leader- ship, and pagan practices spread. In response prophets arose in judgment of Israel’s sins. In the ninth century the prophet Elijah inveighed against the idolatrous prac- tices and decadent lives of the privileged classes. (Elijah was said not to have died but to have been taken to heaven in a chariot of fire, and later Jewish legend claimed that he would return to earth as the herald of the Messiah.)

In the eighth century B.C.E. the prophet Amos, who came from the Kingdom of Judah, fulminated against the oppression of the poor and disinherited members of society. Because of divine election, Amos taught, the Children of Israel, in both the north and the south, had a responsibility to pursue social justice. In contrast to Amos, who stressed justice, the contemporary prophet Hosea spoke of loving kindness. God loved his people, but they did not requite his love and “whored” with Baal, the pagan god of the Phoenicians. In a dream God commanded Hosea to marry a harlot to symbolize Isra- el’s immoral behavior, while at the same time highlight- ing God’s forgiveness and abiding love. The Kingdom of Israel came to an end in 722 when it was conquered by the Assyrians, who exiled the inhabitants. These 10 tribes of Israel were henceforth “lost” from history.

The kings of the Kingdom of Judah proved to be more resolute in fending off pagan influences, and they sought to strengthen knowledge of the Torah and its observance. Nonetheless, they were also subject to the wrath of the prophets. Active during the reign of four kings of Judah, the prophet Isaiah (eighth century B.C.E.) castigated the monarchs for forging alliances with for- eign powers, arguing that the Jews should place their trust in God alone. Isaiah lent support to King Hezekiah (727–698), who instituted comprehensive religious re- forms by uprooting all traces of pagan worship. The prophet Jeremiah (seventh–sixth centuries) denounced what he regarded as the rampant hypocrisy and conceit of the leadership of Judah. When the Babylonians reached the gates of Jerusalem, Jeremiah claimed that it would be futile to resist, and, accordingly, he urged the king to surrender and thus spare the city and its inhabi- tants from further suffering. His prophecy of doom earned for him the scorn of the leadership and masses

J U D A I S M

Worldmark Encyclopedia of Religious Practices 435

 

 

alike. When the city fell in 597, he was not exiled to Babylonia with the rest of the political and spiritual elite. He eventually fled to Egypt, where he was last heard of fulminating against the idolatry of the Jews there.

In 538 B.C.E. the Persian emperor Cyrus, who had conquered Babylonia, allowed the exiled Jews to return to Judea (formerly Judah). At first only small groups were repatriated to their ancestral home, by then a prov- ince of the Persian Empire. The pace of the return gained momentum when Zerubbabel, a scion of King David, was appointed governor of Judea in about 521. Encouraged by the prophets Haggai and Zechariah, the governor led 44,000 exiles back to Judea. With the sup- port of the prophets, Zerubbabel was able to overcome many political and economic obstacles, as well as the public’s apathy toward the rebuilding of the Temple that had been destroyed by the Babylonians. The Tem- ple, henceforth known as the Second Temple, was re- dedicated in 516. Under the leadership of the priest Ezra, another group of exiles returned to Judea in 458. Ezra was soon joined by Nehemiah, whom the Persians appointed governor, and the two worked together to re- build Jerusalem and to reorganize and reform Jewish communal life. They pledged the people to renew the covenant and to rid themselves of foreign and pagan in- fluences.

For the next 300 years Judea was a vassal state ruled by a Jewish governor appointed by the Persian overlords and a religious leader in the person of a high priest. In the last third of the fourth century B.C.E., Judea fell under the power of the Hellenistic world. The Greeks concentrated temporal as well as religious power in the hands of the high priest. To ensure their control, the Greeks also established colonies throughout the land, and their culture gradually penetrated the upper classes of the Jewish population. Hellenization intensified when Antiochus IV Epiphanes (175–164), the Seleucid ruler of Syria, laid claim to Judea and appointed Jason, a Hellenized Jew, to the office of high priest. Jason transformed Jerusalem into a Greek polis (city-state) named Antiochia, in honor of the Seleucid king, and had a sports arena built to replace the Temple as the focus of the city’s social and cultural life. Dissatisfied with Jason, Antiochus replaced him with Menelaus, another Hellenized Jew, with whose conniving he plundered the Temple’s treasures. In the wake of a revolt by Jason, An- tiochus took further measures to obliterate the Jewish character of Jerusalem. He forbade Jews to practice their

religion and forced them to eat foods forbidden by the Torah and to participate in pagan rites. The Temple was desecrated and rendered a site for the worship of Zeus. These harsh actions led to an uprising led by the Hasmoneans, a priestly family headed by Mattathias.

Mattathias and his five sons proved able warriors and leaders. Through guerilla warfare they liberated the countryside from Seleucid control. After Mattathias’s death in 167 B.C.E., his son Judah Maccabees assumed leadership of the revolt. A brilliant strategist and tacti- cian, he further routed the Seleucid armies and eventual- ly dislodged them from Jerusalem. In 164 the Temple was ritually purified and rededicated, and to celebrate the event, the festival of Hanukkah was instituted. When Judas Maccabees fell in battle in 160, his broth- ers Jonathan and Simeon resumed guerilla warfare against the Seleucids. Through diplomatic and military efforts they prevailed and gained de facto independence of Judea. In 140 Simeon convened an assembly of priests and learned men who confirmed him, and his sons after him, as the high priest and commander in chief of the Jewish nation.

Regional Studies 2910 “The Middle East”

This assignment due after two hours from now. Massage me I can’t chat

 

Regional Studies 2910 “The Middle East”

 

Outline and Response Assignment #1:

“Wasif Jawhariyyeh and the Great Nineteenth Century Transformation,”

 

Readings:

i. James Gelvin, “Wasif Jawhariyyeh and the Great Nineteenth Century Transformation,” The Modern Middle East: A History, pp. 100-110
ii. Class Lecture notes

 

Assignment: Respond to the questions below by providing point-form or full- sentence answers.

 

1. Describe in bullet-point format how the Ottoman empire became a modern state during the era of modern reforms in the nineteenth century. Give examples of law, knowledge and education, political authority, and identity we explored in our class lecture. Discuss these various topics in the following headings: “Modern Law,” “Modern Education,” “Modern Political Authority,” and “Modern Identity.”
2. Consider how the figure of Wasif Jawhariyyeh exemplified the larger modern transformations and cultural currents of late nineteenth century Middle East by focusing on the following topics and questions:

i. Examine in full-sentence format how the career and different occupations of Wasif Jawhariyyeh’s father reflected new modern economic opportunities and modern political changes that were available in a modern era.

ii. Explain in full-sentence format how Wasif’s education “demonstrates the fluidity of boundaries in Ottoman Jerusalem during Jawhariyyeh’s youth.” (p. 105) For example, discuss his education and the curriculum he studied.

iii. Explain in full-sentence format the nahda and how Wasif and other artists were influenced by this modern cultural trend.

iv. Discuss in full-sentence format who comprised the “new Islamic orthodoxy” and provide some examples of how a “new Islamic orthodoxy” reacted to the arrival of modern, Western cultural practices and changes in the Middle East. (p. 107). How did this new Islamic orthodoxy react to the new, more open status of women in society?

v. In full sentence format discuss the features and composition of the new, modern cities in the Middle East.

 

Due: Friday October 9, at the beginning of class.

 

Format:

• Use 12 Times New Roman Font; single–space
• staple (deductions for not stapling)
• Paginate
• Provide your full name and title of assignment in a title page, course designation